Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




  1.  
    Bulb (my electricity supplier) mailed to say that Octopus are taking them over.

    It's good that the two 'innovative' companies are combining.

    But it seems the industry has consolidated back into a 'big six' of companies (BG, Eon, EDF, Ovo, SP and now Octopus) , and nearly all the new entrants have been wiped out now.

    The industry has nearly all consolidated onto the same tariffs set exactly at the OFGEM price cap, and it is difficult to switch as they are not taking new customers.

    Given the need for major innovation and change to different kinds of tariffs (ToU,EVs, V2G, VPP, other TLAs), that doesn't seem good to me - what do people think?
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeOct 29th 2022
     
    I was with Bulb until their poor customer service drove me away. So I hope that Octopus 'wins' the corporate culture battle as Greg Jackson says it will.

    The new entrants were all wiped out due to huge incompetence and lack of capital. So I think we have now had a real-life proving that electricity supply is a market that needs scale and resources.

    Prices and tariffs are all pretty much the same because the recent large price increase has essentially broken the free market, and for the time being we're in a government-run monopoly. Hopefully in time prices will come down, or at worst be long enough established at the new levels, that a freeish market can be reestablished.

    I'm not sure how much need for tariff innovation there is, but hopefully in time there'll be more scope for innovation.
    • CommentAuthorMike1
    • CommentTimeOct 29th 2022
     
    Posted By: djhPrices and tariffs are all pretty much the same
    Except for the few on Economy 7, where the day-night tariffs seem to vary significantly between providers.

    I mentioned a relative (with Bulb) in this thread http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16903 who's projecting a 20% annual saving by switching.
    • CommentAuthorwookey
    • CommentTimeOct 30th 2022
     
    You can still change - it's just harder. We moved to Octopus ~3 weeks ago.
    They are still innovating: e.g. a time-of-use tarriff which is good for people with cars and big batteries. Get all your leccy between midnight and 4am or from solar because it's very expensive the rest of the time. And I think they still have the raw wholesale (but capped) tariff but it's not very popular at the moment.

    I'd love a low/no standing charge as we use no gas and not much electricity (1500kWh/yr).
  2.  
    The Octopus Agile tariff is still going, and surprised to see the price has been very cheap this month, and sometimes has even gone to negative price. It must have been windy!

    The question is why are Octopus the only 'Big Six' supplier doing this kind of thing? If they can do it, why does everyone else feel they don't need to do it - is that the inertia that you get with large incumbents - if so, consolidation is a bad thing.

    There seems to be agreement that switching to renewable generation means that a chunk of consumption will need to move to windy sunny days, especially electric car chargers and heating. But that needs enough people moving onto innovative pricing schemes to get enough behaviour change, and techie innovation so that chargers and heaters know when best to turn themselves on.

    That can't happen unless all the big six suppliers feel competitive pressure to promote that kind of thing to their customers. Unfortunately they feel safer going the other way and consolidating on the same standing-charge-and-unit-rates, it's hard even to find a no standing charge tariff let alone anything cleverer
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeOct 30th 2022 edited
     
    Posted By: WillInAberdeenThere seems to be agreement that switching to renewable generation means that a chunk of consumption will need to move to windy sunny days, especially electric car chargers and heating
    Those don't seem very likely examples of movable demand. I might be willing to charge my car overnight (I do) but I can't wait for it to be windy before I go for a drive. Ditto for heating, even in my well-insulated house I run the heating overnight most days in winter, unless it was very sunny. Buffering space heating until the next windy day doesn't feel even remotely realistic.

    What I think we need is distributed generation, over a large enough area that peaks and troughs in generation tend to even out. Plus a lot of storage, in whatever form turns out to be best.

    edit: just to add one possibility: https://suncable.energy/connecting-asia-one-region-one-grid-sun-cable-research-paper-october-2021/

    As to tariffs, are there many potential customers for something like Agile that haven't already got it? And I wouldn't expect there to be much tariff experimentation until free-ish market conditions are restored. I think standing charges are down to the regulatory environment more than anything else, sadly.
  3.  
    As we discussed, many/most new EVs have a range equivalent to a fortnight of UK average driving on a single charge. So if it's forecast to be windy in a couple of days from now, most people could easily skip charging today, and wait until then.

    But why would they do that, if they'll get billed exactly the same amount per kWh tonight as they will do every other night? How do they (or their car) even know when would be the cheapest day to recharge so they can weigh that against their travel plans?

    Likewise there are notable examples on here of people choosing which hours of the day to heat their house (naming nobody!). The best time they could have chosen today is 2230*, before the wind drops later on tonight. But who knew that and adjusted their heating programmer to 2230? Did their energy co tell them, or even adjust it for them remotely? Would they have got a cheaper rate if they had?

    The tech is obviously doable for that to happen, it's the market innovation that isn't happening yet, even by Octopus and much less by the others.


    (Aside - did everyone hear that all the internet cables to Shetland were cut off last week, allegedly by trawlers from a certain hostile nation. I'm rapidly going off the idea of relying on underwater HVDC!)

