<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 17:46:31 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=286499#Comment_286499</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=286499#Comment_286499</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 12:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>WillInAberdeen</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[As we discussed up the thread, there's a localised problem in Southern England, the rest of us have more problems with sea salt than with woodsmoke. Even in Southern England, most air pollution is blown in on the wind from central Europe rather than generated locally. So it makes sense for Simon in London to be restricted, and Jonti in Scotland less so, as with the 1970s clean air laws. At more local scale, woodsmoke would be problematic where houses are close together but in our rural area we have more issues with ammonia from organic farming. If you choose to live in a city, or near a farm, you know what you will expect the air to be like!<br /><br />The Scottish government hasn't yet adopted any restrictions on dryness of wood fuel afaics, but the EcoDesign standard derives from adopted EU law, so it will apply here.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=286500#Comment_286500</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=286500#Comment_286500</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 12:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Peter_in_Hungary</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: djh</cite>Legislation can help sometimes but not everywhere, short of an outright ban.</blockquote><br />Existing legislation is not enforced properly (lack of resources and the will to enforce. e.g at http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&page=56#Item_7 ) so IMO proper enforcement of existing regs would help a lot]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=286506#Comment_286506</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=286506#Comment_286506</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Jonti</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Interesting comments in the last few posts. There are those who seem to think that all people with wood burners will be breaking the law and others who just the simple chance that something might be misused is grounds to ban them. But to take that attitude is also the road to banning everything from cars to breathing so is difficult to take seriously.<br /><br />Peter in Hungary has hit the main issue which needs solving in that governments are great at legislating but woeful at enforcing. The single biggest way in which to reduce emissions and improve air quality is through building houses that are energy efficient.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=286561#Comment_286561</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=286561#Comment_286561</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>owlman</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=286800#Comment_286800</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=286800#Comment_286800</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2021 22:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>ListysDad</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[If you read the original report, it relates specifically to 'wet' wood being burned, so the stuff being collected off the ground on Clapham Common or off garage forecourts <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/sad.gif" alt=":sad:" title=":sad:" /><br /><br />As far as I recall, it 'recommends' burning wood that's seasoned to a water content of 20% or less. They even talked of creating some kind of std / mark to daub the correct stuff with (one also suspect s a price hike for such a luxury) along with marketing to ensure Joe Pubic can understand what is appropriate.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=286806#Comment_286806</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=286806#Comment_286806</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2021 07:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>jms452</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: ListysDad</cite>If you read the original report, it relates specifically to 'wet' wood being burned</blockquote><br /><br />Do you have a reference for this statement?<br /><br />In paragraph 5 the guardian article says:<br />'... people in the study used only dry, seasoned wood.'<br /><br />https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/dec/18/wood-burners-triple-harmful-indoor-air-pollution-study-finds]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287472#Comment_287472</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287472#Comment_287472</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2021 13:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>bhommels</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Following up on this is a government report on the trends in the emission of air pollutants over the last 50 years:<br />https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/emissions-of-air-pollutants/emissions-of-air-pollutants-in-the-uk-1970-to-2018-summary<br /><br />My summary of the summary for particulate matter is that <br />1) man-made UK emissions make up about half of the total for PM2.5, and <br />2) UK emissions across all sectors are on a downward trend except for domestic solid fuel burning which is now the largest fraction, by far for PM2.5 in particular.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287473#Comment_287473</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287473#Comment_287473</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>WillInAberdeen</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Interesting report! Good to see that pm2.5 emissions are now less than 20% of the 1970s levels and still falling a little.<br /><br />But as we discussed further up the thread, most PM2.5s floating around in the air of most of the UK are not actually due to those primary manmade emmissions from the UK, such as woodburning, which are covered by that report.