Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMay 7th 2008
     
    Here's the zero-energy blurb from the drawings of a current Planning Application. It's an ambitious extension and uprate of a 1985 bungalow, including a 10.5m x 8m x 3m high room with roll-away glass on two sides. The site is a SW slope with full sun exposure from dawn to sunset, on the edge of a Devon village, facing open country. The building has empty cavities and no underfloor insulation - ideal for AGS inter-seasonal subsoil heat storage!
    -------------
    A Zero-Fuel project in Mid Devon

    A pioneering demonstration that will attract much publicity.

    Techniques that could take most of UK's building stock 'off-grid' for heating ventilating and cooling - houses, flats, offices, factories .....

    This 1980s bungalow is ideal for uprating by the AGS approach.
    AGS is ANNUALISED GEO-SOLAR - download www.greenershelter.org/TokyoPaper.pdf for a simple explanation of the principles and how it's done.

    AGS buildings collect plentiful summer sun heat and store it in several metres of dry subsoil below and around the building - enough, when retrieved, to provide the entire winter's heating. Zero bought-in heating fuel is needed, therefore zero Carbon dioxide is produced.

    Other inter-seasonal heat storage methods are expensive, hi-tech and yet struggle to retain a full winter's worth of heat, and so require fuel from Jan/Feb on.

    AGS (Annualised Geo-Solar) subsoil storage easily retains the full winter's heat requirement, by low-tech, near-passive means. As a gentle, steady process, an AGS building takes 2 or 3 years to fully charge its subsoil with stored heat; thereafter performance improves year on year. Subsoil effectively provides its own heat-retaining insulation around the storage zone.

    AGS collects summer sun heat by a variety of means, as suits the individual building. There may be solar panels, but principally the building itself collects sun heat through big windows, and is arranged to conduct that heat away to subsoil storage, so avoiding the usual overheating. Consequently AGS buildings often have large windows, by current standards - but nevertheless use zero fuel and produce zero Carbon dioxide.

    AGS buildings are insulated and airtight to the highest standard, well beyond current Building Regulations requirements.

    The technical details are being fine-tuned by computer simulation, using EDSL Tas dynamic thermal modelling software - visit www.edsl.zenwebhosting.com.
    Its performance will be verified by simulating its summer sun heat intake and its winter heat losses through the course of years of actual weather data.
    ----------------------------------------

    As we move into that fine-tuning, and working drawings, I shall no doubt be putting many questions and requests for advice, insights and expertise to this forum. I'll appreciate all feedback.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeMay 7th 2008
     
    How will you stop all the indoor heat going back out through the huge windows in the winter?
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMay 7th 2008
     
    Heavy curtains etc, but not really relying on that. Triple glazed. The point of storing your own private supply of CO2-free heat, is that there's no particular limit to how much you can collect and store, so you can afford to 'waste' a bit where there's good reason to, while conserving to highest standard elsewhere. It's a free and easy alternative to mean little minimise- everything and save-everything Passivhaus! Ideal for e.g. hotels. Obviously a balancing act, between practicable summer collector area (windows and panels) and winter loss (windows) area.
  1.  
    Outstanding fostertom!

    It is good to see the plain logic of AGS, how can they argue with computer with simulation?

    Tony, don't forget high standard glazing are one way valve to a house they give a large net energy gain every year!
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMay 8th 2008
     
    Thankee kindly Jeff
  2.  
    Posted By: Jeff Norton (NZ)Outstanding fostertom!

    It is good to see the plain logic of AGS, how can they argue with computer with simulation?


    Hopefully they won't be able to- as Tom says this is a pioneering design in the UK- watch this space!
    • CommentAuthorBenj
    • CommentTimeMay 19th 2008
     
    Wouldn't it depend on the water table ? how would you guard against saturated ground taking all the heat away ?
  3.  
    Hi Benj, we are working on a method which will overcome that - but commercially sensitive at the moment.
    • CommentAuthorstephendv
    • CommentTimeMay 19th 2008
     
    Posted By: fostertom
    AGS (Annualised Geo-Solar) subsoil storage easily retains the full winter's heat requirement, by low-tech, near-passive means. As a gentle, steady process, an AGS building takes 2 or 3 years to fully charge its subsoil with stored heat; thereafter performance improves year on year. Subsoil effectively provides its own heat-retaining insulation around the storage zone.

