Home  5  Books  5  Magazines  5  News  5  GreenPro  5  HelpDesk  5  Your Cart  5  Register  5  Green Living Forum
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories

This month's favourite choices

    Green Building Bible ((both volumes) fourth edition)
    Green Building Bible ((both volumes) fourth edition)  
    These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

    1 year Green Building magazine subscription
    1 year Green Building magazine subscription  
    Green Building magazine is the UK's only eco-building magazine. It always features a wide range of eco-building projects from all around the UK.

    Ecohouse 3
    Ecohouse 3  
    Sue Roaf never fails to impress with her inexaustible energy, forthright opinion and attention to detail. Ecohouse has become a classic in the green building genre.

    Green Building magazine - Winter 2008 - Radical renovation
    GBmag Winter 2008  
    This issue focuses on renovation and the AECB carbonlite/passivhaus standards, thermal upgrade options, energy calculation dynamic software and lots more.





Zurich Connect Home Insurance

Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




  1.  
    I am in desperate need for advice/help

    In April I had a Hot water Solar panel system installed. The contract was for 2 panels and only 1 was installed. The company is using the small print stating that they can change the specifications.

    The average temperature readings at the collector have been:
    May … 38c
    June … 41c
    July … 37c

    And the highest temperature recorded in the hot water tank is 43c (5th June)

    Numerous calls etc to the company and they then sent an “independent” inspector to do a report on the installation.

    Inspector stated that the pipe insulation needs to be upgraded to 19mm thickness (at present is Armaflex 15mm)

    And that increasing the Pressure from the present 1.5bar to 3bar would raise the temperature in the collector to a satisfactory level.

    The company is using this report to refuse to install the 2nd panel

    The specifications of the system are:

    210 litre dual coil hot water tank, with small immersion top-up
    The collector positioned 19.7metres from the Hot water tank,
    Type of collector is Sunpower Solar Water Heater Co., Ltd SPA-58-1800-18-C (3.12m²).
    Roof position Azimuth: -50°.
    Latitude: 50.92 °, Longitude: 1.42 °

    Am in Hampshire

    Any advice or help would be greatly appreciated
    • CommentAuthorArnold
    • CommentTimeSep 6th 2008
     
    why did you pay them if they only did half the job?

    Who fitted it? what did it cost you?

    Have they increasing the Pressure is it not your job to make changes such as this.

    Does the pump have the capacity to give U the required pressure.

    Also is such a pressure within the tolerance for the rest of the equipment / system

    Arnold

    Are you really sure it was an independent person or a mate of the people who you employed.
    • CommentAuthorchuckey
    • CommentTimeSep 6th 2008
     
    I can't see how raising the system pressure will increase the temperature. The temperature of the collector depends on three things, the amount of heat in from the sun and the heat out, i.e. the water flow conducting the heat away and heat leaking away due to poor insulation.
    If you want a higher temperature, reduce the water flow. The problem with the tank temperature is that when you use hot water, its replaced with cold. So without knowing your hot water useage its not possible to make any judgement on this set up. The insulation on your (excessive) pipe length could will make a significant difference to the performance. I do not think that 19mm is at all impressive. it would be interesting to know the diam of these pipes (flow and return). If your pipes are 22mm then their surface area is 2.64 sq. m, if 15mm then about 15/22 X 2.64~1.6 sq.m, I would expect at least 2" of insulation on them as they are comparable to the the collector it self.
    Frank
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeSep 6th 2008
     
    Poorly functioning solar system? There's only one bad apple spoiling the whole bunch - Earth.
  2.  
    Thank you for replies

    Water usage is minimal, 3 showers in the morning and washing up in the evening, pipework is all 22mm.

    I have reduced the flow which has helped. The figures above are with reduced flow.

    I have now been informed that I have to have my own report done on the system, If anyone can help please get in touch.

