Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:16:01 +0100 https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/ Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3 https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18425&Focus=310547#Comment_310547 https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18425&Focus=310547#Comment_310547 Sun, 19 Apr 2026 23:00:46 +0100 ChrisGT https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18425&Focus=310549#Comment_310549 https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18425&Focus=310549#Comment_310549 Mon, 20 Apr 2026 08:41:06 +0100 philedge
What's nuts about the peak cluster is that it's going to cross the Hynet pipeline but not join it. It's beyond me why they can join the pipelines and share the same resource.]]> https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18425&Focus=310550#Comment_310550 https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18425&Focus=310550#Comment_310550 Mon, 20 Apr 2026 10:28:48 +0100 WillInAberdeen
1) stop using it

2) CCS

3) both of the above

In principle I'm leaning towards 1) but recognise that lots of people are still using it including me, so looks like 2) or 3) are the way we'll be going.

AIUI the Hynet project will quite rapidly fill up the redundant Douglas gas field it is being pumped into, so a different redundant gas field will be used for Peak Carbon further North near Morecambe, if either/both projects are built.]]>