Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




  1.  
    We are about to embark on the next renovation project. A barn conversion of a modern agricultural building.
    As a long time GBF member I would have liked to externally insulate, but this isn't going to happen for various reasons. So this leaves internal insulation.
    We would like to achieve Passive House levels of insulation and airtightness.
    The existing concrete floor will have to come up and be dug out, EPS in the floor should be straightforward.
    But what to do with the walls and roof?
    Considerations so far include I-beams for the walls with either EPS or rockwool between. Would we need to leave a cavity between this and the existing structure? Drained? OSB for racking, with a membrane facing the cavity?
    We quite fancy OSB as the internal face, to avoid plasterboard and skimming. All services could be surface mounted for an industrial feel and for ease of alteration in future. I expect we may need a sprinkler system due to open plan kitchen, dining, lounge etc?
    I have been playing about with U-values, which is easy enough, but I'm struggling with the finer points of construction details.

    The GBF hive mind is powerful and varied, so any ideas or suggestions would be gratefully received.
      cowshed.JPG
  2.  
    Approved Floorplans attached hopefully
  3.  
    Approved Elevations - North and East
  4.  
    Approved Elevations - South and West
  5.  
    You could build a 3x2 stud wall internally about 250mm away from the existing structure, line it with 9mm OSB and fill it with 300mm cellulose.
  6.  
    Thanks for the suggestion VH
    That sounds like it would be cheaper than I-beams and Rockwool?
    What do you think about the interface with the concrete block walls? I guess I could use tanking slurry on the inside face of the block for waterproofing. Ply lining boxes to window reveals.
    • CommentAuthorGreenPaddy
    • CommentTimeMay 16th 2023
     
    Just a few thoughts, that may of course be impractical with not much background...

    - keep the internal conc slab, and build on top. Raise the external ground locally at the front, breaking out some of that concrete apron, to allow planting, softening the frontage visually, and allowing gentle ramps to bring you to the slightly higher internal FFL. The side entrance is stepped anyway, so a couple more steps may not matter. Add some raised beds for planting along the side elevations to disguise this level diff, and again visually soften. This may also help with issues with DPC's or lack of them around the structure. Your wet services are all around the perimeter, so should get drain falls in insulation depth, without cutting into exist slab too much. Big cost and carbon saving, keeping all that concrete.

    - demolish the dwarf block wall, so it's no longer a constraint. You're over-cladding anyway, so it's not part of the visual conservation. Maybe leave the bottom course (or whatever height), to give you the underbuild structure to set the internal frame on, so it is then of use, rather than something to compromise your design. It then becomes more like a simple, typical timber frame construction. The internal frame can be of whatever build-up you prefer. You then have a choice, not forced down a route.

    - I suspect the roof will be a trickier problem than the walls, assuming you keep he original structure, and build inside it, with a thermal layer (similar to the approach for the walls). Maybe a light weight metal stud to carry the insulation and internal surface finish? Are there solar panels planned? Additional load onto the existing roof? Could add a couple of posts, say hidden in the bedroom wall, to give additional roof ridge support if needed.

    - OSB internally and timber cladding externally with adjacent buildings... remember fire spread regs. You'll likely need to treat all those surfaces with a fire retardant to meet the approp Euro Class. BSO's are super hot on anything fire related, (post Grenfell). With no supported floors, you don't have any "elements of structure", so that makes it a bit less arduous perhaps.

    I'd start drawing out some sections at various junctions/interfaces, to clarify what you currently have. That makes the issues more obvious, and so will help formulate solutions.
  7.  
    Thanks for the detailed thoughts GreenPaddy.

    Posted By: GreenPaddyYou're over-cladding anyway, so it's not part of the visual conservation.


    I should have clarified - we are leaving the exterior as it is now, because SWMBO actually likes how it looks and wants to keep it exactly the same. The plans shown are from my dreams of EWI and reclad using the same timber (but with a bit extra) which are now sadly shattered.
  8.  
    So should end up something like this
      cowshed south elevation.jpg
  9.  
    The roof covering will have to come off and be replaced because it is Asbestos. This would give access for installing waterproofing layers and to install framing around rooflights.
  10.  
    For context, this is from the south. The Alder tree will provide summer shading.
      context.jpg
  11.  
    We have a similar farm building which a previous owner has built plasterboard offices inside. It's damp because the sheet roof 'sweats' in damp weather; there's no DPM in the floor slab; and the wall cladding is not 100% watertight.