<br /><br />Mostly they are <br />-natural (seasalt, desert dust, volcanoes, forest fires etc)<br />- manmade outside the UK (industrial and agricultural emmissions from Europe that drift over SE England)<br />- photochemical (NOx and Ammonia emmissions that react in sunlight to make PMs)<br /><br />(Edit to add: I see this is completely lost on the Guardian environment reporters)<br /><br /><br />This report shows actual air quality measurements including all the above sources. Good news that:<br />"All [43 zones in the UK] met both limit values for annual mean concentration of PM2.5 particulate <br />matter: the Stage 1 limit value, which came into force on 1st January 2015, and the<br />indicative Stage 2 limit value which must be met by 2020.<br /><a href="https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/library/annualreport/viewonline?year=2019_issue_1#report_pdf" target="_self" rel="nofollow">https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/library/annualreport/viewonline?year=2019_issue_1#report_pdf</a><br /><br />Graphs show that pm2.5 levels are improving in all the urban areas that are reported, and all are safely within the WHO health limit.<br /><br />Overall I think that air quality in the UK is in a pretty good state, which is a good news story so doesn't get reported much in the press. However people tend to talk about air quality as a distraction from other environmental issues, such as global warming and habitat loss, which need a lot more effort.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287492#Comment_287492</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287492#Comment_287492</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[New article - <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/feb/16/home-wood-burning-biggest-cause-particle-pollution-fires" target="_self" rel="nofollow">https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/feb/16/home-wood-burning-biggest-cause-particle-pollution-fires</a><br /><br />"Wood burners also triple the level of harmful pollution particles inside homes and should be sold with a health warning, scientists warned in December"]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287493#Comment_287493</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287493#Comment_287493</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 09:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>RobL</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I bought a cheapie pm2.5 meter, and tried it in a few places.  All numbers are in ug/m^3.  The unit says that it excludes small particles and large ones, just shows the pm2.5:<br /><br />Indoor 0-2<br />Indoor making nicely browned toast 0-2<br />Wood burner gets a firing for science 0-2 indoor (dunno outdoor though)<br />Indoor making slightly blackened toast, just at the edges (not as bad as when you scrape the black off)  50<br />Indoor frying pan, oil, stirring continuously, just softening onions 10<br />Indoor frying eggy bread a lot, extractor fan on, 100-200<br />Quiet (1 car per 20 seconds) road in Cambridge 5<br />Bus/truck passing on the other side of the road 10<br />Active roadworks (cutting tool, diesel digger) 15<br /><br />It seems that anything that gets burned or looks blackened or smells a bit burnt makes the numbers shoot up.  Frying with enough oil reduces the little blackened bits and keeps the numbers much lower.  After the eggy toast experience, it took an hour to get down to normal background levels - even though we have MVHR.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287494#Comment_287494</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287494#Comment_287494</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 09:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Dominic Cooney</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Seems like eggy bread should have the health warning!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287495#Comment_287495</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287495#Comment_287495</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I do love these home-grown experiments, however approximate, to give an order-of sense of scale to tech-based issues of the day.<br /><br />Just wish we could do simple tests on air permeability of OSB, vapour permeability of EPS etc - just as it's easy to try sucking air through a material, membrane etc, using the very strong vacuum that your mouth can create, and which is easily calibrated by the height of water column it can suck up a 'drinking straw' tube.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287497#Comment_287497</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287497#Comment_287497</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>philedge</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Dominic Cooney</cite>Seems like eggy bread should have the health warning!</blockquote><br /><br />Need to keep this discovery under wraps, or we'll be looking at an outright ban on the retail sale of damp eggs and bread in a fews years time]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287501#Comment_287501</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287501#Comment_287501</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>WillInAberdeen</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Nice one Rob! <br />For context the WHO safe health limit is a daily average of 25ug/m3 and an annual average of 10ug/m3. So you can fry eggy bread continuously for a maximum of 3-6 hours a day before you should worry about your health...! But you can burn your woodburner continuously.<br /><br /><br />Tom, that was the Graun article I meant when I said " as we discussed further up the thread, most PM2.5s floating around in the air of most of the UK are not actually due to primary manmade emmissions from the UK, such as woodburning....I see this is completely lost on the Guardian environment reportersâ€<br /><br />However their real agenda may have slipped out a little! â€half of those burning [wood] were affluentâ€]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287504#Comment_287504</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287504#Comment_287504</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>LF</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Rob, great stuff.<br />what was the baseline outside ?<br />Is it gas or electric hob ?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287506#Comment_287506</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287506#Comment_287506</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 13:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>bhommels</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: WillInAberdeen</cite><br />Tom, that was the Graun article I meant when I said " as we discussed further up the thread, most PM2.5s floating around in the air of most of the UK are not actually due to primary manmade emmissions from the UK, such as woodburning....I see this is completely lost on the Guardian environment reportersâ€</blockquote><br />From the report:<br />13% sea spray.