<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 17:41:25 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=303994#Comment_303994</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=303994#Comment_303994</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2023 14:48:28 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Beau</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi  all<br /><br />I have been roped in to help a friend with a few energy audits. We are just collecting information from the sites and passing the info on to a contractor. I went for the first one last week with no training and don't think my friend has done much. Loads of info to collect some of which is not a simple matter like what insulation type/thickness is in walls and roofs (no access to either). I was a bit taken aback by the amount of guesswork involved and recorded to be taken as gospel!<br /><br />If I am going to help again I want to do as good a job as possible as I see duff data as worse than useless.<br /><br />I suspect some of you good folk know what's involved in doing a proper job and would very much like to hear what you think I should know. <br /><br />In all honesty, I do not think it right how we did the job last week but if I don't I suspect someone else who doesn't give two hoots would replace me.<br /><br />Thanks<br />Beau]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=303995#Comment_303995</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=303995#Comment_303995</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2023 18:04:03 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I don't know anything myself but I subscribe to a very useful, interesting and sometimes cynical newsletter by a chap called Vilnis Vesma <a href="https://vesma.com/index.htm" target="_self" rel="nofollow">https://vesma.com/index.htm</a> There might be something on his site that is relevant.<br /><br />I think it's fundamentally quite a hard problem to solve. How do you know how much insulation is in a wall, without drilling holes at random? How airtight is a building without running an airtightness test? Is the occupant lying or mistaken? Cost and disruption to the occupants place difficult limits on what's possible.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=303997#Comment_303997</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=303997#Comment_303997</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2023 19:36:14 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Peter_in_Hungary</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[EPCs are done on what can be verified at the inspection. If the assessor can't see it then its not there and I believe the standard for the build date is assumed. There is probably good reasons for doing this despite the unfairness in some instances. That is how they solve the above problem. (same here BTW)<br /><br />Without invasive (expensive) inspections I can't think of a better solution]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=303998#Comment_303998</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=303998#Comment_303998</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2023 19:38:26 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Nick Parsons</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[This is some of my 'bread and butter'. I do some surveys for organisations with this own SAP-based model and my own 'elemental' surveys (simply assessing current quirks and estimating current U values, then looking at feasibility of X,Y or Z interventions.<br /><br />Good to have (a) better photographic ability than me, (b) a list of photos you need at minimum, (c) a check-list of all info required and (d) a good idea of the interventions and 'kit' available.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304001#Comment_304001</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304001#Comment_304001</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 09:05:28 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I have drilled holes in walls to verify CWI and used a borescope camera if necessary<br />I use it thermometer, instantly tells you a lot, eg no loft trap insulation, missing insulation inadequate insulation it can even pick up and coming draughts.<br />Looking is best. If no loft trap, suspect no insulation.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304002#Comment_304002</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304002#Comment_304002</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 09:22:13 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA['Default' assumptions may be inevitable/acceptable, because of the 'quick in and out' regime that's enshrined, I guess, in law or the standard rules/regulations of it (which in a different world could be different i.e. much more time/expense/evidential exploration allowed/required).<br /><br />What is then often complained of here, is an unfairness, which seems impossible to correct. If e.g. a property owner is prepared to put in time and money to generate truer evidence, then there should be a mechanism to feed same into a revised EPC calc, whereas it seems that the original approximation is the only result that's allowed to have official status and you're stuck with it.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304006#Comment_304006</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304006#Comment_304006</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:05:48 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The driver in all of it is the cost and the availability of trained, and trustworthy, manpower. If the electorate were prepared to pay for more accurate results the law could require them or at least permit them. There's an obvious unfairness possible if you allow rich people to pay for more accurate methods to be used that might e.g result in a better EPC allowing a better price for a property or even for it to be sold at all.<br /><br />The whole problem with the proposed 'Scottish pasivhaus' revision is the availability of enough certifiers, apparently.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304007#Comment_304007</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304007#Comment_304007</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:50:10 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: djh</cite>the cost and the availability of trained, and trustworthy, manpower.