Home  5  Books  5  Magazines  5  News  5  GreenPro  5  HelpDesk  5  Your Cart  5  Register  5  Green Living Forum
Not signed in (Sign In to the Green Building Forum)

Categories

This month's favourite choices

    Green Building Bible ((both volumes) fourth edition)
    Green Building Bible ((both volumes) fourth edition)  
    These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

    1 year Green Building magazine subscription
    1 year Green Building magazine subscription  
    Green Building magazine is the UK's only eco-building magazine. It always features a wide range of eco-building projects from all around the UK.

    Ecohouse 3
    Ecohouse 3  
    Sue Roaf never fails to impress with her inexaustible energy, forthright opinion and attention to detail. Ecohouse has become a classic in the green building genre.

    Green Building magazine - Winter 2008 - Radical renovation
    GBmag Winter 2008  
    This issue focuses on renovation and the AECB carbonlite/passivhaus standards, thermal upgrade options, energy calculation dynamic software and lots more.





Zurich Connect Home Insurance

Vanilla 1.1.4 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications:: Apply now.




    • CommentAuthormarsaday
    • CommentTimeOct 16th 2009
     
    Hello, i am working on plans for my loft conversion. i have had the drawings done and now i think i will need to have some structural calculations done. does anyone know any independant engineers in north yorkshire.

    i have had a quote from a company and it is £700 inc vat to do the calcs, and drawings etc.

    i really think this is excessive and only want to know the answer to a couple of questions.

    1) can i run the joists from the spine wall of the house into the gable walls. This spine wall has a 9x2 joist sitting on it which forms a triangle in the centre of the roof which is part of the king beam holding up the roof.

    essentially i will be hanging my new floor off this joist. This way of spanning the joists is the shortest and most simple.

    i have a few other questions, but this is the main stumbling block.
    • CommentAuthorMike George
    • CommentTimeOct 16th 2009 edited
     
    Hi Marasday. Two issues come to mind

    1. Does the spine wall go all the way to the ground and is it sat on a loadbearing foundation?
    2. What is the span between the spine wall and the external walls which will presumably form the other bearing for your floor joists?
  1.  
    Posted By: marsaday£700 inc vat to do the calcs, and drawings etc.


    'fraid not. your paying for the structural design; the drawings and calcs are generally free...


    Posted By: marsadaythis is excessive


    £610+VAT not bad, at the top end maybe but not necessarily, 'pends how complicated it is and how good an engineer they are... how much would you spend paying a mechanic to rebuild you car... lawyer, accountant... surgeon...?


    Posted By: marsaday1) can i run the joists from the spine wall of the house into the gable walls. This spine wall has a 9x2 joist sitting on it which forms a triangle in the centre of the roof which is part of the king beam holding up the roof.


    couldn't tell with out survey drawings and calcs... ...that's why you need an engineer...

    :wink:

    J
  2.  
    • CommentAuthorMike George
    • CommentTimeOct 16th 2009 edited
     
    James, have to disagree. I designed my floor layout in my loft without a stuctural engineer. I've also designed many others. Depends on several factors but mostly

    1. Will any bearings safely transmit floor loads to the ground?[which can often be dealt with by digging a trial pit]
    2. Whether something outside of domestic span tables is required ie. Steel. If spans are less than 5.2m [from memory] timber sizes can be taken from TRADA span tables. If not TRADA, then the old Part A.
  3.  
    Oh I'm sorry, I'm just a bit fed up with the old "I just need the architect to 'draw up' some plans" line. and thought I'd show some sympathy for our colleagues on the structural side of things...

    Even so on a simple joist upgrade job perhaps Mike. However on something more complicated (and there's 'loft conversions' and 'loft conversions'), there are potentially more than just two main factors to consider.

    3. Condition of the existing structure and building
    4. Effect of fire on the structure (if required)
    5. Whether you want a creative solution that increases the available space or not
    6. The consequential potentially less obvious effect on existing structure, windloads, overall stability, etc etc.
    7. Whether you want more than one option for the design
    8. Whether you want to have the ability to change the design
    9. Whether you want the design to have the benefit of any PI cover
    10. How charming you are with building inspectors

    etc etc...

    for eg one detail an engineer we have worked with came up with is turning the back of the eaves storage into a big ply-faced box beam, avoiding the need to upgrade the joists by effectively halving the span but only achieved by demonstrating that the joists were only partially loaded in a semi cantilevered condition.at 1.5kN/m2 (ie the bit in the eaves). All on a very simple terraced house, but made the difference between doing it or not in terms of head height.


    However if it is straight forward, then like what Mike said.

    :bigsmile:

    Perhaps some photos and dimensioned sketches up loaded could be good...?