<br />about a third brought in from EU (and you can safely assume the UK "exports" a fair bit as well)<br />Half of the total is man-made in the UK. The guardian article is roughly correct.<br />Because all other sectors make serious efforts to reduce PM2.5, woodburners now are the single largest contributor, easily larger than the sea spray contribution.<br />Of course I agree that habitat destruction etc need attention, but that is not to say we should not make an effort to reduce PM2.5 from burning wood. The more research is done on the subject, the more it turns out that PM2.5 and smaller are really harmful. In that light, I can imagine sea spray having far less nasty effects than the PM2.5 from wood burning.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287507#Comment_287507</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287507#Comment_287507</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 13:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>WillInAberdeen</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Ref the picture in the fifth post of this thread (previous page)<br /><br />Edit: the interesting report Bhommels linked, links through to another interesting report <a href="https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/assets/documents/reports/cat11/1508060903_DEF-PB14161_Mitigation_of_UK_PM25.pdf" target="_self" rel="nofollow">https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/assets/documents/reports/cat11/1508060903_DEF-PB14161_Mitigation_of_UK_PM25.pdf</a><br /><br />Giving sources of PM2.5:<br />- 19% primary UK emissions (of which woodburning is bit less than half, per the Graun, so about 8%, and half of that from "affluent" people)<br />- 30% from UK NOx, ammonia, VOC,<br />- 21% non-UK<br />-15% natural dust, salt<br /><br />Further edit to say: totally agree that serious effort needed to reduce pollution wherever practical, the English ban on under-seasoned firewood will be a good step. And that it's an international problem so we should contribute to solving it with neighbours, the EcoDesign regulations will be EU wide. Together I read somewhere they reduce emissions by 80%. I do think it's unhelpful to focus blame on "somebody else" - all those "affluent" people with their woodburners - when other sources such as NOx and agricultural ammonia are more significant, and when air quality is already pretty good.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287509#Comment_287509</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287509#Comment_287509</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 14:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>RobL</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Our hob is induction.<br />Outdoors in leafy Cambridge suburbs the meter just now claims 0-2ug/m^3 pm2.5 <br />It can clearly detect a match being lit, and it doesn't like candles (Mrs RobL not happy about that)<br /><br />This is what I have by the way (temp & RH on it are useless due to selfheating, I did say it was a bit cheap):<br /><a href="https://www.banggood.com/PM2_5-Air-Quality-Monitor-Digital-Gas-Analyzer-Laser-Duty-Sensor-Air-Detector-Home-LED-Display-Temp-And-Humidity-Test-Equipment-p-1593795.html?utm_design=18&utm_email=1611019523_2324&utm_source=emarsys&utm_medium=Shipoutinform190813&utm_campaign=trigger-logistics&utm_content=leander&sc_src=email_2671705&sc_eh=980627074301d15b1&sc_llid=27252578&sc_lid=104858042&sc_uid=sEFTM2SqmW&cur_warehouse=CN" target="_self" rel="nofollow">https://www.banggood.com/PM2_5-Air-Quality-Monitor-Digital-Gas-Analyzer-Laser-Duty-Sensor-Air-Detector-Home-LED-Display-Temp-And-Humidity-Test-Equipment-p-1593795.html?utm_design=18&utm_email=1611019523_2324&utm_source=emarsys&utm_medium=Shipoutinform190813&utm_campaign=trigger-logistics&utm_content=leander&sc_src=email_2671705&sc_eh=980627074301d15b1&sc_llid=27252578&sc_lid=104858042&sc_uid=sEFTM2SqmW&cur_warehouse=CN</a>]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287514#Comment_287514</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=287514#Comment_287514</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 20:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>bxman</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Never mind what the Guardian says <br /><br />Have a look at this and write to your Democratic Representative <br /><br />Biomass. Is it killing our forests?<br /><br /><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJ_5sLWhVyI" target="_self" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJ_5sLWhVyI</a>]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=288392#Comment_288392</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=288392#Comment_288392</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 08:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>RobL</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[A few more interesting pm2.5 readings I took with our sensor (Â£30 banggood, see above for others):<br />Outdoors, slight tinge of woodsmoke 20ug/m3<br />In garage, activated carbon filtered recirc fan, soldering, thin flux cored solder 50ug/m3<br />As above, different solder, 999ug/m3<br /><br />Yes, I was shocked with that 999 result- it maxed out the display.  I have quaranteened that particular reel of solder wire, it is now for outdoor use only.  That solder is a1mm reel, although I'm sure its the particular flux in it that is the issue- it says ersin 361.   The thinner reel i have for SMT is much lower pm2.5, with no obvious downsides, it is Sn/Pb too, and says Rosin activated flux.   <br />In general soldering should be done window open!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=288394#Comment_288394</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=288394#Comment_288394</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 11:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>jms452</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: fostertom</cite>I do love these home-grown experiments, however approximate, to give an order-of sense of scale to tech-based issues of the day.