</blockquote>Lack of manpower is due to the pathetic payment tariff officially set. I remember being invited to talk about IES-type whole-building thermal modelling (which I was dabbling in at the time) to a local 'chapter' of prospective practitioners of the EPC next-big-thing - a bright lot who were expecting a regime of serious realistic assesment/modelling/recommendation. Instead they got a super-cheapskate tickbox ritual. I wonder what happened to them - all quit I'm sure, replaced by gig-economy pieceworkers.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304010#Comment_304010</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304010#Comment_304010</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 15:16:05 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Nick Parsons</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[+1 for Tony's IR thermometer. V useful as I have no IR camera (and no Smart phone to plug a cheap (?) add-on into). You can even use it to 'plot' temps on plans and elevations to give you an idea of the 'shape' of the heat-loss. Also very much agree that making holes is good!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304012#Comment_304012</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304012#Comment_304012</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 17:58:28 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: fostertom</cite>the pathetic payment tariff officially set</blockquote>But that is presumably the politcians' best guess as to the public mood of cost vs benefit? You and I both think it should be set to produce more accurate results, but we're probably not typical.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304013#Comment_304013</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304013#Comment_304013</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 18:11:35 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Peter_in_Hungary</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Similar over here - A new standard from January, validity reduced from 10 years to 5 years and the EPC rating must be shown in adverts for both sale and rent. (Previously it was enough to have them as a contract attachment, but not part of the contract) The price is fixed at a maximum rate per hour and the time allowed for single story house up to 100 m2 is 2 hours]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304014#Comment_304014</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304014#Comment_304014</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 18:40:04 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: djh</cite>the politcians' best guess as to the public mood</blockquote>Do we want politicians who just comply with the public mood (or rather, their core voters' mood)?<br />or ones who take the risk to illuminate and lead a public into 'what's right' - a public which, if succesfully so led, becomes by definition more united, less rigid in prejudice?<br /><br />The former seems always to be a race to lowest common denominator, careless of 'what's right', as mostly today; the latter seems always enlivening, whether or not you agree with that particular 'what's right', but at least things can move.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304018#Comment_304018</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304018#Comment_304018</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 20:17:44 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Artiglio</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[In the real world of everyday folk an EPC is a nothing , the vast majority wonâ€™t use a building and its appliances to best effect and lifestyle choices will make far more difference , then is a property with an epc of x and energy use of y more efficient as it has more occupants ie) is energy use per person really more important than use per m2.<br /><br />On the radio recently there was a piece about fuel poverty and a charity that distributes heat packs, saying they help those in need by providing a couple of oil filled electric radiators so that damilies can heat just 2 rooms rather than turn the central heating on fornthe whole house. No talk of using rad valves of the existing system or any talk of the relative cost of gas and electricity or how hot water would be provided. <br /><br />Then another article suggesting several million smart meters needed changing as they were effectively obsolete, if the report is correct is there any possibilty that smart meters help  save energy/ money overall ,on that basis by the time the costs of those changes have been added to bills. Then weâ€™ve increased energy costs and the salt in the wound of the standing charge increases to protect the customers of failed suppliers.<br /><br />Add on the other suggestion ,that now that compulsory prepayment meters were no longer allowed, of a extra on bills to protect suppliers from users that donâ€™t /canâ€™t pay. Throw in the energy companies eco subsidies being moved to social housing and low income users and you end up with an energy market / policy that is seemingly never going to benefit the majority of users and that instead theyâ€™ll be forever subsidising others.<br /><br />An epc rating is pretty irrelevant.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304020#Comment_304020</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304020#Comment_304020</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 20:42:20 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: fostertom</cite>Do we want politicians who just comply with the public mood (or rather, their core voters' mood)?</blockquote>You just keep chasing down one rabbit hole after another. What we want is irrelevant. It's what or who the public as a whole elect that matters.<br /><br />There seems to be a shortage of inspiring politicians of any colour at the moment and has been for quite a while.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304021#Comment_304021</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304021#Comment_304021</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 20:47:16 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Nick Parsons</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[An epc rating is pretty irrelevant<br /><br />...and pretty jolly inaccurate in the majority of cases I have come across. That's my major gripe about them.