    Doesn't storing the heat year round present overheating problems during the summer? I could understand that AGS would work fine in both summer and winter if the heat storage was precisely at opposite phase to the seasons - store the heat in summer and wait for it to arrive at the building in winter. And don't store anything in winter so that you don't have heat arriving in summer. But this seems to suggest that the heat will be stored year round?

    Posted By: fostertom
    AGS collects summer sun heat by a variety of means, as suits the individual building. There may be solar panels, but principally the building itself collects sun heat through big windows, and is arranged to conduct that heat away to subsoil storage, so avoiding the usual overheating.

    Letting the summer sun into the building in summer seems counterintuitive. Surely using a solar collector would be better?
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMay 19th 2008 edited
     
    Posted By: stephendvI could understand that AGS would work fine in both summer and winter if the heat storage was precisely at opposite phase to the seasons - store the heat in summer and wait for it to arrive at the building in winter
    Correct
    Posted By: stephendvthis seems to suggest that the heat will be stored year round
    Correct
    Posted By: stephendvLetting the summer sun into the building in summer seems counterintuitive
    Any E/S/W facing 2G or 3G window that isn't shaded by surrounding obstructions, or by the building itself, is a year-round nett heat gainer - so bigger windows the better, it would seem. Problem has always been that the gain's in the summer, when you don't want it, and the loss is in the winter, when there's little gain available. The equation has only really been useful in Spring and Autumn, when there's some solar gain potential plus some loss, both alternating within a small timeframe, within the building's time-capacity to store heat. The worthwhile effect has been to knock say a month off both ends of the fuelled heating season - but has not helped at all in either high summer or deep winter. AGS (or whatever we call its further evolution, currently under development) gets round this frustrating conundrum, by capturing summer solar heat as it lands on the interior surfaces of the rooms that have the windows that the sun's pouring through, taking it away to storage as it arrives, thus preventing over-heat buildup in the rooms. That heat, 'injected' into the subsoil at a calculated depth and/or distance away, then migrates slowly back to the surface (the bit of the surface that we call 'floorslab') at a calculated rate, just in time for winter.
    Posted By: stephendvSurely using a solar collector would be better?
    That either as well as, or instead of, or not at all - the toolkit varies depending on the individual building.
    • CommentAuthorTerry
    • CommentTimeMay 20th 2008
     
    mmmm......
    so how is it 'taken away to storage as it arrives' and 'injected' ???

    I can see that the calculated depth etc will hopefully avoid the heat escaping at night in the summer, but will this not involve a lot of digging or drilling to get it down there. You are also then reliant on getting the calcs right to get the timing right with no control at all. Would it not be simpler to store it under subfloor insulation closer to the surface and then control the release as it is needed ????
    • CommentAuthorMike George
    • CommentTimeMay 20th 2008 edited
     
    Posted By: Terrymmmm......
    so how is it 'taken away to storage as it arrives' and 'injected' ???


    Hi Terry, This can be done by various means, and is part of what is new and different about method- will hopefully reveal all soon.

    Calcs will be done using Dynamic Simulation Software
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMay 20th 2008 edited
     
    Posted By: TerryWould it not be simpler to store it under subfloor insulation closer to the surface and then control the release as it is needed ????
    That is one of the options, but an unnecessarily crude one, which misses out on opportunities for neater performance. It's akin to the 'big tank of water' approach to storage (except the tank's full of soil) which has so far proved expensive, leaky of stored heat, and requiring lots of plumbing, valves, pumps etc and fuel to run same. It's possible to minimise the latter, get semi-passive operation, and possibly even a nett surplus of captured heat, if only there was an easy way to turn that into electricity to sell back to the grid!
    • CommentAuthorBenj
    • CommentTimeMay 20th 2008
     