    Our options seem to be a) build a separate watertight/insulated building, standing just inside the extg structure, but relying on none of the existing elements; or b) knock it down and start again.

    A housing development down the road has done b), clearing the site and then building new houses to the original dimensions, clad in high-spec timber and profiled steel to give an impression of a steel farm shed, but watertight. This suggests that b) was their cheapest option, though I doubt they thought about embodied carbon.

    There are a lot of bats and a family of owls who would need to be rehomed.

    Edit: the steel frame is a thermal bridge too.
  12.  
    Posted By: WillInAberdeenthe steel frame is a thermal bridge too.


    which is why I wanted to externally insulate and carry it on down to include the foundations. Tea cosy.
    We could have then had the steel frame exposed on the inside, and extended the concrete block walls upwards to provide thermal mass inside the heated envelope.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeMay 16th 2023
     
    Posted By: Dominic CooneyBut what to do with the walls and roof?
    Considerations so far include I-beams for the walls with either EPS or rockwool between. Would we need to leave a cavity between this and the existing structure? Drained?
    As others have identified, the existing outer timber etc becomes the mainly waterproof layer. Inside that you'll need a drainage plane - probably a membrane - and then a separate thermal, airtight structure inside that. I-beam, Larsen truss, whatever. SIP if you can get them in?

    Knock it down and rebuild may well be cheapest due to the VAT rules.
  13.  
    Thanks for the comment. Knock it down and rebuild is not an option in this case (due to planning and SWMBO), VAT should be reclaimable for self-build barn conversion so no worries there.
  14.  
    If the steel and dwarf walls are inside the envelope, they'll bridge the floor insulation. Steel is 1000x more conductive than insulation!

    You can see daylight through that kind of wall cladding - treat it as 'decorative' but in no way weather resisting - it's designed to keep cows very much 'ventilated'!

    Suggest to remove and store the cladding, remove the roof, build a new timber building within the steel frame while you have access all round? The inner building should have a waterproof external layer needing no maintenance, perhaps rendered EWI. Then treat the stored cladding and fasten it back onto the steel frame outside (but not connected to) your new building.

    Edit: after living somewhere for a while, we all tend to feel a mental attachment to 'what is already there' and seek to improve it, it is more difficult to get our heads around replacing it. There's probably a psychological term for this! In many cases that is good for carbon and cost.

    However, steel farm sheds are deliberately very low cost and low quality structures. To become houses, they need such a lot of upgrading and the reusable bits are such a low % of the total project value, that it might well be worth thinking again about rebuilding from scratch, and then making it look sufficiently like the original to keep the planners and your co-owner happy?

    This discussion is helpful for our thoughts about what to do with our own shed, so please keep sharing your thinking!
  15.  
    First off, great project. Look forward to seeing how it goes.

    Posted By: Dominic CooneyWe quite fancy OSB as the internal face, to avoid plasterboard and skimming. All services could be surface mounted for an industrial feel and for ease of alteration in future.


    Bear in mind surface spread of flame restrictions. We have Cross Laminated Timber frame which we wanted to expose internally on walls and ceilings. The Building Regs required that we coat it all with a flame retardant finish and I eventually found a nice translucent treatment (NT Deco by Nordtreat) which looks like limewash.

    I actually prefer the finish to the bare timber now, but just remember to budget for the painting. That aspect isn't a saving on plasterboard (although you do of course save on the skimming etc.)

    The other anecdotal advice is that whilst it does mean you can mount pictures and shelves on walls fairly easily and with confidence (unlike the paper thin plasterboard most developers use), you then can't fill the holes so easily if things move. There are wood fillers of course, but so much of the DIY market is geared to white plasterboard walls that it's quite eye opening when you don't have them!

    Posted By: Dominic CooneyConsiderations so far include I-beams for the walls with either EPS or rockwool between. Would we need to leave a cavity between this and the existing structure? Drained? OSB for racking, with a membrane facing the cavity?


    We used the timber I-beam method to overclad our frame, with OSB on the outside as racking and support for waterproof membrane. Comparatively it was v. cheap and reasonably straightforward. Note that the flange and web shape of the beams means there is a risk of voids at the inner and outer edges if you just use standard insulation batts, so we chose our thicknesses to match the different 'layers' of the beam e.g. our total insulation thickness was 400mm but that was a layer of 50mm between the outer flanges, 300mm between the webs and then another 50mm on the inner flanges. This meant each layer could compress to fill its relative width. Possibly overkill but it resulted in a very good flush fit.

