<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - Amber Rudd</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 16:56:48 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=225055#Comment_225055</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=225055#Comment_225055</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 17:30:17 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>ringi</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Until the planning system allows basic homes to be factory build, we will not get the cost down.<br /><br />This also can not happen until the UK housing sector stops being so "up and down", as no one will invest the capital in a mass production home factory, not know if there will be any demand for new built homes in 3 years time.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=225061#Comment_225061</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=225061#Comment_225061</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 22:31:39 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Isn't it the land value that is keeping prices high?<br /><br />The house factory near me can make 30 houses a week.  Not sure if they are.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=225074#Comment_225074</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=225074#Comment_225074</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2015 09:47:51 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Ed Davies</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I think so, though really the other way round. As you say, with limited building land available house prices are set by what the market can bear which is, in turn, set by what the lenders will lend. Building is relatively competitive (nobody makes money building in more expensive ways than others around them do) so the land prices expand to fill the difference.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=225077#Comment_225077</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=225077#Comment_225077</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2015 10:14:33 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>borpin</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Land price is not a great problem to public authorities doing the building.  Most of them have plenty of it just not the finance to do it.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=225109#Comment_225109</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=225109#Comment_225109</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2015 20:55:37 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>GarethC</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Yes, it is indeed the land price that takes up most of the 'value', but it does derive from the ultimate value of the houses that can be built on it. <br /><br />It's interesting to note the massive jump in value once planning permission is achieved (hence the incentive to tax that, as it's essentially a capital gain to the owner).<br /><br />And yes, the supply of mortgage finance is a key determinant, although, unlike incomes, it can't grow at a compound rate forever (there's a discussion). House prices fell and rose in direct relation to mortgage finance drying up, then becoming available again. <br /><br />Not sure if public authorities have the land or not, but they certainly shouldn't lack the finance. Banks love lending to public authorities as it's one of the safest counterparties you can have. Perhaps it's the inclination and/or other wherewithal. It's not technically in their remit to a great degree these days.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=225735#Comment_225735</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=225735#Comment_225735</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2015 09:37:30 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Well this seems to be Amber's first RE endorsement:<br /><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/energy/11663518/Swansea-Bay-tidal-energy-lagoon-gets-green-light-from-Amber-Rudd.html" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/energy/11663518/Swansea-Bay-tidal-energy-lagoon-gets-green-light-from-Amber-Rudd.html</a><br /><br />I wonder if they really can build it for a Â£1bn, or about 40 quid for each household if we pay for it in one go.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=225738#Comment_225738</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=225738#Comment_225738</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2015 16:02:40 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The quarry could give you a bit of meaningful employment ST! - and it could go on for decades, as the promoting co plans lots more lagoons around the UK coast.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=225739#Comment_225739</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=225739#Comment_225739</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2015 16:04:10 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Amber's other masterstroke is to promise that all her new nukes will be attractively styled, to win the public over - got the idea from the Thames Barrage apparently.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=225740#Comment_225740</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=225740#Comment_225740</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2015 16:05:12 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Are they going to put rows of wind turbines on it? If not why not, while they're at it?<br /><br />Suppose this the end for the Severn Barrage? I was looking forward to a short drive to visit Mike in Swansea, or to collect ebay stuff that says '40 miles away' (as the crow flies).]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=225886#Comment_225886</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=225886#Comment_225886</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 16:55:35 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>CWatters</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I wish they would encourage PV on the roof of new factories and warehouses, especially those on greenfield sites. A vast (1 million square feet) new distribution warehouse near Thrapston on the A14  is nearing completion and there is no sign that they plan to put PV on the roof. But never mind, about 6 miles up the road a farmer is proposing to build a new solar farm on good agricultural land adjacent a conservation area.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=225887#Comment_225887</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=225887#Comment_225887</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 17:11:17 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[That does seem barmy, though there is no harm in having both.<br /><br />I can understand that with some existing units there may not be a robust enough local electrical infrastructure, but not on a new build that size.<br /><br />Why don't you get in touch with the developers of the solar farm and ask why they are not putting it on the new warehouse?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=225995#Comment_225995</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=225995#Comment_225995</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 17:21:14 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>CWatters</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I guess I'm mostly annoyed at government policy that doesn't encourage the efficient use of land. It's hard enough finding places where renewable energy won't upset local residents and the roof of this development seems ideal - very hard to see it from the ground.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=226002#Comment_226002</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=226002#Comment_226002</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 21:17:10 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: CWatters</cite>I guess I'm mostly annoyed at government policy that doesn't encourage the efficient use of land. It's hard enough finding places where renewable energy won't upset local residents and the roof of this development seems ideal - very hard to see it from the ground.</blockquote><br /><blockquote ><cite >Posted By: SteamyTea</cite>Why don't you get in touch with the developers of the solar farm and ask why they are not putting it on the new warehouse?</blockquote><br />That seems a good start to beginning to understand whether it is indeed government policy that is at fault and if so in what way and why?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227485#Comment_227485</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227485#Comment_227485</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 07:33:06 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[So in the last week and a bit, our new energy minister has cut both wind and solar subsidies.<br /><br />I hope she does the same for nuclear, and all the 'backdoor' payments to the fossil fuel industries.<br /><br />I just had a look at what the Â£1.5bn overspend, over the next five years actually means, about Â£12 a household if you exclude all the, or about Â£4 if you exclude all the non-domestic users.<br /><br />Â£4 is the price of a pint in St.Ives.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227490#Comment_227490</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227490#Comment_227490</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 08:49:10 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>DarylP</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[... was it her I heard this morning on R4 claiming that nuclear is a 'different type of electricity'?