Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




    •  
      CommentAuthorali.gill
    • CommentTimeMar 22nd 2008 edited
     
    Well, what do you think of that. I think the key thing to view is the timetable for introduction of this certification and to to stir things up a bit by saying that the display energy certificate software (to start oct 2008) hasnt finished being developed yet, then theres accredited schemes, trainers and trainees to find.
    One of my lecturers moonlights training domestic energy assessors and his advice was to swerve the domestic energy assessor role due to the lack of revenue suggesting £30-40 a time.
    i'd love to hear from people that paid for the training with the income promises some of the training firms were suggesting the reality is probably quite a blow, especially coupled with the diminishing number of properties coming onto the market.

    of course theres code for sustainable homes assessors to research yet!
    • CommentAuthorMike George
    • CommentTimeMar 22nd 2008 edited
     
    As you say ali, there is no money in this, especially for the knowledge and expertise that is required. I work with a guy who is writing exam material for CIBSE and you need to be able to

    1 Accurately survey the building
    2. Input the survey data into acredited software
    3. Identify and input heating and ventilation systems
    4. Output the results.
    5. Offer upgrading/remedial measures.

    Existing buildings require an EPC:

    1. Everytime there is achange of tenant
    2. Everytime they are sold
    3. Or after ten years

    Lets see them just pick these boys up of the street like they did with home energy assessors. Comes into effect April 6th? Not much time is there

    EDIT: I've just seen your list of links on the other thread - Seems like you know probably know the above already
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMar 22nd 2008
     
    Posted By: ali.gillWell, what do you think of that
    what? The govt's just done something?
    •  
      CommentAuthorDaren
    • CommentTimeMar 22nd 2008
     
    It seems rediculous to me that from April 6th we need EPC's on new completed buildings, and now we need a Code for Sustainable Homes assessment on all building reg's applications from May 1st. Its just adding extra cost to construction all the time.

    I know the CSH can have a nil certificate, but in the long term for most house builders this seems pointless. Without knowing where you are now against the standard, will probably make it harder when we are required to go to level 3 and above as mandatory.
    •  
      CommentAuthorali.gill
    • CommentTimeMar 22nd 2008 edited
     
    Sorry tom, this was supposed to be in the Energy Assessment category - hopefully keith can shift it over. it was late. 'what do you think of that' refers to the documents flagged up as resources and articles.
    'The govt's just done something?', well yeah, they've dropped us in the, er doo-dooo.

    Its a bit more than that mike as you'll see on those resources. and theres also the element of pre-assessment assessments to make improvements so the actual assessment is better - does that make sense?
    Re: CSH Theres also the element of cheats or loopholes built into the system, that developers will happily find and utilise to save money on installing low carbon heating systems.
    My big concern, as has been implied by others, is that SAP and SBEM use theoretical assumptions that have been found to be incorrect....
    http://www.leedsmet.ac.uk/as/cebe/projects/stamford/pdfs/del8execsum.pdf and http://www.leedsmet.ac.uk/as/cebe/projects/stamford/pdfs/del7coheating.pdf

    hence as i said on the other thread - a like for like comparison of hot3000 (which if Paul says is pretty damn accurate then i'm sure we've placed enough value in his posts to take his word) where was i, right a proposed comparison of hot3000 and SAP and SBEM software/calculation method.
    People are paying thousands for accreditation is using these tools and the government are only allowing approved software. Guidance is to disregard partywalls, yet i think you would struggle to find a larger thermal bridge.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeMar 22nd 2008
     
    "Guidance is to disregard party walls, yet i think you would struggle to find a larger thermal bridge."

    Pure insanity and a clear admission that there is a known problem which is not being fixed.
  1.  
    I am now considering the CIBSE training course so that I can offer EPC's for comercial buildings.

    Is anyone here doing the training? Love to hear what it is like.
    Have you had much interest regarding comissions?
    How much is the going rate? I have heard £1 - £2/m2 floor area

    Also, which software you intend to use, the ones I know of are the free [basic] SBEM one; and the very expensive TAS/IES dynamic ones
  2.  
    Wow, can no one cast any light on this? Seems like it is going to be lucrative
  3.  
    When do we have to have EPCs for commercial buildings Mike (I'm talking about small retail units)? It's not going to be lucrative for me as I'll be paying for them! Perhaps I should do the training, the fees I'll save might pay for it?
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeApr 29th 2008 edited
     
    It's really happening at last! This is where it become unignorable, and capital values and rental values become linked to each building's energy demand - a double whammy when fuel running costs will be giving the same message.
    •  
      CommentAuthorPaulT
    • CommentTimeApr 29th 2008
     
    Chris - the legal requirement came into force on 1st January 2005 (five, not a typo).

