Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




    • CommentAuthorPaul_B
    • CommentTimeMar 26th 2007
     
    I have been tinking for some time if it is worth running a 12v supply around the house? So many devices now seem to use 12v for charging or low voltage lighting. I believe PV Solare Panels tend to run as 12v and then use an invertor?

    So what would be the benefits / disadvantages?

    Paul
  1.  
    Disadvantage is that you'd have to use thick wires due to the high current. A 50W 12V light needs over 4A whereas a 50W light at 240V needs only about 0.2A. If you didn't use thick wires, you'd have a potential fire hazard. Using standard 240V wiring would soon run into current problems. The benefit of running 12V would be that electric shock hazards would be greatly minimized. But I'd say the disadvantages outweigh this small advantage - particularly with the price of copper these days.

    Paul.
    • CommentAuthorPaul_B
    • CommentTimeMar 26th 2007
     
    Paul, yes I agree the higher current would mean thicker wires. However, I am thinking about the number of 12v transformers dotted around the house and the use of low voltage lighting.

    In my expereience most transformers seem to be inefficient torodal transformers. Would it be more efficient to invest in a switch mode power supply and run multiple devices from this unit? Taking on board comments about wire thickness it may be more appropriate to use a radial circuit than a ring

    Paul
  2.  
    I looked at a 12V ring a couple of years back and the wiring sizes were alarming! Star/radial was the only way to achieve what I needed, but then then the sheer mass of the cables made them difficult to route through the house. It's a shame though as the efficiency of the 12V appliances would be greatly improved with a real PSU. I'm surprised that no-one has come up with a more efficient local transformer.
  3.  
    Research has been conducted in Germany into using 48V DC wiring in houses supplied by 48v DC producing PV panels. The cross-sectional area of the wires would be 1.5sqmm which is reasonable. DC appliances are far more efficient than AC appliances meaning that while it would take 50 sqm of PV to run a typical 4 bed house on AC, it would only take 8sqm on DC (all taken from "Factor Four", Weizsacker).

    Sounds great, but no-one makes 48V DC appliances - there is no demand. If we really want to go for a decentralised energy grid and microgeneration in a big way, it would make a lot sense for Government to talk an appliance and a lighting manufacturer into making basic appliances available and then create a demand by insisting on this wiring configuration on new builds. That would be radical and would start to make decentralised energy a realistic prospect.
    • CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeMar 27th 2007
     
    48 or 50 V is an industry standard for all battery supported kit. Things like your local Vodaphone transmitter and all its input kit runs from 50V as do telephone exchanges. There are a lot of standard inverters 50V DC to 230Vac available.
    Toroidal transformers are extremely efficient at about 97% and they don't have any of those silicon based fuses in them.
    frank
  4.  
    Posted By: Chris WardleDC appliances are far more efficient than AC appliances meaning that while it would take 50 sqm of PV to run a typical 4 bed house on AC, it would only take 8sqm on DC (all taken from "Factor Four", Weizsacker).


    I don't believe this for a moment. In what sense are DC appliances more efficient?

    48V is a standard in the telecom industry because it happens to be an easy to supply voltage from large lead-acid accumulators, plus, although capable of giving a shock, is not fatal.

    Paul.
    • CommentAuthorPaul_B
    • CommentTimeMar 28th 2007
     
    In response to Guest I know that toroidal transformers can be efficient if they are made correctly. But the normal plug-in type transformer to charge phones or run various electronic equipment don't seem to be very efficient. Generating lots of heat and is this because the core doesn't contain enough iron?