    * Based on the Agile rate, fwiw
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeOct 30th 2022 edited
     
    Posted By: WillInAberdeenAs we discussed, many/most new EVs will go for a fortnight of UK average driving distance on a single charge. So if it's forecast to be windy in a couple of days from now, most people could easily skip charging today, and wait until then.
    Well they could, but then they'd be taking the risk that the forecast wasn't correct, or would the supplier supply 'cheap rate' electricity because it had been forecast rather than was actually available?

    Likewise there are notable examples on here of people choosing which hours of the day to heat their house (naming nobody!). The best time they could have chosen today is 2230*, before the wind drops later on tonight. But who knew that and adjusted their heating to 2230? Did their energy co tell them, or even adjust it for them remotely? Would they have got a cheaper rate if they had?
    But there's quite a chain of technology there. It requires the user not only to have signed up to a particular tariff from a particular supplier, but also to have bought and fitted whatever specific control gear is required by that supplier to allow said control. It has to be the supplier that does it automatically, really I think, to account for the unreliability of forecasts as before, plus the hassle a customer would have of resetting timers every day. Not many people would sign up for that. So is there really a ready-for-market system out there that a supplier could implement and achieve a sufficient number of customers signing up?

    (Aside - did everyone hear that all the internet cables to Shetland were cut off last week, allegedly by trawlers from a certain hostile nation. I'm rapidly going off the idea of relying on underwater HVDC!)
    Yes and FUD. The Grauniad said "the outage was due to accidental damage to the cable by a UK-registered trawler", which I gather was from an MOD source. Personally, I'd rather see trawling and dredging by fishermen banned rather than stopping laying cables.

    As an aside on an aside I just did a search for "hvdc cable trawler protection" (without the quotes) and was surprised that almost all the results are for PDFs. :surprised: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC97720/ld-na-27527-en-n.pdf seems to be a good summary. It appears the world's longest is https://northsealink.com/ "The cable became operational on 1 October 2021"
  4.  
    Most people, when they see an expensive petrol station on the motorway, are able to decide whether to fill up just in case, or to take the risk and drive onwards in the expectation of filling up cheaper next day at the supermarket. They are given the choice and can make it themselves, based on their travel plans, though with no guarantees. Why would it be different if the electricity company offered them cheaper EV recharging if they wait a couple of days for windy weather? The futures market price is well established for electricity a few days ahead, or even much further, based on modern weather forecasting, so the supplier could prepurchase the electricity to lock in that price. Why aren't all electricity suppliers offering this?


    AIUI, the 'smart' Nest type thermostats which are now widely available, can be controlled on/off remotely over the internet, and can have firmware updated over the air. I understand that's all the hardware that is required for a supplier to offer a service to turn on their customers' heating at the cheapest time of each day (plus obvs a smartmeter so they can be billed cheaper). Why aren't all electricity suppliers offering this?


    Answer to both questions: because they don't feel enough competitors breathing down their necks!
    • CommentAuthorArtiglio
    • CommentTimeOct 31st 2022
     
    WiA

    Because the vast majority of uk homes epare not built or retrofitted to be able to function on such a basis. The ratio of homes heated by gas/electricity alone is a large barrier let alone homes able to retain heat long enough to negate additional heating being required between the optimal supply periods. You’d also have to deal with consumer behaviours, which whilst energy is being subsidised is unlikely to change.
    Legislation is the only way of forcing change, but there is still no certainty on what may or may not finally be agreed in respect of energy efficiency in the private rented sector ( given the numbers of landlords exiting the market and costs of upgrading property it would not be a total surprise to see the proposals downgraded or put on hold) next would most likely be social housing, but that would mean huge grants to organisations who’ve hardly a good record in getting value for money. Then if such taxpayer largesse is doled out there’ll be the political backlash from taxpayers who’d be effectively funding the improvements but are unable to afford to improve their own homes.
    Until such time as there’s a sufficiently large customer base there’s little incentive for the suppliers to invest in the ability to help manage peoples energy use.
  5.  
    Agree with much, but it seems a bit chicken/egg. If the majority of people don't get cheaper power by changing the time they consume it, then the majority won't change behaviour. If the energy companies will only offer cheaper power after the majority of people have already changed behaviour, then nothing happens, and low carbon electricity will be delayed.

    On the plus side, there are still apparently 3.5million legacy E7 meters, those homes must have some flexibility to power their heat or DHW at different times of day. Plus some previously-E7 homes must already have switched to smartmeters. That's a large potential customer base for even a risk-averse Big Six co to market itself to.

    A modernised ToU tariff could have some familiar features of E7, but would be cheaper on sunny afternoons and windy weekends as well as overnight.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeOct 31st 2022
     
    Posted By: WillInAberdeenOn the plus side, there are still apparently 3.5million legacy E7 meters, those homes must have some flexibility to power their heat or DHW at different times of day.
    Well, we've already adjusted our systems to use as much E7 as possible, so I'm not sure what else we could do?

    Plus some previously-E7 homes must already have switched to smartmeters. That's a large potential customer base for even a risk-averse Big Six co to market itself to.
    Well yes, but I haven't been tempted to get a smart meter or by any of Octopus's other tariffs yet. E7 seems a sensible option for a fairly simple life.
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press