Home  5  Books  5  Magazines  5  News  5  GreenPro  5  HelpDesk  5  Your Cart  5  Register  5  Green Living Forum
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building
"The most popular book on green building in the UK today."
New fourth edition in two volumes!

Order both books now for the combined price of just £17.00
and free delivery!

(free delivery applies to UK addresses only).

Or get both books for just £15.00 if purchased at the same time as a subscription to Green Building magazine





Zurich Connect Home Insurance

Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




  1.  
    Has anyone had any experience with MHRV systems,

    We will require one in each of the passivhaus(ish) semis we are building next year, two issues that I don't understand are:

    1. The need for a cooker extract hood - possible problems with grease depoits, rate of extract etc
    2. Woodburning stove
    2a - how do I provide the incoming air without compromising airtightness?
    2b - can MHRV distribute heat from the room with the stove (that's probably too hot)

    J
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeOct 20th 2008
     
    1. my advice is blow it straight outside forget heat exchange etc -- poor I know but practical not all cooking needs the extractor on and its only on for shortish periods of time too.

    2. Get one with an external air supply from Canada and keep stum about it.

    2a. easy now

    2b. yes it will do this anyway

    If it is passivhaus how come you need a wood burner?
    • CommentAuthorjoe.e
    • CommentTimeOct 20th 2008
     
    Tony's 1 is right, I think. Get a straighforward extractor with as short and straight a pipe run as possible, and only use it when you're frying.
    • CommentAuthorskywalker
    • CommentTimeOct 20th 2008
     
    I've been having a look at the nuair cookerXbox:

    http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2678&page=1#Item_0

    Not well received here although nuaire were very confident of it's performance when I spoke to them. You would have to ask them about multiple supplies though as the installation brochure shows only one supply connection.

    Please post back if you come across any other possibilities.

    S.
    • CommentAuthorMarkH
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2008
     
    Regarding air to feed a wood burner - some stoves can accept a ducted air feed. The Clearview people told me that their stoves can do that. I would have thought some other UK stoves could as well... just need to start asking the manufacturers.

    Air flow with MHRV and stove - It is possible to have more air flow into the room with the stove to help move the heat from the stove around the house better, however, I'm not sure if this is actually necessary. Might depend on how often you expect to use the stove.
    • CommentAuthorstephendv
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2008 edited
     
    Couldn't you use an extract vent in the room with the stove to spread the heat to the incoming air via the heat exchanger? Granted you'd lose heat due to the inefficiency of the exchanger.

    Also, I'm trying to understand exchanger efficiencies, say the outside air is 10 degrees, the inside air is 20 degrees and my heat exchanger is 100% efficient, does it mean that the incoming air after passing the heat exchanger is 15 degrees?
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2008
     
    no 20 !!!
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2008
     
    no 15 !!!

    The very best result possible when V m3 of air at 20oC encounters V m3 of air at 10oC, is 2V m3 at 15oC, as would be got by straight mixing; indirect transfer can only approach 100% efficiency. At 75% efficiency the incoming V m3 would be at 14oC.
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2008 edited
     
    Fostertom, straight mixing is far from the best possible result. As you say, it would produce warmed supply air at 15 °C which would correspond to an efficiency of 50%. Practical systems are more likely to have efficiencies around 80%.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countercurrent_exchange
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2008 edited
     
    'Ang on Ed. Given that this non-heatpumped conductive, transfer can only happen while outgoing air is still at least fractionally warmer than the incoming. So if the outgoing air gets reduced from 20 to 15.1oC, then the very best that the incoming air can reach (assuming outgoing's mass flow rate is equal to incoming's) is up from 10 to 14.9oC. Countercurrent might approach that; concurrent wouldn't come close. Explain why I'm wrong!

    Edit - OK, you win! I realise. 20 it is.

    But what about crossflow heat exchangers - don't MHPVs do that?
    •  
      CommentAuthorTimber
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2008 edited
     
    Fostertom

    I always thought the same way as you, however I recently discovered something different.

    Consider the heat exchanger to be a simple tube split in half down its length. the cold air gets passed in one and the hot the other.

    So say intake is 10, extract is 20, becuase they are fed in at opposite ends, there is always a temperature differential along the whole length. At the 'cold' end, the intake is at 10, and say the extract is at 12 (12 because its already been through the exchanger). At the other end (hot end) the intake air has now been warmed to say 18, and the extract has just entered so it is at 20.