    In response to Paul in Montreal; I have also thought that a DC motor is more efficent than a like for like AC monitor. Therefore, could it be that motor based appliances such as washing machine and tumble dryers are more efficicent if fed from a DC supply? I think the statement that all appliances are more run as DC maybe taking this a bit far.
  5.  
    Paul, I have no knowledge of electrical stuff (I can wire a plug and change a light bulb or a fuse but that is it). I was just quoting from a book, "Factor Four" by Ernst von Weizacker

    The reasons given in the book for the greater efficiency of DC over AC are:-

    1 reversing the magnetization 100-120 times a second in an electric motor generates a lot of heat in the iron
    2 transforming AC to DC generates a lot of heat in the transformer

    Examples they gives are:-

    1 a 20v AC water pump can be replaced by an 8v DC of equal performance
    2 computers, video recorders, fans could be 6 to 10 times more efficient
    3 refridgerators and TV sets 60 % more effcient

    My point was that if people are to be encouraged to generate DC current at the domestic level with PVs and micro-wind turbines then surely, assuming that DC appliances are more efficient, it makes sense to equip their dwellings with DC appliances rather than convert the power to AC. Even if you are running on mains 240v I imagine it would save energy to convert to 48v DC at the point the power cable enters the building, assuming appliances were made available.

    It would seem to me that a gradual conversion to DC wiring at the individual building level could bring real savings. It could be implemented in new builds and full rewires (with grants to replace appliances).
  6.  
    After a bit of googling, it seems that small motors operating under partial load are relatively inefficient, but large AC motors have efficiencies in the 90-96% range. The magnetization losses in the core are easily mitigated in the same way they are in transformers: the iron is laminated to prevent eddy currents. Transforming AC to DC does not have much loss in the transformer, it's the subsequent electronics where the losses are. AC to AC transformers also have efficiencies in the high 90s%

    Most computers don't use transformers in their power supplies so it's hard to see where efficiency improvements can come from - switching power supplies are also pretty efficient. Small fans and motors (like in the disc drive) and relatively inefficient and I guess could be improved, but to talk of a 6-10x improvement is fallacious IMHO as most of the power in a computer is dissipated in the chips themselves, not the fans and motors.

    Your example of water pumps is also mistaken since power is measured in Watts, not Volts. So it is meaningless to say a 20V AC pump could be replaced by an 8V one. From what I've read, it seems that is is easier to make small DC motors more efficient than small AC ones, but large motors are almost universally AC - mainly because they need a moving magnetic field to provide the motion which is already supplied by AC whereas has to be "commutated" in a DC motor.

    As for having a DC supply in a house, I do buy the argument that it is better to have only one AC-DC converter rather than having every device have its own converter. However, 48V DC is a much larger voltage than most electronics operate at (3V or less these days) and so some conversion is still required. DC-DC conversion is no more efficient than AC-DC conversion so it's hard to see how much gain there could be. Large appliances would still need 240V AC (as they do in North America where the supply is at 120V for small appliances) so it's hard to see how having an extra supply at 48VDC can save wire.

    Paul in Montreal
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMar 28th 2007
     
    Posted By: Paul in Montrealmeaningless to say a 20V AC pump could be replaced by an 8V one
    Surely Chris meant watts not volts?

    Posted By: Paul in MontrealLarge appliances would still need 240V AC (as they do in North America where the supply is at 120V for small appliances)
    Really? never knew that - how is that arranged? Is 240V brought to every house then transformed down to 120V?
  7.  
    Yes should have been watts not volts... I'll claim a typo there...
  8.  
    Posted By: fostertomReally? never knew that - how is that arranged? Is 240V brought to every house then transformed down to 120V?


    All houses get a dual 120V supply that comes from a centre tapped transformer. "Neutral" is the centre tap and each leg of the transformer gives a 120V circuit. The circuit breaker panels have both "legs" and it is usually arranged that 120V circuits are distributed equally over the two legs to give close to zero neutral current. 240V is given by taking both legs. I just installed a dryer yesterday and it has a four prong plug - two prongs for the 240V supply, a third "neutral" wire and a forth ground wire. Double-pole circuit breakers plug into the panel to connect to both supply legs and bring out the 240V. So we sort of get the best of both worlds - most things are run on 120V with less chance of a lethal shock, but the high load appliances can still use 240V. The downside is the that 120V circuits have to use much thicker wire than would be the case if they ran at 240V.

