Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition |
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment. PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book. |
Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Posted By: Jeff Norton (NZ)Outstanding fostertom!
It is good to see the plain logic of AGS, how can they argue with computer with simulation?
Posted By: fostertom
AGS (Annualised Geo-Solar) subsoil storage easily retains the full winter's heat requirement, by low-tech, near-passive means. As a gentle, steady process, an AGS building takes 2 or 3 years to fully charge its subsoil with stored heat; thereafter performance improves year on year. Subsoil effectively provides its own heat-retaining insulation around the storage zone.
Posted By: fostertom
AGS collects summer sun heat by a variety of means, as suits the individual building. There may be solar panels, but principally the building itself collects sun heat through big windows, and is arranged to conduct that heat away to subsoil storage, so avoiding the usual overheating.
Posted By: stephendvI could understand that AGS would work fine in both summer and winter if the heat storage was precisely at opposite phase to the seasons - store the heat in summer and wait for it to arrive at the building in winterCorrect
Posted By: stephendvthis seems to suggest that the heat will be stored year roundCorrect
Posted By: stephendvLetting the summer sun into the building in summer seems counterintuitiveAny E/S/W facing 2G or 3G window that isn't shaded by surrounding obstructions, or by the building itself, is a year-round nett heat gainer - so bigger windows the better, it would seem. Problem has always been that the gain's in the summer, when you don't want it, and the loss is in the winter, when there's little gain available. The equation has only really been useful in Spring and Autumn, when there's some solar gain potential plus some loss, both alternating within a small timeframe, within the building's time-capacity to store heat. The worthwhile effect has been to knock say a month off both ends of the fuelled heating season - but has not helped at all in either high summer or deep winter. AGS (or whatever we call its further evolution, currently under development) gets round this frustrating conundrum, by capturing summer solar heat as it lands on the interior surfaces of the rooms that have the windows that the sun's pouring through, taking it away to storage as it arrives, thus preventing over-heat buildup in the rooms. That heat, 'injected' into the subsoil at a calculated depth and/or distance away, then migrates slowly back to the surface (the bit of the surface that we call 'floorslab') at a calculated rate, just in time for winter.
Posted By: stephendvSurely using a solar collector would be better?That either as well as, or instead of, or not at all - the toolkit varies depending on the individual building.
Posted By: Terrymmmm......
so how is it 'taken away to storage as it arrives' and 'injected' ???
Posted By: TerryWould it not be simpler to store it under subfloor insulation closer to the surface and then control the release as it is needed ????That is one of the options, but an unnecessarily crude one, which misses out on opportunities for neater performance. It's akin to the 'big tank of water' approach to storage (except the tank's full of soil) which has so far proved expensive, leaky of stored heat, and requiring lots of plumbing, valves, pumps etc and fuel to run same. It's possible to minimise the latter, get semi-passive operation, and possibly even a nett surplus of captured heat, if only there was an easy way to turn that into electricity to sell back to the grid!
Posted By: Benjmaking it airtight/super insulatedNot difficult!
Posted By: BenjWhy is this particular building ideal for AGS?Orientation, sun exposure, garden space around, 1985 bungallow so straightforward modernish construction in good condition, built just at the last moment before under slab insulation and cavity fill came in, well drained non-clay deep subsoil.
Posted By: BenjSounds very site specific indeed. Is it really going to be relevant to most of the UK's building stock ?Just makes it easy this time - techniques and products will make it very widely - might say universally - applicable, in different forms. It's just a principle, an understanding - many ways it could be applied.
Posted By: StuartBDoesn't the ground/subsoil around the house for a a good few metres need to be kept bone dry to store the heat effectively?To handle this at minimum cost and disturbance is key, which we're working on now - very interesting.
Posted By: StuartBWhat do the internal surfaces need be to collect and transfer the heat for storage?Ditto
Posted By: StuartBSounds very similar to PAHS, is this the same thing?PAS evolved out of PAHS and it looks like we're evolving it further. Unfortunately can't get any response or contact out of the PAHS or AGS guys, other than what's freely published. Anyone know why, know them, or know how to approach?
Posted By: chuckeyThe reason for using pumped water is that the warm subsoil will not loose heat directly back into space if the water is turned off.What's
Posted By: chuckeyThe meditteraneum church effect, causes the suns heat to be conducted into the ground during the day but also allows the heat to escape at night.
Posted By: joe.ewould a system like this be viable in an area with lots of huge stones quite close to the surface?Hm, depends how you're going to put your heat into the ground - buried air or water pipes or what? How huge? Shouldn't deter a big excavator. Dense 'plums' like that should increase your soil's volume-based specific heat capacity (how much heat the soil can store per unit volume) - but not all that much, because higher density generally results in lower mass-based specific heat capacity (how much heat the soil can store per unit mass). Or are the stones actually packed together, small stuff in the gaps? Does water flow through it or is it almost dry because water just drops through?
Posted By: fostertomPosted By: joe.ewould a system like this be viable in an area with lots of huge stones quite close to the surface?Hm, depends how you're going to put your heat into the ground - buried air or water pipes or what? How huge? Shouldn't deter a big excavator. Dense 'plums' like that should increase your soil's volume-based specific heat capacity (how much heat the soil can store per unit volume) - but not all that much, because higher density generally results in lower mass-based specific heat capacity (how much heat the soil can store per unit mass). Or are the stones actually packed together, small stuff in the gaps? Does water flow through it or is it almost dry because water just drops through?