<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:20:23 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284340#Comment_284340</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284340#Comment_284340</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 19:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>teach_glas</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hello again,<br /><br />I started a thread a few months back about timber cladding on 200mm EPS EWI with single-leaf masonry blockwork as the substrate. There were a few possible solutions raised but it means getting a bit experimental and could be difficult to get engineer to sign-off on the building.<br /><br />I am considering using a 200mm wood fiber board instead now as this provides much more stability to the fixings and simplifies the cladding design (you can fix the cladding batten with EWI fixing).  <br /><br />Only problem is now is that the projected U-value of the wall is now around 0.18 which is pretty poor considering target was 0.14.<br /><br />Advantages seem to be: sustainability, fire resistance (compared to EPS), and structural rigidity for cladding.<br /><br /><br />Not sure if this is worth compromising my overall insulation... it would be a simpler build.. maybe I could use an insulating render inside, but this messes with my 'storage heater' design!<br /><br /><br />Any thoughts would be much appreciated!<br /><br /><br /><br /><img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/smile.gif" alt=":smile:" title=":smile:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284341#Comment_284341</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284341#Comment_284341</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 19:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Not fail safe, better with nom biodegradable insulation]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284343#Comment_284343</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284343#Comment_284343</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 20:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Peter_in_Hungary</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: tony</cite>Not fail safe, better with nom biodegradable insulation</blockquote><br />+1<br /><br /><blockquote ><cite >Posted By: teach_glas</cite>I am considering using a 200mm wood fiber board instead now as this provides much more stability to the fixings and simplifies the cladding design (you can fix the cladding batten with EWI fixing).</blockquote><br />What sort of cladding are you considering - Is the cladding because wood fibre needs cladding?<br /><br />EPS can be got with fire retardant although my information to date is that EPS with the standard thin film render system is fairly fire resistant anyway and by the time the render has burnt through you have more problems than the burning EPS. Also my info at the moment that the Grenfell disaster (which has brought the fire risk of EWI into focus) was aided and abetted by the chimney effect between the cladding and the insulation (someone correct me if I am wrong on this) and there is no chimney effect with the standard EPS EWI.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284394#Comment_284394</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284394#Comment_284394</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 18:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>teach_glas</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Peter_in_Hungary</cite><br /><br />What sort of cladding are you considering - Is the cladding because wood fibre needs cladding?<br /><br />EPS can be got with fire retardant although my information to date is that EPS with the standard thin film render system is fairly fire resistant anyway and by the time the render has burnt through you have more problems than the burning EPS. Also my info at the moment that the Grenfell disaster (which has brought the fire risk of EWI into focus) was aided and abetted by the chimney effect between the cladding and the insulation (someone correct me if I am wrong on this) and there is no chimney effect with the standard EPS EWI.<br /><br /></blockquote><br /><br />No the cladding is an aesthetic choice, I'm just a bit wary of creating a tinderbox of EPS and larch cladding. <br />Thanks for the info about fire retardant EPS, didnt know about that!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284396#Comment_284396</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284396#Comment_284396</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 19:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Nick Parsons</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I would suggest a scratch coat of render before the cladding, as a fire-resistant layer.<br /><br />I do not understand how you feel  the fixing is easier with WF than EPS. No more difficult, perhaps, but why easier, do you think?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284397#Comment_284397</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284397#Comment_284397</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 19:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>teach_glas</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: tony</cite>Not fail safe, better with nom biodegradable insulation</blockquote><br /><br />I had actually read your thoughts on this before.. but is it really that susceptible? <br /><br />From what I can see its relatively dense (for insulation) wood fiber impregnated with resin and paraffin wax. The wood gets heated enough during manufacturing to dissolve the natural protein in the wood, rendering it inedible to pests..<br /><br />Are there any case-studies about this stuff degrading.. I mean, its been popular in Germany since the 1990s, you'd think we would be aware of any glaring issues by now?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284406#Comment_284406</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284406#Comment_284406</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 09:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>SimonD</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: teach_glas</cite><br /><br />I am considering using a 200mm wood fiber board instead now as this provides much more stability to the fixings and simplifies the cladding design (you can fix the cladding batten with EWI fixing).