<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - Sub base for water tank</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 09:14:46 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Sub base for water tank</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18362&amp;Focus=309453#Comment_309453</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18362&amp;Focus=309453#Comment_309453</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 12:52:52 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>wookey</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[We've just acquired a 3000l water tank, to counter the ever-drier summers. (Our existing 1200l of water butts is no longer sufficient to water the garden properly). It's 1.4m diameter base, and of course will weigh 3 tonnes when full.<br /><br />The supplier tells me to install a 150mm deep reinforced concrete base (600mm wider than the tank - i.e 300mm all round). Which is fine, but I'm wondering if there is a lower-carbon way of doing this? Can one make a strong-enough base to avoid settling and potential damage to the tank base without just pouring 0.6m3 of concrete?<br /><br />Concrete is about 380 kg/m3 so this would be 228KgCO2e, or approx one-way flight Stansted to Barcelona. It feels like there should be a better way.<br /><br />Maybe the way driveways are made with an MOT subbase, and a solid perimeter to avoid spreading. <br />The point loading is very much lower with the tank (1.54m2 vs 0.09m2 for the tyres of a van of similar weight - i.e 1/17th of the load). I'm not sure what surface material to use to avoid risk of puncturing over time.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Sub base for water tank</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18362&amp;Focus=309454#Comment_309454</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18362&amp;Focus=309454#Comment_309454</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 13:54:30 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>owlman</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[It may be 3 tonnes but, if flat bottomed? then spread over a large area, maybe not such a large point load as one at first thinks. My 2000l steel thermal store which is in legs ( so greater point load) has never presented a problem. I would have thought a hardcore base would be OK.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Sub base for water tank</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18362&amp;Focus=309457#Comment_309457</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18362&amp;Focus=309457#Comment_309457</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 16:49:04 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[As well as the load the tank imposes on the concrete, you also have to think about the load the concrete imposes on the ground. Where we are with clay + trees = possibility of heave we had to build the garage as a raft essentially because the ground might disappear (or at least cease providing support) under any part of it. And dig a 2 m deep hole under the house for similar reasons.<br /><br />But if your ground is fairly solid and rigid then I'd think that a foot of sharp gravel would be as much use as a foot of concrete. And reinforcement, seriously? Some sort of membrane + sand to prevent puncturing the tank base?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Sub base for water tank</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18362&amp;Focus=309458#Comment_309458</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18362&amp;Focus=309458#Comment_309458</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 16:52:34 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[PS wookey - elsewhere it seems you are whispering posts to yourself whilst thinking they are public, and for some strange reason fostertom can see them but nobody else can, certainly not me. So you need to edit your other posts, or repost the material using whatever technique you used to post here!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Sub base for water tank</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18362&amp;Focus=309460#Comment_309460</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18362&amp;Focus=309460#Comment_309460</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 19:58:55 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Nick Parsons</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[djh, I can see them when I sign in, but nowadays I generally don't. Nick]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Sub base for water tank</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18362&amp;Focus=309461#Comment_309461</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18362&amp;Focus=309461#Comment_309461</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 20:20:30 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Ah, another one! I'm usually signed in (so I can check what's new) but I don't see whispers unless they're addressed to me. Something flaky in the code to do with the browser I expect, just as there's something that automatically fills in my whisper box every time <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/cry.gif" alt=":cry:" title=":cry:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Sub base for water tank</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18362&amp;Focus=309462#Comment_309462</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18362&amp;Focus=309462#Comment_309462</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 11:50:50 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>WillInAberdeen</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hoping that all of us who dislike the software, have chipped in to the replacement kitty!<br /><br /><a href="https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18341" target="_self" rel="nofollow">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18341</a><br /><br />As was said, the pressure on the ground (2tonnes/m2) is not an issue here, much less than a human footprint. It's more about the risk of differential settlement where one part of the base gets compacted over time more than another part, as the tank fills and empties, and maybe as rainwater moves underneath it. Then the tank weight might end up on uneven ground and it would tilt, or even split.<br /><br />The proposed slab is to act as a ground beam and transfer the loads from any unsupported points, to well supported points (which is why it has reinforcing)<br /><br />The tank manf hasn't seen your site ground condition so has to give CYA guidance that works anywhere. (We're in the same position, and know less about how the tank is built and how accommodating is base is!)<br /><br />If you're willing to take some limited risk of it tilting/splitting/leaking (what damage could that cause, where it is located?) then dig a hole down to undisturbed subsoil, fill it back up with well compacted hardcore, install the tank and keep an eye on it. If you can find some old paving slabs, they would be good to go on top of the hardcore layer and stop any pokey-up stones from poking the tank.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Sub base for water tank</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18362&amp;Focus=309466#Comment_309466</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18362&amp;Focus=309466#Comment_309466</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 16:39:14 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>wookey</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The tank is one of these: https://www.ecosure.co.uk/collections/rainwater-tanks/products/3000-litre-water-tank-black<br />The plastic is about 10mm thick. Rotomoulded.<br /><br />The ground is the far corner of the garden, pretty-much undisturbed since at least 2008. Clay-based soil. Nothing bad happens if the tank leans or leaks (except that if it's bad enough I have to do this again in 10 years, better).]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Sub base for water tank</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18362&amp;Focus=309474#Comment_309474</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18362&amp;Focus=309474#Comment_309474</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 18:01:20 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Peter_in_Hungary</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[If your soil is clay based then you can't rule out shrinkage or heave in the future.<br /><br />I would go with the manufacturers recommendations.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Sub base for water tank</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18362&amp;Focus=309479#Comment_309479</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18362&amp;Focus=309479#Comment_309479</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 21:11:23 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Not all clay is the same; only some types are prone to heave. I forget the details. And IIRC correctly it's tree roots that cause the problems, either by growing and taking more water or getting killed and taking less water. Building Regs has a good set of rules for houses as I remember. I certainly think a concrete slab is overkill. WiA's paving slabs over hardcore sounds like a good scheme. Basically dig a deep enough hole and fill with hardcore and the problem goes away. Piles and beams are for if you can't dig for some reason (TPO).]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Sub base for water tank</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18362&amp;Focus=309495#Comment_309495</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18362&amp;Focus=309495#Comment_309495</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2025 19:39:58 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>revor</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: djh</cite>Basically dig a deep enough hole and fill with hardcore and the problem goes away. Piles and beams are for if you can't dig for some reason (TPO).</blockquote><br /><br />It is important that when digging down you do not disturb the ground at the level of where the hardcore meets the bottom of the hole. The ground will be compacted over the years and will form an excellent subbase for well compacted hardcore. Around here the BCO is very particular that the base of excavations prepared for concrete pours are flat and solid and they don't tolerate digger bucket tooth grooves. Might be overkill for your tank but the principle holds well. Topping the hardcore with flags is a good idea, helps distribute the load, look better more a finished look and inhibit weeds that would otherwise grow around the base of the tank.<br />I use a redundant 3600 l silage tank to collect rain water and I used to pump it up (ca 7m) to our growing area, that is until I worked out that it cost a bit more in electricity to drive the pump than the cost of domestic water.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Sub base for water tank</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18362&amp;Focus=309496#Comment_309496</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18362&amp;Focus=309496#Comment_309496</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 10:08:36 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Prob true, but nowadays electricity's in glut, 'free' in true environmental terms if not by inflexible tariff, in summer when you're needing to water the vegs, just when mains water is ever-scarcer and costly in true environmental terms.<br /><br />The advent of 'free' renewable electricity changes the conventional (50yrs?) environment-conscious rules-of-thumb.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>