Home  5  Books  5  Magazines  5  News  5  GreenPro  5  HelpDesk  5  Your Cart  5  Register  5  Green Living Forum
Not signed in (Sign In to the Green Building Forum)

Categories

This month's favourite choices



Vanilla 1.1.4 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications:: Apply now.




    • CommentAuthoran02ew
    • CommentTimeJun 27th 2012 edited
     
    I have heard from the residents near an existing AD plant that the odour is intolerable; I understand that the malodour is caused not by the AD plant itself but from the lagoon that stores the by-product. The residents that live near the existing lagoon all report frequent malodour in most wind conditions that makes using their garden impossible, also headaches and a loss of trade to the local vineyard. I also have heard reports that the environment agency is investigating the plant after two spills contaminated a fresh water stream. My concerns are that the business is only concerned with profit and getting its hands on the FITs As a champion of all things green and renewable I find myself torn between something promising and ground-breaking and on the other hand peoples life’s are being ruined, I point to Sue Roaf article on Alliethesia (page 4 GBM) I can’t imagine what they must go through every time the lagoons get filled or the wind changes direction.

    I would appreciate your thought on this problem, should there be such a malodour from the lagoons? Is there any solution for smelly lagoons? If this is the norm and all lagoons smell then we should be very careful about encouraging AD plant on every spare square inch of our green and pleasant land, fast forward 50 years and we are one big AD plant taking rubbish from Europe like a giant smelling compost heap?
    •  
      CommentAuthorDamonHD
    • CommentTimeJun 27th 2012
     
    I don't see any necessary reason why all AD plants would need smelly lagoons at all, but avoiding such hazards may for course make for greater expense, bigger buildings (and refused PP for example), but I don't know as much about AD as I'd like...

    Rgds

    Damon
    • CommentAuthoran02ew
    • CommentTimeJun 27th 2012
     
    yes, DHD but with goverment pushing this sort of tech do the planners have any choice but to rubber stamp "APROVAL" on all application? this is my current concern as a local AD plant plans on expanion with two new lagoons the closest of which is only 500M from my home...

    for more info on AD try page 16 of current Green building mag.
    • CommentAuthorSteveZ
    • CommentTimeJun 28th 2012
     
    Where is the offending AD plant? I visited one in Holsworthy, North Devon, run by Andigestion, a couple of years ago and I was surprised at the lack of unpleasant smells. My memory is pretty rubbish, so I could be wrong, but I don't remember any ponds or lagoons there. The overwhelming impression I took away was the effort to keep any 'pongs' within the buildings and treatment/storage areas. Unless anyone with more recent experience of the Holsworthy plant knows differently, maybe your developer could take a look at it and its systems.

    I have no connection with Andigestion and I would prefer to see pyrolysis of waste rather than AD (but both better than incineration!!)

    http://www.andigestion.co.uk/category/image-galleries/sites/holsworthy?page=1
    • CommentAuthoran02ew
    • CommentTimeJun 28th 2012
     
    Posted By: SteveZWhere is the offending AD plant?

    somerset

    Posted By: SteveZbut I don't remember any ponds or lagoons there. The overwhelming impression I took away was the effort to keep any 'pongs' within the buildings and treatment/storage areas.

    As you say the area of initial treatment seem well protected against the release of smells its the lagoons that store the by-product that is then spread over fields as fertilizer that cause the smell. these lagoons can by sited some distance from the treatment plant and the sludge is then pumped into the lagoons. that may be why you never seen the?

    i have just recieved an email stating that the application has been withdrawn, i suppose due to the local out-cry? i have mixed feeling on this, as i have stated i want this to work. Far better to treat the mountains of waste than bury it, but i do think it needs careful monitoring especially with the FITs payments available, this can encorage fast growth with little responsabilty, now where have we seen that before?
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press