Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.
Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
 Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




General: RAAC / thermolite

Bottom of Page

1 to 27 of 27

  1.  
    • CommentAuthorRex
    • CommentTimeSep 2nd 2023
     
    What ho one and all,

    Been following the RAAC / schools closure topic with interest.

    While not unduly concerned for myself as my house is timber framed but the external rendered walls are thermolite block.

    What is the difference between this RAAC stuff and thermolite blocks? Obviously my walls are not load bearing but I would hate to think that they will crumble in time, albeit, probably long after I have gone.

    Your thought are most welcome

    Thanks and toodle pip
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeSep 2nd 2023
     
    I was curious too, but from what I've discovered they are similar inasmuch as both are aerated. Apparently it's the addition of rebar upsets the product integrity. I tried to find out if the basic mixes were different but as yet nothing.
    Apparently Aircrete blocks are safe in domestic properties so we shouldn't worry. The inner leaf of my property is Thermalite (1984 ), and when I've seen exposed bits when doing roof work there were no signs of any deterioration. I seem to remember mortar adhesion and strength ( needing a weaker mix, I think ?) could be a potential problem at the construction phase.
  3.  
    My understanding at the moment is that the RAAC will suffer if it gets damp and it will as a consequence loose its compressive strength, it is also possible for it to loose its compressive strength for other reasons about which I have no knowledge.

    Reinforced concrete relies on the rebar to give strength in tension and the concrete gives strength in compression - a happy relationship when in a suspended slab the rebar is at the bottom and the concrete is above, they work in conjunction with each other. If however the concrete looses its compressive strength then there is nothing to stop the slab folding up - and the ceiling falls down.

    Thermloite blocks will suffer from wet but the stresses on them are nothing like the compressive forces on a reinforced suspended slab so I wouldn't expect the same type of catastrophic failures.

    Health warning - I am not a SE and this is just my understanding at the moment
  4.  
    Good explanation https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-66669239

    The main problem is water getting through to the steel reinforcement, which corrodes unseen and can fail unexpectedly.

    Aerated blocks in house walls don't have or need steel reinforcement, apart from wall ties.
  5.  
    Apart from water getting to the rebar I also heard that any freeze thaw cycles in the RAAC due to water/ damp can cause the collapse of the concrete structure and thus loosing its compression strength.

    Whilst still in the UK I knew a chap whose business used RAAC concrete as a bulk filling material. The process was to fill most of the volume with RAAC then pour a reinforced slab of conventual concrete on top. I don't know it such structures also are affected, I guess it depends upon how much the slab relies on support from the substrate RAAC.
    • CommentAuthorArtiglio
    • CommentTimeSep 3rd 2023
     
    Rather expect there are lots of councils up and down the country looking into the construction of the flat roofed blocks of flats that were popular for social housing in the 50’s -80’s. Though you’d also hope that given that the issue is hardly a new thing , councils have already checked. It’ll utter chaos if there are anymore than a tiny percentage of homes affected.
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeSep 3rd 2023 edited
     
    Posted By: ArtiglioRather expect there are lots of councils up and down the country looking into the construction of the flat roofed blocks of flats that were popular for social housing in the 50’s -80’s. Though you’d also hope that given that the issue is hardly a new thing , councils have already checked. It’ll utter chaos if there are anymore than a tiny percentage of homes affected.



    Especially as the design life is generally accepted as 30years.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeSep 3rd 2023
     
    Posted By: owlmanEspecially as the design life is generally accepted as 30years.
    I don't understand this bit. When was that decided? If they knew it at the time, why would anybody build with something with that short a lifetime? And of course, why wouldn't any body (i.e. the government) plan to replace them after that time.
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeSep 3rd 2023
     
    In fairness, I don't think it was known at the build stage. Plus, I understand, there was a rush to get stuff up quickly. Full filling political promises I'm guessing. The 30 year bit I also understand was discovered later, and with no phased programme of demolition and re-build. Possibly a case of; " act in haste, repent at leisure. "
    I'm only paraphrasing what I've read and I'm certainly no expert.
  10.  
    Decided sometime around 1996 apparently

    https://www.cross-safety.org/sites/default/files/1999-01/scoss-review-1997-99.pdf

    Section 3.5 describes all the problems which are in the news today and refers to a 1996 BRE report "Reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete planks designed before 1980. BRE Information Paper IP 10/96." which is paywalled but apparently sets out the 30 years figure. At that time the advice was "inspect them carefully" rather than "replace them".

