<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - All Discussions</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:22:06 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Stone walls and impermeability</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1040</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1040</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 20:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>dnfh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[We have bought a 1770 2 storey stone walled house. Curiously in 1996 permission was given fand the first floor was dry-lined with standard plasterboard with c. 50cm air gap - and vinyl paint. The ground floor was directly plastered with modern cement plaster (NOT lime). Over the last 3 months neither first nor ground floor has any damp detectable (first floor in the air gap, ground floor directly meassured with probe meter).<br />Neither floor has any formal insulation, and we wish to improve the heat loss to allow heating with Air source heat pump and thus reduce our carbon footprint. While generally wishing to follow green principles, these have already been breached with no apparent problems. This poses two questions.<br /><br />1. Ground floor: As it has already been impermeable for 10 years without apparent problem, is there any reason not to put eg urethane foam on top of the plaster?<br /><br />2. First floor: If (again) standard plasterboard has been fine for 10 years, we can presumably put standard insulation on top of the plasterboard. But would putting urethane foam IN the cavity produce problems despite the apparent lack of current problems?<br /><br />(Urethane seems to be much cheaper AND more effective than eg cellulose).]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>generator fault finding</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1028</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1028</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>funcrusher</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I have a stand-by diesel generator  with problems.  The engine is fine, but we are not getting any electrical output. I suspect its a fault in the electronic box of tricks which powers the field coils (?) as there are no obvious loose connections<br /><br />Anyone any experience of fault-finding on these or helpful advice?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Stone Confusion</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1069</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1069</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Bonty</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Can anybody please help - we have an old stone cottage and the advice I've been getting for internal insulation is leaving us quite confused as to the least risky/most effective method.<br /><br />- We have 2 feet thick external stone walls with rubble infill . These are facing seaward and are elevated, so they are fairly exposed on the south and west sides only.<br />- I've removed all the painted cement render from the outside and the intention is to rake out and re-point in (NHL 3 ?) lime as meticulously as possible to reduce air permeability but not vapour perm.<br /><br />My confusion comes with what to do with the inside in order to keep my insulation level as high as possible and the draughts as low as possible (assuming we can properly draughtproof windows etc).  After lots of reading and talking to various 'experts' (none of whom seem to agree) I have distilled my understanding to four possible methods but  I'm not sure if my understanding of  the actual risks of each one is correct or whether I may be missing another, better method.<br /><br />Regardless of which method I ultimately use, I intend to repoint the exterior in lime.  The four internal options are then  :<br /><br />1. Repoint the interior in lime mortar only. This will give the least insulation internally. This is the only option that will show off the stone walls (not important to us for these walls)<br />2. Use a hempcrete plaster. Not sure whether this will give decent insulation and not sure how electric fix will work with this.<br />3. Use tannalised batons fixed directly to the stone with carbon fixings. Insulation with Thermafleece and then Celonit/Building boards on top with lime plaster finish. Maintains breathability but the crooked nature of the walls will probably require cross- batons. Also the direct contact of stone walls with sheepswool insulation ??<br />4. Fix a timber frame (e.f 4x2) to the floor/ceiling internally but not touching the stone walls so we leave an air gap. Thermafleece insulation and then faced with Celonit / Building boards which are then lime skimmed.  Not sure what effect the air gap will have - I'm assuming we seal all other draughts.<br />5. Other .....<br /><br />Thanks !!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Outdoor Heating</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1060</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1060</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Many restaurants, pubs and clubs have recently built outdoor covered smoking areas-- some with heaters!<br /><br />Thus we have the weird situation where one good government policy has had a knock on effect leading to a ghastly waste of energy trying to heat out door spaces.<br /><br />Insane or what?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Bay Window Insulation Project</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=422</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=422</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 12:11:30 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>adon30</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hello to all. This is my first post.<br /><br />Back in October I purchased a 1930's build semi detached. After spending the winter in a really cold bedroom I have decided to do something now that I have got around to redecorating.<br />Being a 1930's build all it has a solid wall construction so cavity wall insulation is out of the question. I added an additional 170mm to the existing loft insulation to save energy. However most of the cold air came from around the bay window so this is where I have decided to start.<br /><br />The construction is as follows. Downstairs there is a solid brick wall on which sits the downstairs bay window. On top of this there is a wooden framework that extends into the bedroom with the bedroom window on top of this. I have removed all the plasterboard from the inside as this was in need of replastering anyway and I need to be able to fit the insulation. On the outside is a layer of felt on top of which roof tiles are hung (same construction as a roof, just vertically). Now that I have removed the plasterboard you can feel a lot of air movement in the void.<br />A picture of the construction is available at this link: http://s11.photobucket.com/albums/a167/adon30/others/?action=view&amp;current=BayWindow1.jpg<br />and the void going down to the downstairs bay : http://s11.photobucket.com/albums/a167/adon30/others/?action=view&amp;current=BayWindow_Void.jpg<br /><br />So basically I have a layer of plasterboard with an air gap then a layer of felt covered with tiles. No wonder it was so cold!<br /><br />The plan is to fill the void from the top of the downstairs window to the bottom of the upstairs window with celotex/ kingspan then re-cover the inside with plasterboard. However nothing is ever that simple and a I now need help with a few questions I have.