<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - All Discussions</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 20:19:55 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Insulating mortar</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=782</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=782</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 18:53:16 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[A lot of people are still using aerated concrete blocks to build with. In my opinion these are naff! They crack and move arround too easily, are brittle, insubstantial and of too low thermal mass. I wont use them, instead I use medium or heavy weight blocks. But when I use mine I use mortar of the same thermal properties as my blocks but them that use aerated blocks use thermally bridging mortar--  crazy or what?<br /><br />Is there such a thing as insulating mortar? Surely if the blocks can be insulating then shouldn't the mortar be as insulating? (even though I hate aero blocks it only seems common sense to me to have matching mortar)  then again there it a sad lac of common sense in the way we build so it is not a surprise.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Low energy lighting in new builds and renovations</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=581</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=581</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 21:58:40 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Richard Waite</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I'm struggling to find regulations / guidance on fitting low energy light fittings (i.e. compact fluorescent bulbs) in new builds / renovations.   I know that people are still installing old-style fittings which means years of high energy lighting to come.   I'm thinking of spots and recessed light fittings, especially the small GU10 downlighters.  To get the equivalent brightness of a halogen, you need a longer low energy (cfl) bulb and so a longer fitting - but I know that people are still installing fittings which will not take the longer cfl's (without the bulb sticking out).  The longer fittings are available.   <br />The question is, do people have to fit cfl-compatible fittings and if so, can you tell me where I can find the regs / standards on lighting? <br />Many thanks.<br />Richard]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Silver foil insulation</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=766</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=766</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:05:45 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>oiseaux</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I know its not the most greenest of insulation materials, but in my particular situation it really is the only alternative if I want to see my green oak rafters from below. I see that Actis still do a version here in France which uses sheep wool  and they claim a u value of 6.1. What do you think?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Esse Cookers</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=780</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=780</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:54:07 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>jdpatton@dnet.co.uk</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi there, I was hoping someone here might have some experience of the Esse Gas Cooker/Stove with the Catalytic Flue. The Rayburn I bought has failed to cope with our prevailing winds and I thought the Esse might be the answer. But I am unhappy paying the Â£3.5K based solely on the salesmans blurb. Does anyone know of anyone who has one??<br />Many thanks,<br />Jeff.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Steady state predictions of heat losses through solid floors</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=753</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=753</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 23:39:59 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Mike George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I remember reading somewhere [can't remember where] that using steady state calculations; the maximum heat loss through a ground bearing slab is predicted to be around 10% of the total for a building. Obviously this varies with the introduction of insulation.  Is the 10% figure correct?  If so how much of a saving is made by the introduction of insulation and how quickly does the saving diminish as u-values are reduced? At what point do steady state calculations predict that the otimum level of insulation will be reached? <br /><br />Anyone care to have a stab at some ball park figures?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Green Building Magazine</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=315</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=315</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 17:50:49 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Keith Hall</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Nearly ready]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>My cold loft</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=776</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=776</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:10:26 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Joinerbird</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi there Greenguys.<br />I have one of those questions things for you.<br />I have finally looked up into the loft of my new house. Its big and cold. There is 100mm of pinkish mineral wool down already, so I intend to lay an addtional 200mm (criss crossing of course) Will that do? I know its 270mm, but with the existing 100mm down already....<br />And.<br />I am used to seeing nicely renovated loft spaces with good bratherble felt or trad felt and vents. But in my space, there is rafters and tiles. Thats it. (1934 house, 2 hips, semi) I noticed that some of the crap that was left in there by ex resident was damp and mouldy. Is there a danger of the roof becoming damp? There are no vents in sofit or ridge. I can see daylight in some points, but not gapping holes. Can breatherble felt be added to underside of rafters? Will it help? Am I worrying about nowt?<br />Thanks guys, any comments welcome.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Free sustainable building events from 12th Novembers</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=778</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=778</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:51:45 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>GBP-Keith</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The first in a new series of free debates examining ways of improving the<br />sustainability of regional buildings and improving the lives of communities gets<br />underway next month.