<br /><br />Just wish we could do simple tests on air permeability of OSB, vapour permeability of EPS etc - just as it's easy to try sucking air through a material, membrane etc, using the very strong vacuum that your mouth can create, and which is easily calibrated by the height of water column it can suck up a 'drinking straw' tube.</blockquote><br /><br />you could measure eps vapour permeability fairly easily Tom:<br /><br />glass fish tank with a cm of water in the bottom.<br />sheet of EPS over the top (thinner is better for the measurement).<br />mechanically clamp it into the fish tank rim then PU air tightness foam around the join.<br />keep somewhere vaguely stable in terms of temperature and RH (i.e. inside) and note down average temp & RH<br />weight it every day until you have a low uncertainty best fit line.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=288398#Comment_288398</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=288398#Comment_288398</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Sounds good. In fact invaluable!<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: jms452</cite>keep somewhere vaguely stable in terms of temperature and RH (i.e. inside) and note down average temp & RH</blockquote>You mean note down temp and RH both inside and outside the tank, thus the difference (gradient across the EPS)? And what - compare that with daily loss  of weight of tank (i.e rate of water evaporated out)?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=288405#Comment_288405</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=288405#Comment_288405</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>jms452</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[if you have a decent surface area of water in the tank the internal conditions will essentially be at 100% pretty quickly. You can also assume the air in the tank is the same temperature as the air out outside (in the steady state) so it's mainly recording the temp and humidity outside the tank (i.e. in our house it would be 19C 50% pretty much all the time).<br /><br /><blockquote ><cite >Posted By: fostertom</cite>compare that with daily loss of weight of tank (i.e rate of water evaporated out)?</blockquote><br /><br />mass loss (per unit time) combined with sheet area, sheet thickness and the differential driving conc can be used to calculate the vapour permeability.<br /><br />The basic calc is very similar to heat loss (i.e. linear diffusion).]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=288406#Comment_288406</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=288406#Comment_288406</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 18:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>jms452</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Basically a noddy version of this:<br /><br />http://en.labthink.com/en-us/literatures/an-outline-of-standard-for-cup-method-water-vapor-permeability-testing.html]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=288415#Comment_288415</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=288415#Comment_288415</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: jms452</cite>the internal conditions will essentially be at 100% pretty quickly. You can also assume the air in the tank is the same temperature as the air out outside</blockquote>Neat]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=288424#Comment_288424</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=288424#Comment_288424</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2021 13:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>WillInAberdeen</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[That's the way to get a good numerical answer<br /><br />You might just prefer to have two (or more) fishtanks, with EPS on one and another material on the other - woodfibre, mineral wool, breather membrane, etc. Don't bother logging data, just check after a week which one has lost its mass of water, a) at all, b) the fastest. <br /><br />Use buckets if you have no fishtank.<br /><br />Post us a picture of your experiment!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=288427#Comment_288427</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=288427#Comment_288427</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>jms452</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[on contemplation I think Pyrex kitchen bowl is probably most reusable and least likely to leak]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=298565#Comment_298565</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=298565#Comment_298565</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 21:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Oxford have just come out urging residents not to burn wood as they emit harmful polluting particulates]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=298570#Comment_298570</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=298570#Comment_298570</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 00:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: tony</cite>Oxford have just come out urging residents not to burn wood as they emit harmful polluting particulates</blockquote>Good for them. There's lots of obvious stuff like that that would be so easy to do.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guardian item on wood burning stoves</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=298574#Comment_298574</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16867&amp;Focus=298574#Comment_298574</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 09:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>WillInAberdeen</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Interested that this is a campaign with the Canal and River trust. People who live aboard canal boats have few cheap alternatives for heating, either diesel or bottled LPG, and not so much storage for seasoning firewood, so it must be tempting to burn firewood from the riverbanks.<br /><br />Was slightly alarmed that they "aim to highlight particulates .... including the use of gas heating and cookers as well as solid fuel stoves".  I've never really thought about particulates from gas heating, but I suppose there must be some. Domestic boilers and cookers don't have any exhaust treatment.<br /><br />As previously, they are focusing on those particulates which are already in particle form at the moment they are emitted. Most particulates actually start out as gases (NOx SOx and ammonia, from exhausts and agriculture) which get turned into particles by sunlight.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>