    Am in the GU32 area

    thanks
    • CommentAuthorchuckey
    • CommentTimeSep 8th 2008
     
    Say Onceaknight, what about the surface area and heatloss from your 2.6sq.m of pipe?
    Frank
  3.  
    Heat loss through the 22mm pipe is approx 7c

    I removed the heat sensor from the tank and strapped it to pipe which went into the tank. Then compared it to the Collector temperature.

    Knowing the heat loss I then reset the perameters so that the pump came on at +16 and off at +10c

    Doing this stopped the pump from removing heat from the Hot water tank
    • CommentAuthorchuckey
    • CommentTimeSep 9th 2008
     
    Do you mean the ends of the flow are 7 deg different? what about the return? There will also be a temperature drop across this, albeit smaller. Lets call the ambient temperature 20 deg C. Then as the collector is at 40 deg, i.e. 20 deg above ambient. As the water goes down the flow pipe it drops 7 degs, so water into tank heat exchanger is 33 deg C, ambient + 13 degs, so you have lost 7/20 of your solar energy. If its a stratified tank, the bottom of it may be cold, so the return may be as cold as 15 degs, so if +20 deg loses 7 then -5 gains 7/4 degs. The return into the panels will then be 15 + 1.7 degs = 16.7 degs. If however the bottom of your tank is at + 30 then the heat loss will be 10/20 X 7 = 3.5 degs and the return to your collector will be 26.5 degs. So you have lost 10 degs worth of heat. This should be compared to the panels + 20 degrees of solar gain. Or if the return wter is the cold example, + 23.3 degs of solar gain. it looks to me either way you are loosing 30% of your heat in the poorly insulated pipes.
    Frank
  4.  
    Thanks Chuckey

    I can now see having 22mm pipe is a serious disadvantage. Unfortunately a lot of work has been done in the loft which would make it difficult to replace the pipe work with 15mm copper. (Load bearing steels and stud work now obscure the solar pipe work)
    Maybe to use 15mm pre-insulated,stainless steel on a roll would solve the problem of heat loss.

    But would I still need another panel to give enough heat to heat 210 ltr tank?
    • CommentAuthorskywalker
    • CommentTimeSep 10th 2008
     
    onceaknight

    Is this you

    http://www.navitron.org.uk/forum/index.php/topic,4536.0.html

    If so I think you have a body of good advice there and it is one of the better places to find an 'independant'.

    S.
  5.  
    Yes it is, but so far have been unable to find anyone who is prepared to give a report on the system.

    Chuckey has given brilliant advice and knowledge. and I am starting to understand why my system is not working properly.

    in the mean time I am still after a written report so that the company will put it right
    • CommentAuthorchuckey
    • CommentTimeSep 11th 2008
     
    Changing the pipes to a smaller diameter is not a good way to go, if the insulation level was correct, what you would be doing is to reduce losses of say 7% to 5%, while restricting the flow and hence the heat transfer, unless the pump was increased in size. . .
    Onceaknight, get your contractor to wrap your pipes in insulation, or better box them in some hard insulation (kingspan/celotex/ why)leaving a space of a couple of inches around them, fill this with loose insulation well padded down to get it under/around the pipes, top off with another lump of rigid foam, tape foam top/sides/bottom together. Or spiral wrap pipes in long strips of 3mm foam "wall paper", say 1" wide taped every 6", very labout intensive(many layers). The existing insulation is a start, no point in removing it. Starting from scratch, getting the correct grade of insulation would be the way to go but whether they could buy (or afford) what is essentialy an industrial product in small quantities and the problem of cutting/fitting it at bends/cocks etc., makes the boxing in a cheaper and easier way to go for an "ad hoc" installation. Kitchen foil, newspaper, old carpet, bubble wrap, anything that traps air and stops it moving, is what you want. If there are pipe runs close to the "floor" of the loft, just piling over them 12" wide strips of 6" glass fibre insulation would be very cost effective (and easy to do).
    Frank
  6.  
    Hi Onceaknight...

