Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.

The AECB accepts no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site. Views given in posts are not necessarily the views of the AECB.



  1.  
    Hi,
    Can anyone recomend any sun pipes / tubes. I've lots of info and brochures, seen them at shows etc, but very short on practical experience - ie nil. This would be for a flat roof application with a drop down of about 2.5 m

    Any key points to look out for?
    Any recomendations
    Any types/manufacturers to avoid?

    Cheers for any info
    Mike (up north)
  2.  
    We've got 2 at South Yorkshire Energy Centre (www.syec.co.uk). I declare an interest in that a local dealer gave us one of them, but as soon as I first saw one (at Hebden Bridge Alternative Technology Centre (www.alternativetechnology.org.uk)) I was won over. I simply did not believe the claims at first - light going round corners, pah! - but I am now an evangelical convert.

    Ours is a Solatube.

    Have fun with yours.

    Nick
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeJun 18th 2007
     
    They are great in tropical countries where you want light but not heat and the light quality in the sky is good. In the UK in mho they are an expensive waste of time and money and if you want a window in the roof then fit a proper one..
  3.  
    Tony,
    I base my liking for them on the assumption that you are 'ducting light in' so a space which cannot be served by a window or a roof light. Our upper one serves an internal WC. It kinks up through the attic roof space and out the rear roof. It would have been well nigh impossible to 'borrow' any light from a roof-light. Of course I agree, if you can fit a window, fit a window, but where you can't, they're good.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeJun 18th 2007
     
    OK I agree but they are still unnecessarily expensive in my view.
  4.  
    I guess the question is how long does it take to recover the outlay of the sunpipe by way of reduced electricity for lighting?
    • CommentAuthorSolar bore
    • CommentTimeJun 19th 2007
     
    I recently read of a power station that had fitted them so that there control room could switch off the lights.

    If the sums work out for a producer of electricity then it must be worth it for consumers.

    I presume I saw it in Green Futures
    •  
      CommentAuthornigel
    • CommentTimeJun 19th 2007
     
    They also do not have a very good u value so I would be wary of heat loss through them.
    Sunpipe quote values between 1.6 and 2 as compared to 0.2 for a good roof.

    Also they are a potential source of air leakage as they will penetrate the air leakage membrane.
  5.  
    Mike George said: "I guess the question is how long does it take to recover the outlay of the sunpipe by way of reduced electricity for lighting? "

    Yeeeaaarrrs, I'm sure, but it's a bit of a 'lifestyle choice' too. I like natural light whenever I can get it. I'd be prepared to pay for that.

    Nigel's right about the u value, but it's no worse than a bldg regs-compliant window and, as above, you've got natural light. Not sure re the air leakage issue. Any 'sun pipe' manuf's reading this?
  6.  
    Thanks all,

    Yes its to duct light down through an upper story (approx 2.5m drop) to illuminate a dark room area and of course natural light is best. If its just a case of the money i'd have left the light on.
    So far only SolaTube gets anyones vote. Any others??

    Cheers

    Mike (up north)
  7.  
    Ask Hebden Bridge ATC (see web details above) what make theirs is. I don't think it's a Solatube, and it looks just as good.

    Nick
    • CommentAuthorMike George
    • CommentTimeJun 19th 2007 edited
     
    Hi Nick, I agree it is not as simplistic as I suggested and it is not just about electric bills. Though if you have for example a 15W CFL instead then it will take you quite a while to run up a bill of around £180 plus instalation costs

    Personally. I would use one if the daylighting issue was that immportant. I hear velux make a good one:bigsmile:
    • CommentAuthorTerry
    • CommentTimeJun 19th 2007
     
    Hi Mike
    We are opting for the solatube as well. Seems to perform the best and the company comes across as very helpful.
    Presumably goes without saying to avoid the concertina type tubes?
    The tubes are expensive and even more so when you are extending down to a lower floor, but as Nick says, a bit of daylight is worth paying for - especially as in our case we have no other means of geting natural light into the room.
    HTH
    • CommentAuthorRachel
    • CommentTimeJun 20th 2007
     
    I used a light tube in our straw bale house and the mistake was that the longer you extend it, the less light. We extended it about 2.5metres and so the light from it is a bit pathetic. They are very expensive and don't need to be. I bought mine from the loft shop.
    • CommentAuthorTerry
    • CommentTimeJun 20th 2007
     