<br /><br />1) The gap between plasterboard and the outide is 70 to 72mm. My local supplier of Celotex/kingspan has thicknesses of 50, 60 and 70mm. Now do I just go for the thickest piece that will fit or do I need to leave any sort of air gap in the void?<br /><br />2) Where the bay angle changes there are two pieces of timber that are very close together (see photo). At this point it would be impossible to fill with any solid form of insulation. My plan is to purchase some cans of expanding foam and fill the gap up that way. I have no idea if this is suitable as insulation or is the best method. Any ideas much appreciated.<br />Close up photo of wood detailing: http://s11.photobucket.com/albums/a167/adon30/others/?action=view&amp;current=BayWindow_Close.jpg<br /><br />3) I have various options also when it comes to refitting the plasterboard. I was thinking of going for a thicker plasterboard (12.5mm) however I can also get plasterboard with an additional 20mm of polystyrene insulation attached (30mm total insulation). Has anyone used this plasterboard? and is it any good as far as insulating properties?<br />I have an additional 50mm underneath the internal window ledge so the thickness is not a problem.<br /><br />4) I have read in another post about fitting pvc sheeting between the plasterboard and the insulation. Would I need to consider to consider this in my project?<br /><br />This is just the start of my bay window insulation. Once finished I will be tackling the void between the roof and the ceiling of the bay. One step at a time though :)<br />Any help much appreciated, Aidan]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Alternatives to ply or mfi boards for floor</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1029</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1029</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 12:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Jan</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I live in a Victorian semi, the back room of which is a kitchen.  The floor is concrete over rubble, which we suspect was put down in place of a rotten wooden floor.  This floor is very wet and where the pine boards of the adjoining room have touched the wood has rotten and fallen through.  Some years ago we had the plaster hacked off up to a meter and damp proof stuff injected inside and out.  This did no good at all and now we have arranged for a builder to come and dig up the damp solid floor and the adjoining half rotten wooden one.  The builder says this type of house should not have a solid floor and is proposing to take the whole lot out and put in new brick piers and wooden joists, and over the top put boards.  I wanted pine floor boards put down but he says that will be too expensive and I will have to have big boards which I think are either ply or mdf or some such.  My worry is that I believe these boards contain noxious chemicals and want to know if there is some green alternative which is not too expensive.  Any information will be much appreciated.:angry:]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Scrapheap DIY Green living Soloutions for zero bucks!</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1063</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1063</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>richy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I shoud have put a question mark, not an exclamation in the title.<br /><br />I'm interested in finding some soloutions to providing renewable energy using scrap heap materials.<br /><br />In 1975 there was a YTV program where this dude built a green dwelling, and everying was from common materials or scrap, there were solar panels made from old radiators painted black and put in glass/timber cases.   <br /><br />Anyone got any similar ideas?    making wind turbines from old motors? can we bury old radiators and use central heating pumps to get heat from the ground?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Sizing an off-grid PV array and battery bank</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1058</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1058</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 14:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>stephendv</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I've written a blog entry and spreadsheet on how to size a PV array and battery bank for an off-grid house at: http://www.casanogaldelasbrujas.com/blog/?p=9<br />All the formula's were taken from a single book, so I'd like to confirm whether my calculations are correct or not.  If anyone has access to PV sizing software, I'd really appreciate a second opinion.  <br />The data is:<br />Location: Barbastro, Spain (Huesca, LLedia, Lerida or Zaragoza are nearby cities)<br />Daily elec consumption: 6.7kWh<br />System should be designed to supply 100% of the requirement up till October (the winter months will be augmented with a generator).<br />The battery bank should supply 3 days of autonomy (typical recommended depth of discharge is 50%).<br />According to my calculations, I'd need a PV array with 2221 peak watts.  And a battery bank with 3617 Ah of charge at 12V.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Insulation and air sealing of suspended timber floors</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1064</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1064</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 08:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[http://www.energysavingtrust.org.uk/uploads/documents/housingbuildings/CE184%20-%20practical%20refurbishment%20of%20solid-walled%20houses.pdf  <br /><br />pages 7&amp;8<br /><br />1) I dont agree with the notion that replacing floor boards with chipboard or laying hardboard will stop draughts both ideas are wasteful of materials and only address a small part of the draught problem.<br /><br />2) No attempt has been made to include a vapour barrier on the warm side of the new insulation indeed they say one should not be used!<br /><br />3) no air sealing barrier. No advice on sealing between floor and skirtings -- this is very important<br /><br />4) It is prety good othersise with some nice pictures]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Thick stone walls: Insulate or not?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1031</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1031</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Pontius</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[We have an old farmhouse in the extreme SW of France. Weather broadly similar to the UK but hotter in summer.  Walls are  aprox 600mm  (2') thick and made from stone with lime mortar.  I intend pointing the outside with a sand/lime mix which leaves the inside.....  a) Simply render with lime mix giving a solid wall with no insulation. One advantage may be in keeping it cooler in summer. b) I won't have a stud wall so some form of insulated foam board and a 100mm aercrete block wall which will be lime plastered.  Heating will be UFH powered by a log boiler.  Logs are free so not an issue if we use a few more.  Comments from anyone who has personal experience of log boilers (not wood burners) appreciated too as there are several good manufacturers and we are struggling to choose one.<br />Roof is a new green-oak framed structure with external insulation R value 4.7 then slates.  Well, think that will do for now.... Thanks!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>'Eco-homes' in the forest.