    I've probably misunderstood, but when you say the azimuth is -50, what exactly do you mean? as my understanding on that would be that you mean the panels are facing northwest (or northeast if the '-' was just a dash rather than a minus), which essentially means that other than last thing in the evening when the sun is weakest, your panels will only be absorbing heat from diffuse radiation - ie it will only get direct sunlight for an hour or so a day, the rest of the time it's just working off the light reflected from the clouds etc.

    If I've got this right, then there's no way anyone should ever be installing panels at this angle in this country - well at least not without pointing out this issue to the customer, and IMO making them sign something specific in the contract to show that they'd been told the location was unsuitable, but wanted to do the installation anyway.

    Also a 40 metre pipe run (return) from tank to collector, in 22mm pipe for one panel I'd think would be an utterly stupid set up - guidance is to have the panel as close to the tank as possible to minimise heatloss from the pipes. 22mm pipe = 0.32 litres per metre of pipe, meaning over 12 litres of water in the pipe between collector and tank, and probably around 2 litres in the collector and 1.5 -2 litres in the coil in the tank... ie the water spends 3 times as long in the pipes as it does in the tank and collector combined, or 6 times as long in the pipes as it does in the collector, and obviously all the time it's sat in the pipes it's losing temperature.

    They've probably also put the pump at too high a speed due to the volume of water involved, meaning that it will be wizzing through the collector too fast to heat up properly. If the original spec was for 2 panels, chances are they've used the same pump at the same setting for one panel as they were going to for 2, so the waters going through the panel too fast to heat up enough.

    and then they've only supplied 2 panels when they specc'd 2 panels. The only way this is possibly acceptable is if the total collector area is the same between the 2 panels - ie. the panel installed is twice as big as the 2 panels originally specced.

    there's also no way that increasing the pressure from 1.5 bar to 3 bar will do anything to increase the temperature - pressure obviously can make a difference to the temperature water can take before reaching boiling point, but makes sod all difference at the 40-60 degree temperature range. You should have a look at your manual to see what pressure it recommends for the collectors, but I think I'd be right in saying that most systems actually have a pressure relief valve set at 3 bar, meaning that if you set the pressure at 3 bar when the system is cold, the pressure relief valve will be going off constantly when the system is hot until the pressure falls back to a more acceptable pressure. this is a particularly stupid thing to be telling someone to do in a system that's got in the region of 14 litres of water in it, meaning that if you wacked the pressure upto 3bar, and then ever did actually get some heat in the system you'd end up with a good cup full of water coming out of your pressure release valve.


    basically, this looks like a trading standards / small claims court job to me, unless you specifically demanded they installed you the system in this way, and ignored their warnings... does depend on exactly what was specified in the contract I suppose though in terms of the 2 panels thing... meantime, just see if you can find the pump and give it a try with the pump on a slower speed, just in case this sorts it to some extent.
  7.  
    ah - just read the thread on the navitron boards... so it's facing south east, ignore my first paragraph.

    trading standards and small claims court it is then. Does it actually state 2 panels and the size / make / model of the panels in the contract? if so they've not got a leg to stand on if they said 2 and only installed 1 - a clause stating that they can change the spacs without notice only refers to swapping around like for like components - eg. changing the make of the pump/valve for a similar spec pump / valve, not for making a major change like only installing half the area of panels they've quoted for - that's like ordering a tv and getting a radio - ie. breach of contract.
    • CommentAuthorwookey
    • CommentTimeSep 17th 2008
     
    Actually changing the pipe size _is_ a good idea for improved efficiency. 22mm pipe for a small system like this (18X58mm tubes) is a major source of losses, as explained above. It will work, but not particularly well. New installs from people in the know are mostly done with 10mm pipe, which is fine unless you have long pipe runs or a large area of panels, or a very low-power pump. As you have 40m of pipe it's worth doing the sums to check - you might need some 15mm, depending on which pump you have. See http://www.navitron.org.uk/pmwiki/pmwiki.php?n=Main.PipeSizingCalculations for the details
    • CommentAuthorchuckey
    • CommentTimeSep 17th 2008
     
