Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition |
![]() |
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment. PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book. |
Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Posted By: ferdinand2000They are mainly limes,
Posted By: joe90any structural engineer could design for you.
Posted By: pmusgroveThe calcs for the mass loading (don't forget snow) are easy but the wind loading is a little more difficult and it is the wind that is the critical factor. If the BCO/ MCS is going to be a stickler you need to consider this carefully as wind does funny things around buildings!
Posted By: SeretI'd be inclined to go the other way and design it assuming the maximum wind was going to act perpendicular to the panel (ie: max drag). That'd probably never happen in real life, but that's sort of the point of overengineering.
Posted By: SteamyTeaCountered by the 20 kg weight though.
Posted By: SteamyTeaCountered by the 20 kg weight though.Lift isn't necessarily upwards, just perpendicular to the relative airflow.
Posted By: pmusgroveMy calcs showed that lift certainly is the worst case especially when the panels are close to the top of a ridge roof
Posted By: pmusgroveConsider how one of those can drag a heavy boat through the water (or try and hold the sheet without a winch) and it becomes apparent how strong lift can be!And that's also the order of magnitude of wind (let alone internal buoyancy even when there's no wind) that acts on a building to create airchange, even thro tiny hairlines and pinholes. People don't generally get it, what forces airtighting efforts are up against.
Posted By: pmusgrovemean wind speeds