</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1043</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1043</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 08:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>biffvernon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/highlands_and_islands/7167107.stm]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Warmcel detail for timber frame build</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1056</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1056</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 00:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Nick Parsons</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[We are building a t-f garden room for a customer, and the design has evolved so much from the original dwgs that some details remain undecided. I should be particularly grateful for views on detailing of insulation in the floor (suspended timber - 225 x 50 joists with 25 x 38 battens fixed at the bottom between each pair, and 18mm ply slotted in and mastic sealed to take insulation) and the roof (shallow pitch - about 15 - 20 degrees, 225 x 50 rafters, proposed built-up felt covering, and heavy green roof on top, with up to 150mm of growing medium).<br /><br />For the floor I propose to run tyvek over and between each joist so that there is a tyvek-lined joist/ply box to fill with insulation. Having taken up about 56mm with battens and ply, we have about 170 left for insulation/air gap. I think I should probably leave a gap of at least 25mm (I often say 50 but am pushed to get sufficient insulation in) below the floorboards. I hardly ever use a vapour barrier above u/fl ins, and have never had a prob. I could, however, use another layer of tyvek, so we end up with a tyvek/warmcel sandwich.<br /><br />For the roof, it will be underdrawn with an insulation board (pl'bd and extr poly) of appr 50mm, plywood baffles at appr 1m centres between the rafters to prevent settlement to the eaves and help to maintain an air gap and, I reckon, a layer of tyvek over the top, appr 25mm below the top of the rafters to maintain an air gap. This should then be vented both sides at the eaves. <br /><br />The walls are of 300mm spaced studs between 150 posts and these will be fully filled with warmcel.<br /><br />Comments and suggestions gratefully received.<br /><br />I am awful at photos, but hope to post some on the syec web-site soon.<br /><br />Nick]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ground floor thermal bridging free on cool basement</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1052</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1052</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 16:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>manoka</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hello,<br /><br />How and with which materials is it recommended to build a ground floor slab free of thermal bridging on a cool basement?<br /><br />Cheerio<br />manoka]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Npower energy price increases</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1053</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1053</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 19:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Jeff B</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Interesting to see/read some of the shock/horror initial reactions to the news that Npower gas prices are to rise by about 17% and electricity by 13% with immediate effect. The cost of heating oil has risen by 50% in the last 12 months but as this probably has little effect on the population of the south east of England we don't hear much about that. Can't help feeling that this is just the beginning - peak oil here we come! <br /><br />The annoying thing will be that having spent a fortune on insulation, heat pump, solar panels etc. within a short time the government will be giving away massive subsidies to encourage us all to install them and manufacturers will be turning out such kit at bargain prices. I guess I can console myself with the fact that I have done my bit to save the planet and, the way oil prices are likely to be going, probably enjoyed a more rapid pay-back time than I could ever have dreamed of.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Could a big kettle heat a home?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1036</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1036</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Peter A</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Was just thinking some more on the link that Chris put on the &quot;Christmas list suggestion&quot; link;<br />http://www.hawkin.com/?PAGEID=20670&amp;CTL_CAT_CODE=1167&amp;STK_PROD_CODE=00570&amp;aid=WEBG01<br />If this can generate hot water that quickly with minimal fuel how about a bigger version to supply the home, some sort of furnace at the base with air intakes and the &quot;big kettle&quot; immediately above?<br />Is there anything like this on the market?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Convection driven earth tubes for ventilation</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1026</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1026</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 10:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>StuartB</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Does anyone have have any experience of the effectiveness of convection driven earth tubes providing ventilation in an earth sheltered home?  Detail in the following link.<br /><br />http://www.primedesign.us/self_heating_houses/pahs_article_1.html<br /><br />This seems a very simple and cheap way to provide ventilation probably with the help of a solar powered fan.  Any known problems with this approach?<br /><br />Cheers]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Glossary</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1051</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1051</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 16:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>GBP-Keith</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The glossary below is from Volume 1 of the current edition of Green Building Bible. Feel free to add comments (on current list) or other glossary items to the bottom of this thread and I'll get them added in.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Insultation thickness required for outside cold water storage</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1050</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1050</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 09:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>jamesingram</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I was think of using a single storey side extension flat roof to store rainwater from the gutters above <br />to use for a washing machine and downstairs toilet below <br />I'm not sure what level I need to insulate it to, to protect it from freezing <br />I was thinking of.<br /><br />   25mm closed cell pipe lagging on all pipes <br />   150mm mineral wall surrounding tank<br /><br />does this sound enough<br /><br />thanks for your thoughts<br /><br />JIm]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>&quot;Solid&quot; wood flooring</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=882</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=882</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 18:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>pdurkan@yahoo.co.uk</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hello,<br /><br />We're considering laying so-called solid wood flooring on our ground floor - placed on top of that green cellulose board stuff which would be on top of the existing mix of concrete and suspended timber.