<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - Thermal Bridge Calcs</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 19:19:53 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Thermal Bridge Calcs</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=14465&amp;Focus=245569#Comment_245569</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=14465&amp;Focus=245569#Comment_245569</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:03:54 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Daren</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Has anyone heard of <a href="http://www.htflux.com/en/" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.htflux.com/en/</a><br /><br /><br />Any comments?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Thermal Bridge Calcs</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=14465&amp;Focus=245570#Comment_245570</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=14465&amp;Focus=245570#Comment_245570</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:10:16 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA["GLASER 2d, a unique method developed by HTflux applies the well known and proven Glaser method on two-dimensional geometries."<br /><br />Hmm, the known deficiencies of the Glaser method are what things like WUFI try to overcome. So I'd be cautious about a development that applies the method, especially if the development is unique unless it is published in a peer-reviewed paper.<br /><br />No idea about its other capabilities.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Thermal Bridge Calcs</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=14465&amp;Focus=245573#Comment_245573</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=14465&amp;Focus=245573#Comment_245573</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:46:58 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Daren</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Thanks.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Thermal Bridge Calcs</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=14465&amp;Focus=245593#Comment_245593</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=14465&amp;Focus=245593#Comment_245593</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 08:09:53 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Really comes down to how well it is calibrated against the real world.  For that they are probably using a statistical model, so why not just go straight to a stats based model in the first instance.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>