    Rachel is correct - increased length affects performance negatively as do any bends.
    I have heard from people who have installed various types and one consistent comment is that they provide less light than expected. Whether that was due to unrealistic expectations of the buyers or over enthusiastic marketing I dont know. Either way we will probably fit a bigger size than recommended by the suppliers.
    I know a few people who have fitted the concertina types and they perform very poorly compared to the rigid systems, but that stands to reason.
    • CommentAuthorarthur
    • CommentTimeJun 21st 2007
     
    Of course another obvious point is how much is the room used when there's sunlight anyway. For many domestic buildings not a lot probably. I can't help thinking that I could live without natural light in the WC!
    Good for offices perhaps though.
  8.  
    Hi, Thanks all,

    I have about 3m drop, perhaps a bit less, so based on that I'll have to increase to the 350mm unit. I have to get light down to an internal room about 8 by 8 foot that is off of another room. The existing window will become internal when some bulding work is complete so I really do need some light otherwise folk will switch the light on always. I doubt there will be enought light to read by, but i'm trying to avoid a dark hole.

    Sloartube seem to be veryone recomended one.

    Cheers
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeJun 22nd 2007
     
    Proper window in the roof and you won't have turn the light on to read and you will get controllable ventilation too.
    • CommentAuthorRachel
    • CommentTimeJun 22nd 2007
     
    With a 3m length, I don't think you'll get much more than a moonlike gentle glow.... as ours does, which was a waste of money, unfortunately.
  9.  
    Thanks all,
    A proper window would be nice except that it would only illuminate the room below not the room on the floor below ie the ground floor, I'd need to put a window in the floor as well. Looks like 3m is going to be much too long for a tube. It would have run vertically down from a flat roof (even worse I think) in an enclosed cupboard to the room below. I’d hoped 350mm diameter would do it.

    Any other suggestions?

    Cheers
    • CommentAuthorTerry
    • CommentTimeJun 24th 2007
     
    Hi Mike
    We have two rooms on the ground floor with no access to an outside window. In one we have managed to get in an angled light well, but the second room has no such option. We are therefore going to go ahead with the 350 solatube on the basis that it is the best of a bad lot. It will only go in in a few months so will be a while before we can report back on it.
    Only other idea is to have internal windows, but our room is the main bath/toilet so that has been vetoed.
    • CommentAuthorPeter A
    • CommentTimeJun 26th 2007
     
    Fitted these several years ago in new build as a bit of a gimmick but they went down a storm.
    Recently been thinking about using them for light at night! Was thinking along the lines of a halo of solar garden lights around one that would provide light until midnightish, do you reckon it would work?
    The best ideas always come after a glass or two of vino! That of a load of gibberish.
  10.  
    The very best light and heat there is for us in the UK deserves a lot more of our attention.
    I have seen the light transmitting concrete (works very well), the top reflecting brise solaire light shelf (works very well), the north light, the skylight and the sunpipes all very good liked the old fresnel lens too but we still don't see the true value of light holistically other than liking south.
    Highly reflective cheap foils (like the ones sunpipe line their light tubes with and can easily be made or adpated and light transmitting fibres are now available.
    At least we paint the walls light or white.

    oh yes you have got to keep the tops clean which warrants another sustainable product related entry for the CDM risk assessment.
    regards
    • CommentAuthorLeslie4
    • CommentTimeOct 15th 2007
     
    I was very interested to see comments on sun tubes. I have a 1870s railway carriage ( a "passenger brake") which I paint in. But all the light comes in from side windows, the main pool of light being about knee lheight. After such a dull grey summer I long for natural overhead light and sun tubes were suggested. I tried to find these on the net but they were all US firms and/or very very expensive. The roof is formed of 34 ft long teak(?) planks, with 10" circular cutouts where a man would drop down an oil lamp into each compartment! I had thought of taking out two complete planks at the apex of the curve of the carriage roof and replacing them with polycarbonate 5 wall sheet. The lack of shadows from the diffuser under a suntube attracts me, but not if cuts down the amount of light. I have to refelt the roof anyway, so was taking the opportunity to get natural light at the same time.

    Any helpful comments?
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeOct 15th 2007
     
    Cletesory conversion? not sure how to spell cletesory Railway carriages with a raised bit of roof down parts of the middle with small glazed lights to each side.
  11.  
    Clerestory.

    IMHO Natural light is worth paying for, houses are not necessarily just 'machines for living',

    ....but..... (that was a big 'but' by the way, not to be confused with a 'big butt', which is entirely different)... does the light from Sun-tubes actually feel like natural light...?