<br /><br />Organised by the architecture centre for the North East, Northern Architecture,<br />the initial event is being held on 12 November at Newcastle Civic Centre and<br />will look at sustainable cities.<br /><br />It is the first of five over the next five months that will raise the level of<br />debate about how the North East should respond to climate change and increasing<br />pressure on resources, whilst constructing and maintaining long-lasting<br />buildings and places.<br /><br />Latest figures suggest that 50% of all the UK's carbon emissions are generated<br />by buildings and structures, while the building design and construction industry<br />creates a third of all waste.<br /><br />Each event will feature a panel of experts from within and outside the region<br />talking about the many complex sustainability issues that concern regional<br />architects, engineers, planners, developers, policy makers and others.<br /><br />The first one kicks off with a panel of experts from design and business<br />consultancy firm Arup, urban planning and design practice Urban Initiatives and<br />UK's leading sustainable transport charity, Sustrans looking at ways of creating<br />long-lasting and eco-friendly neighbourhoods featuring carbon free buildings and<br />energy efficient systems.<br /><br />They will also discuss how these impact on people's lives and the first time<br />house buyers market, and propose guidelines for planners and other professionals<br />trying to create more sustainable communities and cities.<br /><br />The full programme is:<br />Â·    12 November, Newcastle - Sustainable cities<br />Â·    11 December, Durham - Sustainable buildings<br />Â·    16 January, Sunderland - Sustainable communities<br />Â·    12 February, Middlesbrough - Sustainable resources<br />Â·    18 March, Gateshead - Sustainable futures<br /><br />All events 6 - 8 pm. Admission free but booking required. Call 0191 260 2191 or<br />visit www.northernarchitecture.com/events]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Range cooker</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=773</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=773</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:32:34 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>David Salter</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Range cooker]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Flat-pack housing, is this the way forward?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=728</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=728</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 22:09:37 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Mike George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Read this today-<br />http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,1961670,00.html#article_continue<br /><br />Any thoughts? the article is a little lacking in detail]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Understanding Energy in Buildings - Basic Principles</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=775</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=775</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:50:14 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>sallyh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[IMPORTANT INFORMATION Course at RIBA 25th October (see previous posting). It has been decided to make this first course a 'pilot', and the charge has therefore been reduced to Â£117.50 inc VAT. All participating will be encouraged to provide feedback which will inform the later courses. For more information and to book log onto www.carbonlite.net]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to prevent having to use LPG central heating so much</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=774</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=774</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:53:48 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>David Salter</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[We recently moved to a largish,2700 sq ft, south facing bungalow in Sussex and want to cut down on the amount of LPG,which was already installed before we arrived, used to keep the central heating system going.<br /><br />The roof space is fully insulated and the cavity walls filled and all the windows double glazed.<br /><br />We added a 30 tube evacuated solar panel in the summer which provided all the hot water required without having to resort to the LPG.<br /><br />We now want to get rid of the old cooker and replace it with a Rayburn/Esse type one <br />a/ to cook from<br />b/ to heat the kitchen<br />c/ help warm up the cylinder water so that the LPG does'nt have to kick in so frequently to keep the central heating upto temperature.<br /><br />Would I be rigt in thinking that I need a 3 coil cylinder to take the 3 heat sources, ( Solar,Rayburn/Esse,LPG) and that by investing in a Rayburn/Esse to help boost the water temperature in the cylinder that the call on the LPG will be far less?<br /><br />Would a 3 coil water cylinder be the same as a heat store?<br /><br />Would a Dunsley Neautraliser need to be fitted?<br /><br />What would the best arrangement be to save on the use of LPG?<br /><br />Do not want to go to the expense of taking the LPG out,and also want to have the comfort factor of the Rayburn/Esse.<br /><br />Any information would be gratefully received, and if any plumbers, who live near Battle, East Sussex, would be interested in plumbing in the Rayburn/Esse please get in touch.  <br /><br />Rgds DES]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Understanding energy in buildings.</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=757</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=757</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:15:02 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>sallyh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Understanding Energy in Buildings - 25th October at RIBA, 66 Portland Place, London W1B 8AD<br />This course is open to architects, architectural technicians, builders, developers and anyone who is involved with the design and construction of buildings and needs to enhance their understanding of:<br /><br />Â·	How buildings work as systems particularly with respect to energy and environment<br />Â·	New and traditional building technologies available for managing energy in buildings<br />Â·	How to design buildings as a complete energy system and so deliver low energy standards in, for example, the higher levels of the Code for Sustainable Homes and the forthcoming Code for non-domestic buildings<br /><br />The course will relate to Building Regulations, AECB Standards, compliance methodologies including SAP, other assessment procedures and the Code for Sustainable Homes.<br />Â£352.50 inc VAT per person (AECB member)<br />Â£470 inc VAT per person (non-AECB member)<br /><br />http://www.carbonlite.org.uk/carbonlite/training.php]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>cavity wall insulation</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=533</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=533</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:55:57 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>rae</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi All,<br /><br />Dh and I have talked for a long time about getting cavity wall insulation.