<br /><br />We spotted some nice pine floorboards at B&amp;Q, but the chap there said we'd get condensation if we did as I've described. He then said it would be ok if we bought those small multi-sized tongue &amp; groove solid wood floor bits they sell. Now I'm confused; wood is wood surely, and in terms of condensation behaves similarly whether in 6 foot or 1 foot lengths?<br /><br />Is it also the case that we need to lay the wood at 90 degrees to the original floor boards? This is inconvenient, as obviously we'd like to follow the joists for nailing in such flooring.<br /><br />Any help/opinions much appreciated.<br /><br />Paul]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Is this the worlds most inefficient heating appliance?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1038</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1038</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>nigel</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[A mere 21% efficient. Does anyone know of anything worse?<br /><br />http://www.dovre.co.uk/html/canopy-2700-gas.html]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Light bulb levy?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1048</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1048</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 07:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I think that we need a clear statement to all from HMG regarding their seriousness about energy saving measures.<br /><br />I would like to see no VAT on LED and CFL bulbs with immediate effect.<br /><br />AND an additional levy of Â£1.00 on incandescent light bulbs --  yes each.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>No Frost above Dormer Room</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1021</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1021</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 13:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>bobn</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[We recently extended our bungalow, constructing a bedroom and bathroom in the loftspace.  In keeping with building regs the converted loftspace is lined with lots of Celotex type insulation between and under the rafters.  I was surprised after the recent frosts to see no frost on the tiles immediately above the converted loftspace rooms but plenty above the empty loftspace.  The empty loftspace has 120mm Rockwell between the joists.<br />Is this lack of frost normal or have the builders installed the converted loftspace insulation incorrectly?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>underfloor insulation vs central heating pipe runs</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1049</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1049</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 08:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>TheDoctor</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi All,<br /><br />Happy New Year!<br /><br />I have been lurking here for a good while now, but have now joined up, as building works are a lot more imminent!<br /><br />I am extending / part re-furbishing a Scottish Steading.<br /><br />All the new, and part of the old will be built well beyond current building regs in terms of air tightness, insulation, triple glazing, etc etc.<br /><br />However, due to financial constraints and other issues, i am not able to fully upgrade all of the older part of the building to my preferred level.<br />The new area is all underfloor heating, but the old (just bedrooms, so never more than 16 - 17 degrees) is served by conventional radiators.<br />I am insulating and draft proofing beneath the existing floors in all but one room, and will be replacing all the existing central heating pipe runs and solving all the fit sized holes in the floor.<br /><br />so, question,<br />do i lay the new central heating pipes above the insulation quilt and breather membrane in notches in the joists, through the insulation in holes through the joists, or well lagged and underneath the whole lot?<br /><br />My brain suggests they should be above all the insulation to ensure any heat loss makes it into the house rather than the floor void.<br /><br />I have read numerous threads about insulating and draft proofing floors, but cant find reference to pipe-zones.<br /><br />thanks!<br /><br />The Doctor]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Eating your own dog food?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=990</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=990</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Tuna</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The Americans coined this phrase to mean using your own products rather than just foisting them on other people. I'm interested to see how much this applies to people on this forum. How many people here:<br /><br />1. Live in a building that was designed from the outset to be 'green'. Let's blur the green definition to mean that the house has some design element or feature that is unusual or uncommon in standard domestic builds for the area in order to reduce energy consumption or environmental impact. for example, significantly exceeding building regs for insulation, or using solar heating for hot water.<br /><br />2. Are in the process of building 'green' homes for themselves or clients.<br /><br />3. Are attempting to specify a 'green' design with the realistic intention of building at some time in the future.<br /><br />4. Supply 'green' technology or consultation to clients who are actively using them to produce homes?<br /><br />5. Have retro-fitted green technology to their current home in order to make it more energy efficient?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Can I retro fit GSHP and under floor heating?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=824</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=824</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>lusstor</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I have just purchased a 5 bed detached house with a few storage heaters. We are not on mains gas (and cant ever be) and are looking for a solution for hot water and central heating.  The house has cavity wall insulation and is double glazed.  Its quite a large house and has some good incidental heat gains (2 huge south facing patio windows). There is also a large rear garden, with a water wishing well and no direct neighbours.  I believe the ground floor of the house has concrete floors.  <br /><br />I had wanted in a prefect world to fit a geothermal heat pump and under floor heating.... However... This is sounding more and more unlikely.... :cry:<br /><br /> <br /><br />the things troubling me, and I don't know if you can advise;<br /><br /> <br /><br />Can I even fit a heat pump, regardless of how much insulation I have, is my house just not efficient enough, how do I tell? <br /><br /> <br /><br />Can I fit under floor heating on top of the existing concrete and just have the floor an inch or or more  higher? (the existing floors are disgusting and the skirting is knackered so its no loss)<br /><br /> <br /><br />I assume hot water can be heated as well?