<br /><br />Only problem is now is that the projected U-value of the wall is now around 0.18 which is pretty poor considering target was 0.14.<br /><br />Advantages seem to be: sustainability, fire resistance (compared to EPS), and structural rigidity for cladding.<br /><br /><br />Any thoughts would be much appreciated!<br /><br /><br /><br /><img src="<a href="https:///newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/smile.gif" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https:///newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/smile.gif</a>" alt="<img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/smile.gif" alt=":smile:" title=":smile:" />" title="<img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/smile.gif" alt=":smile:" title=":smile:" />" ></img></blockquote><br /><br />When I went to Pavatex to get the technical designs done for my house, they took our target of 0.16 to 0.20 suggesting that the woodfibre insulation will make up for it due to better y-value. However, this could be questioned as we're talking about ewi and thus will there be a real world thermal bridge difference in a well detailed ewi installation regardless of the material? I don't have enough experience of each of these materials to make the comparison. Perhaps someone else on the forum can share their knowledge? <br /><br />I'm personally somewhat dubious about our obsession with u-value as I think it also depends on how the material behaves, not just in terms of keeping us warm, but also in terms of keeping us cooler. In this regard I think woodfibre lies ahead of eps.<br /><br />Each of these insulations will behave differently which I think is where you may benefit most in doing your research to make the decision.<br /><br />FWIW I'd take the woodfibre over EPS anyday  <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/bigsmile.gif" alt=":bigsmile:" title=":bigsmile:" /> - simply handling the two is a totally different experience. And if you're looking to clad it, then the woodfibre board can readily support this. I don't know about EPS as it's not my area of interest.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284408#Comment_284408</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284408#Comment_284408</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 10:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Nick Parsons</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[SimonD, you write, re wood-fibre, '' And if you're looking to clad it, then the woodfibre board can readily support this.'' I'm not contradicting this, just questioning. Are you saying that the cladding could be fixed *only into the W-F*? If so, that surprises me. My main use of W-F has been as IWI, not EWI, but my experience suggests that light things can be fixed, but not heavier things. Again, I go not know the likely effects of wind (direct action and suction) and how that, too, would affect the connection.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284410#Comment_284410</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284410#Comment_284410</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 11:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: SimonD</cite>if you're looking to clad it, then the woodfibre board can readily support this</blockquote>How is it different to EPS? Neither AFAIK is strong enough to 'support' cladding (other than direct render or stik-a-brik fake brickwork) i.e. to prevent long through-screws from having to take the load in bending - niether EPS nor wood fibre will support the shaft of the screw long term, and neither is uncompressible enough to support the weight by friction.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284419#Comment_284419</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284419#Comment_284419</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 15:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>teach_glas</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: fostertom</cite>hings. Again, I go not know the likely effects of wind (direct action and suction) and how that, too, would affect the</blockquote><br /><br /><blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Nick Parsons</cite>I would suggest a scratch coat of render before the cladding, as a fire-resistant layer.<br /><br />I do not understand how you feel  the fixing is easier with WF than EPS. No more difficult, perhaps, but why easier, do you think?</blockquote><br /><br /><br />I'm currently talking to Steico about this but it appears they know of fixings that are suitable to hold a batten on  200mm of insulation:<br /><br /><br />"..you can also use STEICOprotect dry L at 200mm thick with an external timber cladding system as well as long as you create a ventilated airspace behind the cladding and use a sufficiently large batten to hold the insulation in place. Fixings would need to go through the batten, through the insulation layer and at least 40-50mm into the blockwork so a significant connection. Fixing spec is generally provided by the relevant fixing manufacturer based on localised loading requirements and the density of the insulating layer which we can of course provide."<br /><br /><br />Have emailed fixing manufactures today and await reply...]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284425#Comment_284425</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284425#Comment_284425</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 18:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>SimonD</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Nick Parsons</cite>SimonD, you write, re wood-fibre, '' And if you're looking to clad it, then the woodfibre board can readily support this.'' I'm not contradicting this, just questioning. Are you saying that the cladding could be fixed *only into the W-F*? If so, that surprises me. My main use of W-F has been as IWI, not EWI, but my experience suggests that light things can be fixed, but not heavier things. Again, I go not know the likely effects of wind (direct action and suction) and how that, too, would affect the connection.