<br />My limited knowledge goes back to when I first heard about people having formaldehyde-loaded stuff pumped into their walls and then suffering headaches.<br />Since then I have just tarred all cavity wall insulation with the same brush and always resisted it.<br /><br />However, it is becoming apparent in the home we are in now, that it really could help us make our home more energy efficient.<br /><br />Can anyone tell me what is used now? Is it safe (I don't mean do the Government and service provider's tell us so, I mean is it *really* safe)<br />I'd like to know what impact it might have on the health of the people in my home and the environment please. <br /><br />many thanks<br />Rae x (slightly paranoid it would appear :surprised:)]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Underfloor insulation</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=758</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=758</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:43:49 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Hugh Roberts</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi,<br />I am about to renovate an 1890 end terrace house and have read lots about cavity wall insulation and from previous experience I would prefer to leave the cavity empty so am looking where else I may be able to counter this. The ground floor has a decent void underneath and I was wondering whether there is any advantage or disadvantage to fixing kingspan/celotex between the joists or would it be better to insulate on top of floorboards before carpet/wooden floor goes down.<br />Secondly I intend to retain old sashes and want to draftproof them. I understand that if i remove the openers i can route a groove and fit a draft strip. Any tips on this, where can i buy the draftstrips and is there any system that is particularly good.<br /><br />Thanks<br /><br />Hugh]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Clearing wall cavities - help!</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=752</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=752</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:57:41 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Hugh Roberts</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[We have just bought a victorian terrace and have a clear problem with damp at the bottom of the walls - (rising damp?) We are against the idea of injecting silicon and want to try all other angles first. <br />My understanding is that we need to identify any possible drainage problems which may be introducing damp, sort out the seventies windows without trays, and also to clear the cavities to ensure the dampcourse is not bridged. <br />So to the question! How do I approach the clearing of the cavities? Is it easier from inside or outside? Do I take a brick out above the dampcourse? How far apart should I remove bricks - is it the distance I can reach?! And do I need to replace the prevous brick and wait for the mortar to dry before I do the next one? All help on dealing with damp without recourse to chemicals very gratefully received.<br />Hugh]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ground floor slab/insulation.</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=742</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=742</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:40:08 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>AndrewJwaters</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[My agreed spec for the make up of the ground floor slab [ To a barn conversion] is as follows:-<br />Mot type 1<br />Dpm<br />100mm conc<br />50mm cellotex<br />Wet UFH<br />50-75mm screed<br />Floor tiles<br /><br />My question is :-<br />Any advantage in increasing the 50mm cellotex to 100mm thick?<br />Thanks.<br />:cool:]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Underfloor Insulation(wooden Floors)</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=761</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=761</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 05:34:04 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Howard Frey</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I would like to insulate underneath my sanded and varnished pine floor boards without having to pull them all up first.<br /><br />I had the idea of taking up a couple of boards  and taking gardeners netting to the under sides of the joists then filling the space between the joists with rockwool insulation.<br /><br />I'm just a little concerned that this would prevent any air flow to the underside of the f.boards as the joists are 100 mm deep and the rockwool 100 mm thick. the varnish on the top is Johnson's Traffic Cote.<br /><br />Any thoughts advice much welcomed]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Advice on rafter spacings</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=736</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=736</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 09:48:08 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>oiseaux</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I have just started to load the roof on my previously mentioned garden room, and I am now concerned as to whether I have got my rafter spacings correct. I am using green oak rafters, 2.6 metres long at 45 cm centres. The tiles are terracotta, with a weight of 75 kg. per sq metre. The first section I have installed shows a deflection of 3mm at the midway point. Is this acceptable or should I increase the number of rafters and to what centres. Thankyou for any advice.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>THERMAL MASS</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=375</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=375</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:52:44 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Richard Oxley</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Further to the informative article on the Benefits of Thermal Mass in the latest Green Building Magazine I am interested to know if a solid wall with internal insulation was modelled, as this would separate the thermal mass from the living space and possibly provide a clearer picture of the value/performance of thermal mass. I would be interested in the results for any such modelling.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Hot Air</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=764</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=764</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:45:15 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>albacore</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Does a heat recovery ventilation system have to compensate for the fact that hot air rises? The systems I have looked at all deliver the warm fresh air at ceiling level. Is the flow-rate sufficient to even out the temperature or does living with the system mean warm ears and cold feet?  