    Paul in Montreal.
    • CommentAuthorPaul_B
    • CommentTimeMar 28th 2007
     
    Paul in Montreal, if you were to consider PV or Wind turbines as the electrical source would it then make more sense to run at lower voltages in DC? I believe most off-grid solutions are 12v / 24v and stored in lead acide batteries. They then require an invertor to step up to mains voltage.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMar 28th 2007
     
    I haven'y yet discovered what's the difference between an invertor and a transformer?
  9.  
    Transformers can only do AC-AC conversions (and can do it with close to 100% efficiency). Invertors convert DC-AC (sometimes the other way) using high power electronics with somewhat lower efficiency (I think 70-80% is typical).

    For PV sources that are DC, then if the DC can be used directly, this is a big advantage. If mains voltage is required, invertors do cause some loss, and high power invertors are expensive.

    Paul in Montreal
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMar 28th 2007
     
    So if I wanted to transmit quite a bit of PV-generated power for some distance, for a PV application that I know you're sceptical about Paul, could a number of PVs be coupled in series, no transformers, no inverters? Or is that risking Xmas tree lights syndrome?
  10.  
    As far as I know the series connection will be OK as far as voltage is concerned but you could run into problems with current if your application is what I think it is. I really think that if you want to move heat around, you're better off doing it directly as in the Deer Lake solar community in Alberta. All that said, series connections may work, but you're right about the Christmas tree lights syndrome. At least this would avoid any conversion losses though (except for the really poor light to electricity conversion in the PV array in the first place compared to what can be extracted directly as heat).

    Paul
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMar 28th 2007
     
    Posted By: Paul in Montrealproblems with current
    Of course yes, can't pass current through a series.

    So I wonder what would be the neatest way of outputting some kW of power from a large array of PVs (yes I know it's not economic), dc, any voltage considered but the higher the better, but near-constant voltage when on, therefore presumably pulsed with variable on:off ratio to suit the variable power production?
    • CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeApr 13th 2007
     
    Dear sir or Madam,

    Thank you, for giving us the opportunity to ask questions concerning electricity. As of now, I am doing my further studies in Electronique Telecommunication.

    There is an house and an office that are being supplied electricity by using generators (gensets) 24hours/day and 7days/week; I was asked to investigate what will be required to charge batteries during the day and then at night time convert DC-AC for only 10bulbs x 100watts, a tv and a refrigerator in order to reduce the cost of keeping the gensets running 24hours. Please do advice as appropriate.

    Thank you in advance for your assistance.

    JNV.
  11.  
    Are the bulbs standard tungsten filament type? If so, changing the 100w bulbs for compact fluorescents (20W for similar illumination) would be a good start along with not leaving the TV on standby (if it has such a function) when not in use. These will both reduce your costs by cutting consumption.
    • CommentAuthorSolar bore
    • CommentTimeApr 16th 2007
     
    very interesting lads this is what I like about this forum not to technical but understandable. thanks.
    • CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeMay 11th 2007
     
    Just come accross this after posting on another thread about my fun using a small (5w) PV to power a 'charging station' (OK its a cigarette lighter socket splitter) to charge mobiles, MP3s and all the other 12V capable 'neccesities' we tend to aquire these days. I've also got a 12v ni cad charger plugged into it for all the batteries we use around the place (Civilization end with the death of the remote control) - it also pumps rainwater into into the downstairs loo.

    I've come to realise that small is best with 12v, so my next trick is to get another PV 5 - 10w and put 12v bedside and reading lamps in the bedrooms (compact flourescents, 10W each, standard bayonet connections) . I should get away with 5 amps max in any one cable , even with a couple of spurs form one room to the next

    I know adding one small PV sysyem after another isn't the most effecient way to do it, but it keeps the current down, makes for shorter cable runs and lets you handle small panels up a ladder.