    History does tend to repeat itself, I wonder what modern materials we are embracing now which will turn out to be a liability after 30 years?
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeSep 3rd 2023
     
    Sticky tapes used for airtightness :wink:
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeSep 3rd 2023 edited
     
    Posted By: owlmanSticky tapes used for airtightness :wink:
    I hope not :cry:

    Apparently they were first used sometime in the eighties in Germany and I haven't heard anything about any problems yet. So fingers crossed. Pro Clima say they had their Tescon Vana tested at Kassel Uni using 'accelerated aging' techniques to prove a 100 year lifetime. They've given me a 25 year warranty on my roof, which includes some as well as some of their membranes. Hopefully I don't need to call on it :bigsmile:
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeSep 3rd 2023
     
    Posted By: WillInAberdeenDecided sometime around 1996 apparently

    https://www.cross-safety.org/sites/default/files/1999-01/scoss-review-1997-99.pdf

    Section 3.5 describes all the problems which are in the news today
    Thanks for that. The photo on p20 is interesting. It reminds me of a railway bridge (rail above road) where we used to live. After one-collision-too-many they got fed up of having to close the railway every time until it was surveyed, so they installed extra dirty great big* beams next to the bridge but separated from it by a foot or so. The idea, which did seem to work in practice, was that any vehicle striking the beams would do itself more damage than it would cause to the beams, and not affect the railway bridge at all. :bigsmile: They also put up a warning system to try to prevent the strike before it happened.

    I see the section on cladding is all about stone and glass cladding, although it does mention innovation.

    * technical engineering term
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeSep 4th 2023
     
    Re:- Sicky tapes
    They are just one item, but over reliance on modern building adhesives and foams in general. Many, ( unlike your
    Pro Clima ) product I doubt have had such rigorous testing.
    I also wonder if Passivhäuser and other "eco" homes in general will survive the first change of ownership. That's nothing to do with excellent initial build quality but more with Human nature. Once the words re-furb. or update are mentioned then there's a strong possibility bang will go the Passiv bit.
    I could be wrong and an enlightened future generation may gladly adhere to a lifestyle boldly envisioned 30 years previous. All still good and somewhat efficient, and maybe better than most; I guess.

    I occasionally manage to watch lunchtime TV, and the missus likes, find me a home in the country, or something like that. I'm quite curious at the want lists and the house viewing comments. They are a good insight into human nature. Often it's knock a wall down here and add an extension or conservatory there. Rarely is energy efficiency mentioned, it could be a result of editing, but looks and "feel" are important, with the "quarter acre" kitchen/living/dining/sun room being the most important. Oh and umpteen spacious bedrooms, all "en suite".

    Unscientific, I know, but an interesting observation.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeSep 4th 2023
     
    Posted By: owlmanThey are just one item, but over reliance on modern building adhesives and foams in general. Many, ( unlike your Pro Clima ) product I doubt have had such rigorous testing.
    Yes, I would hesitate to trust anything except Pro Clima and Siga tapes myself. There may be others that are good; I simply don't know.
    I also wonder if Passivhäuser and other "eco" homes in general will survive the first change of ownership. That's nothing to do with excellent initial build quality but more with Human nature. Once the words re-furb. or update are mentioned then there's a strong possibility bang will go the Passiv bit.
    Yes, I agree and wonder if that might be another advantage of certification. At least it's clear what the standard is. Maybe our house will be lucky, in that it's such an eccentric build that a new owner is likely to be reasonably well-informed. And we built it so you can rip out all the internal walls if you fancy a redesign.
    I'm quite curious at the want lists and the house viewing comments. They are a good insight into human nature. Often it's knock a wall down here and add an extension or conservatory there. Rarely is energy efficiency mentioned, it could be a result of editing, but looks and "feel" are important, with the "quarter acre" kitchen/living/dining/sun room being the most important. Oh and umpteen spacious bedrooms, all "en suite".
    I don't think most people yet appreciate that "climate crisis" is somehow different to "business as usual" :cry:
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeSep 4th 2023
     
    Interesting fact, you may know already:
    I occasionally catch a BBC 4 programme I think its called "more or less", all about fact checking the oft publicised numbers. On last night's edition they confirmed that China has emitted more CO2 since 2014 than the UK has since the start of the industrial Revolution. It kind of puts things in perspective, and with India on the rise and flexing industrial muscle the future doesn't look too bright.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeSep 4th 2023
     
    Could well be true, but OTOH China has a much larger population, as does India, so the per capita figures might be interesting. But the good ole' USA knocks them all into a cocked hat :devil:

    https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-which-countries-are-historically-responsible-for-climate-change/

    "In total, humans have pumped around 2,500bn tonnes of CO2 (GtCO2) into the atmosphere since 1850, leaving less than 500GtCO2 of remaining carbon budget to stay below 1.5C of warming.

    "This means that, by the end of 2021, the world will collectively have burned through 86% of the carbon budget for a 50-50 probability of staying below 1.5C, or 89% of the budget for a two-thirds likelihood."