As even ears (for some of us at least) are considerably below ceiling height, does that mean there is a lot of unused warmer air at ceiling level?<br /><br />Any views on what it is like to live with one of these systems from someone who has done so would be very welcome.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>calculating current radiator outputs</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=751</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=751</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:26:37 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>mitchino</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Is there a formula or online calculator available whereby I can measure all my current radiators and find out their outputs? I can find outputs for similar sized radiators from manufacturers online catalogues, but is there an exact method?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Foam Insulation and Halo-Carbon Green House Gas Emissions</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=384</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=384</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:16:44 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Mark Siddall</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[â€œNet climatic impact of solid foam insulation produced with halocarbon and non-halocarbon blowing agentsâ€ by L.D. Harvey is a study that examines the embodied energy and emissions payback for insulation. In particular polyurethane insulation using either HCFC 141b, HCFC 365mfc or n-pentane as blowing agents are considered. The study is based on a climate with 4000 degree days (and a range of other assumptions to numerous to mention here) are considered. Two performance levels of insulation are considered RSI 3.0 and RSI 10.0. Conclusions are that: -<br /><br />Â· The emissions payback for RSIs ranging from 3.0 to 6.5 and blowing agents HCFC 141b and HCFC 365mfc are between 22 and 39 years respectively.<br />Â· For an RSI of 6.5 payback are in excess of 40 years and an RSI 10.0 marginal payback times are in excess of 100 years!!!<br />Â· n-pentane (Global Warming Potential of 7) has marginal payback for RSI 10.0 of 25 years. <br />Â· Harvey notes that the embodied energy payback for foam insulation with an RSI of 6.5 is 8years and for an RSI of 10.0 is 11 years.<br /><br /> Referring to the above data, given that an RSI of 3.0 is a U-value of 0.30, if you ensure than the GWP is less than 7 it is bordering on acceptability i.e. CO2 equivalent emissions are likely to be recovered within its life span.<br /><br />Referring to the EE of cellulose and low-density mineral fibre the authorâ€™s graphs show payback within 0.25-2years. You will note that this payback is substantially less than the CO2 payback for the foamed insulation i.e. the difference is &gt;22years at an RSI of 10....or U-value of 0.1. So, from a holistic environmental stance Harvey concludes that foam insulation in high performance low-energy houses is counterproductive. <br /><br />This noble conclusion is obviously is easier said than done. The use of foam insulations in low-energy homes is almost a requirement for technical reasons if no other i.e. to support floor slabs etc. In this light a balanced approach is surely the most reasonable. Minimise the use of foam insulations wherever possible.<br /><br />It is very clear that the GWP of the blowing agent should be &lt;5 (as BREEAM/ECO-Homes requirements.) Some manufactures now claim to use such blowing agents with a GWP of 3. Ideally a GWP of &lt;1 should be specified (but I'm not sure whether that is technically possible at this stage.)<br /><br />The EE payback for High Density Mineral is circa 20 years. In this light the gap between foam (&lt;GWP 5) and dense mineral wool begins to close. <br /><br />For your own copy of these findings please follow this link: <br />http://www.geog.utoronto.ca/info/facweb/Harvey/Harvey/aspapers/Harvey%20(2007d,%20ClimateTradeoffs_Insulation).pdf<br /><br />In a nutshell I guess the deeper lesson, beyond GWP, is that low-density insulation is best....all this kind of suggest that SIP Systems have a major hurdle to cross....<br /><br />Mark]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Veneered external doors</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=759</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=759</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:33:01 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Chris Wardle</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Anyone know of the best treatment to weather proof an oak veneered external door?  Something clear would be preferable as I like the look of it as it is.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>average energy requirements</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=760</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=760</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:11:17 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>mitchino</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Does anyone know where can I find figures/statistics/calculators for average domestic household annual energy requirements? I'm in Scotland so figures for there would be best. Thanks for any help.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Therma Fleece</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=754</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=754</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:17:11 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>richy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Not much information on the Green Building Store for this material.<br /><br />What thickness is equal to 100mm king span?<br /><br /><br />What thickness of warmcell 100 is equal to 100mm kingspan?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Using floors as thermal mass</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=685</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=685</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 07:35:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Mike George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Jeff Norton (NZ)</cite><br /><br />I am involved with designing and overseeing the construction of some lightweight buildings on ICF foundations/slab on grade homes. Timber construction suites our conditions well as we have plenty of timber plantations and sheep's wool to insulate them.<br /><br />A well insulated building requires minimal heating and a lot of NZ has dry well draining ground ideal for thermal storage. The light weight building can us the ground as the thermal mass by insulating the foundation edges and with wing insulation. The trick is to balance the energy demand of the house with the sites passive and active solar harvesting abilities and sizing a thermal store to blend the two.