    It also staggers the maintenance (the batteries don't all hit 5 years old on the same day)
  12.  
    We have been installing dual voltage systems for a number of years now.
    It is great to have the choice and resilience provided by ELV.
    In the average house there are already a plethora of ELV devices nearly all of which are plugged into micro charging transformers.
    The life cycle analysis for the myriad of these little transformers usually indicates a far greater cost than the products themselves.
    Renewable and conventional electricity distribution are complimentary and well established perhaps the best source for newcomers would be researching the marine industry.
    The ELV (Extra Low Voltage) level should not be the prime concern ie whether it is 12V, 24V, 48V unless you have high power requirements.
    Submarines and Milk floats being a good example of 48V.
    The most important data to collect is what your load profiles are (ie power and number of appliances x time used)
    We recommend doing 3 profiles for an average year (summer / Autumn & Spring / Winter).
    There are a large number of domestic low power appliances available including fridges / washing machines etc.
    The fridges are even tri input (ELV / LV / gas) and the washing machines DC motors etc.
    Our experiences are as follows:
    if using 12V distribute in a radial manner (Star) directly to appliances and seperate lighting circuits into logical groups
    Limit circuit lengths.
    Always use a different colour sheathed cable for ELV than those used in LV and run them segregated.
    Avoid daisy chaining for DC and centralise all circuit protection (fuses)
    Allways split your battery storage and for back up use a sensing battery charger (pulsed type).
    replace batteries in pairs.
    Minimise the use of incandescent lamps (halogen/tungsten etc).
    Nearly all domestic appliances convert AC to DC usually more than once.
    Standby (parasitic losses) can be fairly onerous over time.
    Use DC fans for vent and heat recovery.
    Use DC voltage converters for all those portable appliance battery chargers rather than invertors.
    If you wish to have ELV DC as the primary distribution use a 230V LV AC step down isolating transformer.
    If using renewables specifying DC pumps / heating elements can be useful way of shunting your excess supply in time of inclement weather.
    Over larger distances (or as the previous writer described) it is better to provide isolated clusters of ELV DC of smaller power.

    Saying that though if you are really keen on the subject consider one of our solutions....
    Get your laughing hats on..
    We allready have very cheap and reliable CHPs running at ELV available (LV AC mains alternators can be retrofitted also).
    It is very simple to plug them in for both heating / hot water and electricity.
    If you are going to use one anyway and are keen on biofuels it is probably the best solution allround.
    Voila...
    the motor car used as a back up domestic CHP...

    best regards and remember to fuse ALL your ELV & LV electrical circuits
    www.thamesrenewables.com
    • CommentAuthorchuckey
    • CommentTimeMay 14th 2007
     
    Eventually LEDs will be the primary source for general lighting. The problem is that they are inherently low voltage/hi current devices, varying from 100mA at 2V to 10A at 10V. At present every one needs its own ac/dc convertor, so for a £3 light the PSU costs £4 and increses the component count and hence the unreliability.
    So how about a 2Amp supply? all the bulbs are strung in series each with its own on/off switch that shorts it out when its "off". The one PSU would be electronically current stabilized and fully floating, with only an earth current detector wired to the earth.
    The advantages would be that the 20 light fittings would be smaller, cheaper and cooler. No nasty mains threading its way through ceiling voids and into plasterd in switch boxes. A very high life expectancy (>100,000 Hrs ~8years). Fully floating switch mode conversion for 400W PSUs would only cost £50 when made in quantity (like PC PSUs), houses could be fitted with a main and an automatically switched in standy if the main one failed. You may never have to change a light emitting device again!!
    Frank
  13.  
    I'm planning to build a garage on a parking space I own a couple of hundred yards down the road from my house. I'm intending to convert the back of it into a home office and will need some power for a light and to recharge my laptop.

    Do you think I could provide the power I need off a 12v car battery? Eventually I could charge it with micro-renewables but initially I'll just carry it up to the house and charge it off the mains. Assuming this is possible, what tackle would I need? The transformer for my laptop gives an output of 19.5v, 3.34A.
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press