<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - Slate Monopoly</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 14:18:29 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205510#Comment_205510</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205510#Comment_205510</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:22:12 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Triassic</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[As part of my planning approval there is a requirement for a diminishing course slate roof using local green or local blue/grey slate "local being slate mined or quarried in the National Park". <br /><br />I now find that there is only one quarry within the National Park and hence a supply monopoly. Is it right that the planners should be imposing an absolute requirement to buy Lord Soansos very expensive and monopolistic slate, what ever happen to the competition rules?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205512#Comment_205512</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205512#Comment_205512</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:31:59 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Nick Parsons</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Nah, it's actually encouraging competition! Open a slate mine! <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/bigsmile.gif" alt=":bigsmile:" title=":bigsmile:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205537#Comment_205537</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205537#Comment_205537</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 17:43:22 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>stevethefarm</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[In my experience National Park planning authorities, and their conditions, are a joke.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205556#Comment_205556</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205556#Comment_205556</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 07:31:55 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Or just put on the slate]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205560#Comment_205560</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205560#Comment_205560</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:21:23 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>CWatters</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Planning conditions can be challenged if they don't meet the rules in here...<br /><br /><a href="http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/blog/guidance/use-of-planning-conditions/application-of-the-six-tests-in-nppf-policy/" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/blog/guidance/use-of-planning-conditions/application-of-the-six-tests-in-nppf-policy/</a><br /><br />Quote: <br /><br />â€¢A condition must not be imposed unless there is a definite planning reason for it, ie it is needed to make the development acceptable in planning terms.<br /><br />â€¢If a condition is wider in scope than is necessary to achieve the desired objective it will fail the test of necessity.<br />End Quote<br /><br />You could argue that the condition is not &quot;necessary&quot; to make the application acceptable. For example I doubt the application could have been refused if you specified another slate that looked similar/identical to local slate. So requiring one sourced from within the national park would appear to fail at least one of the tests. Consider appealing the condition. <br /><br />You should also check local planning policies - is there a general policy of requiring materials to be sourced locally for other reasons? Are they valid planning reasons?<br /> <br />If you won at appeal I'm pretty sure the appeal inspector would modify the condition so that you are required to submit samples of alternative slates for approval to the planners. You can expect them to be very fussy.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205561#Comment_205561</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205561#Comment_205561</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:26:42 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>CWatters</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Oh boy...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.eryri-npa.gov.uk/visiting/hafod-eryri/new-summit-building/sourcing-materials" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.eryri-npa.gov.uk/visiting/hafod-eryri/new-summit-building/sourcing-materials</a><br /><br />"Under European law the Authority cannot insist that local people use local materials only."<br /><br />"6. The words European Law have been mentioned.  Why didnâ€™t the Authority insist that the contractor uses local stone?<br /><br />This is a complex area but I will try to explain it.  The Authority obtained independent expert legal advice. They advised the Authority that it could not under European Treaty principles specify to the contractor where he sources the building materials."<br /><br />"8. But if the Authority cannot specify where stone comes from, it could come from anywhere.<br /><br />True. The contractor has a budget for stone within his tender price and he can source from anywhere in the world. The stone for the roof, for example, is coming from Portugal...."]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205562#Comment_205562</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205562#Comment_205562</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:31:25 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>db8000</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I think the snowden example relates to European procurement rules by a public body. The principle may not be transferable here.<br />the challenge to the condition by appeal seems most sensible, if the cost and time of such challenge fits with the development timeline!.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205573#Comment_205573</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205573#Comment_205573</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:03:39 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Triassic</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: db8000</cite>if the cost and time of such challenge fits with the development timeline!</blockquote> Why must I, a simple sole, have to challenge a Public Body. Why aren't they complying with the rules? The further I'm getting into this whole self build malarkey the more I'm feeling the whole thing is a stitch up by various vested interests. I actually thought that the Government wanted more houses built and would be looking to simplify the whole process, but no!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205609#Comment_205609</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205609#Comment_205609</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 18:17:55 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: CWatters</cite>Oh boy...<br /><br />http://www.eryri-npa.gov.uk/visiting/hafod-eryri/new-summit-building/sourcing-materials<br /><br />"Under European law the Authority cannot insist that local people use local materials only."<br /></blockquote><br /><br />An earlier paragraph looks even more germane:<br /><br />"4. The use of granite for the building has caused some concern, particularly as the impression is that the National Park Authority insists that local people use local materials.  Isnâ€™t this double standards by the Authority?<br /><br />"Under European law the Authority cannot insist that local people use local materials only. The Authority encourages people to use natural materials wherever possible and preferably from local sources. In the case of roofing slate, the Authority places a condition stipulating local slate or an equivalent in terms of colour, texture and weathering characteristics. Up to the 1980s it is true that the Authority required only Welsh slate but it lost a legal case and the advice that we received from solicitors in this case is that we would be in breach of European treaty principles if we stipulated in the contract that the contractor must use local materials only."<br /><br />I think I'd certainly find a local solicitor that specializes in planning law and have a chat. <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/cry.gif" alt=":cry:" title=":cry:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205629#Comment_205629</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205629#Comment_205629</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 22:13:38 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Peter_in_Hungary</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[So I'm left wondering who in the planning dept. has a relative with shares in the local slate quarry.  <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/devil.gif" alt=":devil:" title=":devil:" /><img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/devil.gif" alt=":devil:" title=":devil:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205638#Comment_205638</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205638#Comment_205638</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 07:24:45 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Greenfish</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Peter_in_Hungary</cite>So I'm left wondering who in the planning dept. has a relative with shares in the local slate quarry.</blockquote>Quite!<br /><br />In reality no one is going to check the source of your building materials, you just need to ensure the end result looks like the local stuff. The LA do not monitor the construction process, they usually do not even check it is completed according to plan, it is down to a third party complaining.