<br /><br />These homes are design to maintain a minimal internal temperature of 18 degC year round (from solar, occupied or not) and with additional spot heat when required. Most clients want a fire place in the living room any way.<br /><br />By having the 3 elements to work with (load, mass and generation) you can look for the most cost effective solution, passive house standard construction might be to expensive compared to solar panels or compacted hardfill!<br /><br />Because every site/project is different, I always push for a good simulated computer model of a design at concept stage to establish the future path.</blockquote><br /><br />Jeff's post prompted me to start this new thread. <br /><br />In the UK we are ever pushing for lower and lower u-values in floors. Clearly  insulation is needed for suspended floors. However, it seems curious to me that while the principle of using thermal mass in walls is generally acceptable it is not really taken advantage of in solid floors. I have long considered a similar method to that suggested by Jeff above, I.e. continuous cavity insulation down to formation level. It is after all acceptable above ground, and has been advocated as an alternative to conventional floor insulation in CIBSE Guide A. ' Insulation wings' could be added to minimise heat loss further. Should this type of construction be adopted in the UK? If not, why not?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>GSHP - why have I been on the phone all day ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=748</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=748</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 20:02:13 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tomlin</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[As part of my self build in the far north west of scotland, I've been seriously considering a ground source heat pump.<br />Having contacted several manufacturers I have been disappointed with the response I have received. My experience so far is that ;<br />- I get no response from flling in enquiry forms on supplier websites<br />- Telephone contact is not much better - promises of returned calls aren't honoured<br />- Suppliers happy to quote but dont have their own installers and don't or can't provide installers covering the Highlands<br />- Suppliers offer to 'train your plumber' - Im sorry but that doesn't inspire confidence (no disrespect to plumbers intended)<br /><br />If this is the response to a pre-sales enquiry, Im starting to question what level of post sales support will be available. I wonder if this is to do with geography or the fact that this is an imature technology in the UK ?<br /><br />Has anybody a good story to tell of installing GSHPs in the Scottish Highlands before I give up and go for an easy but not at all green option?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Temperate timber</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=744</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=744</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:08:22 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Danb1203</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi all,<br /><br />i've been asked to do some reasearch into temperate timber - and how it is the first choice as a material for sustainable construction within the UK.<br /><br />So I thought i'd post it on here and see if any of you lot would have any knowledege or information on this, or even a view.<br /><br />All thoughts would be helpful<br /><br />many thanks]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DPM material for under UFH - whats the alternative?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=740</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=740</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:30:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>geegee</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Firstly, can anyone explain why a damp proof membrane is necessary under a water-piped underfloor heating system? My architect is insisting it is not necessary but all other websites I have consulted on construction tecniques seem to include one as standard, above the subfloor but below the insulation surrounding the pipes. <br /><br />Secondly, whats the alternative to PVC - is there a more ecological option or is this just one of those things we just have to accept for practical reasons? And what about the material for the pipes? (oh dear, this being green can be very challenging for us novices).<br /><br />For interest, my system will be powered by biomass from locally sourced waste material, the insulation is natural compressed cork board topped by a layer of concrete (oops) and the finish either local stone or FSC-certified engineered oak board. It would seem a shame to have to use polluting plastic for the DPM, although I understand there isn't an alternative to the concrete layer over the pipes.<br /><br /> Any advice would be much appreciated.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Heat exchanger connecting vented and pressurised heating</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=747</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=747</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:24:18 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>bryand</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi<br />Han anyone tried to transfer heat from an independent vented heating system (wood stove with 34,000 btu boiler with coil plus big rad) to a closed pressurised system (wood pellet with rads and underfloor) using a heat exchanger? I am just about to get the stove and am a bit nervous!! Can anyone see a problem with such a system, so long as a stat on the stove gets the pumps in the two systems running? The heat exchanger would be placed on the return pipe back to the boiler.<br /><br />Thanks]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Off Site renewables no longer eligible for zero carbon homes</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=724</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=724</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 17:13:37 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Olly</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[An article in Building today says that offsite renewables will no longer be permitted for zero caron homes.<br /><br />http://www.building.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=3096695<br /><br />With regards to the CfSH, this only relates to energy for appliances, all energy for SAP (heating, hot water, pumps, fans etc) has always been required to be produced on site.