<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - Who should form the next Government?</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 10:30:27 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Who should form the next Government?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1956&amp;Focus=24597#Comment_24597</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1956&amp;Focus=24597#Comment_24597</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:05:53 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Chris Wardle</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I disagree with that.  In that situation, I, in conjuction with some other people, have prevented another candidate, who I really didn't want to see get in, from winning.  For example, I might want a Green MP, but I'd vote Tory in a Tory/Labour marginal to keep Labour from getting another term.  If, along, with enough other people who would rather vote for a minority party but voted Tory, had voted for their first preference, then Labour might have got the seat and that would have been my least favoured outcome.  It is a negative way of voting but there is a logic in it.<br /><br />I'd like to see a single transferable vote.  You would vote for a first and second preference and if no candidate got more than 50% on the first prefs, all but the two top candidates would drop out and their second pref votes would be added.  I'd use the first pref votes to form the the House of Lords on a party list system strictly proportional to the national first prefs vote.  That way you get a strictly representative revising chamber (with the power to alter bad legislation) with a Commons where there was still a chance of a single party forming a government without all the coalition building that can lead to weak administrations.<br /><br />Under that system, I'd vote Green then Tory in that order, so I'd hopefully get a strong environmental voice in the Lords to scrutinise bills coupled with the ejection of the Labour administration.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Who should form the next Government?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1956&amp;Focus=24623#Comment_24623</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1956&amp;Focus=24623#Comment_24623</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:58:26 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>joe.e</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Yes, I'd very much like to have that system.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Who should form the next Government?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1956&amp;Focus=24629#Comment_24629</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1956&amp;Focus=24629#Comment_24629</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:06:35 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>biffvernon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[joe.e&gt;unless the candidate won by a majority of one then your vote still didn't achieve anything<br /><br />Since our elections never seem to be won with a majority of one, all voting is wasted.  Notwithstanding this self-evident truth I have voted in every possible election and my candidate has always lost by a very large margin.  Why do I persist?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Who should form the next Government?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1956&amp;Focus=24635#Comment_24635</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1956&amp;Focus=24635#Comment_24635</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:50:24 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>mrswhitecat</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I persist in memory of poor misguided Emily Davison.  A bit OTT I think but I'm also a believer in 'use it or lose it'.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Who should form the next Government?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1956&amp;Focus=24642#Comment_24642</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1956&amp;Focus=24642#Comment_24642</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:05:13 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>joe.e</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: biffvernon</cite>joe.e>unless the candidate won by a majority of one then your vote still didn't achieve anything<br /><br />Since our elections never seem to be won with a majority of one, all voting is wasted.  Notwithstanding this self-evident truth I have voted in every possible election and my candidate has always lost by a very large margin.  Why do I persist?</blockquote><br />Yes, I always vote as well. What I was arguing against is the idea that if your chosen candidate is certain not to win, you should vote for someone else who might, my point being that actually you're equally unlikely to have a measurable effect on the outcome. The whole point of democracy is that we agree to accept the majority opinion. In a multi-party situation with low turnouts, that means that most of the people, most of the time, will live with a government they didn't vote for. But that's ok, because that's democracy, and it's better than the alternatives. So I go ahead and vote for the person I'd like to get elected, regardless of what chance they have of winning. I'm stating my opinion, not betting on a horse race.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Who should form the next Government?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1956&amp;Focus=24724#Comment_24724</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1956&amp;Focus=24724#Comment_24724</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:37:17 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>greenman</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[This may be the exception, but 'protest votes' can sometimes achieve something - remember the general election in the mid-late eighties (can't remember which one it was)? There was a huge (comparitively) vote for the Green Party, badly rattling both Conservative and Labour. Before that election, none of the major parties had any significant green policies (or they didn't get any publicity if they did). After that 'wake up call', and ever since, they all have.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Who should form the next Government?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1956&amp;Focus=24730#Comment_24730</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1956&amp;Focus=24730#Comment_24730</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:21:49 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>ludite</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Greenman.  That's the reason I stood for the greens.  You can't vote for a party if they don't put up a candidate for election.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Who should form the next Government?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1956&amp;Focus=24807#Comment_24807</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1956&amp;Focus=24807#Comment_24807</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:42:49 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>biffvernon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Er, what are the significant green policies that 'they all have'?  Brown went to Saudi to get more oil so that we can combat global warming. Doh.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Who should form the next Government?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1956&amp;Focus=24892#Comment_24892</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1956&amp;Focus=24892#Comment_24892</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:44:18 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>greenman</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Well perhaps 'policies' was overstating it then - let's just say that they are aware that they all have to try to 'appear' to be environmentally aware (even if it is all for show)! 'Green issues' are now in mainstream politics, where previously they were the preserve of the Green Party and the 'fringe' elements.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Who should form the next Government?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1956&amp;Focus=24893#Comment_24893</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1956&amp;Focus=24893#Comment_24893</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:57:55 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Chris Wardle</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I've heard the point made that the people who are concerned about global warming need to make common cause with the Peak Oil people because this is where the attention is going to be in the next decade.  I agree with this but feel that some in the environmental movement have been reluctant and I'm not really sure why.  Peak Oil is going to be the main issue in the mind of the politicians and the general public, because it hits you in the pocket now.  In my view environmentalists need to piggy back on that agenda and make sure that the solutions don't involve CTLs etc.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Who should form the next Government?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1956&amp;Focus=24911#Comment_24911</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1956&amp;Focus=24911#Comment_24911</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:09:54 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>biffvernon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Yes, quite a lot of folk in the environmental movement just don't get it about Peak Oil.  The conjuction of energy security and climate change is the big issue from now on.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>