Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




  1.  
    If you could only afford 3G for some windows would you put them upstairs or down? Heat rises to the upstairs and wind speed is likely to be higher but bedrooms don't need to be so warm as living rooms downstairs.

    Bathroom would be first choice i guess (but maybe not if you have a hole in the wall extractor fan in there).

    Sheltered or exposed? - sheltered aspect may get less wind but also less sun.

    Presumably North facing more important for 3G than south. But my house faces West (and a little bit North) with the rear facing East (and a little bit South).
    • CommentAuthorringi
    • CommentTimeNov 12th 2014
     
    Unless the current windows were very poor, I would not put in 3G until a window needed replacing.

    However if there was one window that I felt cold when sitting near it, I would consider it. 3G saves very little heat compared to most other upgrades you can do.

    Also I expect the cost of 3G to reduce a lot over the next few years, so choose between upgrade 2 windows this year, or put money in a CASH ISA and maybe upgrade 4 windows in 2 years time....
    • CommentAuthorSigaldry
    • CommentTimeNov 12th 2014
     
    Opinion only, but Northerly facing ones for 3G first I'd say.

    Triple glazing typically has a better U-window, but that usually comes with reduced light transmittance, so less solar gains.

    Replace any that are single glazed first - especially anything metal framed with no thermal spacers.

    If replacing 2G, I'd concentrate first on one's that are obviously failed, then those to your front that are more northerly which are most overshaded, then those to your front that remain, then those to the rear (southerly).

    That said, in terms of payback, replacing windows at all seems to be a slow one compared to the costs involved.

    Personally I'd try and incorporate insulated cavity closers where possible and insulate reveals while at it.
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeNov 12th 2014
     
    Posted By: ringi3G saves very little heat compared to most other upgrades you can do.
    Exactly. Plucked out of the air round numbers to get an idea: ratty old 2g, about 2.8 W/m²·K; decent but not absolutely top-notch 3g about 0.8 W/m²·K so 2 W/m²·K saving. For 4000 heating degree days that's 192 kWh/m²/year or less than £30/m²/year even if you heat with standard rate electricity. £10/m²/year if you heat with gas.
  2.  
    Currently single glazed all round so going to be upgraded anyway - unless it's really waiting a couple of years for prices to drop.
    • CommentAuthorringi
    • CommentTimeNov 12th 2014
     
    I would set your heating going on a cold day, get the temperature of each room to be the same, then starting with the rooms you use the most, find the windows that the feel the coldest when you are near them.

    The real saving with better windows, is not that they let out less heat, it is that you can feel comfortable at a lower temperature. None of the energy rating systems for buildings have a good way of taking this into account.

    To get most benefit you need to fit a heat recovery ventilation system, as cold drafts from window vents rather defeats the point.

    Also unless you are going for frame that allow thicker glazing units than normal, 3G does not give much better U value then the best 2G. So I question if 3G is worth the cost over 2G unless you are going for high end frames.
  3.  
    Thanks Ringi. Not that easy equlising temperatures in the house currently with limited heating system.
    I am thinking of a limited MVHR system, maybe a breathing window or two, although I'm struggling to think where it would go - would it be too low down underneath a window?

    2G with secondary glazing would be another option i guess.
  4.  
    I think what people are saying, and I agree with them, is that it is not worth going down the 3G route for you, period. Better to get high end 2G, and get them fitted really well (which will make a mess!). Ref now or later, it is the same as PC speed and the answer is invariably get them now not later. Spend the money you save on air tightness measures and HR (however achieved). 2 FreshR units is a lot of money! Unless you are going to reap the benefits of the lower running costs because of high end insulation and airtightness I would think again or at least have a conversation with yourself that starts: OK I have to fit HR how am I going to do it without the FreshR Unit. Ref the FreshR units, easy enough to shoot an E Mail to them asking if it can be mounted landscape (assuming it is not covered in the on-line documentation).

    I remain sceptical as to the 'game changing' nature of FreshR units, so far I see them only being used in bespoke new build PH scenarios, where they are designed in or in retrofit scenarios where there really is no other way and significant efforts are being made with airtightness coupled with all those compromises ref big gaps under doors etc.

    In short: I think you have asked the wrong question. Perhaps better would be something like: How should I prioritise the renovation of my house to improve comfort and energy saving....include in your question lots of details about your house, your plans and qualitative flavour of your budget. Otherwise it is a bit like your 20 year old son asking which Merc he should buy...would you be doing him a favour if you gave him a straight answer?
  5.  
    Fair enough, that was my hunch anyway but some people suggest that when you're paying a lot of money anyway for new windows, the extra for 3G isn't that great.