    Why is this particular building ideal for AGS? Surely making it airtight/super insulated would be more expensive than demolishing and starting from scratch ..........
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMay 20th 2008
     
    Posted By: Benjmaking it airtight/super insulated
    Not difficult!
    Posted By: BenjWhy is this particular building ideal for AGS?
    Orientation, sun exposure, garden space around, 1985 bungallow so straightforward modernish construction in good condition, built just at the last moment before under slab insulation and cavity fill came in, well drained non-clay deep subsoil.
    • CommentAuthorBenj
    • CommentTimeMay 20th 2008
     
    Sounds very site specific indeed. Is it really going to be relevant to most of the UK's building stock ?
    • CommentAuthorStuartB
    • CommentTimeMay 20th 2008
     
    Sounds great fostertom. A couple of questions.

    1. Doesn't the ground/subsoil around the house for a a good few metres need to be kept bone dry to store the heat effectively? Will this involve large amounts excavation/moving outbuildings/paths etc and laying some kind of waterproof membrane?

    2. What do the internal surfaces need be to collect and transfer the heat for storage? Will wood suffice?

    3. Sounds very similar to PAHS, is this the same thing?
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMay 20th 2008 edited
     
    Posted By: BenjSounds very site specific indeed. Is it really going to be relevant to most of the UK's building stock ?
    Just makes it easy this time - techniques and products will make it very widely - might say universally - applicable, in different forms. It's just a principle, an understanding - many ways it could be applied.

    Posted By: StuartBDoesn't the ground/subsoil around the house for a a good few metres need to be kept bone dry to store the heat effectively?
    To handle this at minimum cost and disturbance is key, which we're working on now - very interesting.
    Posted By: StuartBWhat do the internal surfaces need be to collect and transfer the heat for storage?
    Ditto
    Posted By: StuartBSounds very similar to PAHS, is this the same thing?
    PAS evolved out of PAHS and it looks like we're evolving it further. Unfortunately can't get any response or contact out of the PAHS or AGS guys, other than what's freely published. Anyone know why, know them, or know how to approach?
    • CommentAuthorchuckey
    • CommentTimeMay 20th 2008
     
    I have been cogitating on something very similar. This is an extension of solar heating. You have bought the panel, pump,controller, double coil DHW tank and hot storage tank. Its August and the whole system now has to dump heat cos' all the stores are up to temperature.
    What I was thinking about was to bore 4" diam holes from 1m out from the house walls pointing inwards so at a depth of say 7m they are terminate 2m inside the houses foundations. Now you install a concentric water pipe. 4" outer copper pipe then a 3" plastic pipe with a 22mm plastic pipe inside that, filling this gap with foam. The 4" pipe has its end sealed and is stuffed into your bored hole. Pumping the excess hot water down the centre pipe to the bottom of the hole, the water returning via the gap between the 4" Cu and 3" plastic pipe. Now your excess hot water is warming the soil under your house.
    The reason for using pumped water is that the warm subsoil will not loose heat directly back into space if the water is turned off.
    The meditteraneum church effect, causes the suns heat to be conducted into the ground during the day but also allows the heat to escape at night.
    The marginal cost of my system over a solar water heating set up, would be boring the hole, bit of specialized pipe and an extra panel, say £4k. The outcome would be zero heating bills. Sounds a better deal then GSHP.
    Any comments?
    Frank
    • CommentAuthorjoe.e
    • CommentTimeMay 20th 2008
     
