<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - Dynamic Insulation - same principle as Airflow Windows</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 21:24:20 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Dynamic Insulation - same principle as Airflow Windows</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=5701#Comment_5701</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=5701#Comment_5701</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:56:16 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Continuing from Airflow Windows <a href="http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=538&page=1#Item_9" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=538&page=1#Item_9</a><br /><br />        Posted By: biffvernonnegative U-value, i.e. they gain more heat than they lose<br /><br />    Indeed - the principle can be applied to whole walls, slight internal vacuum drawing air through the pores of the wall and bringing all the escaping heat back in with it.<br /><br />Here's the reference I was looking for: <a href="http://www.forevergreen.org.uk/articles/articlesthebreat.html" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.forevergreen.org.uk/articles/articlesthebreat.html</a> - the bit about Dynamic Insulation.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dynamic Insulation - same principle as Airflow Windows</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=5718#Comment_5718</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=5718#Comment_5718</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:43:51 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[It is a sort of good idea but there is no control. Using the air leakage of the building to ventilate is is crazy-- too much will come in on windy days and in theory if the fabric is in any way well built it shouldn't even work at all.  The better idea is build tight ventilate right.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dynamic Insulation - same principle as Airflow Windows</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=5736#Comment_5736</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=5736#Comment_5736</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 20:38:11 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>biffvernon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[There could be something in the idea but you would need a porous wall, not a solid wall with cracks at the corners.  I'm not quite sure what sort of material this would be.  Strawbales?  But as soon as you rendered/plastered them they would become too airtight.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dynamic Insulation - same principle as Airflow Windows</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35188#Comment_35188</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35188#Comment_35188</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:05:14 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Mike George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Came across this. [not the multifoil article] scroll down for Dynamic Insulation piece from Mark Brinkley <a href="http://www.housebuildersupdate.co.uk/labels/Insulation.html" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.housebuildersupdate.co.uk/labels/Insulation.html</a> Some good links to a system being developed. Anyone have an opinion?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dynamic Insulation - same principle as Airflow Windows</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35191#Comment_35191</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35191#Comment_35191</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:21:05 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Cant be zero U value! The heat thrown away or lost via the depressurising fans must be added in to all calcs.<br /><br />This system has no hope --  living in a collander is never going to be thermally efficient.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dynamic Insulation - same principle as Airflow Windows</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35196#Comment_35196</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35196#Comment_35196</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:39:31 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>joe.e</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Presumably in order to make this idea work, you have a heat-recovery ventilation system that's set up to expel more air than it draws in through the heat exchanger, with the remaining air drawn in through the walls. The heat exchanger obviously has a certain level of efficiency in terms of how much heat it can recover from the departing air - a percentage of the heat leaves the building anyway. So the more air you suck out, the more heat you lose. The question is, how much air do you need to draw through your insulation in order to pull the heat in with it? Because if it's quite a lot, then the loss through the heat exchanger will be relatively high. <br />And am I right in thinking that the relative flow rates are the wrong way round for good efficiency in the heat exchanger? If it's drawing in a lot less air than it's expelling, it won't be as efficient at getting the heat out of the departing air - is that right?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dynamic Insulation - same principle as Airflow Windows</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35199#Comment_35199</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35199#Comment_35199</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:53:28 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[What a great collection of Brinkley articles. interesting that Mark's attitude to multifoils seems to have softened a bit since the 'Multifoils: last throw of the dice ' one!