    Wooky, using 10mm pipe will reduce the pipe area from 2.64 sq.m (22mm) to about 10/22 X 2.64 ~ 1.2 sq.m - Still a huge area wrt panels. Insulate the pipes!
    Frank
    • CommentAuthorwookey
    • CommentTimeSep 17th 2008
     
    The significant thing is the reduction in volume of 'dead' water in the pipes from 13.3 litres (40m or 22mm pipe) to 0.7 litres.(40m of 10mm pipe).
    As the manifold only contains about 1.5l you can see that this is significant, especially in the UK climate where intermittent pump operation is common. The corresponding higher flow-rate also matters, as there is much less residency time between panel and heat-exchanger during which heat is being lost.

    I absolutely agree that decent insulation on the pipes is very important too. The more the better, but with low-volume pipework, the insulation becomes a less significant a factor in overall efficiency. A 40m 22mm pipe single panel system will be pretty poor on anything other than a good hot cloudless day.
    • CommentAuthorchuckey
    • CommentTimeSep 18th 2008
     
    Good point Wookey, I wonder low long the pump would take to circulate this 13l of water. Suppose we take this as 2 minutes, so the sun comes out, the pump starts and two minutes later we get our hot water. Now at the end of the day(?) the sun goes in and the pump stops so we loose 13l of heat stuck in the 22mm pipe. So out of our sunny period (> 4 HRs?), we loose 2 minutes + 13l of hot water or another 2 minutes of pump running time. So in total out of 240mins we have wasted 4 ~ 1.6%. I still think its the insulation that counts (or short pipe runs).
    Frank
    • CommentAuthorskywalker
    • CommentTimeSep 18th 2008
     
    I'm with Wookey and the raft of professional/experienced installers 10mm for this panel size would be much better. Insulate like a mad insulating fetishist but main problem is that his panel size is too small for the volume of water you are trying to heat. I have 30 x 47 mm tubes (roughly equivalent to 20 x 58) connected to a 210l DPS heat store. In order to have been off grid for hot water this summer I would have needed up to 60 X 47 tubes. OK so heat store need to be kept a bit hotter & mine is a combi store (does heating too) so lots of pumps, pipework & bosses to lose heat (about 3 degrees in 10 hours) but the basics are much the same.

    Get more tubes, if the company were going to fit 36 x 58 then that sounds pretty much on the money (although you will need a heat dump for when El ninia stops sodding about with global warming).

    S.
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeSep 19th 2008
     
    Posted By: chuckeySo out of our sunny period (> 4 HRs?), ...


    Trouble is, we often don't get 4 hours of bright sunshine. It's much more common to get a number of short bursts. For example, a typical nice summer's day (anybody remember them?) has cumulus clouds covering maybe a quarter of the sky. The light level at any one point varies dramatically from being completely in shadow to being in bright sunshine with reflective white clouds down sun adding extra illumination over a timescale of tens of minutes.

    Similarly, in spring and autumn it's quite common to have gaps in the clouds with lengths of the order of an hour or so. E.g., when a cold front has passed through there is often a blue (cloudless) gap until convection starts again and the stratocumulus fills in.

    In cases where there needs, for whatever reason, to be long runs between the solar collectors and the hot tank I wonder if it is ever worthwhile to have a small tank (maybe 30 litres or so) close to the collectors. The pump running water through the collectors could cycle on and off fairly rapidly in response to the sunshine. When a reasonable amount of heat has been built up in the small tank it could be transferred in bulk to the main tank - paying the hit of heating the "dead" water just once. Obviously, a small tank with a poor volume to area ratio would need lots of insulation.
    • CommentAuthorskywalker
    • CommentTimeSep 19th 2008
     
    Sounds good but there is more to go wrong at the end of the day.