</blockquote><br /><br /><br /><blockquote ><cite >Posted By: fostertom</cite><blockquote ><cite >Posted By: SimonD</cite>if you're looking to clad it, then the woodfibre board can readily support this</blockquote>How is it different to EPS? Neither AFAIK is strong enough to 'support' cladding (other than direct render or stik-a-brik fake brickwork) i.e. to prevent long through-screws from having to take the load in bending - niether EPS nor wood fibre will support the shaft of the screw long term, and neither is uncompressible enough to support the weight by friction.</blockquote><br /><br />As I said, I don't know about EPS but re the wood fibre take a look at the Pavatex ewi clad solution including for masonry walls here:<br /><br />https://www.natural-building.co.uk/system/external-wall-insulation-clad/<br /><br />It even has BBA certificate and suitable down to u-value of 0.10<br /><br />hth.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284427#Comment_284427</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284427#Comment_284427</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 19:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Nick Parsons</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I have had a quick read of that BBA cert and cannot see how the cladding fixings work with masonry, or any ref to the battens being fixed only into the WF. Have I missed something? Anyone?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284431#Comment_284431</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284431#Comment_284431</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 10:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>SimonD</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Nick Parsons</cite>I have had a quick read of that BBA cert and cannot see how the cladding fixings work with masonry, or any ref to the battens being fixed only into the WF. Have I missed something? Anyone?</blockquote><br /><br />It's all in the technical manual available for download on that page.<br /><br />the TLDR version is:<br /><br />for timber battened cladding: Basically you put on a levelling coat onto the masonry, put the board to the wall and hold them in place with a couple of wall fixings. Then you install the battens which are fixed against the woodfibre board using long screws that go right the way through into the masonry. <br /><br />I think there was a question above about screws bending under load: because the screws are in tension against the battens and woodfibre board, there isn't a bending force, I think it's actually a sheer force which is reduced due to the friction forces created by the material connections.<br /><br />hth]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284433#Comment_284433</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284433#Comment_284433</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 11:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[This would be significant if true - hope we can pursue it to a conclusion.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284436#Comment_284436</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284436#Comment_284436</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 15:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Nick Parsons</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Thanks SimonD, but that's as I have always thought - fixing *through* the WF to the  masonry, not fixing *into* the WF.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284445#Comment_284445</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284445#Comment_284445</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 18:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[How long are the fixings?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284446#Comment_284446</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284446#Comment_284446</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 19:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>SimonD</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: tony</cite>How long are the fixings?</blockquote><br /><br />IIRC the Pavatex clad system recommends 70mm embedment depth tbc by either their technical department or structural engineer depending on the substrate.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284447#Comment_284447</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284447#Comment_284447</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 19:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>teach_glas</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: SimonD</cite><br />I think there was a question above about screws bending under load: because the screws are in tension against the battens and woodfibre board, there isn't a bending force, I think it's actually a sheer force which is reduced due to the friction forces created by the material connections.<br /><br />hth</blockquote><br /><br />Steico mentioned the compressive strength of the Protect L board when discussing my cladding requirements...<br /><br /><br /><br /><blockquote ><cite >Posted By: tony</cite>How long are the fixings?</blockquote><br /><br />I will know on Monday, they are putting a proposal and quote together for me <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/bigsmile.gif" alt=":bigsmile:" title=":bigsmile:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284449#Comment_284449</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284449#Comment_284449</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 20:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: teach_glas</cite>Steico mentioned the compressive strength of the Protect L board when discussing my cladding requirements</blockquote><br />That's odd. From the data sheet for 'protect dry':<br /><br />Compression strength [kPa]  200 (H)  100 (M)  50 (L)<br /><br />so the L is the most compressible and is weaker than even standard EPS75, let alone EPS200 or EPS300. So if they were concerned about compressibility I'd have thought they would recommend H or M rather than L.<br /><br />There must be more to the story. Do let us know.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284451#Comment_284451</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=284451#Comment_284451</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 21:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Worrying about insulation being insufficiently thick.