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dynamic Insulation - same principle as Airflow Windows</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35201#Comment_35201</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35201#Comment_35201</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:03:44 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>caliwag</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Mark Brinkley's blog now on this site<br /><br /><a href="http://web.mac.com/markbrinkley/Mark_Brinkley.net/Home.html<img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/bigsmile.gif" alt=":bigsmile:" title=":bigsmile:" />" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://web.mac.com/markbrinkley/Mark_Brinkley.net/Home.html<img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/bigsmile.gif" alt=":bigsmile:" title=":bigsmile:" /></a>]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dynamic Insulation - same principle as Airflow Windows</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35202#Comment_35202</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35202#Comment_35202</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:05:02 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>caliwag</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[now that didnt work<br /><br /><a href="http://web.mac.com/markbrinkley/Mark_Brinkley.net/Home.html" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://web.mac.com/markbrinkley/Mark_Brinkley.net/Home.html</a>]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dynamic Insulation - same principle as Airflow Windows</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35206#Comment_35206</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35206#Comment_35206</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:18:55 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Mike George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Just noticed one of the Brinkley  links doesn't work <a href="http://www.environmental-building.co.uk/dbb.shtml#energy." target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.environmental-building.co.uk/dbb.shtml#energy.</a>]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dynamic Insulation - same principle as Airflow Windows</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35207#Comment_35207</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35207#Comment_35207</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:34:44 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Ed Davies</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The references give an indication of the airflow rate through the insulation but not of the pressure differences required to create them.  I wonder how they compare to the dynamic pressures created by a stiff breeze.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dynamic Insulation - same principle as Airflow Windows</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35217#Comment_35217</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35217#Comment_35217</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:04:13 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Mike George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[This from the BBA certificate <a href="http://www.environmental-building.co.uk/documents/4578PS1i1_web.pdf" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.environmental-building.co.uk/documents/4578PS1i1_web.pdf</a><br /><br />" Dynamic insulation<br />6.6 It should be noted that ventilation air drawn through the dynamic cells will recover some of the heat which would<br />otherwise be lost by conduction(1).<br />(1) At the time of issue of this Certificate, a formal codified method for quantifying or using â€˜dynamic U-valuesâ€™ is not available, but the Certificate<br />holder is currently undergoing such an assessment, in accordance with SAP 2005, Appendix Q, to enable this mechanism of heat recovery to<br />be formalised and used in heat-loss calculations."<br /><br />'Some of the heat'  being the interesting part]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dynamic Insulation - same principle as Airflow Windows</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35220#Comment_35220</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35220#Comment_35220</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:12:25 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Well, this one certainly can't be assessed and accredited by trad hotbox methods!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dynamic Insulation - same principle as Airflow Windows</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35230#Comment_35230</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35230#Comment_35230</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:03:25 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Mike George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Yes, there's quite a few cases now aren't there]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dynamic Insulation - same principle as Airflow Windows</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35261#Comment_35261</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35261#Comment_35261</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:33:42 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>sinnerboy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Jaysus ! Sorry Tom - this thread should be renamed "Dynamic Insulation - same principle as Convection Ovens" <br /><br />this is amusing - from the BBA cert <br /><br />"8 Behaviour in relation to fire<br />8.1 The product is classified as â€˜combustibleâ€™.<br />8.2 When installed, the product will be contained by a suitable lining (eg 12.5 mm thick, Type F plasterboard), with<br />all joints fully sealed and supported by timber rafters/studs/joists. Therefore, it will not contribute to the development<br />stages of a fire or present a smoke or toxic hazard until the lining is compromised.<br />8.3 The use of the products in pitched roofs will not affect the external fire rating of a slated or tiled roof when<br />evaluated by assessment or test to BS 476-3 : 2004. The products must not be carried over junctions between those<br />roofs and walls required to provide a minimum period of fire resistance." <br /><br />The single lining in item 8.2 will be punctured by elec points and vent openings . An outbreak of fire will quickly spread to the wall cavity causing flashover temperatures to be reached all over the house . Don't look to intumescents to provide an answer - they act too slowly to solve this problem <br /><br />http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=jQV_MJwYQ3k&feature=related<br /><br />http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=TKPfkrGDv7U]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dynamic Insulation - same principle as Airflow Windows</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35268#Comment_35268</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=564&amp;Focus=35268#Comment_35268</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:13:24 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[This is why I don't regard fire regs as a bureaucratic annoyance to be circumvented. it's cost many lives to write them, for the safety of us who've never been in a fire, as well as the firefighters'.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>