Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition |
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment. PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book. |
Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Posted By: rhamdufuelled by cheeseburgers.I am about 500 yards from a burger outlet, should I drive to it.
Posted By: Chris P BaconI was just looking at secondhand prices of 1st. Gen Nissan Leafs the other day as there is no way I could spring for the cost of a new one. These would be cars where the batteries are owned outright not leased. But then I did a bit more research and read a bit about "range collapse" which could seriously impact the usability of the car with some owners reporting a range of less than 50 miles on older cars.
Running costs would rise considerably if the batteries are leased but the Renault Fluence seems to be coming to small money and might balance the equation out.
But if you are leasing batteries what guarantee do you have on their performance/capacity? If they start to suffer from range collapse are you entitled to swap for new?
Posted By: Rob_14the total ownership costs are very competitive when you factor in fuel cost savings.Competitive with what? An economical, similar performance car that can do around 600 miles between 'charges', or a bus full of people?
Posted By: SteamyTeaPosted By: Rob_14the total ownership costs are very competitive when you factor in fuel cost savings.Competitive with what? An economical, similar performance car that can do around 600 miles between 'charges', or a bus full of people?
I think with current and foreseeable battery technology that hybrids are probably the better bet.
Posted By: SteamyTeaI still think that the major problem they have is range anxiety and high price.
I would like to have an EV that did at the very least 500 miles, rather have 600 mile range, then I can visit family.
Take the last couple of days. Yesterday I did about 100 miles in 2 journeys, today about 50 in 5 journeys and two different vehicles.
Tomorrow I have a 300+ journey and the same the day after. So an EV is strictly out for me, a hybrid would do it nicely and probably use at least 20% less fuel. Not perfect, but an improvement.
EVs are still a long way off being viable for personal transport for anyone other than city dwellers that also have access to other vehicles.
Posted By: SteamyTea4 inches narrower than my Scenic, makes a difference on our third-world roads!
So take that 50 to 60 mile range. That would get me half way to Exeter, but take probably an hour longer, 6 hours to Bristol and I am still in the West Country.
They are just not worth considering, even for a second car. I just can't see what the fuss is about.
It is worth remembering that they are not pollution free, just that the problem is 'exported' to somewhere else.
Posted By: Rob_14Prof Dame Julia King's blogI have read her bit. It is rather bias.
Posted By: wookeyBig subject.
* No children - arguably the greenest thing you can do by a large margin.
Posted By: squirrelPosted By: wookeyBig subject.
* No children - arguably the greenest thing you can do by a large margin.
Ok I'll bite. How is that a sustainable choice? If everybody makes the same choice, mankind will be extinct within a few decades.