    Regarding costs - these are all notional and are not updated to current prices! So do not take the EPC's as being accurate in any way.
    •  
      CommentAuthornigel
    • CommentTimeApr 29th 2008
     
    I suspect rates for doing these will be low.

    The costs of the qualification are too low to prevent too many people offering the service and like the home epc you will probably have a job getting enough work.
  4.  
    <blockquote><cite>Posted By: PaulT</cite>Chris - the legal requirement came into force on 1st January 2005 (five, not a typo).</blockquote>

    Paul, I thought this came into force in April 2008. Have I missed something? Tas are not yet supplying their version of the software so anything which requires level 5 assessment [which requires dynamic simulation] is not yet doable, at least not with Tas.

    More here on the levels and what they mean

    http://www.cibsecertification.co.uk/consultants/how-to-become-a-cibse-energy-assessor/buildinglevels
  5.  
    Wooo there Tom! None of my tenants either current or prospective have every asked me about energy efficiency or utility costs. I'll let you know when they do.

    Paul, how come I haven't heard anything about this until recently? Maybe there is a minimum size under which it hasn't applied yet? I let my retail units through a professional agent (who is a chartered surveyor) who hasn't mentioned it either.
  6.  
    Posted By: nigelI suspect rates for doing these will be low.

    The costs of the qualification are too low to prevent too many people offering the service and like the home epc you will probably have a job getting enough work.


    Hmm, level 5 qualification costs are not cheap by my way of thinking. You first need experience with Dynamic Simulation, and by my estimation around £7k to set up including top up training and software purchase :cry:

    Maybe most buildings will be be modelled using SBEM? Though I am not sure this is going to be as simple as most seem to think.
  7.  
    Posted By: Chris WardleWhen do we have to have EPCs for commercial buildings Mike (I'm talking about small retail units)? It's not going to be lucrative for me as I'll be paying for them! Perhaps I should do the training, the fees I'll save might pay for it?


    Chris, the law according to CIBSE here http://www.cibsecertification.co.uk/clients/energy-certificates-the-law
    • CommentAuthorjon
    • CommentTimeApr 29th 2008
     
    "Wooo there Tom! None of my tenants either current or prospective have every asked me about energy efficiency or utility costs."

    Is that because the standard response of agents would have been 'we haven't a clue'

    Perhaps things will start to change with EPCs: It can, after all, add an unexpected £100+ onto a tenants's monthly bill in properties that are towards the low end of the scale
    •  
      CommentAuthorPaulT
    • CommentTimeApr 29th 2008
     
    The legal requirement cam from Europe.

    We have been braking this law since 1st Jan 2005.

    THe building regulations (April 2006) were a delyed response - It is then that the EPC's should have come into force.

    there was then another delay...

    there was then another delay...

    At the moment I am not sure what is happening; Various statements are being made but I am not prepared to spend money on accreditation until there is a very clear need.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeApr 29th 2008
     
    Posted By: Chris WardleNone of my tenants either current or prospective have every asked me about energy efficiency or utility costs. I'll let you know when they do
    Give it 12-18 months to really bite. I might even say - get out while you can - or be willing to hit the ground running - and prosper greatly by being amongst the first! When you think it through it's great - creating value and finance availability out of what we're all avid to do, and know how to, better than anyone.
    •  
      CommentAuthorPaulT
    • CommentTimeApr 29th 2008
     
    We were all geared up to do SAP and air tightness testing in 2005 ready for the regulations in April 2006....

    We are still getting people doing SAP and air tightness for the first time!

    I agree that we should push ahead and be the best, but we also need to be realistic about expectations.
  8.  
    Posted By: PaulT
    At the moment I am not sure what is happening; Various statements are being made but I am not prepared to spend money on accreditation until there is a very clear need.


