<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - celulose, will it compact over time?</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:29:59 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>celulose, will it compact over time?</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17912#Comment_17912</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17912#Comment_17912</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:46:38 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Ben</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I am putting 300mm celulose into the walls of a timber new build, Will it sag over time and cause a void under the windows and at the top of the walls or does it stay put? Any thoughts]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>celulose, will it compact over time?</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17919#Comment_17919</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17919#Comment_17919</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:15:03 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Yes, this is a known downside of the product.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>celulose, will it compact over time?</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17921#Comment_17921</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17921#Comment_17921</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:20:23 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Paul in Montreal</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I'm intrigued that your walls are 12" thick - this is more than twice the thickness of low energy housing in Canada. Sounds like a lot of extra material will be required for little benefit. If you need high insulation levels, use a better product than the cellulose and you'll save in many ways.<br /><br />Paul in Montreal.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>celulose, will it compact over time?</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17936#Comment_17936</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17936#Comment_17936</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 21:47:29 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Bluemoon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[By "cellulose" do you mean loose-fill such as Warmcell, or a blanket system.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>celulose, will it compact over time?</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17958#Comment_17958</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17958#Comment_17958</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 11:27:15 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Ben</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Warmcell. Fitted by them via the wet blown system.<br />I want breathable walls and plan to use feather edge boards on the outside with a breather membrane. Then the 300mm warmcell with unfired bricks and clay plaster on the inside. Hopefully a low carbon foot print and quite unexpensive to build?!?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>celulose, will it compact over time?</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17960#Comment_17960</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17960#Comment_17960</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 11:45:50 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[You should do a dew point analysis of  your wall construction. Also what will breathe? the rooms or only the wall? Indeed what do you understand by a breathing wall?<br /><br />It sounds good I know but in the early days these included a vapour barrier on the warm side of the insulation! now they sometimes specify less resistance all the way out through the wall so make sure your breather layer is not a bottleneck in this process.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>celulose, will it compact over time?</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17964#Comment_17964</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17964#Comment_17964</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 12:56:13 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Ed Davies</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Here's a reply from Laren Corie on the Yahoo LittleHouses group to my question about whether you let cellulose settle then top it up or something:<br /><br />"   That is not the way it is done.  The natural settling density<br />of cellulose is between 1.3 and 1.6 pound per cubic foot.  So, by<br />"Dense Packing" it into walls and cathedral ceilings, at between 3<br />and 3.75 pound per cubic foot, you can assure that any vibrations<br />will expand it rather than settle it.  It is like an over-stuffed pillow<br />that will push out its stuffing if ever opened.  Over time, it expands<br />and equalizes, into every tiny crevice in the wall. It expand instead<br />of settling.<br /><br />"  This, "Dense Pack" technique uses, on average, 2 to 2.5 times<br />as much material, so it is not without cost, but there are other very<br />important benefits to "Dense Pack"   One is that it seals against air<br />leakage, close to as well as spray foam insulations, but at a far lower<br />cost. The other is that it can absorb large amount of moisture without<br />any significant effect.    This also serves to save other materials in the<br />wall from water related damage. In tests at the University of Colorado,<br />cellulose was shown to be far more effective than fiberglass of the same <br />Rvalue (about 25% IIRC).  Also while bat insulations, like fiberglass,<br />rockwool, etc, loose as much as 50% of their 72°F rated insulation<br />value, as temperatures drop to -20°F, the Rvalue of cellulose actually<br />increase (~20% IIRC).  So, as temperatures drop, and you need<br />insulation the most, fiberglass performs worse, and cellulose performs<br />significantly better than its rated RValue.<br /><br />"   In the real world, moisture in walls is a major issue, and the fact<br />the dense pack cellulose can absorb over a cup of water, per cubic<br />foot, without even a significant change in Rvalue, make a real<br />difference, that does not get included in any of the Rvalue<br />comparison number."<br /><br />Unfortunately, I left his group early in the year when it got overrun with political comments.  Pity as there was good information there.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>celulose, will it compact over time?</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17968#Comment_17968</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17968#Comment_17968</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 17:11:01 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Albert</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Ed Davies wrote:<br />>Also while bat insulations, like fiberglass,<br />>rockwool, etc, loose as much as 50% of their 72°F rated insulation<br />>value, as temperatures drop to -20°F, the Rvalue of cellulose actually<br />i>ncrease (~20% IIRC). <br /><br />Have I been totally unobservant? I'm sure this is the first time I've ever seen a statement about R value varying with ambient temperature. Can anyone explain (in simple terms) the mechanism behind this?<br /><br />On the general topic of this thread I'd prefer to use batts or sheet material in a new build timber frame, using blown insulation only where access is a problem. Just my opinion.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>celulose, will it compact over time?</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17984#Comment_17984</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17984#Comment_17984</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 19:34:03 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Ed Davies</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[It would, perhaps, have been more accurate to say "Ed Davies quoted" than "Ed Davies wrote".<br /><br />"Have I been totally unobservant? I'm sure this is the first time I've ever seen a statement about R value varying with ambient temperature. Can anyone explain (in simple terms) the mechanism behind this?"