<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - Pentland Firth tidal turbine project given consent</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 16:57:54 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Pentland Firth tidal turbine project given consent</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11145&amp;Focus=184160#Comment_184160</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11145&amp;Focus=184160#Comment_184160</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 06:57:49 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[About time someone did it.<br />Not sure if all the units used in the report are correct, but no matter.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-24100811" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-24100811</a>]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pentland Firth tidal turbine project given consent</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11145&amp;Focus=184162#Comment_184162</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11145&amp;Focus=184162#Comment_184162</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 08:05:34 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Jonti</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[We will have to wait and see. I would have thought that Tidal could provide 100% if fully exploited not just 20% if usage were reduced through energy saving ways.<br /><br />Jonti]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pentland Firth tidal turbine project given consent</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11145&amp;Focus=184164#Comment_184164</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11145&amp;Focus=184164#Comment_184164</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 08:41:31 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Ed Davies</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote >â€¦could generate up to 1MWt of power.</blockquote>Any idea what â€œMWtâ€ is? I'd guess it's the total amount produced (i.e., nameplate power Ã— capacity factor) as the demonstration turbines seem to be 1.5 MW each.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pentland Firth tidal turbine project given consent</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11145&amp;Focus=184165#Comment_184165</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11145&amp;Focus=184165#Comment_184165</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 08:41:32 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[It is very good news<br /><br />It is silly to quote figures of how many homes they could provide power for, hopefully they will be able to provide for increasing numbers of homes.<br /><br />I would prefer to have seen the turbines with open centres and less dangerous (to marine creatures) but am dead happy to see it starting, all be it a generation too late.<br /><br />And yes tidal could provide all our energy needs.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pentland Firth tidal turbine project given consent</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11145&amp;Focus=184166#Comment_184166</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11145&amp;Focus=184166#Comment_184166</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 08:50:09 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Ed Davies</cite>Any idea what â€œMWtâ€ is?</blockquote>Usually thermal, e is electric, g gravity, c chemical.  But no standard on it.<br />Of and H is hours <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/wink.gif" alt=":wink:" title=":wink:" /><br /><br /><br /><blockquote ><cite >Posted By: tony</cite>It is silly to quote figures of how many homes they could provide power for</blockquote>They just do that to make it sound more human, if an average household uses 3 MWH/year, it is easy to imagine what what they are producing.  Trouble is we all fell asleep in our maths and physics lessons.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pentland Firth tidal turbine project given consent</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11145&amp;Focus=184191#Comment_184191</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11145&amp;Focus=184191#Comment_184191</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 16:20:35 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Seret</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: tony</cite><br />And yes tidal could provide all our energy needs.</blockquote><br /><br />Not by a long shot I'm afraid Tony. The UK needs about 400TWh of electricity per year, the technical potential for tidal stream is only about 36TWh. Actual economic potential would be lower than that.<br /><br />Good news to see bigger tidal stream plants going in though. It means they must be getting on top of some of the durability challenges.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pentland Firth tidal turbine project given consent</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11145&amp;Focus=184200#Comment_184200</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11145&amp;Focus=184200#Comment_184200</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:40:30 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>joe90</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Roll on a similar scheme for the Severn (or a barrage)]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pentland Firth tidal turbine project given consent</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11145&amp;Focus=184201#Comment_184201</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11145&amp;Focus=184201#Comment_184201</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:49:30 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[There will never be a barrage, I would like to see one but too many pressure groups, public enquiries etc will sink it<br /><br />Lagoons, yes and sooner the better]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pentland Firth tidal turbine project given consent</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11145&amp;Focus=184202#Comment_184202</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11145&amp;Focus=184202#Comment_184202</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:53:22 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: tony</cite>There will never be a barrage</blockquote>And at the rate our coalition government can make a decision on energy policy and energy infrastructure we won't get anything new. <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/devil.gif" alt=":devil:" title=":devil:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pentland Firth tidal turbine project given consent</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11145&amp;Focus=184205#Comment_184205</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11145&amp;Focus=184205#Comment_184205</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 19:07:59 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Jonti</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Posted By: SteamyTea&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Posted By: tony&lt;/cite&gt;There will never be a barrage&lt;/blockquote&gt;And at the rate our coalition government can make a decision on energy policy and energy infrastructure we won't get anything new.&lt;img title="<img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/devil.gif" alt=":devil:" title=":devil:" />" alt="<img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/devil.gif" alt=":devil:" title=":devil:" />" src="/forum114/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/devil.gif"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;<br /><br />The previous government was no better, quicker or greener and that in a time when the UK was awash with money. I will quite happily blame them for not sorting out the problem when they had the chance.<br /><br />Jonti]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pentland Firth tidal turbine project given consent</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11145&amp;Focus=184206#Comment_184206</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11145&amp;Focus=184206#Comment_184206</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 19:14:02 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Yes, they had a half baked attitude to the whole problem.<br />I think the Thatcher government was the last one that made a difference, whether you agreed with the policy of not.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>