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=286594#Comment_286594</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=286594#Comment_286594</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 07:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Jonti</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[If you use vertical wooden cladding not horizontal the solves most of the load bearing issues as it will bear it's own weight.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=286595#Comment_286595</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=286595#Comment_286595</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 08:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Resting on what, at the bottom? Or do you mean hanging from the top, thus saving vertical battening, but still needs horizontal battening instead.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=286597#Comment_286597</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=286597#Comment_286597</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 09:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Jonti</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[You could hang the vertical battening from the top and also have the battening sitting at the bottom. This would work for horizontal cladding but if you added horizontal battens then vertical cladding could also sit at the bottom thus reducing the load further. A bit like build a self supporting wooden shell around the building. I have never done this with a house but I don't see why it wouldn't work. Just an idea though. Not suggesting it a good one though <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/wink.gif" alt=":wink:" title=":wink:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=286602#Comment_286602</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=286602#Comment_286602</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 10:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Jonti</cite>then vertical cladding could also sit at the bottom</blockquote><br />I used horizontal cladding because I didn't like the thought of all the boards in vertical cladding rotting at their bottom ends together because of splashback. A fortiori I wouldn't want the lower ends of vertical boards resting on anything instead of being surrounded by free air. But that's just IMHO. <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/smile.gif" alt=":smile:" title=":smile:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=286605#Comment_286605</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=286605#Comment_286605</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[What do you support it on? by definition, on a EWI'd building the cladding is well outboard of the foundation wall, tho may just perp down to the edge of the strip found. Are you going to build up a found just to suppotrt the cladding?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=286606#Comment_286606</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=286606#Comment_286606</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: fostertom</cite>What do you support it on? by definition, on a EWI'd building the cladding is well outboard of the foundation wall</blockquote><br />If you did want to do it, it would be quite possible to have a brick dwarf wall at the bottom, outside the EWI, and stand the cladding on that. Yes, it would need some sort of foundation.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=286608#Comment_286608</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=286608#Comment_286608</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Huge amount of work and cost, when suspending from above (a roof is an easily cantilevered element) is straightforward, or can be if designed for.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=286612#Comment_286612</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=286612#Comment_286612</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 18:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Jonti</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: fostertom</cite>Huge amount of work and cost, when suspending from above (a roof is an easily cantilevered element) is straightforward, or can be if designed for.</blockquote><br /><br />Then do it that way. Maybe I was over thinking it Tom <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/confused.gif" alt=":confused:" title=":confused:" /> <br /><br /><blockquote ><cite >Posted By: djh</cite><blockquote ><cite >Posted By: fostertom</cite>What do you support it on? by definition, on a EWI'd building the cladding is well outboard of the foundation wall</blockquote><br />If you did want to do it, it would be quite possible to have a brick dwarf wall at the bottom, outside the EWI, and stand the cladding on that. Yes, it would need some sort of foundation.</blockquote><br /><br />Or even a rail system needing just occasional support.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=286615#Comment_286615</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=286615#Comment_286615</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 18:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Jonti</cite>Maybe I was over thinking it Tom</blockquote>No, it needs thinking thro, because as a small detail it's surprisingly fundamental to what can be a fairly standardised approach to EWIing. Of course if rendered or brick slips finish, then no problem, but if clad then first thing to look at is a way to hang it from overhanging rafters, incl creating same if not existing. Creating an overhang may come for 'free' if you want overhanging eaves (and verge) anyway. If not, then that's a good reason to think of something other than cladding as finish.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wood fibre EWI, worth it?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=286623#Comment_286623</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16778&amp;Focus=286623#Comment_286623</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 22:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Jonti</cite>Or even a rail system needing just occasional support.</blockquote><br />I don't follow that? I'm imagining a fence rail floating in the air (supported at intervals) which seems like it would look decidely odd. So I suppose I have the wrong picture?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>