    As you say, the future doesn't look too bright. :sad:

    https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-co-emissions
    https://ourworldindata.org/contributed-most-global-co2

    I see that the last link counts the Middle East, Africa and South America all as part of Asia! And note that all the figures are slightly out of date. Lots more links on the last page.
  18.  
    The numbers are not that clearly presented, but here's a flavour

    UK cumulative emissions since industrial revolution 75bn t ÷ 67million population now = 1100t per person now

    US 1547t per person

    China 190t per person

    India 60t per person

    Owlman this may be encouraging that Chinese and Indian emissions are still nowhere near as much as UK or US ! So we do have agency ourselves, it's not all in the hands of others.

    Tim Harford's motto on R4 is brilliant: "is that a large number, and does it mean anything?"
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeSep 4th 2023
     
    I wonder how the emissions per capita graphs year by year, especially for places with a long history of emissions.

    Does it mean anything is a good question, since a lot of our emissions are greenwashed away as being somebody else's fault, for example.
    • CommentAuthorJeff B
    • CommentTimeSep 4th 2023 edited
     
    Posted By: owlmanRe:- Sicky tapes

    I occasionally manage to watch lunchtime TV, and the missus likes, find me a home in the country, or something like that. I'm quite curious at the want lists and the house viewing comments. They are a good insight into human nature. Often it's knock a wall down here and add an extension or conservatory there. Rarely is energy efficiency mentioned, it could be a result of editing, but looks and "feel" are important, with the "quarter acre" kitchen/living/dining/sun room being the most important. Oh and umpteen spacious bedrooms, all "en suite".

    Unscientific, I know, but an interesting observation.


    Not only is energy efficiency not mentioned but how the place is heated is often not mentioned at all except when there is a wood burning stove to be had. Oil fired C/H is never mentioned - at least not in any of the episodes I have watched.
  21.  
    As owlman mentions above,alot of hitec materials that are helping with energy efficiancy have only been tested for a short period.
    Ive been told that foam insulation seen in 1980s buildings has turned to dust and ive personally seen polythene thats become brittle like crisps,even though its not in sunlight.
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeSep 5th 2023
     
    <blockquote><cite>Posted By: chrisinbrighton</cite>As owlman mentions above,alot of hitec materials that are helping with energy efficiancy have only been tested for a short period.
    Ive been told that foam insulation seen in 1980s buildings has turned to dust and ive personally seen polythene thats become brittle like crisps,even though its not in sunlight.</blockquote>

    +1 in both cases, likewise mesh reinforced roof felt, gun applied tube adhesive. I also have doubts that breathable and vapour membranes will last the course, at least in a good enough form to 100% fulfil their original purpose.
    • CommentAuthorjon
    • CommentTimeSep 9th 2023 edited
     
    Raac contains reinforcement: the main big difference (other than what it was typically used for). Because it's aerated, it also carbonates quickly. Thermalite is similar in some ways. Carbonation isn't usually a strength problem but it does change the composition from alkaline to acidic. This provides ideal conditions, with moisture, for corrosion. The corrosion might not be obvious because it might expand into the aerated concrete. On top of that, the way the material works leads to deformation if it gets waterlogged. This leads to more deformation if ponding occurs.

    After that it becomes more complex because of the failure mechanism (especially at bearings).

    Hope this helps a bit
    • CommentAuthorCerisy
    • CommentTimeSep 10th 2023
     
    What jumps out from the technical comments is that the material would be lasting longer if properly inspected and maintained. We’re back to the nonsense called austerity that cut back on school maintenance budgets and let the schools handle it. Some used properly qualified staff, others used a mate of one of the governors! One school in Derbyshire stripped out old windows without checking that they had asbestos linings. It cost 750K to clean the whole school out before the kids could get back in. There’s no way these guys will be inspecting roof coverings to check for leaks. Sad situation.
    • CommentAuthorRex
    • CommentTimeSep 11th 2023
     
    <blockquote>
    Ive been told that foam insulation seen in 1980s buildings has turned to dust and I've personally seen polythene that's become brittle like crisps,even though its not in sunlight.</blockquote>

    So the insulation below the UFH will break down and the screed will become unstable?
  26.  
    Posted By: Rex

    Ive been told that foam insulation seen in 1980s buildings has turned to dust and I've personally seen polythene that's become brittle like crisps,even though its not in sunlight.


    So the insulation below the UFH will break down and the screed will become unstable?

    Are we talking about the CWI from the 80s which was Urea formaldehyde type foam insulation whereas today it is usually EPS or XPS used with UFH. So different materials. The Urea formaldehyde insulation from the 80 has known problems but I've not yet seen reports of issues with EPS (except shrinkage when subjected to heat under roof tiles - reference recent thread here). This is not to say in another 30 - 40 years problems won't arise but it has been used since the 60s (?) without falling apart yet.
    • CommentAuthorRex
    • CommentTimeSep 12th 2023
     
    I do realise that by the time there is a likely problem, I will probably not be too concerned.

1 to 27 of 27

  1.  
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
Back to Discussions Top of Page
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press