    J
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeOct 16th 2009
     
    Posted By: Mike GeorgeI designed my floor layout in my loft without a stuctural engineer
    What did you charge yourself?
  4.  
    Posted By: James Norton

    However on something more complicated (and there's 'loft conversions' and 'loft conversions'), there are potentially more than just two main factors to consider.

    3. Condition of the existing structure and building
    4. Effect of fire on the structure (if required)
    5. Whether you want a creative solution that increases the available space or not
    6. The consequential potentially less obvious effect on existing structure, windloads, overall stability, etc etc.
    7. Whether you want more than one option for the design
    8. Whether you want to have the ability to change the design
    9. Whether you want the design to have the benefit of any PI cover
    10. How charming you are with building inspectors

    etc etc...

    for eg one detail an engineer we have worked with came up with is turning the back of the eaves storage into a big ply-faced box beam, avoiding the need to upgrade the joists by effectively halving the span but only achieved by demonstrating that the joists were only partially loaded in a semi cantilevered condition.at 1.5kN/m2 (ie the bit in the eaves). All on a very simple terraced house, but made the difference between doing it or not in terms of head height.


    However if it is straight forward, then like what Mike said.

    :bigsmile:" aria-posinset="0" aria-setsize="0" hspace="0" alt=":bigsmile:" vspace="0" loop="1" src="http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/bigsmile.gif" ismap="false" width="15" start="fileopen" height="15" >

    Perhaps some photos and dimensioned sketches up loaded could be good...?

    J


    I agree with you James, I was probably being a litle pedantic - sorry
    • CommentAuthormarsaday
    • CommentTimeOct 16th 2009
     
    "1. Does the spine wall go all the way to the ground and is it sat on a loadbearing foundation?
    2. What is the span between the spine wall and the external walls which will presumably form the other bearing for your floor joists?"


    ok, some more info for you all:

    Of all the lofts to convert this is the easiest to do, gable walls, no roof dormers, big space, lots of head room. 1910 house in red brick. All internal walls are ground based. the house was built on a brick rubble base, but not sure what the foundations actually are. the ground floor is all concrete, except the front room which is joisted. So i am pretty sure this is a strong old house. the egineer has said not to worry about the foundations as he thinks they will be fine.

    the spine wall is 6.3m in length and the joist which sits on it is 8.5m in length. The last 2.2m has no support as the front room opens out to the side here. i understand here i will put in a steel and run the joists from this into the front wall. this area is also where the stairs come up.

    i have photos, put not sure how to post here.

    the joist spans laying this way will be 3m and 3.5m
    • CommentAuthormarsaday
    • CommentTimeOct 16th 2009
     
    i can of course not bother about spaning the width of the house and go for a back to front span. This way i will not use the spine wall as much. i will though need to take a load off it when i use some steel. this will be needed around the stair area.

    the spans this way are 5.2m and 3m (there is a wall dividing the front and back beds here).

    it is all about whether i can use the king beams joist framework to build the floor off. You see this structure is resting on the spine wall and so a good percentage of the roof will be.

    here is a photo
      Picture 003.jpg
    • CommentAuthormarsaday
    • CommentTimeOct 16th 2009
     
    i will try and post this drawing i have done, but not sure it will post.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeOct 16th 2009
     
    One trick, if it's necessary to span the new floor crosswise to the extg ceiling joists, is to make the floor out of e.g. 7x3's or 8x2's laid flat edge to edge. Makes a very pleasant 'springy' (but perfectly strong) floor which still rises minimally above the extg. ceiling joist tops.
    • CommentAuthormarsaday
    • CommentTimeOct 16th 2009
     
    space isnt a problem, so i will be floating well above the ceiling joists
  5.  
    Now we know more - like what James said - you need a Structural Engineer
    • CommentAuthorbiffvernon
    • CommentTimeOct 17th 2009
     
    Work out your own solution, then double the size of all structural members. It'll still be cheaper than hiring a structural engineer.
  6.  
    Nice idea Biff, but assuming the Local Authority are involved, this will still have to be justified by calculation as the timber sizes are bigger than those found in domestic span tables.

    If the Local Authority is not involved, then there will almost certainly be a major problem to overcome should the house be put up for sale. A Completion Certificate will be required - and there won't be one.

    Not inolving the Local Authority is a very bad idea as there are many more aspects of the design which require approval - such as provision of escape in the event of a fire.
    • CommentAuthormarsaday
    • CommentTimeOct 17th 2009
     
    i have a solution and can go the long way from front to back, but i will still need to take some loading off the spine wall.

    So all i want to ask is can this wall take some loadings or all loadings ? I am not paying £700 to have that answered. if the structural engineer on here thinks that is a reasonable price then i give up.
  7.  
    Marasday, I don't think anyone who has comented so far is a structural engineer. But several have a good enough knowledge to see that you will need one. Since you mention a steel beam, you will need to have calculations, end of story, sorry.