<br /><br /> <br /><br />What sort of costs am I looking at?<br /><br /> <br /><br />Any advice? <br />:confused:<br /><br />HELP!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Most cost effective form of insulation for barn conversion</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1037</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1037</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 15:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>21grantbridge</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi everybody,<br /><br />First post so please be gentle.  I am halfway through a barn conversion.  I have basically built a timber framed house inside the existing walls.  I have an external breathable vapor barrier between the frame and the stone, which has been repointed on both sides.  I have a minimum of 250mm between the inside of the frame and the vapor barrier.  Until reading this forum I was going to use a 85/105mm kingspan from seconds and co at a cost of Â£4.50m2 for the floor, walls and loft.  Is this the most cost effective sollution?  I am Ok using it for the floor, but having taken in what everybody has said about drafts, and as the product is rigid - how do you make it draft-proof on the walls and ceiling if its going between trusses and frames?  I had originally intended to build a floating roof and cross batten it for slating, but as I am reusing all the old slates, which are several different sizes and split if put into dressed battens I had to go for sarking.<br /><br />put in a few words ... With 250mm to play with and a limited budget what is the most cost effective and if possible green insulation to use?<br /><br />Any advice greatfully appreciated.<br /><br />James]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>window Insulation Kits- Help!!!!</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1007</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1007</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>johnwoods</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Please Help!!!!<br />I have just purchased a house and its freezing!!<br />The heating seems to warm the place- only to go cold again within minutes of turning it off.<br />I checked the problem out and its the windows!<br />I came across this site www.window-insulation.co.uk<br />I have ordered four packs- has anyone used this item?<br />How effective is it??<br />Would appreciate any help at all!!<br />Cheers<br />John.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>New York City now using green power</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1030</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1030</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>john13</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Mayor Bloomberg of New York City just announced that they are going to use these Microturbines for apartment buildings.  They can run on natural gas, waste gas, biogas, as well as liquid fuels. They require no oil or lubrication to run. <br /><br />Why canâ€™t every city use these? This will help cut greenhouse gases and cut back on our dependency on foreign oil.<br /> <br />Youtube clip on these turbines<br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmBNtoXFX5o<br /><br />website <br />http://www.capstoneturbine.com/]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The carbon cycle of plastic</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1025</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1025</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 09:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Mike George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Not stricktly a building question [but related]<br /><br />After all of the pastic packaging I have seen recently, I had a good look at some of the environmental information on the stuff we are recycling. I was surprised to see the following on a bag of potatoes:<br /><br />"This bag will fully degrade to carbon dioxide, water, organic material and a small amount of inorganic residue after 4 yeatrs in the domestic waste system. This compares to conventional plastics taking over 100 years to degrade"<br /><br />I wonder how much plastic associated with building degrades in this way? I've heard that some insulations for example 'offgas'<br /><br />Is this approach specifically targeted at food packaging? and is it a good thing or not, given that CO2 is a by-product of the chemical reaction?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Green Building in Baja Mex.</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1034</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1034</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>bertram</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I am very happy to announce that we are now starting to Green Build in Baja Rosarito mex. (20 minutes south from the U.S borther San Diego) we are building with SIPS panels and we are getting a very good response from the people around here, everyone is starting to ask us more about this product and I think everyone is going to build like this in the near future.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Low energy bulbs</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=964</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=964</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 20:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>david</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Low energy bulbs are more efficient because they produce more light and less heat than incandescent bulbs.<br />We tend to have our lights on more when the daylight time is shorter and this period coincides with lower temperatures and having the heating on.<br />As most heating systems are thermostatically controlled and the heat output from incandescent bulbs contributes to space heating the boiler will consume less fuel.<br />When low energy bulbs are fitted the boiler will run for longer.<br />We have the disposal problems of fluorescent tubes and only succeed in moving part of the heating load to the boiler. <br />Is there a better way of looking at this?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Novice needing help</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1003</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1003</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 18:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Kparry</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I am a complete novice and looking for guidance on the best way to make some changes.<br />I have a 12 year old 3 bed room detached house with a large conservatory extension and converted garage.It already has UPVC glazing,fitted about 3/4 years ago.The insulation is as fitted when built-about 100mm in loft.No cellar etc.<br />It is costing huge amounts to heat and some parts of the house are always cold.<br />The boiler is due for renewal and we would like to do a loft conversion and open up living room into the converted garage space.Given the extent of the changes we plan i was hoping we could improve it's Green credentials at the same time.<br />I know little about it,but like the thought of wood burning stoves/heating,renewable solar energy,insulation and making the place airtight(how).I have concerns over cavity wall insulation as i thought the cavity had a purpose.