Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)


Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!

powered by Surfing Waves

Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.

    • CommentAuthordicktc
    • CommentTimeSep 14th 2016
    I am looking at SAP calculations for a new build - the full printout which runs to about 30 pages. Section 10a ("Fuel costs") takes the various energy requirements such as Space Heating and Lighting, and multiplies the "Fuel kWh/year" by "Fuel price p/kWh" to arrive at a "Fuel cost £/year". So far so good. It then does a similar calculation for the energy generated by solar PV which it then nets off against the fuel costs.
    I am assuming this PV figure is based on the total predicted PV generation for the year. However why would it be multiplied by the standard price for a unit of electricity? Isn't this misleading?
    If my PV system generates electricity when I'm out all day and there is no demand, then surely that electricity will be sold back to the grid at a considerably worse unit price than the price I have to pay to buy electricity, so in reality it won't offset my energy costs in the way the SAP report suggests.
    Grateful for your comments if anyone knows about this.
    • CommentAuthorbarney
    • CommentTimeSep 14th 2016
    I'm not a SAP assessor, but I understood it to be based on a notional 50/50 split between use and export and should have the import and export cost included at the relevant values.

    I'm not sure the assumption should be sale cost equals import cost


    • CommentAuthordicktc
    • CommentTimeSep 20th 2016
    Thanks Barney. I am going to ask my SAP assessor to clarify this point with the company that provide him with the SAP Calc software.
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   

© Green Building Press