    Wookeys side arm stratification dooohicky is the way to go (or a commercial version) if you ask me, but you need big enough cahoolies (collector area) in your system to match you needs in the first place.

    S.
    • CommentAuthorchuckey
    • CommentTimeSep 19th 2008
     
    The reason the pros like 10mm is that the installation time is 1/10 that of 22mm and the cost is 1/5 (depending on how many bends) and the problems of drilling 2 X 22mm holes in joists/walls are easily surmounted. the aformentioned advantages coupled with 1/2 the surface area and the ease of slipping a bit of insulation over the pipes, makes it a nobrainer. FWIW, 10mm pipe + 25mm insulation = 60mm diam, 22mm + 25mm insulation = 72mm diam (+12mm). Volume of insulation in the second case is about 1.3 times that of the first, so I guess its cost will be inline with this.
    Frank
    • CommentAuthorchuckey
    • CommentTimeSep 19th 2008
     
    Ed davies, if the pipes do not loose heat, then the next time the sun shines, the (old) hot water in the pipe heats the tank, followed (13l later) by the latest batch of hot water from the collector?. Also the return to the collector is at a higher temperature.
    (just thought of this!)
    Frank
    • CommentAuthorDantenz
    • CommentTimeSep 19th 2008
     
    Re: pipe size and energy collection/trnsfer.

    Regardless of whatever pipe size you choose between the solar panels and the cylinder the energy collected by the panels will be the same. So, this given quantity of energy will still exist whether distributed via large diameter pipe or small diameter pipe. However, with a larger pipe size this quantity of energy is then absorbed and distributed into a larger volume of fluid which means same amount of energy but at a lower temperature. Small diameter pipe = less volume for the same amount of energy = higher delivery temperature. Therefore, In order to maximise solar gain and achieve high stored hot water temperatures the pipe size has a direct relationship between the energy collected by the panels (collector area), the temperature required in the cylinder and the volume to be heated.
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeSep 20th 2008
     
    Posted By: chuckeyEd davies, if the pipes do not loose heat, ...


    If.
    • CommentAuthorgoinggreen
    • CommentTimeOct 22nd 2008
     
    Q: how many tubes in total are installed...also is the cylinder vented or un-vented. I have a friend who had a navitron 47mm tube system installed 172Ltr vented cylinder 2 x 20 tube manifolds SSE facing...his collector temp during the period above raised the cylinder temp to 77 Degress without any problem..all pipe work is 15mm with the pump set to its slowest setting. What temp diff has been set on the control panel...remember in solar we do things a bit at a time..!!
    • CommentAuthorskywalker
    • CommentTimeOct 22nd 2008
     
    1 tube to 4.3l a (clearly) good ratio for the sort of weather we have been having (and way higher than the Navitron standard recommendation) - I would have thought it would have done better than that but good enough in any case I suppose.

    Hope he has a heat dump circuit for when we get back to mad summers!

    S.
    • CommentAuthorCWatters
    • CommentTimeOct 22nd 2008
     
    Posted By: onceaknightThe contract was for 2 panels and only 1 was installed. The company is using the small print stating that they can change the specifications.


    Take that to a solicitor. Most will give you 30 mins free to discuss if they can help.

    Specification is one thing, quantity and performance is another. Otherwise they could use the same argument to supply no panels!
    • CommentAuthorgoinggreen
    • CommentTimeOct 22nd 2008
     
    The sytem does have a heat dump rad...which only lets the Cyl get to 77Degrees...looking through the logs the highest temp was 84 degrees at the collector..so I guess the dump to the Rad works
    • CommentAuthorskywalker
    • CommentTimeOct 22nd 2008
     
    All is good then & would explain why it didn't get much hotter.
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press