    I would expect to pay no more than £150 for calculations for a simple Universal Beam - but there may be a greater loading on the floor than you currently envisage. Roof loads on dwarf wall perhaps? Or structural timbers needed to compensate for any that you wish to remove? My advice is get an Engineer
    • CommentAuthormarsaday
    • CommentTimeOct 17th 2009
     
    i will be getting an engineer. just one who charges a reasonable price.
  8.  
    Posted By: marsadayI am not paying £700 to have that answered.


    As earlier posts. Your not paying £700 for just that. I'd be happy to pay anything less than £500+VAT, if you've already had an architectural design prepared along with the associated drawings and documents and these were available to the engineer. If you don't have that then the engineer will have more survey time, drafting time and more risk.

    Consultants aren't trying to rob you, just doing the job properly. No architect or engineer ever got rich on loft conversions!

    J

    (not an engineer)
    • CommentAuthormarsaday
    • CommentTimeOct 17th 2009
     
    i have given the design drawing to them to photo copy, so yes they have these.

    I myself had a figure of £400. They charge £50 an hour and i reckon 8h's coming to measure and then do the workings etc is a reasonable time frame.

    i will try another company.
    • CommentAuthorbiffvernon
    • CommentTimeOct 17th 2009
     
    Posted By: Mike GeorgeNice idea Biff.
    Thanks Mike, I can always rely on your agreement.
    :smile:
    • CommentAuthorjoe90
    • CommentTimeOct 17th 2009
     
    I did a loft conversion for a customer (storage not living space) removing trusses to enable space to be used. I did drawings for the customer but explained that as I was not a structural engineer I would have to get one to do the "sums" for me to prove to L.A. it would take the loads. I intended to make two structural beams consisting of top and bottom purlin with vertical and diagonal timbers. I have done this many times on other jobs and had no problems. The customer had a relation who was a structural engineer and wanted to use him for the calcs. What I got back from him was nothing like I had proposed but two glue-lam beams (top and bottom) with ply glued and screwed to one face. The problem was the beams were 8mtres long and each beam was 340mm by 150mm. I priced the beams and indicated to the custmer the price would go up by £1000 just to buy the beams. Also because they were 8metres long we could not get them in in one piece (houses either side were in the way) they had to be joined with engineered plates.

    The structural engineer even added a beam in the ridge (240mm by 120mm). I have only ever had to place additional beams in the ridge if one slope of the house is being replaced by flat roof dormer or tile loadings changed on one elevation. The L.A. inspector said this was not required but was included in the calcs.

    Even the L.A. inspector said the glue-lams were completely over the top but said he was in no position to argue with the calcs. The customer went with this design purely because blood is thicker than water, but it cost him dearly ( and they were a bugger to get up in the loft).

    If I was younger I would love to go to night school and learn how to do these kinds of calcs. I, like most builders with a good reputation, know what will stay up and what will fall down but get fed up with some architects who re-design your proposal because they think they know best. This does not mean that I am not open to suggestions from qualified people as we never stop learning.

    End of rant
  9.  
    Nice rant joe
    •  
      CommentAuthorDAI_EVANS
    • CommentTimeOct 18th 2009
     
    Remember your not just paying for their expert knowledge on structures but also the assurance that if does go Pete Tong you can go back to them with a legal foot to stand on. Remember if it was easy everyone would be doing it.
    • CommentAuthorbiffvernon
    • CommentTimeOct 19th 2009 edited
     
    Indeed. A great many of our most venerated buildings could not be built today as they would be rejected by structural engineers operating in our litigious environment.
    • CommentAuthorCWatters
    • CommentTimeOct 19th 2009 edited
     
    Nice brickwork evident in the background. Round or arched window going in there perhaps?
    • CommentAuthormarsaday
    • CommentTimeOct 19th 2009
     
    those are the 2 chimney stacks from the front and back rooms coming up and converging in the loft. beautiful feature and our bed will go underneath them !! i will leave the brick work exposed.
  10.  
    Posted By: DAI_EVANSthat if does go Pete Tong


    Do you think the aforementioned disc spinner ever says, 'its all gone a bit me'...?

    J
    • CommentAuthorjon
    • CommentTimeOct 20th 2009
     
    "No architect or engineer ever got rich on loft conversions!"

    From the 'secret structural engineer's handbook':

    Loft conversions:

    1: Avoid this type of work entirely if you can.
    2: Never get employed by a member of the public because they just can't tell when you've saved them money (or their life)
    3: Doing the calcs is the easy part. Finding out what calcs need to be done costs the money.
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press