<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - what&amp;#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 03:54:16 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=28908#Comment_28908</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=28908#Comment_28908</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 12:45:19 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>bobo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I have this river that runs down from the mountains and drops about 20ft from one side of my land to the other.It never dries up and always has a good flow.<br />What would be the best way to use it's power ?<br />Thanks.<br /><a href="http://img127.imageshack.us/img127/1438/0003766qs1.jpg" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://img127.imageshack.us/img127/1438/0003766qs1.jpg</a><br /><a href="http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/1536/0003763mm5.jpg" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/1536/0003763mm5.jpg</a><br /><a href="http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/4904/0003765cw4.jpg" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/4904/0003765cw4.jpg</a><br /><a href="http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/2293/0003767rw3.jpg" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/2293/0003767rw3.jpg</a>]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=28924#Comment_28924</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=28924#Comment_28924</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 15:53:08 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Oh boy ... Which national park is this?<br /><a href="http://www.british-hydro.co.uk/download.pdf" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.british-hydro.co.uk/download.pdf</a><br /><a href="http://rapidshare.com/files/133406549/Alexandersson_-_Living_Water_-_Viktor_Schauberger_and_the_Secrets_of_Natural_Energy__1990_.pdf" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://rapidshare.com/files/133406549/Alexandersson_-_Living_Water_-_Viktor_Schauberger_and_the_Secrets_of_Natural_Energy__1990_.pdf</a>]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=28963#Comment_28963</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=28963#Comment_28963</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 21:51:42 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>bobo</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Thanks Tom.<br />I was thinking more along the lines of a simple turbine like the Navitron ones.<br />Are these any good ?<br /><br />ps........its Snowdonia <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/wink.gif" alt=":wink:" title=":wink:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=28964#Comment_28964</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=28964#Comment_28964</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 22:17:32 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Ah yes, Snowdonia - Dartmoor, Teign Gorge, me. Are the Navitron ones different from http://www.british-hydro.co.uk/download.pdf ? Do you mean a water wheel that just dips into the passing water? Very little power there.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=28965#Comment_28965</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=28965#Comment_28965</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 22:18:46 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[You will need to use the full 20 ft = 6m head and do some substantial engineering to dam the river enough to collect the water and pipe it to a turbine at the lowest point on your land. It would be good to measure the water flow possibly using a v board and then estimate the output. From previous experience this could be disappointingly low but it could be more in winter when you need it most but the capital cost will go up to do that and then not be used to its full in the summer.<br /><br />Do calculations first, then cost it, then decide.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=28977#Comment_28977</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=28977#Comment_28977</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 23:40:18 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[And what (low) %age of that flow are you prepared to divert down the pipe, so it no longer comes over your fabulous rocks and falls? Maybe you only take flow (a high %age) when it's in spate? Economics.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29056#Comment_29056</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29056#Comment_29056</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:46:26 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>mrswhitecat</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Would a GSHP set up (I've seen sketches of them with the slinky affair dipping into a water source) save the prettiness of the river?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29088#Comment_29088</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29088#Comment_29088</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:41:17 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>pahuk</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[In my experience, I have found the Environment Agency and Planning Authorities very negative when discussing small hydro electric power plants.<br /><br />I have been deterred from applying for any licenses by very broad brush attitudes from EA officers with comments like 'of course you will need to change the flow of the water and we can't allow that' and 'the impact on water life will be devastating, what if a fish swims into the turbine'<br /><br />I feel a lot of this has to do with a lack of education and understanding within the relevant authorities (especially where planning is concerned) and a presumption that all hydro electric plants are the same as the huge civic hydro electric dams but on a smaller scale. <br /><br />As a result, I'm afraid I have absolutely no experience with building anything like them, even though I really want to.<br /><br />I hope it is not all doom and gloom and wish bobo the best of luck and would be interested to see how you get on.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29544#Comment_29544</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29544#Comment_29544</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 08:52:13 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Cliff Pope</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[What about an old fashioned over-shot waterwheel with some of the water fed along wooden troughs? The whole thing could be home-made.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29552#Comment_29552</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29552#Comment_29552</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:50:37 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[A 12ft diam overshot wheel only generates 1 horsepower per ft of width - but huge torque.