Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.

The AECB accepts no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site. Views given in posts are not necessarily the views of the AECB.



    • CommentAuthorciaranw
    • CommentTimeNov 16th 2009
     
    Hello, a short and simple question, what are the benefits of cavity wall construction? not including it's familiarity. Just interested
  1.  
    To combat damp (if left empty)

    the quick answer

    cheers Jim
    • CommentAuthorCWatters
    • CommentTimeNov 16th 2009
     
    Many types of bricks are very porus. Under some conditions, typically rain with wind, water will go through them. Try filling a bucket with new facing bricks (not engineering bricks) then fill to the top with water and see what happens. When I did this earlier in the year the bricks fizzed and popped and over about an hour half the water soaked into the bricks. They were noticably heavier when I lifted them out. Quite an eye opener.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeNov 16th 2009
     
    OK then how come Victorian houses are still here semis and terraces and the vast majority are lived in and are not damp.

    I think cavity walls were a big mistake as they effectively halve the thermal performance and allow wind from outside into houses far too easily -- like under the first floor for example.
  2.  
    "OK then how come Victorian houses are still here semis and terraces and the vast majority are lived in and are not damp."
    would the answer to that be central heating ?
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeNov 16th 2009
     
    The ones that haven't been condemned long since as irremediable slums were the ones made of bricks that weren't porous - Victorian brickworks made the complete spectrum of bricks of different quality (and price presumably)
    • CommentAuthorjon
    • CommentTimeNov 16th 2009
     
    "I think cavity walls were a big mistake as they effectively halve the thermal performance and allow wind from outside into houses far too easily -- like under the first floor for example."

    Why do you think that Tony?

    I think that jamesingram has a point (central heating) as does Tom.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeNov 16th 2009
     
    How air leaky are our houses -- compared to Europe -- compare a new heavy weight house in central western Europe with a new one here in air tightness terms -- I rest my case.

    Then look back to the last half of the last millennium and see how energy inefficient out houses are compared ti theirs.
  3.  
    Posted By: tonyOK then how come Victorian houses are still here semis and terraces and the vast majority are lived in and are not damp.

    I think cavity walls were a big mistake as they effectively halve the thermal performance and allow wind from outside into houses far too easily -- like under the first floor for example.


    Many Victorian houses had glazed bricks to act against wet penetration.

    Cavities were introduced en-mass because of poor craftsmanship in a building boom - 1920-30s. The Germans think we are mad building two walls instead of one. They are right.
  4.  
    Posted By: fostertomThe ones that haven't been condemned long since as irremediable slums were the ones made of bricks that weren't porous - Victorian brickworks made the complete spectrum of bricks of different quality (and price presumably)


    I recall as a kid, many Victorian house just crumbling the bricks were so poor. Only the best survived giving a false impression of Victorian workmanship.
    • CommentAuthorMike George
    • CommentTimeNov 16th 2009 edited
     
    Posted By: CWattersMany types of bricks are very porus. Under some conditions, typically rain with wind, water will go through them. Try filling a bucket with new facing bricks (not engineering bricks) then fill to the top with water and see what happens. When I did this earlier in the year the bricks fizzed and popped and over about an hour half the water soaked into the bricks. They were noticably heavier when I lifted them out. Quite an eye opener.


    Agree. From memory I think the average concrete brick will absorb around a pint of water.

    Also it's not just porus bricks that can lead to water running down the inside of the cavity. Amyone ever used composite stone? The rainwater absolutely floods through the joints and if your cavity is not very clean you will have big problems. I built one around a year ago and the amount of water that comes out of the weepvents in the rain is tremendous

    Posted By: Water SystemsCavities were introduced en-mass because of poor craftsmanship in a building boom - 1920-30s..


    That's interesting, Where did you get that from if you don't mind me asking?

    Posted By: tonyHow air leaky are our houses -- compared to Europe -- compare a new heavy weight house in central western Europe with a new one here in air tightness terms -- I rest my case.


    I think it's all about workmanship. I can build a cavity wall as airtight as a solid one. It's not even difficult! A shame that the weep vents allow air in but these are just as necessary as the cavity itself. The key is to be very fussy with the inner leaf and partial fill insulation.

    Unfortunately, people used to like leaky houses [some still do] and cavities were often deliberately ventilated so as to stop timber joist ends etc from being in conditions conducive to wet. rot /dry rot

    Priorities have now changed that's all.

    I forcast problems for rendered single block walls [in the UK] in years to come.
  5.  
    Mike , What do you see as the future problems with rendered single block in the UK
    Damp degarding the blocks over time ?
    Do you include EWI single block with this ?
    • CommentAuthorMike George
    • CommentTimeNov 16th 2009 edited
     
    Re rendered external insulation [all walls]

    Dense material on less dense substrate - breaks the golden rule of rendering

    1. Possibility of vandalism / impact damage, leading to water ingress - leading to trapped moisture - leading to degredation of insulation [depending what it is]- possibility of frost damage
    2. Thermal expansion - particularly in summer, where shaded areas meet unshaded areas- leading to cracking - leading to water ingress...