    You'll need EPS for at least the bottom 150mm 'below DPC', but comparatively this was a lot harder to fit tightly. We staggered joints etc. but you really want to foam glue the edges as you go too.
  16.  
    Thank you for the deatiled response and the suggestion of NT Deco.
  17.  
    No problem.

    I also just spotted this write-up of a passivhaus barn conversion project. Page 38 onwards. Sounds exactly like what you want to do:

    https://passivehouseplus.co.uk/issuu/uk-edition

    EDIT: edited to add that the issue I was referring to is number 44 (the hyperlink just takes you to the latest version)
  18.  
    I had a play around with U-values and got it to 0.11

    any observations gratefully received.
      cowshed potential wall section 1.jpg
  19.  
    Full version attached.
  20.  
    Posted By: Doubting_ThomasSounds exactly like what you want to do


    Great link thanks, I will have a read in more detail. This is the one my friend has seen and suggested the I-beam construction inside the exisitng shell.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeMay 16th 2023
     
    Posted By: WillInAberdeenYou can see daylight through that kind of wall cladding - treat it as 'decorative' but in no way weather resisting - it's designed to keep cows very much 'ventilated'!
    In a balanced rainscreen it is the inner drainage plane that needs to be waterproof. Probably a membrane in this case. The outer screen intercepts some of the rain and slows the rest via pressure effects.
  21.  
    Indeed, but the outer screen is intended to keep UV light off the inner screen and exclude insects, bits of dead leaves, etc, from the cavity - so if you looked through the open door in the OP pic, you ideally shouldn't be able to see any daylight through the far end of the building!

    Whereas cows like lots of draughts through cowshed walls to keep them healthy.

    The offices I mentioned are in our agri shed, have a stud wall with a membrane facing the original dwarf wall and cladding across a cavity. It is apparent that the membrane is leaking, possibly due to debris in the cavity, or the efforts of birds/mice. But the membrane is inaccessible to maintain, so I recommend a no-maintenance waterproof layer on the outside of the 'inner box'.

    The article in PH+ has the right idea, build a separate new building inside the existing one 'a box inside a box'.
  22.  
    Posted By: WillInAberdeenno-maintenance waterproof layer on the outside of the 'inner box'.


    I wonder if this could be tanking slurry on the inner face of the concrete block walls? increase their height up to eaves level so that the vertical timber boarding is just decorative. It could even have a roofing type membrane behind it to help shed driving rain that gets through the gaps.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeMay 16th 2023
     
    Posted By: WillInAberdeenIndeed, but the outer screen is intended to keep UV light off the inner screen and exclude insects, bits of dead leaves, etc, from the cavity - so if you looked through the open door in the OP pic, you ideally shouldn't be able to see any daylight through the far end of the building!
    Sorry, but that's simply not right. Keeping UV out is necessary iff the drainage plane is UV-sensitive, sure, but that's not a given. Keeping insects and leaves out should be done by a separate insect mesh if needed. Insects will get through pretty much any timber cladding, since joints need to be open to allow for movement of the timber.

    See e.g. the pictures at https://www.russwood.co.uk/blog/timber-open-rainscreen-cladding-the-ultimate-guide-to-detailing/ or read the wikipedia rainscreen article.
  23.  
    "an insect mesh could cause more harm than good" ?

    Edit: post deleted as this is going OT. Just treat the existing cladding as decorative and put a no-maintenance beastie-proof waterproof outside layer on the new building within the barn.
  24.  
    Posted By: Dominic CooneyThanks for the suggestion VH
    That sounds like it would be cheaper than I-beams and Rockwool?
    What do you think about the interface with the concrete block walls? I guess I could use tanking slurry on the inside face of the block for waterproofing. Ply lining boxes to window reveals.
    If the block wall isn't letting in water you could leave it be, pumping the void with EPS beads would be more resistant than Cellulose and may eliminate the need to plaster the external wall, a perimeter french drain around is always good.
  25.  
    Posted By: Viking Housepumping the void with EPS beads


    Would beads normally be cheaper than solid slabs of EPS for the same volume?
  26.  
    Posted By: Viking Housea perimeter french drain around


    Also a good idea and was hoping to do this.
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press