<br /><br />The implications are that this will make code level 6 projects virtually impossible on many sites, and prohibitively expensive on most. <br /><br />I'm not sure how this will pan out, I'm currently working on a code level 6 project, and I can tell you that if we need to provide energy (electricity) for appliances on site then we're in serious trouble, there's only so much electricity you can produce on a small site, we already have lots of PV to offset the carbon from the biomass heating/hot water and MVHR, I simply don't think there will be enough roof area to produce the quantities of electricity required. Wind is simply not an option with planning, leaving biomass CHP as just about all that's left and that is simply unproven at this scale (35 units) and the load profile is also completely wrong.<br /><br />Is this simply due to concerns that the take up of zero carbon homes for stamp duty exemption will be too high?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>S I units</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=727</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=727</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 14:00:28 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I get wound up extraordinarily by the awful use made of units in general and we should be getting &quot;with it&quot;.<br /><br />In the 1970's the UK adopted 'SI'  (system international) units <br /><br />We should only talk about meters, kilograms and seconds and combinations with factors of a thousand allowable<br /><br />Thus centimeters are not SI units, meters or millimeters or kilometers are.<br /><br />Feet and inches are definitely out, as well as inches only which are more so, as are fractions of inches. <br /><br />BTU's  no way ---  Watts   (W or   kW) etc are the ones to talk in terms of<br /><br />Kilogrammes,   degrees Celsius or may be Kelvin too <br /><br />Should we clean up our act on here?  What do we think.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ground source or LPG boiler for underfloor heating?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=272</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=272</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 09:13:23 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>EdF</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I'm shortly to install underfloor heating in an outbuilding conversion which will make a 2 bedroom bungalow. The house will probably be occupied by only two people and our intention is to rent it for a few years and then move into it ourselves .. We had intended to use a ground source heat pump as we have a large field next to the property. However, I understand the heat pump will use nearly 3KW of electricity all the time it's running, but I do realise that one 'gets out' about 9KW. Underfloor heating has to be left on for long periods, days rather than hours and I fear that our energy consumption may work out more than at present. We certainly don't use 3KW of energy constantly now. My wife and I live in a large house which has LPG wet central heating with radiators, installed before we bought the place. We only have the heating on in three rooms for a couple of hours in the evening and morning in the winter, our main heat source being a large woodburner in the sitting room. As I get into my dotage, however, in about 10+ years time I don't want to have to cut 4 tons of wood a year (we live in the Highlands and are surrounded by managed woodland and there's a ready supply of firewood not suitable to go to the mill). The very high cost of a heat pump and underground loop is also a main concern, and I am concerned that we will never see a return on the extra cost and in the meantime the electricity bills may be much higher than at present. <br />I would be interested in opinions as to which way to proceed. At the moment we favour the UFH with an LPG boiler, with the possibility of changing over to a ground source heatpump in a few years time should the cost fall. I cannot afford the extra cost of electricity generation to offset mains useage. I can see UFH with a heatpump would be a boon if one has a large house to heat most of the time and one has very high heating bills, but I am sceptical about it in our case.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Heating Solution Advice Please</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=335</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=335</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 23:07:07 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>learner</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi<br />My wife and I are buying a small farmhouse that we would like to extend.  DHW and central heating for 5 radiators is currently provided by a solid fuel Rayburn Supreme which I believe is rated the same as the current 355SFW model.  Despite the info on their website, I am nonetheless suspicious that the Rayburn may struggle when the number of radiators increases to 9.  Additionally, we will not light the cooker in the Summer and an immersion heater will be expensive.  Here are 3 options that I am considering:<br /><br />1.  Add solar heating panels to help provide DHW (especially in Summer).  Add solid fuel stove in new lounge.  Accept any shortcomings in central heating.<br /><br />2.  Add solid fuel stove with boiler in lounge to help Rayburn with DHW and heating.  Use immersion heater in summer.<br /><br />3.  Add oil fired boiler to work alongside Rayburn when necessary.<br /><br />We are Rayburn virgins so any informed views would really help us to decide on the best solution.  There seems to be a huge difference in energy rating depending on whether you use wood or smokeless fuel?  Thoughts and alternative ideas gratefully received.<br /><br />Rob]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Lammas eco village refused</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=738</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=738</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 14:47:07 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Nanuls</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Bad news for Lammas, who've had their plan for an eco-village in Pembrokeshire refused by the councils planning commitee.  It was the first to be submitted under the council's new &quot;low impact development&quot;. <br /><br />http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/south_west/7034371.stm]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>experimenting with papercrete/paper adobe</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=739</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=739</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 17:48:35 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>applecheeks</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hello all,<br />       I want to build a domed room in my garden with a kind of verandah attached. Sounds posh but it won't be, I want to be hidden, comfortable and soundproofed while I am there so I can write music and practice guitar.<br />       I like the idea of papercrete and paper adobe, but as I am in Wales and we get a lot of rain, am wondering what is going to stand up best to the weather.