<br /><br />It seems to be to do with convection kicking in at a certain temperature gradient.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.homeenergy.org/archive/hem.dis.anl.gov/eehem/92/920510.html" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.homeenergy.org/archive/hem.dis.anl.gov/eehem/92/920510.html</a>]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>celulose, will it compact over time?</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17986#Comment_17986</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17986#Comment_17986</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 20:43:23 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Albert</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Sorry, Ed. Old Usenet habits die hard. <br /><br />Must admit that I'm unlikely to live anywhere with outside temperatures much below zero for any signicant periods so my interest is purely academic.<br /><br />Edit: Having read it I can see the logic for the convention effect  but can't see why cellulose loose fill should actually improve with greater temperature differentials.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>celulose, will it compact over time?</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17987#Comment_17987</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17987#Comment_17987</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 21:24:13 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Ed Davies</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[No, I don't know why cellulose improves.  I think the text from Laren Corie I quoted is actually discussing dense packed cellulose rather than loose fill.  Perhaps it's to do with water vapour condensing out and being absorbed, somehow.  There's perhaps some risk of getting into the static/dynamic discussion here but any ideas, anybody?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>celulose, will it compact over time?</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17988#Comment_17988</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17988#Comment_17988</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 21:36:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>howdytom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Dare i mention multi-foil !<br />tom]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>celulose, will it compact over time?</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17989#Comment_17989</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=17989#Comment_17989</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 21:58:19 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[NO  !!!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>celulose, will it compact over time?</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=18040#Comment_18040</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=18040#Comment_18040</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 20:07:33 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>OJ</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Paul in Montreal</cite>I'm intrigued that your walls are 12" thick - this is more than twice the thickness of low energy housing in Canada. Sounds like a lot of extra material will be required for little benefit. If you need high insulation levels, use a better product than the cellulose and you'll save in many ways.<br /><br />Paul in Montreal.</blockquote><br /><br />Can you say, Paul, what a "better product" would be in this situation?<br /><br /><br /><blockquote ><cite >Posted By: tony</cite><br />It sounds good I know but in the early days these included a vapour barrier on the warm side of the insulation! now they sometimes specify less resistance all the way out through the wall so make sure your breather layer is not a bottleneck in this process.</blockquote><br /><br />Can you give an example of what you mean, Tony?  Are you saying that working to the five times rule for vapour resistance is not the best way to go in a breathing timber wall (not breathing room)?  Vapour barrier on the warm side is described in current publications i.e. 2008, not so early days.  Who are "they"?<br /><br />Many thanks, OJ]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>celulose, will it compact over time?</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=18047#Comment_18047</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=18047#Comment_18047</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 20:48:22 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I would always advocate using a vapour barrier and it seem that you are too. No way would I risk there being a problem in a wall with condensation.<br /><br />When breathing walls were first introduced they too had a vapour barrier. At the time it seemed to me to make a nonsense of the breathing bit.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>celulose, will it compact over time?</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=18049#Comment_18049</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=18049#Comment_18049</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 21:02:17 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>OJ</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Ok, I'm with you now.  Cheers.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>celulose, will it compact over time?</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=18076#Comment_18076</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=18076#Comment_18076</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:30:44 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Johan</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[There are also celulose batts available, which might be better if you're worried about the loose fill sagging. E.g. Vital, http://www.benkoski.co.uk/images06/pdfs/VITAL_Spec.pdf. Same performance as Warmcel.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>celulose, will it compact over time?</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=18094#Comment_18094</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=18094#Comment_18094</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:34:56 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Bluemoon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The Vital material looks to be just what I want for my Scandinavian wooden house project.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>celulose, will it compact over time?</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=18117#Comment_18117</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=18117#Comment_18117</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 21:55:35 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Terry</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[quick check on the website says only 600 width, no 400. Does say special dimensions to order so maybe UK importer has arranged that as it is standard rafter/joist spacing in UK?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>celulose, will it compact over time?</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=18144#Comment_18144</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=18144#Comment_18144</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 09:32:41 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Johan</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Terry, it's aimed for external walls with cc 600 studs, but as you say they'll do specials if you need it. I suspect it can become a bit expensive though...<br /><br />Flax based insulation also perform well, like this one http://www.isolina.com/gb/insulation.cfm.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>celulose, will it compact over time?</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=18150#Comment_18150</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1535&amp;Focus=18150#Comment_18150</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 11:14:10 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Bluemoon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[According to the Vital website for another language, they do make it in other sizes as standard.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>