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Geopolymers as a replacement for cement</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1027</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1027</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>turbocabbage</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi, I am a 20 year old undergrad, with no scientific background apart from a biology A level and what I've read my self. I am very interested in sustainable living and I intend to be more politically active in this field. However, I am still learning, and there are many areas where I could do with a hand. So, I have a question I hope you'll be able to answer.<br /><br />As I'm sure you're aware, cement production results in a huge amount of CO2 emissions: about one tonne of CO2 per tonne of cement produced, according the the papers I've read, linked below. A possible alternative are geopolymers, which are formed by reacting alumina-silicate products with an alkaline solution. They can be formed from any source of alumina-silicates, which are extremely common, both in the earth's crust, and in some industrial waste. The huge environmental advantage they have over cement is that their synthesis emits no CO2 of itself. Additionally, it requires much lower temperatures and consequently much less energy. They also have numerous structural advantages: concrete from geopolymeric cement is subject to 80% less shrinkage than concrete from Portland Cement, is faster setting and stronger than, and has very high heat resistanc (1000 to 1200 degrees without losing function) and low thermal conductivity. In addition to this it is ultra-durable, and can withstand thousands of years of weathering. All of this information I obtained from the papers below, and I haven't found anything disputing them. Geopolymers have been around since the late 70s and have been commercially applied in some areas, but they are far from replacing cement. If they are so preferable, economically and environmentally to ordinary cement, why haven't they replaced ordinary cement? I have emailed the geopolmyer institute regarding this, and got a very brief response, asking me refer to their FAQ section (I already had, and hadn't found an answer). Thanks a lot, peace<br /><br />sources:<br />http://www.cptechcenter.org/publications/sustainable/lisustainable.pdf<br />http://www.geopolymer.org <br />http://espace.lis.curtin.edu.au/arch..._GC2__2006.pdf<br />http://www.buildingforafuture.co.uk/autumn05/ordinary_portland_cement.pdf]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Philosophy of a new build</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1014</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1014</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>jon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[We have a series of buildings that can be designed in three ways:  None other are acceptable<br /><br />Option A, when annualised over its lifespan, has a projected real lifespan of 60 years, a total embodied CO2 of 58 tonnes CO2 output from construction (together with renewals over its lifetime) and thus an annualised CO2 output of 12.9 kg/sqm/annum<br /><br />Option B, when annualised over its lifespan, has a projected real lifespan of 100 years, a total embodied CO2 of 97.5 tonnes CO2 output from construction (together with renewals over its lifetime) and thus an annualised CO2 output of 13 kg/sqm/annum<br /><br />Option C, when annualised over its lifespan, has a projected real lifespan of 150 years, a total embodied CO2 of 114 tonnes CO2 output from construction (together with renewals over its lifetime) and thus an annualised CO2 output of 13.1 kg/sqm/annum<br /><br />All these options require heating &amp; other energy at an annual cost of 25-40 kg CO2/sqm/annum (so pretty good perhaps 88kWh/sqm/annum).  There is a good chance that this can be reduced with time as most of the CO2 supply is in appliances and relatively little in heat. (About 50-60% is heat &amp; water)<br /><br />Option A is 5% cheaper than B to build.  Option C is 10% more expensive than B.  We know that all of these options will become more expensive over the coming decades but that Option C will become more significantly expensive to construct than either of the other two.<br /><br />Option A is least carbon now.  Options B and C have the same annualised cost as A over their lifespans.   However, there is an argument that B and C are more sustainable because they will provide homes for future generations at a lower financial cost (and, of course, they will still be standing in 70 years time whereas option A will not)<br /><br />Edit: (thanks to Bowman) To the developer, all options are equal:  If more money is spent on option C, the buyers are known not to fully appreciate whole life cost and will therefore only pay for a building roughly in proportion to the cost of the build.<br /><br />Edit: (thanks to CWatters):  The lifespans shown are based on average historical figures for the building types.   However, an individual building could last significantly longer than shown.<br /><br />Which should be built?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>external render for concrete slab house?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1024</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1024</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>roughbert</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[This link (http://www.wbs-ltd.co.uk/refurb_uvalue.htm#woolaway) shows encouraging calculations for the success of &quot;phenolic&quot; renders applied to concrete slab prefabricated house (like mine). But I am a little wary of the way they are marketed. There may be alternative external finishes which will get a similar result at a lower cost, particularly if I apply the stuff myself. I'm not personally interested in views on the internal insulation, but don't let that hold you back!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ground source heat pump problems</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1022</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1022</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 14:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>mikejd</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[This is a continuation of a previous post - 'Ground Source Heat Pump Question' - as I am still experiencing problems which the so-called 'accredited installer' can't seem to solve.<br /><br />The system was installed and commissioned in November, worked for about 10 days albeit at a very low temperature which was the subject of the previous post. It hasn't worked since except for short periods as various 'solutions' were tried to get it working. When it stopped after about 10 days working the heat pump showed an 'Error level 2' fault. There were two suggestions to sort this - one to turn off and back on, the second was to clean the strainer. Both allowed the pump to start working again but in both cases only for less than 24 hours.<br /><br />The next suggestion was to provide a larger ground loop pump. This was installed, the system started and shut down 'Error level 2' after about 9 hours. Next the ground loop was repressurised as the pressure has dropped - same result. The latest suggestion is that there is insufficient antifreeze allowing formation of ice crystals and slowing the flow. They have calculated that 79 litres of antifreeze is required; they supplied 75 litres with the system which has already been put in. The MD of the company, who I am now dealing with, has now gone on Xmas holiday until 14 Jan so I assume there will be nothing happening until then.