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304037#Comment_304037</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304037#Comment_304037</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2023 13:25:37 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Beau</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Thanks all for the advice. <br /><br />Plenty of useful tips there for us to do a better job next time if there is a next time. Can't believe how long it takes to get all the written on-site info into the Excel files once back at base.<br /><br /> Do you tend to enter it all into Excel files as you go along on-site?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304039#Comment_304039</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304039#Comment_304039</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2023 17:47:09 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Nick Parsons</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Do you tend to enter it all into Excel files as you go along on-site?<br /><br />I don't, but I bet those more tech-savvy than me probably do. Yes, when I do do measured surveys it always takes me a huge time to 'interpret' my 'drawings' and enter everything. Always take twice or 3x as many pics as I do to 'fill in the gaps'.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304040#Comment_304040</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304040#Comment_304040</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2023 18:01:37 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Peter_in_Hungary</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[There are software packages for doing EPCs (iSBEM was something I tripped over) but I'm afraid I don't know enough to say where to go or which one. Google and a bit of research should come up with something but I suspect there will be licencing fees etc.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304055#Comment_304055</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304055#Comment_304055</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2023 20:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>wookey</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[If you want to enter data as you go, this is a useful SAP/EPC calculator:<br />https://openenergymonitor.org/sapjs/<br />You can install it locally, and all data stays local anyway:<br />Here is mine: http://wookware.org/SAPjs/<br /><br />Links to docs, the source and other tools are at the bottom.<br /><br />That is SAP 9.92. Is 10.1 in force now? In which case it needs an update.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304056#Comment_304056</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304056#Comment_304056</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 08:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>RobinB</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The AECB now have two Retrofit courses which cover this quite thoroughly, there is a lot to it! And so much scope for unintentional consequences - mainly moisture related. https://aecb.net/the-aecb-carbonlite-retrofit-online-training-course/  .   <br /><br />As for the EPCs which are next to useless - due to the can't see it so can't count it approach, the only glimmer of light I think is that maybe UK buildings are not nearly as bad as we think they are. They can't even see/evaluate triple glazing, wall insulation or indeed most of the things that contribute to a good energy rating.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304068#Comment_304068</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304068#Comment_304068</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 20:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: RobinB</cite>They can't even see/evaluate triple glazing</blockquote>That disappoints me, but perhaps not surprises me. It's quite easy to see triple glazing and not too difficult to see surface coatings and spacer types.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304072#Comment_304072</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304072#Comment_304072</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 00:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Peter_in_Hungary</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: djh</cite><blockquote ><cite >Posted By: RobinB</cite>They can't even see/evaluate triple glazing</blockquote>That disappoints me, but perhaps not surprises me. It's quite easy to see triple glazing and not too difficult to see surface coatings and spacer types.</blockquote><br />If the UK is anything like over here where EPCs are restricted in the hourly rate that can be charged and the time allowed is also defined then perhaps substitute 'The can't even see' for Don't have time to properly look.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304107#Comment_304107</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304107#Comment_304107</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2023 00:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>RobinB</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Agreed Peter, doesn't have time to see or be shown is more accurate.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304146#Comment_304146</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304146#Comment_304146</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 19:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>revor</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[For those interested an article here on EPC. <br /><br />https://www.insidehousing.co.uk/comment/making-energy-performance-certificates-fit-for-purpose-83617]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304148#Comment_304148</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304148#Comment_304148</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 20:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hmm, seems to be a lot of good words but I haven't found any substance yet?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304149#Comment_304149</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005&amp;Focus=304149#Comment_304149</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2023 09:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>revor</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: djh</cite>Hmm, seems to be a lot of good words but I haven't found any substance yet?</blockquote><br /><br />Thought you might think that. The how abundantly absent.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>