<br />       I don't really want to use cement at all, but I am wondering how little I can get away with in a papercrete mix that would still make it weatherproof and strong. Failing that, is there another plaster of some kind that I could use, but add a weatherproofing substance to the mix? Grateful of any help you can give me.<br />       Thank you!<br />          Applecheeks]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Fixings to green oak</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=734</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=734</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:23:47 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>oiseaux</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[What sort of screws should I use to make a fixing to green oak, zinc plated seem to react in a corrosive manner. Many thanks]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Protection for under floor soffit</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=726</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=726</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 12:01:14 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>richy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Cabin in the woods project; built 200mm off ground on piles.   Under the floor joists, I have to fit a 18mm plywood soffit to give the structure stiffness and to stop vermin getting the floor void and the warmcell insulation falling out.<br /><br />Painting/treating the panels is a one shot deal, it gets done this once and then will be inaccessable for ever.........So what is the best protection?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood burning boiler radiator control valve, any suggestions</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=729</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=729</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 22:33:14 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>DIY bob</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I am looking for a 28mm radiator valve which is non-electric (bi-metalic or such like) which will open above a given temperature say at 80 degrees.<br /><br />I have a hot water store which is connected to a wood stove in parallel with a massive burn off radiator.  What I am finding is the the temperature seems to self limit at about 60 odd degrees due the radiator.  I really would like to stick extra temperature into the store to burn off first thing in the morning.<br /><br />I have had a good look on the interweb and cannot find any such valve.   Any suggestions?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Hot3000 house simulation examples</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=733</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=733</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 09:32:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>engadven</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hello<br />I've just downloaded the free Hot3000 simulation software which looks fantastic.<br />I've done a lot of computer simulation work before but never for a house.<br />Before I start I was wondering if anyone has some typical UK house models I could use, walls and climats etc. Or perhaps knows a website where the relevant data is held.<br />I'm assuming it will take a while to build the first model but others will be much easier afterwards so perhaps there might be a group of people who want to work on the first one together.<br />As I say I've not really started to use it yet so any tips would be welcome.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Can a back heater, a solar thermal system and a gas heater all be combined?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=722</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=722</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 08:47:30 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Peter_Shield</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[hi,<br />I would like advice on how to build a water heating system that can work all year round and be powered by renewables as much as possible.<br />I have an off-grid house- at the moment there is an old (and unfunctioning) gas water heater and central heating system, and a wood burning pot. The house is a south facing stone building in the South of France- loads of sunshine.<br />I don't need the central heating system- but rather than rip it out I would like to just disconnect it from the system- the next owner may not be so hardy and may want to re-connect it.<br />The thoughts that have been rattling round my brain is- can I install a solar thermal system -panels and tank, which will effectively give me all the hot water I need in the summer, and combine it with a back heater on the stove for heating in the winter? <br /><br />If I do this would it be wise to update the gas system so that in times of little overcast but warm days when niether the solar nor the wood burner is on i can feed the water over through the gas system to give me the heat I need?<br /><br />I have been told that if you pass pre heated water through a gas heater it uses less power to get the water to the desired temperature- is this true?<br /><br />Last but not least where can i find information on this?<br /><br />thanks in advance for any advice<br /><br />Pete]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Under Floor Heating and building flexibility</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=731</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=731</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 12:53:17 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Kieran</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I'm going for UFH on a screed (either limecrete or concrete with flyash content).<br />My plans are very simple at the moment - one big kitchen / dining / living room. I expect the house to change once we have moved in - perhaps expanding the kitchen and potentailly installing some new stud walls. How does UFH cope with this? Obviously you don't want to be screwing stud walls into the UFH pipes but can you cover the floor above UFH pipes? How about installing new kitchen counters, fridges etc above?  Is UFH an inherently inflexible heating system?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DBERR</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=730</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=730</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 11:19:07 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>ted</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Apparently the Department of Beer, Enjoyment and Rest and Relaxation are now only to be referred to as BERR instead of DBERR.<br /><br />Seems that they have quite quickly become fed up of being called &quot;Chris&quot;.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Accreditation for Clear Skies installers</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=719</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=719</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:42:36 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Neil K</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[We will be putting in a heat pump into the new build &amp; are looking round for suppliers &amp; installers. Having looked into the whole issue of grants I see we need to use an accredited installer to claim the money back.