    I think the way forward for external insulation is sectional cladding [eg hung tiles] with a ventilated airgap [Cavity wall by another name]
    • CommentAuthorjamesingram
    • CommentTimeNov 16th 2009 edited
     
    That makes sense
    Impact damage Would be my first worry with EWI , though with the thincoat mesh render systems it seems quite sturdy.
    Tried hitting a wall I did ( 70mm EPS/polymer mesh render,acrylic finish , last week ) last week
    With various stones and blunt objects , sharp stones left small dents but no cracks
    It even survived a good whack with a hammer , dented again but no cracking, the finish might not cured totally though. My thoughts were that a dense insulation , like XPS would strengthern it. ( used XPS on some tintops in the early 90s and it worked well)
    I heard Tom mention EPS was preferable to stop trapped moisture problems ?

    Vandals would have no trouble comming up with something to damage it , though tiles/slate are probably weaker
    and bricks make a good place for spraying 'tags' .I've seen a few garden walls pulled down for fun or ammo !

    On one of the EWI threads there's a long term study of EWI in Germany i think, which looked quite promising
    I guess your concerns due to the damp climate we get in the UK
  6.  
    Posted By: jamesingramI guess your concerns due to the damp climate we get in the UK


    Yes UK

    Some damage on a building local to me - will take a pic
  7.  
    Be interested to know what long term damage to EPS moisture would do , I was thinking not a lot

    I used to labour with a team of guys doing external GRP render with text coat finish and EWI mesh coat etc.
    in the early 90s , we did most of the remedial work , had no problems on the EWI jobs , but general the problem were blown render , rarely cracked , but just come away from the wall which then lead to easy impact damage.
    I presumed it was due to moisture retention as the finish was Oil based I think
  8.  
    Agree about the EPS.

    I also did a fair bit of rendering of this kind in the 90's. Though was on an RAF camp so can hardly go and see what its like now.

    Damage may have been thermal expansion? Imagine how much energy from the sun is incident on such a thin coat of material. It isn't easilly transferred through the insulation.
  9.  
    Mike, I read it somewhere a long time ago. Cavities were also used in the 1930s to use large concrete blocks in the inner leaf, much as we do now. Post WW1 in the depression, governments went on a house buildings programme to eliminate the Victorian slums (WW2 got in the way as we know). House building also gave much needed labour intensive jobs. Skills have to be taught quickly and the cavity was a way of eliminating poor workmanship, and materials, that produced damp. The large concrete blocks never really took off until the 1950s, with many homes having two brick walls.

    This is interesting showing the first prefabbed concrete panel flats, built from waste power station ash - 1905.
    http://www.liverpoolwiki.org/Home_of_the_Skyscraper
    • CommentAuthorCWatters
    • CommentTimeNov 16th 2009
     
    Yes even cavity walls have a wikipedia entry...
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavity_wall

    Just for interest ... It seems cavity walls are older thanI thought. Tonight I found this article..
    http://www.mileslewis.net/australian-building/pdf/bricks-tiles/cavity-wall.pdf
    ..that refers to true cavity walls being built on the Isle of Wight in the 1840's and some even earlier references.
  10.  
    Posted By: CWattersIt seems cavity walls are older than I thought.


    Cavity walls were built in wind driven usually coast regions. The usual way was to render to seal the brickwork. In the 1930s they were built in sheltered regions. Some houses are tight together and have cavities.
  11.  
    The house I grew up in in rural cheshire was built in 1890 and had cavity construction throughout. It also used pitch pine for all window frames, skirting boards, staricase,etc.
    • CommentAuthorciaranw
    • CommentTimeNov 18th 2009
     
    So the main reason (apart from the usual, it is what we are used too) is to stop wind driven rain, agreed?. How do other places with rain cope?, as I believe the uk and ireland are the only places which use this method. Other countries, I am led to believe, also have wind driven rain.
    I appreciate that rain screen systems use the same principles with different materials. To come clean I am just trying to figure out why so many people seem so wed to an antiquated building method. Surely another simpler, more cost effective, environmentally aware system would benefit all? I am really interested in peoples opinions on this and am in no way trying to annoy or insult cavity wall enthusiasts, as I do see the major point in using the existing knowledge base.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeNov 18th 2009
     
    Building in the UK is very reactionary and incredibly slow to adopt new ideas or to change.

    I think the introduction of cavity walls was a huge mistake and has cost us mega trillions in lost heat.

    If I were you I would lead the move for change.

    Bricks and cement mortar are possibly one of the contributing factors; lime giving less problems as it tends to dry out bricks.
  12.  
    • CommentAuthorciaranw
    • CommentTimeNov 18th 2009
     
    Tony, I believe you are a masonry man and a builder I believe, thats a big brave thing to say. I am a timber man myself but I know that there is more than one way to skin a cat as long as it is done properly. Having had a glance at your site/house, properly seems to apply. As far a leading goes, I'm not in that position but do want to push the envelope a little and try to do things properly.

    Tom, had a look at that, but became disheartened when the 'timber frame expert' didnt show! I do think that the building industry and public do need a damn good shake up and not let the large house builders etc (including planners and BC) dumb down good thinking and ideas.
    • CommentAuthorMike George
    • CommentTimeNov 18th 2009 edited
     
    Here's one I did earlier. Be interested to hear any criticism regarding air tightness, thermal bypass, etc.
      cav1.jpg
  13.  
    Foam trimmed
      cav3.jpg
  14.  
    and taped.
      cav5.jpg
  15.  
    Corner and supplementary fixing
      cav6.jpg
    • CommentAuthorciaranw
    • CommentTimeNov 18th 2009
     
    looks well tidy, can I use the word proper here. I did something similar on a refurb job, but had problems with the tape sticking to the insulation. any dust buildup caused the tape to fail. even after wiping clean had issueswith the tape peeling. Mike, did you have any issues?
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press