<img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/bigsmile.gif" alt=":bigsmile:" title=":bigsmile:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227498#Comment_227498</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227498#Comment_227498</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:39:16 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>owlman</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: SteamyTea</cite>So in the last week and a bit, our new energy minister has cut both wind and solar subsidies.<br /><br />I hope she does the same for nuclear, and all the 'backdoor' payments to the fossil fuel industries.<br /><br />I just had a look at what the Â£1.5bn overspend, over the next five years actually means, about Â£12 a household if you exclude all the, or about Â£4 if you exclude all the non-domestic users.<br /><br />Â£4 is the price of a pint in St.Ives.</blockquote><br /><br /><br />I hope she does for Anaerobic Digesters too, at least the ones that are not farm scale/closed loop ones.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227500#Comment_227500</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227500#Comment_227500</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:55:07 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: DarylP</cite>'different type of electricity'?</blockquote>Yes, that made me smile too.<br /><br /><blockquote ><cite >Posted By: owlman</cite>I hope she does for Anaerobic Digesters too</blockquote>I have mixed feelings about AD.<br />It does solve a waste stream problem and generate power, but it also adds to atmospheric CO2.<br />Used on site it can be a good power supply and benefits from stored energy, if the waste is transported I am not so sure ust how good it is.  There is also the land use issues, though if farmers grows energy crops on Grade A or B land, they are probably not making best use of their assets.<br /><br />I can see the argument that, once though planning, there should not be a fixed price for the energy produced, but this does not take into account the price of not having that energy.<br />It is a bit like buying a new car when petrol is Â£1.20/lt, then only having to pay Â£1.20/lt for the next 20 years, regardless of your mileage, and get others at the gas station to pay your bill.  When you get punched on the nose and taken to hospital by someone that feels you don't deserve this special treatment, you then send the full NHS bill, and another for loss of earnings to everyone.<br /><br />I think the real problem was that the last Labour government created such a muddle of schemes dismantling then is never going to be easy.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227503#Comment_227503</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227503#Comment_227503</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:45:02 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: SteamyTea</cite>AD ... adds to atmospheric CO2</blockquote>I thought the whole point of 'anaerobic' is that it's not an oxidation process (to CO2) - produces CH4 instead?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227508#Comment_227508</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227508#Comment_227508</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 11:15:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>owlman</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: SteamyTeaIt ..................but it also adds to atmospheric CO2.<br /><br />Dunno about that ST, but it does add atmospheric ammonia.</cite></blockquote>]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227518#Comment_227518</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227518#Comment_227518</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:27:45 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: fostertom</cite>I thought the whole point of 'anaerobic' is that it's not an oxidation process (to CO2) - produces CH4 instead?</blockquote><br />Good one, Tom! What do you suppose happens to the methane?<br /><br />But seriously, it's only atmospheric oxygen that is excluded. There's still oxygen chemically bound in the feedstock and some of that gets released as CO2 anyway.<br /><br />C6H12O6 â†’ 3CO2 + 3CH4 according to wikipedia]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227521#Comment_227521</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227521#Comment_227521</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:50:29 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: djh</cite>What do you suppose happens to the methane?</blockquote>I thought the other point of 'anaerobic' is that the methane is captured as fuel - so it eventually ends up as CO2 anyway. But no more and no less that wd happen anyway to the original organic matter left to itself.<br /><br />So whether 'anaerobic' produces CO2, CH4 etc shd surely be completely immaterial to<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: SteamyTea</cite>feelings about AD</blockquote>AD doesn't<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: SteamyTea</cite>adds to atmospheric CO2</blockquote>]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227523#Comment_227523</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227523#Comment_227523</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 14:08:51 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[There seems to be a bit of a myth that all organic matter rots down to CO2.<br />Much of it goes into the ground and gets converted to carbon.  Why intensively farmed areas have low carbon content soil.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227526#Comment_227526</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227526#Comment_227526</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:28:54 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: SteamyTea</cite>Much of it goes into the ground and gets converted to carbon</blockquote>Emitting hydrogen as water? What's the mechanism?<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: SteamyTea</cite>intensively farmed areas have low carbon content soil</blockquote>because ploughing exposes the carbon to oxidation?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227531#Comment_227531</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227531#Comment_227531</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 19:47:58 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Generally it decomposes though enzymes, mechanical and some digestion by fauna.  Some methane is released, but if you think about how long it takes something to rot down when you are not deliberately composting it, you will know that it can be years. <br /><br />I believe that ploughing can released trapped CO2 from the ground, I am not sure what mechanism it is via though.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227540#Comment_227540</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227540#Comment_227540</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 22:49:41 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I'm sceptical about hydrocarbon cellulose decomposing to pure carbon - surely endothermic, so where does the input of energy come from? Why doesn't it prefer the more 'downhill' (exothermic) oxidation route (or in absence of oxygen, decomposition to methane)?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227543#Comment_227543</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227543#Comment_227543</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 23:30:44 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>ted</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ST, the Â£1.5 billion overspend of LCF is not over a 5 year period, but the figure for one year reached in 2020/21 which is in 5 years time.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227545#Comment_227545</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227545#Comment_227545</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:09:24 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>ted</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Data from OBR]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227546#Comment_227546</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227546#Comment_227546</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:22:38 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>ted</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[In that table Feed-in tariffs, Renewables obligation and Contracts for difference are the components of the Levy Control Framework (LCF).]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227549#Comment_227549</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227549#Comment_227549</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 08:21:02 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Triassic</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: ringi</cite>Until the planning system allows basic homes to be factory build, we will not get the cost down.</blockquote><br />They're called park homes, usually delivered in two halves.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amber Rudd</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227550#Comment_227550</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13356&amp;Focus=227550#Comment_227550</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 09:05:44 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Ted<br />Not got time to look into it further at the moment, are those figures, year figures or accumulative?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>