<br /><br /><br />All the accredited installers in the area charge more than the non-accredited ones, but I cannot actually see how this system serves the consumer.<br /><br />As far as I can see an installer needs to pay Â£1800 to be accredited. None of the money from any installation they do goes to the accrediting authority, so none of the price seems to be some sort of inspection charge to maintain their accredited status. Indeed there does not seem to be any quality check on the installations done by accredited installers before the grant payments are made. I know of atleast one installation done by an accredited installer that is defective, but there seems to be no means of getting it arbitrated upon, or accreditatio revoked.<br /><br />The Â£1800 seems to go to the BRE to help fund the low carbon buildings programme.<br /><br />I seem to be left with the impression that paying the Â£1800 gets an installer the right to be able to charge more for the installation and nothing more; well they also obviously go onto an 'favoured supplier' list, so getting more trade.<br /><br />Can someone please assure me that accreditation is more than just a case of writing out a cheque? What is the quality control process that means an accredited installer gets to keep their accreditation? Has anybody ever lost their accredited status through poor work?<br /><br />Finally: If I have mis-represented this then please say so.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>open vented wood burner</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=705</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=705</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:54:57 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>clynelish</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi <br /><br />I am hoping to fit a wood burning stove with a charging unit (laddomat 21) sending the heat to a 1500 litre accumulator, I am also going to be sending solar to this tank form an evacuated tube panel.  My plumber is worried about &quot;pump-over&quot; in the vent pipe that rises off the hot (flow) side. Has anyone got a working installation like this ? <br /><br />Thanks in anticipation]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Cavity wall insulation concerns</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=723</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=723</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:04:33 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>jivingjon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I am renovating a 1958 semi detached house and am thinking about cavity wall insulation. I have had seen so many different ideas and opions that I getting more confused. So here are some more questions to add to my confusion.<br />My main concern is created damp spots on internal walls if I go ahead with cavity wall insulation.<br /><br />My upstairs windows do not have lintels. There are however a concrete slabs across the front and back of the house which acts as window lintels and includes the outside gutter that I think goes across the cavity and becomes part of the internal wall. Firstly could these blocks be part of the inside wall? Does this become a cold bridge into the house and thus becoming a place for vapour to condense?  If this is the case is there any point in using cavity insulation?<br /><br />Secondly I am guessing that there a metal ties between the 2 walls. By introducing insulation could I increase the likelyhood of condensation created on the ties dripping on to the plastic beads of the insulation and then get carried into the internal wall? If condensation does get created on the ties won't this just rot them away?<br /><br />Any thoughts are welcome.<br /><br />jon]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Erlund House proposed</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=339</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=339</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 23:26:12 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Bluemoon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[My wife and I recently stayed in a large Erlund House, and we were very impressed with the look and feel of the building.  So much so that we are planning to sell our late-18thC stone cottage in Wales, much extended but now that the children have gone/are going, it's not the right home for us.<br /><br />I have trawled the Internet looking, largely without success,for other people who live, or have lived in one, to give their views on them.  Though it seems to be an expensive kit, as is their assembly service, the insulation standard is superb, and low running costs are important now we are getting on.  Can anyone assist?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Merton Rule Debate</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=725</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=725</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 18:26:02 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>sallyh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The UK Green Building Council invites you to the following debate on:<br /> 'Beyond Merton: local planning for cutting carbon'<br /> Speakers:<br />Philip Wolfe, Renewable Energy Association<br />Adrian Hewitt, Merton Borough Council (TBC)<br />Chris Twinn, Arup<br />Dan Labbad, Lend Lease<br /> Chair:         Paul King, Chief Executive, UK-GBC<br /> Date:         Wednesday 17 October<br /> Time:         10.00 to 11.30am (refreshments available from 9.30am) <br />Venue:       The Building Centre, Store Street, London WC1E 7BT<br />Please RSVP to: beyondmerton@mission-21.com<br />The UK-GBC is committed to facilitating dialogue between government, industry,  and other stakeholders, to achieve radical change in the sustainability of our  built environment. The 'Merton Rule' and its role in the upcoming Planning Policy Statement (PPS) on climate change has been the subject of controversy in recent weeks. The aim of this debate is to understand how we learn lessons from the practical application of Merton-style rules, and build on this to deliver maximum emissions savings from our buildings, by the most effective means.<br />For more information contact Susie Hartley<br /> T 0845 226 0803<br />M 07854 462 092]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Warmcell installer in Cornwall?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=720</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=720</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 20:49:12 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>sye</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Anyone know  of one?<br /><br />ta]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>