Home  5  Books  5  Magazines  5  News  5  GreenPro  5  HelpDesk  5  Your Cart  5  Register  5  Green Living Forum
Not signed in (Sign In to the Green Building Forum)

Categories

This month's favourite choices



Vanilla 1.1.4 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications:: Apply now.




    • CommentAuthorBrompton
    • CommentTimeMay 8th 2012
     
    I am part way through extending/refurbishing a 1980's house (including MVHR, improving insulation and airtightness but unlikely to achieve less than 5 m3/hr/m2) and had intended fitting a sub 5 Kw room sealed wood stove for occasional use.
    It seems that most supposed room sealed wood stoves have external air supplies/controls that are not sealed from the room and therefore leak room air/heat via the stove/chimney (see Leaky Stove thread)
    I am beginning to think it may be better to fit a room sealed lpg stove with a short horizontal balanced flue through the wall (published efficiency figures seem similar) However, woodstove air controls can be closed when not in use which presumably reduces the flow of external and possibly leaked internal air through the stove. The flow of external air into a room sealed gas stove cannot be restricted (although as there is no chimney draw the inflow of external air is reduced?) so the stove will still exert a cooling effect to the room when not in use.
    Can anyone advise as to whether a room sealed lpg stove would be better in terms of heat loss (particularly when not in use) than a non room sealed woodburner with an external air supply?
    Thanks
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press