    The FreshR units don't seem that expensive compared with the ducting, installation and general complication of a full house MVHR (not to mention running costs). One in the bathroom might perhaps be sufficient in a small house which is never going to be exceptionally airtight. Or one downstairs and a cheaper through the wall MVHR unit in the bathroom.
    • CommentAuthorgravelld
    • CommentTimeNov 12th 2014
     
    Posted By: GotanewlifeRef now or later, it is the same as PC speed and the answer is invariably get them now not later.

    In isolation I agree, but, say, if the property was also requiring re-rendering soon, and that would be an opportunity for EWI, then best to hold off until the new windows can be fitted with the EWI, right? (Just a hyopthetical example).
  6.  
    Yes gravelld, you are right I was generalising without mentioning exceptions. I think a big picture post from Hapless would help because there are lots of interesting posts now for very specific issues without any sort of an overview
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeNov 12th 2014
     
    Why do you think that something approaching 90% of Central European windows made are now 3g?
    • CommentAuthorGotanewlife
    • CommentTimeNov 12th 2014 edited
     
    Posted By: tonyWhy do you think that something approaching 90% of Central European windows made are now 3g?
    I assume you are excluding the UK in that and I know for sure you are excluding italy. Even saying that I find it difficult to believe in the round.

    Why do you think hapless should spent his money on an improbable ROI and on miniscule improvements in comfort over decent 2G when his door leaks like a sieve?
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeNov 12th 2014
     
    If you are going to a job do it well, 3g cut out more noise, last longer, are more robust and last longer.

    How come they are almost standard in the countries Central Europe?
  7.  
    You're repeating yourself Tony without answering the opposing arguments. How about this then: why do you think less than 10% of windows sold in the EU are 3G?
    • CommentAuthoradwindrum
    • CommentTimeNov 13th 2014
     
    When deciding which to get triple I was advised that those with more frame to glass area should be triple as lots of heat escapes via frame...so small windows and those with long thin glazing.
    I suspect Europe probably has triple as its cheaper to upgrade than us.
    • CommentAuthorRob_14
    • CommentTimeNov 13th 2014
     
    3g is a red herring – it's U values (whole window, not centre-pane) that count. High quality 2g will thrash the lower end 3g product, which is often sold to naive customers who haven't done their homework.

    Heat loss is proportional to temperature difference, so it makes sense to fit the highest spec (lowest U value) windows to the rooms that you want to maintain at the highest temperature. Also, rooms where there is a proportionally higher area of glass.

    It is true that with 3g, lower room temperatures are more comfortable.

    However, if I was tackling our house again, I would have been far more creative about reducing the area of fenestration.
  8.  
    Circumstances are solid wall victorian house for considerable refurbishment, single glazed throughout except one pvc double in bedroom which will stay. Windows are large relative to the amount of external wall. Original sashes have already gone so no reason to keep single glazing. Walls to be insulated internally, possibly some externally at rear. Rear side-return extension with rooflights and patio doors to be added.

    Actually, I'm guessing that rooflights would be top priority if i was to bother with any 3G, and then patio doors, especially if we were to go for trendy bifolding.
    Thanks for the comments anyway. I can see 3G brings out some strong opinions!
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeNov 13th 2014 edited
     
    Without knowing the prices and U-values of the windows Hapless is considering this discussion will just go round in circles. With those numbers it'll be easy for them to see what makes sense within their budget but I really doubt it'll be a mix of 2 & 3g so I think the original question is likely to turn out to be moot.

    (Cross posted with above, by the way).
    • CommentAuthorringi
    • CommentTimeNov 13th 2014
     
    3G rooflights now seems to be much more of a standard option, they are also good for reducing the sound of rain.

    Will anyone be sitting next to the patio doors? If so comfort may be a bigger driver then saving heat.
    • CommentAuthorrhamdu
    • CommentTimeNov 13th 2014
     
    No actual experience with 3G, but if buying it I would prioritise tall windows in rooms where you spend a lot of waking hours. As ringi says, it's mainly about comfort rather than energy-saving. Tall windows cool the air progressively as it flows down them, and create the strongest and coldest draughts.
    • CommentAuthorrhamdu
    • CommentTimeNov 13th 2014
     
    Posted By: ringireducing the sound of rain.


    Oh but I love the sound of rain on a (2G) rooflight!
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press