<br /><br />There has been a suggestion that the problem lies with the ground loop borehole which may not be fully grouted. If so the solution would have to be sorted with the borehole contractor, letting the 'installer' off the hook. At the moment I can't think of any way to check the grouting of the borehole, short of excavating and redrilling.<br /><br />The 'installer' appears reluctant to actually come to site to try and investigate although I have now written to them to say that this is what I think they should do. I am also considering trying to find an independent engineer who could check the system, although this would obviously cost me more money. So far I have not named the 'installer' but I may do this soon if I get no satisfactory solution and I will certainly not be recommending them to anyone else.<br /><br />I would be interested in any comments/advice anyone can offer.<br /><br />Mike Davies]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Shadow Price of Carbon</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1019</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1019</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 09:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>biffvernon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Our Government seems to be developing a core strategy around this paper:<br />http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/climatechange/research/carboncost/pdf/background.pdf The Social Cost Of Carbon And The Shadow Price Of Carbon: What They Are, And How To Use Them In Economic Appraisal In The UK<br />Economics Group, Defra December 2007<br /><br />It was the front page story in yesterday's http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2007/dec/22/climatechange.carbonemissionsGrauniad<br />and there are summaries from http://www.defra.gov.uk/news/2007/071219e.htm] DEFRA<br /><br />http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/cc-instruments/index.htm  Consultation open till 19th March '08.<br /><br />I wonder what the implications for the building industry will be.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar PV Installation books</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=813</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=813</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 09:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>stephendv</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Can anyone recommend good resources on the technical aspects of designing and installing an off-grid PV system?  The only resource, I can find on amazon which seems that it may meet my needs is very expensive: &quot;Planning and Installing Photovoltaic Systems: A Guide for Installers, Architects and Engineers&quot;.  I'm looking for something beyond the basics with a lot of technical detail on the design and installation of these systems.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>School heat losses</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1011</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1011</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[We have been talking about reducing heat losses from homes and the way forward to very good effect.<br /><br />But what about schools? Often flat roofed without any insulation! From a virtual satellite they would appear as white hot square patchworks in every town.<br /><br />Heating is paid for directly bu all of us --  akin to putting radiators in our gardens and told that they must be turned on!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Floor strengthening advice needed!</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1016</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1016</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>tom.harrigan</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I have a downstairs space, about 8m x 4.5m. The floor above it is constructed from 4&quot;x2&quot; timbers (17&quot; centres) hung from the walls and a central oak beam. The oak beam (dating from about 1650) spans the 8.5m and is supported at half way. The ceiling is just the upstairs floorboards.<br /><br />This arrangement is unsatisfactory for several reasons, the most annoying of which is the way the 4x2s are hung off the oak beam - it really is a mess! It's also going to be quite difficult to run services as the joists are so shallow, the sound insulation is non existent, and the floor is a tad bouncy. I had resigned myself to ripping the whole lot out and putting in a new floor. I don't want to box in the beam as it's one of the few period features I have, and there's not much headroom as it is.<br /><br />Then it occurred to me that I could just put another floor on top of the existing one. I could mirror all the joists and glue and screw both floors together. This would allow me to improve the aesthetics of the beam/joist join. Then I would get a less bouncy floor, have room to run services and save lots of money and time, and there would be much less waste. If the wife objects to the floorboard look of the ceiling (which I think would look quite nice painted white), I could stick something onto it even if it's only paper or do the usual plasterboard thing (eventually).<br /><br />Does this seem a sensible idea, or is there something I've not thought of?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Merry Christmas to all</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1020</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1020</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 12:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>GBP-Keith</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I would like to wish all forum users a very merry christmas and a happy fruitful and green new year. :whorship:<br /><br />Special thanks needs extending to the very regular forum contributors, a few of who can be seen in the top posters list in the left column of the forum homepage but the regular contributors list is far too long to include everyone. <br /><br />We all know who they are as they consistently over the past year have offered us all (and each other) useful and practical answers and tips to our questions. <br /><br />Tony has managed to get himself to the top visitor and top poster position so congrats to him. Still work to do though Tony to kick me off the top discussion starter position.<br /><br />Other forum users please feel free to add your praise or ideas for further improvement on this festive thread.<br /><br />Thanks again - Keith<br /><br />:flowers: :grouphug::cheer::rolling::swingin::thumbup::crazy::jumping::clap::boogie::heartsabove::kissing:]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Heat Pumps- 3 out : 1 in : 3 out</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1009</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1009</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>ally.gill</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I'm producing a uni paper on env design and want to consider the incorporation of heat pumps to achieve csh.  i'm not content with the concept of 3 parts energy to 1 part electric feed to 3 parts heat.  i cant see the benefit especially with the reliance on energy security through centralised supply.  So,<br />1. How often would the pump need power and to what quantity?<br />2. Can rooftop supply (pv array/turbines) provide the electrical energy required at reasonable cost/payback? (based on avge uk wind and solar figures)<br />3. Could a 100 dwelling development provide localised renewable heat and energy within achievable cost parameters to omit reliance on gas and centralsied power, provide an oversupply of electric feeding the grid to fund maintenance costs, and provide affordable homes with the required level of profit margin to satisfy shareholders.