<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - U/F heating slab construction</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 16:47:02 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>U/F heating slab construction</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=5008&amp;Focus=68777#Comment_68777</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=5008&amp;Focus=68777#Comment_68777</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>gustyturbine</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi,<br />I am just starting to construct my slab for block/partial fill cavity/block new build. I am not allowed to totally fill the cavity due to the location of the property as it is deemed an exposed area. My architect wanted me to build the slab with hardcore,insulation then 125mm concrete. My plumber has told me with underfloor heating the best construction is hardcore then concrete with insulation on top. This then allows for a 50mm liquid screed housing the heating pipes. What are the opinions with regards to the best construction method? I guess that the screed on concrete is less responsive but acts as a thermal mass but how much heat is lost in the slab for good?<br />The screed on 90mm insulation seems like a better system and would be more responsive. Any advice would be greatly appreciated,<br />Steve.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>U/F heating slab construction</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=5008&amp;Focus=68781#Comment_68781</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=5008&amp;Focus=68781#Comment_68781</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Do you want quick response?  Then dont use UFH  --  if you are happy with 24/7 comfort then put the insulation under the concrete and ignore the plumber<br /><br />Insulate a whole lot better than they tell you if you are going to stay there.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>U/F heating slab construction</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=5008&amp;Focus=68784#Comment_68784</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=5008&amp;Focus=68784#Comment_68784</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>jamesingram</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[no expert , but would your planned usage or heating system help you decided.<br />Will the building be occupied through out the day ?<br /><br />Does your heating system use low grade heat energy , low flow return temperature ( heatpump, thermal store)<br />In this case I'd have thought the architects onthe right track , how about 200mm reinforced concrete slab , <br />(to finish)/Damp proof membrane/ 250mm expanded polystyrene insulation  . AECB gold (have alook at their construction details )<br />24/7 heating throughout the heating season with very low flow/return temperatures has been proven more<br />efficient in certain climates<br /><br />Or will it be empty alot of the time so a fast responsive heating morning and evening would suit better<br />with say a gas condensing boiler<br />Then the thin screed suggested by the plumber makes sense <br /><br />I built a small german kit house that had 200mm EPS /100mm slab / 50mm  PUR / 65mm screed with UFH in it<br />heating 24/7 all season , works great.<br />I'll have to ask what the idea was there ?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>U/F heating slab construction</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=5008&amp;Focus=68790#Comment_68790</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=5008&amp;Focus=68790#Comment_68790</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>CWatters</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[We've lived with our UFH system for three years. I'd go with your plumbers advice.<br /><br />What floor coverings are you going for?  <br /><br />In areas with a wood floor covering you can do without the screed. Fix say 80mm deep battens to the concrete slab. Between these lay Osma foiled insulation system or similar system with heat spreader plates. Nail and glue the finished wood floor to the battens. Works well. Good response time and maximium thickness of insulation. Wood floor must be &gt;18mm thick to avoid flexing. Avoid any unnecessary layers - don't go for a thin laminate that would  need 18mm chipboard under it as well.<br /> <br />Carpets: We discovered that (contrary to what some people say) you do have to be careful choosing carpets. Several carpet salesmen said their carpet and underlay was suitable for UFH when it clearly wasn't. What they mean is your UFH won't damage the carpet not that the carpet will let the heat out.  You need to source low TOG underlay (0.6-0.7) and keep the total TOG as low as possible. Ideally below 2 but no more than 2.5. Ask to see the makers data. Most places don't have the TOG info info to hand and will have to look it up. Ideally check it yourself with a call to the manufacturer. One sales rep we spoke to obviously had never heard of TOG but rather than loose a sale he made up the info. Told us it was twenty seven or some such nonsense. <br /><br />Stone and tile: Best choice with UFH. Works really well on screed. Watch out if tiling through a door way between two adjacent rooms. We had a problem with the screed in both rooms shrinking away from each other. It cracked at the door way and the crack propagated through the stone floor. If doing this again I would stop them screeding through the door way and insert an expansion gap. Then arrange for a grout line in the tiles/stone to be over the gap. This would encourage any movement to occur at a grout line. Our builder covered the screed with plastic sheet when it was laid to carefully control the drying process and we allowed several months for it to dry out properly so that wasn't the cause.  <br /><br />Bathroom on timber first floor. Make sure the builder knows if you are going to tile it. Tiles can only be laid on a rigid wood floor. To make it rigid extra noggins and one or more layers of marine plywood are normally screwed down. Not great for UFH but should work. I wish someone made better solution. Perhaps a structural cement board that conducts heat better than marine plywood? We oped for a beam and block first floor as well so it wasn't an issue for us. Heatmiser make an UFH stat with a remote sensor. Allows the stat to be outside the bathroom out of all the steam.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>U/F heating slab construction</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=5008&amp;Focus=68819#Comment_68819</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=5008&amp;Focus=68819#Comment_68819</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>welshboy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Just a question really- could the floor concrete be replaced with pumice concrete - 15 times better for insulation as I read it ?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>