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29590#Comment_29590</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29590#Comment_29590</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:55:24 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Cliff Pope</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[But it would look nice, wouldn't need engineering works like dams etc, needn't interfere with the natural river at all, as you could regulate the flow with a wooden sluice gate and just operate the mill when you wanted the power.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29600#Comment_29600</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29600#Comment_29600</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:57:24 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>joe.e</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: fostertom</cite>A 12ft diam overshot wheel only generates 1 horsepower per ft of width - but huge torque.</blockquote><br />Does that torque translate in practice into a higher output for any generator connected to the wheel? If so, how do the calculations work?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29614#Comment_29614</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29614#Comment_29614</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:29:50 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Power is proportional to volume (weight of water) x fall ------------ torque is a red herring in thinking about this problem.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29621#Comment_29621</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29621#Comment_29621</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:17:16 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>joe.e</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[So for an overshot water-wheel presumably (the amount of water held on the falling side of the wheel) x (the height of fall during which the water stays on the wheel)? For which you'd need to know the capacity and exact shape of the 'buckets' on the wheel (excuse my ignorance of overshot water-wheel component terminology). And the flow would come in to it, because the wheel would have to be designed to accommodate as much water as possible to maximise power, but would maybe be inefficient if it was handling a lot less than its designed capacity?<br />I'm intrigued, because there's a semi-derelict mill near where I live; the wheel, about 12 foot diameter, is there but almost collapsed, the mill-house is crumbling, but the mill-race is intact, about a hundred foot run all neatly lined with big pieces of slate, with nice stone sluices all ready to open. The owner has refused to sell the place to anyone, evidently preferring to let it rot, but it had occurred to me that one day it could be a good spot for a little private hydro-electric project.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29623#Comment_29623</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29623#Comment_29623</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:43:45 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>jamesingram</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I was involved in a mircohydro (6Kw) project in the early nineties<br />It was in a national park <br />a  catchment point was constructed at the highest point in a convient pool in the stream , then a 150mm pipe was run about 60m+across pasture the most direct route possible to the lowest point and the generator shed ,then on to feed back into the stream<br />it was all done in a very low keys way<br />As far as I'm aware ita been happily generating energy for the last 18 year without problem and the knowledge of any authorities]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29630#Comment_29630</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29630#Comment_29630</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:55:31 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>joe.e</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Jamesingram, do you remember what the height difference was, roughly?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29644#Comment_29644</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29644#Comment_29644</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 09:00:09 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: joe.e</cite>the wheel would have to be designed to accommodate as much water as possible to maximise power, but would maybe be inefficient if it was handling a lot less than its designed capacity?</blockquote>Not particularly - you mean if the buckets were half empty? You don't need to know the shape of the buckets as long as they're big enough.<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: joe.e</cite>one day it could be a good spot for a little private hydro-electric project</blockquote>Only inasmuch as water extraction rights exist (or not, if they've lapsed or been sold). You wouldn't use the leat, wheel or mill building - it would be done as jamesingram describes, which means it could be done anywhere, regardless of previous waterworks. http://www.british-hydro.co.uk/download.pdf has everything you need to know.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29668#Comment_29668</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29668#Comment_29668</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13:03:05 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>jamesingram</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I've been trying to remember more details , I was paid in food and drink (whiskey)for my efforts so my memory of the job is a bit cloudy<br />thinking about it, the run must have been 100m+ and very roughly the head was around  30m]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29678#Comment_29678</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29678#Comment_29678</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13:44:29 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>mike7</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I think CAT has good information on this subject.<br />Old geezer remembers ..... I made a working model cross flow turbine for them about 25 yrs ago. It drove a bike dynamo.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29818#Comment_29818</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29818#Comment_29818</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:03:22 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Cliff Pope</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[With a waterwheel you could have some fun operating machinery directly, rather than thinking in terms of generating electricity first. What about a saw mill? Either a geared-up wheel, or a slow cutting straight saw you could feed tree trunks past. I watched a tiny engine at a show geared down with a leather belt with a crank hitched to a large reciprocating saw. He just put a 2 foot tree trunk on the ground and left it to saw away.<br /><br />Drill<br />Pumps<br />Grinding corn<br />The uses must be endless one you have rotating shafting in a workshop.