    Yes, I share you worries. I have heard for example that it is currently only necessary to provide a certificate AFTER contracts have been exchanged! Given the economic concerns of the moment I wonder when this will be tightened up as originally inteneded? Ie. provision of a certificate for prospective tenants to view prior to exchange?

    I can see what you meant about the EPBD [2005] requirement now.
    • CommentAuthorMike George
    • CommentTimeApr 29th 2008 edited
     
    There is a facility to search for accredited assessors including those undergoing training] here http://www.cibsecertification.co.uk/clients/find-a-low-carbon-energy-assessor/glasgow?ordering=&searchphrase=all&limit=0

    Seems like a very rare species at the moment

    0 in Cardiff
    0 in Bristol
    4 in Glasgow
    2 in Manchester
    20 in London
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeApr 29th 2008 edited
     
    Posted By: PaulTwe should push ahead and be the best, but we also need to be realistic about expectations
    Yeah it's hard to gauge the timing for investment, because it hasn't got going yet and the shape of the trend's not clear. A management accounting colleague of mine is putting together some spreadsheets so we can go to money-minded business policymakers and buildings managers and run them through what-ifs, inputting different assumptions about fuel price rise rate, %age extra necessary to make a buildings uprate or newbuild project into a low- or zero-fuel one .... etc. They have to get their heads round the possibilty of low- or zero-fuel, the consequent rewards and conversely the penalties for inaction (which are quantifiable), before they can make their own judgements about effect on buildings capital or rental value, and the value of the business itself that owns or occupies such buildings (which are future-gazing).
  9.  
    I'll be interested to know what the assessors say about retail units given that many of the big chains leave their doors open all winter. Difficult to be energy efficient when people are go into and out all day leaving a big hole in wall. Most units have single glazed plate glass windows as well.
  10.  
    Chris, the software will factor in glazing areas with the high end versions like Tas being very accurate indeed. It remains to be seen whether the free SBEM is any better than SAP......

    As for air losses Tas can accurately model these as well, but the estimation of such losses is always going to be subjective, and I cannot imagine anyone will get much work if they consistently do modelling work which produces low scores because of this. More likely it will be the same ald same old, and an unrealistic assumption will be made by software default Sad but true
    • CommentAuthorSimonH
    • CommentTimeApr 29th 2008
     
    There was provision in the EPBD for a late start given a shortage of suitably qualified assessors. This was excusable for a year or two. There's a final drop dead date of Jan 2009 - upon which any country not having implemented the EPC for all buildings will have to pay a fines. So we leave it till 2008 for non domestic and rentals ;-)

    EPC's HAVE to be shown to PROSPECTIVE tenants. It's in something like article 7 of the EPBD. It's basically misses the whole point of the directive if you wait till after someone has signed. The whole purpose of the EPC was to influence buying/leasing behaviour. This is also common misconception in the HIPs world where the NAEA has been spreading all sorts of mistruths.And most estate agents still don't show prospective buyers the EPC despite it being written in statute. Grrrr.

    Simon
  11.  
    Mike, I'm sure there will be some way of calculating the necessary figures but I was really wondering what kind of measures are going to be recommended to improve things, e.g. do you make all retailers fit draft lobbies and keep the doors shut, or take the plate glass windows out and replace with something that doesn't lose so much heat? I've never understood why shops need to be heated since the people going into them presumably have dressed according to the weather conditions. Make the staff do the same and take the heaters out. People might not go shopping as much either which would suit me fine (as I hate it) and benefit the climate.
  12.  
    Sorry Chris I misunderstood.

    I've yet to see this, but this is my understanding from what I have heard: As well as producing the ABC label, the software will automatically produce a list of remidial measures which can be undertaken to improve the rating. It is not for the assessor to recomend solution x,y or z allthough I think it will become obvious with a little experience which will are the most effective and/or economic
  13.  
    Simon, Not sure I get you completely, Are you saying there is no truth in the rumour that EPC's do not need to be produced until post-contract?

    Or that the rumour is true, but illegal under the EPBD?
  14.  
    I have just canvased some local Letting Agents

    More rumours

    It seems they have been informed that the requirement for EPC's has been delayed until October 2008 Anyone know if this is true?

    One agent told me that he would be much more interested if I could provisde him with dodgy certificates! Oh dear
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press