Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMar 7th 2022 edited
     
    A new one on me - a problem of renewable generation is not just intermittency, but also maintenance of frequency:
    https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/mar/07/onward-inertia-the-secret-source-for-keeping-the-lights-on-and-greening-the-grid
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeMar 7th 2022
     
    The National Grid are incredibly good at managing this, yes it can be a problem but it is a known problem and is well managed. It is easier to tell generators what to do and for them to respond. Wind would be better if it operated at 90% and could be ramped up the extra 10% when the wind dropped or when needed but FiTs drives 100% all the time cutting out that possibility
    • CommentAuthorRobL
    • CommentTimeMar 7th 2022
     
    Old school elec generators had steam turbines and lots of rotating synchronous generators. They would once have had mechanical rotating "governors" which would throttle the power up or down based on generator frequency - they were slow to change, but it was ok because all that rotating mass had so much inertia so everything happened slowly. I think generally a few seconds of inertia (stored mechanical energy divided by output power). As the grid got loaded up, the frequency would ever so slightly fall, power stations get turned up, and all rotating machine loads would draw slightly less power.
    PV and solar electronics don't have conventional inertia at all - we have PV, it outputs "real" power only. I'm sure it could mimic a little inertia if need be, or lots if it were designed to do so. As electronics takes over the power grid, it needs less inertia, still some I think to keep a distributed network stable, as everything in electronics land can happen quicker.
    My dad was the chief efficiency engineer in a coal power station, my knowledge is from him :-)
  1.  
    National grid have a number of issues with increasing renewables:

    Inertia, which as mentioned is delivering or absorbing stored energy, to stabilise very short disturbances (eg up to a couple of seconds)

    Fast frequency response, which is increasing or decreasing power generation (or storage) to keep supply and demand in balance (over several seconds or minutes)

    Intermittent reserve capacity, which is paying for generators (or storage) to not generate until days they are needed

    Reactive power generation/consumption, which is keeping the amps nearly in sync with the volts

    Black start, which is the ability to start up the power grid after a Texas-style blackout, using stored energy

    Short circuit level, which is the ability to deliver a burst of extra current during a fault without tripping the generators


    These services came for free with coal/gas/hydro power. When people realised they dont come free with wind or PV, initially it was raised as a reason why renewable power "could never be more than 20% of the grid" (insert number to taste). Now the Grid pays separately for these services so some suppliers have specialised in selling them, this cost is becoming a significant part of our bills.

    The grid are running a number of pathfinder projects to discover the cheapest and most reliable ways to do this before 2026. The flywheel projects in Tom's article are a simple 'brute force' approach. The rise of battery storage (including EVs plugged in at home) offers more elegant solutions, but the question is how does the household battery owner get paid?

    https://www.nationalgrideso.com/research-publications/system-operability-framework-sof
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMar 7th 2022
     
    I see, so that article is talking about power-storing flywheels, which are nothing new, the 'other' traditional method of doing so, along with pumped hydro betwen upper and lower lakes? It's not just about creating a robust time-keeper.

    Wd it be true that switching to electronic inverters for frequency stability would de-couple frequency from instantaneous demand (and/or supply) fluctuation? AFAIK an inverter can produce any frequency regardless of current/voltage?
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeMar 7th 2022 edited
     
    In addition to Will's link, this page https://www.nationalgrideso.com/news/green-inertia-projects-and-world-first-tech-tell-british-energy-success-story looks like the main source for the grauniad's story.

    One place I used to work (a TV station) had a flywheel as a component of it's UPS. It sat in between the mains input and the offices and held the mains up until the diesel generator in the basement came online. The result was the cleanest mains supply I've ever seen. Perfect sine waves on a scope, all the time.
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeMar 7th 2022
     
    Posted By: fostertomI see, so that article is talking about power-storing flywheels, which are nothing new, the 'other' traditional method of doing so, along with pumped hydro betwen upper and lower lakes? It's not just about creating a robust time-keeper.
    Robust time keeping is just a matter of energy storage responding on timescales of milliseconds to small numbers of seconds.

    If there's a sudden surge in demand in part of the grid then the currents increase which increases the back EMF in the spinning machinery (whether old-fashioned generators or these flywheels) which causes them to slow and therefore release some of the energy stored in their rotation which tends to compensate for most of the extra current. Obviously that can't go on very long otherwise the frequency drops below allowed values and other things begin to trip out.

    Rotational inertia is obviously one way of doing this. Another would be battery storage which has powerful enough inverters to be able to source the extra current needed.

    Posted By: fostertomWd it be true that switching to electronic inverters for frequency stability would de-couple frequency from instantaneous demand (and/or supply) fluctuation?
    Yes, a grid which only has electronic inverters would not need to use frequency at all to signal demand. It could have everything locked to atomic time or whatever and use some other means to detect & signal load fluctuations.

    Off-grid AC-coupled systems often work like this at the basic level. Typically you have a battery-based inverter which connects the battery to the mini-grid with the current flowing back and forth between the mini-grid and the battery depending on the AC voltage of the mini-grid. In practice the battery inverter often does vary the mini-grid frequency in order to signal to the other inverters (from, e.g., PV or wind) when the battery is full and the demand is low so they should back off but that's just a legacy solution resulting from the existing available grid-tie inverters being designed to operate on a spinney things grid. In principle any other means of signalling could be used, Ethernet, semaphore, whatever.
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press