    Fostertom, would a system like this be viable in an area with lots of huge stones quite close to the surface? Otherwise it's fairly well drained soil. I've had vaguely encouraging noises about a grant for a building I'm planning, so things have moved forward a tiny fraction towards doing a proper job on it rather than having to cut every corner.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMay 20th 2008
     
    chuckey, you've dead-heated with us on the concentric idea! but why such high spec? 4" copper?!! plastic outer and inner, no 3rd item, no insulation might not make such good thermal contact, but let the water loop round a few times .... Would you blanket the ground for a distance around with insulation, to prevent the heat shortcutting up to the outdoor ground surface? How would you go about boring multiple holes? What do you mean by
    Posted By: chuckeyThe reason for using pumped water is that the warm subsoil will not loose heat directly back into space if the water is turned off.
    What's
    Posted By: chuckeyThe meditteraneum church effect, causes the suns heat to be conducted into the ground during the day but also allows the heat to escape at night.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMay 20th 2008 edited
     
    Posted By: joe.ewould a system like this be viable in an area with lots of huge stones quite close to the surface?
    Hm, depends how you're going to put your heat into the ground - buried air or water pipes or what? How huge? Shouldn't deter a big excavator. Dense 'plums' like that should increase your soil's volume-based specific heat capacity (how much heat the soil can store per unit volume) - but not all that much, because higher density generally results in lower mass-based specific heat capacity (how much heat the soil can store per unit mass). Or are the stones actually packed together, small stuff in the gaps? Does water flow through it or is it almost dry because water just drops through?
  4.  
    The ideas are starting to flow, there must be numerous ways of balancing heating load, solar gains (active & passive) and heat storage of a house.

    A good driver of a dynamic simulation software package (& with a copy of a Rawlings price guide) should be able to design a house for every location with minimal heating.

    Chuckey's sounds like a good option too.
    • CommentAuthorjoe.e
    • CommentTimeMay 21st 2008 edited
     
    Posted By: fostertom
    Posted By: joe.ewould a system like this be viable in an area with lots of huge stones quite close to the surface?
    Hm, depends how you're going to put your heat into the ground - buried air or water pipes or what? How huge? Shouldn't deter a big excavator. Dense 'plums' like that should increase your soil's volume-based specific heat capacity (how much heat the soil can store per unit volume) - but not all that much, because higher density generally results in lower mass-based specific heat capacity (how much heat the soil can store per unit mass). Or are the stones actually packed together, small stuff in the gaps? Does water flow through it or is it almost dry because water just drops through?

    I don't know how heat would be put into the ground - I hadn't given the system any consideration until I read this thread. But it would be a new build, so I could dig out before starting. I haven't dug the exact site, but elsewhere on the land there's a foot or two of topsoil, then fairly dry subsoil with chunks floating in it that vary from as big as a TV to as big as an armchair.
    The building will have about 11m x 5.5m of south-facing roof; I'm thinking water to heat the soil. I suppose the question is, how many pipes and how deep? If not too many, I should be able to thread them between the bigger rocks and dig out the smaller ones where necessary.
    • CommentAuthorBenj
    • CommentTimeMay 21st 2008
     
    Fostertom

    If modifying an existing building to be super insulated and airtight is "easily done " then why am I finding it a nightmare to specify a brand new building which will be the same.
    Would you just wrap the whole thing in celotex?
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMay 21st 2008
     
    Don't worry, you'll crack it. Multifoil simplifies many things but a) needs more thought and detail than the manufs put out and b) you may not believe in it.
    • CommentAuthorBenj
    • CommentTimeMay 21st 2008
     
    I think you've summed the whole thing up in "B".
    Seems to me all of the technologies discussed here have their advocates and non believers. Just when I think ive got the design sorted I read another post which swings me in the opposite direction.
    Are there any proven Passivhaus standard multifoil insulated buildings ?
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMay 21st 2008
     
    I've confused matters - you don't have to 'believe in' multifoil to get into the AGS approach - multifoil is not part od AGS, I just said it simplifies super insulation and airtightness.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeMay 21st 2008
     
    not sure about the insulation bit! never mind super insulation.
    • CommentAuthorstephendv
    • CommentTimeMay 21st 2008
     
    Interesting article on storing "late summer" heat using a sand bed for thermal mass:
    http://www.arthaonline.com/Word%20Files/Ramlow_SolarToday_ND07.pdf
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press