    As such there is always a temperature differential, but the actualy temperatures rise. I don't know exact efficiencies, but they are able to exceed a 50% efficieny (cold air raised to 15!)

    Timber
  2.  
    Does it say COP in the title of the thread???
    mmh? mmh? does it....?

    No. I didn't think so....

    (Only kidding wandering off topic is just what its all about :bigsmile:)
  3.  
    Anyway, back 'on message' as those dastardly marketing types say.

    Tony,

    Re extract... thanks for bringing me back to the real world but would still be interested if any manufacturers offer such an option.

    Re passiv haus, some heating is still potentially required in coldest of winter days and to reassure those of lesser faith, (and it looks nice..! hell why not, do you see me wearing a hair shirt?) Also idea would be to get a something with back boiler to thermal store to indirect DHW sort of arrangement.

    Skywalker,

    will look at your Xbox but so far have looked at Genvex and Paul from the green building store.

    J
    • CommentAuthorskywalker
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2008
     
    They look like 'proper jobs' as they say.

    I think the cookerXbox is squarely aimed at retrofit (the likes of me). I have to say nuaire are the only company I have found so far that do a cooker extractor integrated into the unit.

    Regards.

    S.
    • CommentAuthorstephendv
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2008
     
    Well the efficiency was very much related to the topic because if you could conserve a lot of the heat in the exchanger then it could be worthwhile to use an extract vent in the room with the stove to circulate the heat via the heat exchanger. So if efficiency means what you say it means, then this is quite viable with exchangers that have good efficiency ratings.
  4.  
    Stephen,

    but can you actually rig the thing up to the MHVR, with al that grease flying around, or are you thinking a single room type thing?

    J
    • CommentAuthorstephendv
    • CommentTimeOct 22nd 2008
     
    I was referring to the wood burning stove, not the cooker hood!
  5.  
    ahh...

    (Note to self: Read posts properly)

    J
    • CommentAuthordocmartin
    • CommentTimeOct 24th 2008
     
    Regavent, Biggleswade, Bedfordshire do a British built, high efficiency MVHR; DC motors etc. When I discussed the feasibility of connecting to cooker hood they suggested obtaining a hood with no motor/fan and installing the damper valve option in line with the cooker hood with a booster switch for kitchen extraction when required. Does anyone else find cookerhoods on high speed unbearably noisy? The 'atmosphere' in our kitchen becomes quite fraught when it is on and the radio inaudible!
    • CommentAuthorstephendv
    • CommentTimeOct 24th 2008
     
    Posted By: docmartinRegavent, Biggleswade, Bedfordshire do a British built, high efficiency MVHR; DC motors etc.


    Isn't it just a rebranded version of the Renovent from this Dutch company: http://www.brinkclimatesystems.nl/renovent-hr/1696
    In the "High Efficiency" section of this page: http://www.rega-uk.com/product/hrv.htm they mention "renovent".
    • CommentAuthordocmartin
    • CommentTimeOct 24th 2008
     
    Stephendv, my (lack of) Dutch was not up to reading your reference to Brink climate Systems. I could not find a picture on their website that resembled the RegaVent unit that I saw at the Homebuilding show at the NEC earlier this year. RegaVent definitely gave me the impression that they built the units; perhaps they were being economical with the truth and were referring to the ducts, dampers and their noise level reduction ducting.Incidentally,when I questioned them about the "90%" efficiency, they said that in the British climate 75% would be normal; 90% only applies in more severe continental type winters. The British built claim has more appeal now that exchange rates have moved against us; the continental kit seemed pricey enough a few months ago.I will make further enquiries.
    • CommentAuthorJulian
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2008 edited
     
    The Brink units resemble (as far as I can see from the tiny images) Ubink HRV units.
    • CommentAuthorstephendv
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2008
     
    The Brink page displays in English for me.. odd. Anyway, there are other UK resellers of the Renovent HR, see: http://cart.vacuumsdirect.co.uk/index.php?p=catalog&parent=35&pg=1
    Have you received a quote from Regavent yet? I'm going to be in the market for an HR unit next year so would be interested in price comparison.
    See my post of 1st August on: http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2243 for prices of other MVHR systems.
    • CommentAuthordocmartin
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2008
     