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29869#Comment_29869</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29869#Comment_29869</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:50:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[mechanically driven heat pump, for infinite COP! (in terms of bought fuel)]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29872#Comment_29872</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29872#Comment_29872</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:33:39 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Paul in Montreal</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: fostertom</cite>mechanically driven heat pump, for infinite COP! (in terms of bought fuel)</blockquote><br /><br />COP is always defined as (power output) /  (power input) - it makes no mention of the cost of that input power. Though it would be a good use of that river, that's for sure since it would be both the source of the heat and the mechanical power needed to make it useful.<br /><br />Paul in Montreal.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29875#Comment_29875</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29875#Comment_29875</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:55:35 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[In this case it meant coefficient of pocketmoney.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29876#Comment_29876</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29876#Comment_29876</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:59:33 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Paul in Montreal</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: fostertom</cite>In this case it meant coefficient of pocketmoney.</blockquote><br /><br />Howabout Coefficient Of Parsimony? That would certainly appeal to my fellow Yorkshiremen ;)<br /><br />Paul born in East Yorkshire and now in Montreal]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29885#Comment_29885</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29885#Comment_29885</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:27:30 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Aha! Actually, why didn't those early mill engineers invent heat pumps? History might have been very different!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29886#Comment_29886</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29886#Comment_29886</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:36:50 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Davipon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Excuse my ignorance,how does water run a heat pump & be the source of heat,blooming cold there!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29898#Comment_29898</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29898#Comment_29898</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:27:34 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Ed Davies</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Paul in Montreal</cite>COP is always defined as (power output) /  (power input) - it makes no mention of the cost of that input power.</blockquote><br /><br />If what you say was true then the long-term average COP of all devices would be exactly one.<br /><br />To make sense COP counts the paid-for power in and useful power out.  E.g., a split air-conditioner type heat pump in heating mode might have:<br /><br />1. Electrical input: 3 kW.<br />2. Heat delivered to the room: 9 kW.<br />3. Heat absorbed from the outside: 6.5 kW.<br />4. Heat and noise wasted to the outside world: 0.5 kW.<br /><br />Adding all the inputs and outputs you'd get a COP = (9 + 0.5) / (3 + 6.5) = 1.<br /><br />More sensibly, you take the useful heat to the room (9 kW) and divide by the paid-for electricity (3 kW) and get a COP of 3.<br /><br />In other words, you ignore the energy going in which has zero cost.  If Tom wants to regard the power from his water mill as zero cost then that's up to him.  Personally, I think there's at least an opportunity cost there.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29904#Comment_29904</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29904#Comment_29904</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 02:57:29 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Paul in Montreal</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Ed Davies</cite><br />To make sense COP counts the paid-for power in and useful power out.  E.g., a split air-conditioner type heat pump in heating mode might have:</blockquote><br /><br />It's not paid for power - it's power you supply to run the pump in the form of mechanical work. So my comment still stands  - COP = power output / power supplied to run the pump<br /><br />The heat moved by the pump is not counted in the COP calculation.<br /><br />Paul in Montreal.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29911#Comment_29911</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=29911#Comment_29911</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:30:29 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Miked2714</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[pahuk. Sorry to hear about your negative experiences with people from the Environment Agency. The attitude you mentioned is not even in keeping with their own policies. People's experiences must be dependent on individual officers as there are plenty of micro hydro schemes going ahead with Agency support. Can anyone please post something if in the future they run into problems of this nature and I will endeavour to help.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>what&#039;s the best way to use this small river ?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=30024#Comment_30024</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2273&amp;Focus=30024#Comment_30024</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:59:18 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>pahuk</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Miked2714.<br />It seems that it is very dependant on the area you are in and not necessarily the merits of the scheme as to the response obtained from the Environment Agency, I wonder if this has something to do with education rather than policy.<br />For an example, a project I had some involvement in (not huge technical involvement though so please don't ask me for all the facts and figures) was the reuse of an existing mill with existing chase but having lost its wheel some time ago.<br />The project was to re-insert an overshoot water wheel into the existing chase (is that the right word?) and use it to generate a small quantity of power and use the mechanical movement for other demonstrations within the old working mill to grind corn etc.<br />The Environment Agency's response was less than helpful and felt like a huge hurdle jumping exercise with comments like those I posted before being banded about and a renewal of a historic extraction licence being the subject of our misery.<br />Despite the fact the chase was not dry, i.e. it already had water running through it, and to all intensive purposes the mill was in working order, with the exception of the mill wheel, the EA refused to allow the occupants to control the water on 'environmental and flood grounds'<br />I would be happy to hear of peoples successful applications as this is of interest to me in the future.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>