    J
  12.  
    James, interesting...come up to South Yorkshire Energy Centre and have a look....


    Nick
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeOct 15th 2007
     
    Compared to a glass panel in the roof --- no.
    •  
      CommentAuthorOlly
    • CommentTimeOct 16th 2007
     
    My parents have a Monodraught Sunpipe, which they're very happy with it, they've had it for a couple of years now, although I do think they seem quite expensive for what you get.

    It is above the "double" landing which is about 4x4m and has only one small window which is set back in an alcove. Therefore it was the easiest and cheapest way of getting more natural light in and it does produce a decent amount of light.

    One added bonus which we hadn't really thought about was that it's also very good at night if the moon is out as it allows you to find your way to the bathroom, as originally the options were either blinding yourself with the main 100w bulb or walking in the pitch black and risking falling down the stairs.

    The only downside is that it has replaced the main light and the Sunpipe has a built in 50w halogen lamp which is mounted within the tube and shines through the diffuser, this provides significantly less light than the 100w bog standard incandescent bulb that was there originally and also seems to refract the light unevenly and gives some slightly odd rainbow effects. I chatted to a guy from Monodraught the other week and it sounds like they're working on some low energy CFL/LED alternatives.
    • CommentAuthorRMU
    • CommentTimeDec 20th 2007
     
    Hi Mike (up north),
    There are several manufacturers of sun pipe systems: Monodraught is probably the key player in this country, then you have Sola Skylights, Sola Tube, and Velux. Monodraught and Sola Tube produce rigid systems, Sola Skylights produce Rigid and Flexible systems, Velux used to produce just Flexible but have just bought out Monodraught so there is likely to be a merging of products in the not too distant future.

    The first point to make is that these things do work. The key to a bright room is making sure you get the right size unit. Install one that's too small and all you have is a glowing circle of light.

    There are differences in the systems, no two ways about it. The rigid systems do carry more light due to the level of reflectivity achieved inside the tube. However, they do cost more. A fair comment might be that more light = more expensive, true. But you'll really only see such a benefit in quite a large room. A standard room, let's say 15ft x 15ft, would benefit from a 500mm rigid system or a 550mm Flexible system with a 3mtr. distance from roof to ceiling. The difference in cost is worth looking at: the Rigid system (based on Monodraught's web site) is going to cost around £700.00 as the standard kit requires the purchase of additional sections of pipe to cover 3 metres. The Flexible system (based on Sola Skylight's web site) is £345.00 and comes with 3 metres of flexible tube as standard. Not only that, the Flexible system is much easier to fit. A good installer will do it in less than 2 hours, a DIYer could do it in 4. The rigid system is a lot more fiddly, requiring rivets, more measuring etc. Not really a DIY job.

    Now, if you go to http://www.solaskylights.com/light_calculation.html, you can see the results of a study carried out by Durham University on the light emission from both Rigid and Flexible systems. A point to bear in mind is that once you compare the out put from either system to a 100watt bulb, you get the idea of how much light gets into the room. By the time you get to 1000+ lux the human eye is struggling to tell the difference between that and 1500 Lux - it's just uncomfortable.

    Next you may want to consider ventillation. Most buildings require passive ventilation to keep them in good condition. Only the Sola Skylights system comes with passive ventilation as standard (although you can choose not to use it if you prefer) the others require a different unit. And you may want to consider a double-glazed diffuser for when it gets to winter because heat can travel up these things. The u value is about the same as a window in most of them.

    Another thing, obviously, is what to do at night. Most of them allow the fitting of a light inside the tube just above the diffuser so that you can light the room artificially (energy efficient bulb recommended) but you need a fairly high wattage bulb as the diffuser does impare it a bit.

    The last point is overall whole life cost. These units tend to come with a fairly decent guarantee from 10 to 20 years depending on the system and they're pretty much maintenance free as the rain keeps the roof dome clean, so after the initial investment they have a zero running cost. If you start comparing the cost of running a bulb against the cost of installing a sun pipe, the sun pipe will lose. One bulb will run for a long time for £300.00 (even longer for £700.00). The benefits are that you get daylight in a room that doesn't normally have it and you aren't using any carbon once it's installed (unless you fit a light and even then you're cutting down). And, let's face it, natural light is far nicer than artificial.

    Hope this helps. :wink:
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press