    Stephendv, earlier in 2008 the 325D -power 140W, up to 325m3 per hour, 48vDC was £1374 inc.VAT. AC version 210W, £1104.50 incVAT. 25% discount for on-line orders, quoteTRHV-957; possibly this reference was for show orders and not valid now. Have e-mailed RegaVent for latest prices and whether British made or Dutch.
    • CommentAuthordocmartin
    • CommentTimeOct 27th 2008
     
    Stephendv, had an e-mail from Linda at Regavent, today. no updated price, yet, as I was too vague about the exact nature of the quote I was given; apparently a "budget price without a design". Have asked them for the same again to see how prices have moved. Hopefully not a lot as Linda re-assures me that they do make the units themselves using German fan units from ebm papst. She says "we have no link at all to the Brink system...your informant is probably mixing us up with a company called Ubbink" - incidentally also at the same show at the NEC.
    • CommentAuthorJulian
    • CommentTimeOct 27th 2008
     
    Hi docmartin
    are those prices for the complete system or the HRV base units?
    • CommentAuthordocmartin
    • CommentTimeOct 27th 2008
     
    Hi Julian, just the base units as systems vary in layout,duct length, bends, junctions and number of vents etc.
    By the way, can anyone tell me how efficiently the units with DC motors convert to DC from the AC mains? I sem to remember seeing a figure of 33% less power consumption for a DC fan cf. an AC fan; but how much is lost in the conversion?
    • CommentAuthordocmartin
    • CommentTimeOct 30th 2008
     
    Hi Julian and Stephendv, after some delay, caused by confusion about the previous quote,I received the updated prices, today. The 325L DC ( smallest loft mounted DC unit ) is now £1,228 + VAT. This includes a condensate drain, thermal and acoustic insulation jacket and a mounting cradle incorporating rubber mounts. A motorised control unit to give heat exchanger bypass for summer operation is £199 + VAT.
    • CommentAuthorsubonehour
    • CommentTimeOct 30th 2008
     
    Hi James,

    1. I plan to build to PH standard next year and MVHR is part of the spec. I've recently contacted Itho, based on their BRE listing under passive house ventilation systems. They can supply cooker hoods designed for MVHR systems and which include downdraught hoods which, would seem to offer a solution to the otherwise limited air flows such systems would have.

    I don't know how effective such units are at containing smells but I'd appreciate any comment from those that know as it is something that concerns me.

    2.a Wood burning stoves to PH standard are available, consult BRE web site for options. They are in effect balanced flue by design, drawing combustion air from outside therefore not affecting leak tighness other than where the flue penetrates the building fabric.

    The PH consultant who reviewed my design has suggested installing one in my house, as a back up, to the main heat source which would be an ASHP, possibly a compact unit incorporated into the MVHR, during the heating season and Solar Thermal for the other 6mths. I have reservations, I think that the heat input to the room from a WBS is grossly excessive in a passive house, unless most of the heat is distributed away from the source such as a back boiler type or ducted hot air type were to be used.

    2.b. I guess an MVHR could play some part in distributing the point source heat of a WBS but this strikes me as probably inefficient and less effective than providing the right amount of heat input in each room to balance losses.

    regards
    Ian
  6.  
    Great input Ian,

    Will let you know anything I find out. With regard to the WBS, I hear where your coming from entirely hence this other thread:

    http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2796

    I envisaged something that could get enough combustion air without threatening the air tightness of the house, would chuck most of its heat to a thermal store to supplement the solar thermal to provide the hot water in the cloudy winter days - and then chuck as little as possible back to the room - however if that was all, what I'd be describing is a wood boiler... but also you can't beat the traditional idea of the hearth as focus rather than TV for eg - so the idea would be for something stove like the likely down side being a surplus of heat to the room in question, but if the MHVR circulated this through the whole house (which at most would have tails for radiators [to please any nervous future buyers - and currently nervous spouses] and maybe a towel rail)...?

    Also have heard back from Andrew at Green building store about the 'Paul' (pronounced Powel I think) MHVR unit/system - lot of respect for the chaps at GBS therefore would have high hopes for anything they are distributing- will feed back with info.

    J
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press