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205659#Comment_205659</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205659#Comment_205659</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 16:36:35 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>ferdinand2000</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[You could FOI them for the advice received, referencing the list, and then copy that in to a letter asking for the condition to be withdrawn.<br /><br />Or you could just ask the legal department.<br /><br />F]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205662#Comment_205662</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205662#Comment_205662</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 17:45:44 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Nick Parsons</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Do you find that with slate Monopoly the houses  and hotels last longer....?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205664#Comment_205664</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205664#Comment_205664</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 17:57:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Triassic</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Nick Parsons</cite>Do you find that with slate Monopoly the houses  and hotels last longer....?</blockquote> They do, but if you have to buy a new one they cost way more than a plastic one and there's only one supplier !]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205676#Comment_205676</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=205676#Comment_205676</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 19:02:50 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Simon Still</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Greenfish</cite><blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Peter_in_Hungary</cite>So I'm left wondering who in the planning dept. has a relative with shares in the local slate quarry.</blockquote>Quite!<br /><br />In reality no one is going to check the source of your building materials, you just need to ensure the end result looks like the local stuff. The LA do not monitor the construction process, they usually do not even check it is completed according to plan, it is down to a third party complaining.</blockquote><br /><br />This.  Don't waste your time appealing it, just do what you need to do.  Based on the advice above they'd be laughed out of court if they tried to enforce the condition. <br /><br />However,  at least get a quote for local supply.  From a green perspective not transporting slate from China is a positive and it will help keep local people in employment.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=206405#Comment_206405</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=206405#Comment_206405</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2014 07:15:42 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Triassic</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Out of interest, where do you buy your slate, local builders merchant, or on-line and which offers the best price?<br /><br /> Also is there a list of UK slate mines for those who want go buy British?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=206406#Comment_206406</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=206406#Comment_206406</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2014 07:24:35 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Bit about slate mines on the radio this morning:<br /><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04brrjl" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04brrjl</a>]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=206422#Comment_206422</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=206422#Comment_206422</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2014 16:34:08 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>aa44</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[For my build, I found that good Spanish slate was about 40% of the cost of Welsh and the spec was nearly as good.  There are lots of standards for slate, but I heard from two sources that the most stringent is the French standard.  If you can get a slate that has passed the French tests, then you ought to be OK.  From all the research that I did, I came to the impression that Chinese slate was cheap, but brittle, never mind the impact of shipping it half way round the world.<br /><br />You might find that a specialist roofing supplier is both cheaper and more knowledgeable than a builders merchant.  I'll whisper you where I got mine.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=206430#Comment_206430</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=206430#Comment_206430</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2014 19:17:06 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>borpin</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Triassic</cite>As part of my planning approval there is a requirement for a diminishing course slate roof using local green or local blue/grey slate "local being slate mined or quarried in the National Park".</blockquote>  Good job planning departments are a new thing else we would still live in mud huts with straw roofs.....]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=206437#Comment_206437</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=206437#Comment_206437</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2014 21:16:31 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: borpin</cite>we would still live in mud huts with straw roofs.....</blockquote><br />Nah! It would have to be reed roofs. Straw roofs require an organized farming community!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=206448#Comment_206448</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=206448#Comment_206448</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2014 08:17:11 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Triassic</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: borpin</cite>straw roofs</blockquote> but only if you buy straw from Lord Soananso's farm.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=206455#Comment_206455</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=206455#Comment_206455</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2014 10:09:58 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Yanntoe</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Whilst I agree that the planners seem to disregard the EU directives/regulations as it suits them (viz local occupancy), could you not use reclaimed slate?  This is  widely available eg John Barr in Ulverston ,cheaper, greener than Burlington Green (there's a pun in there somewhere) , often looks better, and will keep the planners happy?  Just a thought.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=206486#Comment_206486</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=206486#Comment_206486</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2014 16:42:38 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Triassic</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I had considered second hand slate, but having visited a number of potential suppliers I was not impressed with what was available. I also worry about quality having never used second hand slates for a whole roof. Anyone got any experience of such things?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=206498#Comment_206498</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=206498#Comment_206498</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 08:55:09 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Yanntoe</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Just had my "new" home re-roofed using reclaimed slate.<br /><br />About 50% original/reused, and 50% reclaimed.<br />Looks good - well, much much better than it did prior to the work.<br /><br />If anything the re-claimed stuff looks "new" in contrast to the original, so certainly not sub standard in any way.<br /><br />If I could post a picture I'd be happy to ......]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=206500#Comment_206500</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=206500#Comment_206500</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 09:05:08 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>snyggapa</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[We used 40% original (street facing elevation) , 40% reclaim (rear elevation) and 20% new (on a side that would be covered by PVs anyhow)<br /><br />The builder commented that the reclaims were in much better condition than the original ones that we used - and he used the best of the original bunch. <br /><br />If I remember I will try and dig out where we got them from - I have the paperwork in a drawer somewhere.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=207264#Comment_207264</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=207264#Comment_207264</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2014 20:31:34 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>snyggapa</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Just dug out the invoice - it was <a href="http://www.roofslates.com/" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.roofslates.com/</a> , we got reclaimed welsh slate. Builder was pleasantly surprised with the quality.<br /><br />-Steve]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Slate Monopoly</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=207283#Comment_207283</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12337&amp;Focus=207283#Comment_207283</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 12:19:31 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Yanntoe</cite>greener than Burlington Green (there's a pun in there somewhere)</blockquote>You mean Burlington Bertie?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>