<br /><br />And as an aside if we are in an energy crisis can the government introduce a power ban (similar to a hosepipe ban) to prevent this ridiculous waste of electricity on christmas lights outside peoples houses?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Accomodation block</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1018</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1018</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[How many air changes per hour? Background after showers (20 ensuites)? during the night??<br /><br />Will have MHVR but I worry about design with two much air flow/wasted ventilation heat.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Heat Loss Calculations</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1004</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1004</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Paul @ Carbon Free</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi Guys,<br /><br />I've been asked to provide a quote for a heat pump for a very modern and energy efficient home, but due to the design being far from normal my usual software and a meers calculator are not accurate enough. I've been given  U values for the floor, walls and ceiling but don't have the system to turn this info into a heat loss figure.<br /><br />If any of you guys have any idea how I could do this your help would be greatly appreciated<br /><br />Kind regards<br /><br />Paul]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Double glazing costs</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1015</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1015</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Neil Adam Hall</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi guys,<br /><br />Could anyone propose a standard m2 rate for replacing single glazing with double glazing in a large office block?<br /><br />Im estimating a potential Â£150,000 15 year energy saving if this was done, and just wanna see if its feasible.<br /><br />Cheers!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Choice of Heating System</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1000</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1000</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Jeff</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Buying a bungalow - detached/1/2 way up a hill &amp; will take wind from the North.  No gas in village.  Available services are Oil, Electricity &amp; LPG.  All are expensive, oil being the worst.  I have already started a thread on insulation and intend to insulate &amp; be as air tight as possible.  Thinking about heating I don't like any of the above.  Have been reading threads on ground &amp; air sourced heat pumps.  I don't have the footprint to do a horizontal ground sourced system.  The vertical version sound expensive.  The air sourced heat pump might work well.  How noisy are these machines?  Can they be 'silenced' in any way?  I appreciate they run on electricity but assuming The Government actually does something constructive about renewable energy/nuclear in the future, at least I'd have a suitable system in situ to make the most of it.<br /><br />If I am air tight and heavily insulated, could a stove (assuming a suitable supply of wood) be sufficient?  If so how do you 'move' heat around the house to where it is needed?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Bedroom airbricks keep or lose &amp; get MVHR</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1010</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1010</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>skywalker</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Slowly getting there on the insulation/draught exclusion so on the way to a well insulated house with low(er) infiltration.<br /><br />Actuallly I'm fairly sure that by the time I've finshed the hidden stuff incoming air will be confined to a dodgy back door (which will be replaced with a nice home made oak job and fitted to a new frame rather than thrown at an old one), a monstrous UPVC creation where a front door with sidelights should be (again to be replaced ASAP), the three air bricks in our nominal bedrooms (2 upstairs &amp; one downstairs used as an office) and a new airway I put in behind our woodburner as once I have done the front room floor there will be no other free air flow into the room. <br /><br />Our horrible UPVC double glazing has no trickle vents but the new velux type windows I am fitting (in each each bedroom) have. I will be changing the existing windows but not until I have saved up some money - probably at least a couple of years if not longer and will either make my own/buy oak ones (We like Mr Vernons Yorshire Sashes) or get super duper scandinavians - haven't decided.<br /><br />The 'bedroom' airbricks are are 9&quot;X9&quot; and I'm inclined to keep them but put manually closeable vents on the inside. With single unit heat recovery ventilation units in the kitchen and bathroom to mitigate for smells/moisture. The house is a small dormer bungalow with a floor area just over 80m2 and a volume of around 260m3. <br /><br />Does this make sense or should I go for whole house (or in our case all but one room due to ducting issues) MVHR or stick with passive/manual ventilation.<br /><br />Thanks in advance .<br /><br />S.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Economic influence to a property developer</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1008</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1008</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>ally.gill</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I need to produce a paper on the influence of the economy on a property developer and want to look specifically at changing building standards, incorporation of green bling, provision of grants, etc.  Any pointers or input from this forum would be greatly appreciated.  Also any uk economics supply/demand help would be great, as i'm struggling to find suitable reference material.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Christmas List Suggestions</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1005</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1005</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Bowman</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Okay, I know its a bit late, but how about some Christmas list suggestions/recomendations<br /><br />A book I found inspirational: No Nettles Required by Ken Thompson]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Spring 2008 issue topic for GB4</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=984</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=984</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>GBP-Keith</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The topic of the next edition of GBmag will be building services and renewables. We have an in-depth look at fuel cells planned among other things.<br /><br />Also I want to organise a debate on heat pumps. I'm looking for two representatives (one from the for camp and one from the against camp) to tough it out in print. Anyone interested? OR suggestions of someone who I can contact that would be happy to get in the ring would be welcome please.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>