<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - Biomass - a burning issue</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 19:13:50 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99002#Comment_99002</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99002#Comment_99002</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 08:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Brianwilson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[S.T.- Colour does not indicate quality, unfortunately swimming in the sea quite often involves going through the motions especially during high rainfall periods. I understand water quality  is a problem for surfers in SW.<br />  Your comment on flowers does raise questions re land usage, needs, imports etc.<br />Rgds<br />Brian]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99003#Comment_99003</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99003#Comment_99003</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 08:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Brian<br />But you can at least sea the lumps down here.  Only too aware of the rainfall problem down here, always check the beach for cotton buds first.<br /><br />Was a bit from the Mech E on the radio about population growth and what a 'challenge' it will be.  Just like an engineer, here is a problem, let us sort it.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99005#Comment_99005</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99005#Comment_99005</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Joiner</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Brian - "unfortunately swimming in the sea quite often involves going through the motions".<br /><br />You don't have to tell surfers and divers that mate!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99007#Comment_99007</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99007#Comment_99007</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Just don't tell the emmets <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/bigsmile.gif" alt=":bigsmile:" title=":bigsmile:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99043#Comment_99043</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99043#Comment_99043</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: SteamyTea</cite>Was a bit from the Mech E on the radio about population growth and what a 'challenge' it will be.  Just like an engineer, here is a problem, let us sort it.</blockquote><br />Yes, I guess we engineers never should have developed drains, or plumbing. Then we wouldn't have a problem with population growth.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99046#Comment_99046</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99046#Comment_99046</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/bigsmile.gif" alt=":bigsmile:" title=":bigsmile:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99052#Comment_99052</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99052#Comment_99052</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Joiner</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[All the fault of those bloody Romans then!<img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/sad.gif" alt=":sad:" title=":sad:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99057#Comment_99057</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99057#Comment_99057</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Brianwilson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[There would appear to be a direct correlation between population increase and C02 . Should the policeman keep  truncheon in his trousers, always wear a helmet or is it all down to irresponsible use of human plumbing? It surely cannot be the responsibility of us poor engineers.<br />Rgds<br />Brian :<img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/bigsmile.gif" alt=":bigsmile:" title=":bigsmile:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99109#Comment_99109</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99109#Comment_99109</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Brianwilson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Interesting EPA report-    http://uk.news.yahoo.com/22/20110112/tot-environment-us-usa-epa-emissions-05687e7.html  <br />EPA delays C02 permit requirements for biomass.<br />Rgds<br />Brian]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99113#Comment_99113</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99113#Comment_99113</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Joiner</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Brian - says that link is no longer available!<br /><br />"Sorry! We couldn't find the page you requested.<br /><br />The page you requested is no longer available on Yahoo! News."]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99115#Comment_99115</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99115#Comment_99115</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>DamonHD</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Try this instead:<br /><br />http://www.businessgreen.com/bg/news/1936985/epa-delays-biomass-emissions-ruling-secures-texas-court-victory<br /><br />Rgds<br /><br />Damon]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99117#Comment_99117</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99117#Comment_99117</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hopefully this link will be available.  Is to do with speculation on food prices and mentions biofuels/oil prices.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00x9z74" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00x9z74</a>]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99118#Comment_99118</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99118#Comment_99118</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Joiner</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Thanks Damon. But oh bloody dear.<img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/sad.gif" alt=":sad:" title=":sad:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99120#Comment_99120</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99120#Comment_99120</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Joiner</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[ST - interesting, but nothing surprising there. Some brilliant ducking and diving going on. We can only cringe at what will happen when they move into the biofuels markets with a sense of purpose!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99122#Comment_99122</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99122#Comment_99122</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Brianwilson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Ditto- Thanks Damon, I acessed it via    http://www.ecolincs.org/ <br /> Does provoke thoughts  on decision making/lobbying in energy provision.<br />Rgds<br />Brian <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/confused.gif" alt=":confused:" title=":confused:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99318#Comment_99318</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99318#Comment_99318</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 18:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Brianwilson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Still trying to track down report from Swedish National Energy Administration , promised 3 year study into Emissions and air pollution from combustion of biomass detailed to cover many aspects of impact, carcinogenic,cardiovascular  etc . Understand it was carried out under European Commission and due to be published 2007-8. Anyone spotted this please. Suspect  I am flogging a dead horse trying to increase awareness of biomass combustion impact when Green Building apparently featuring biomass as the 21st century fuel in current mag.<br />  Does anyone have synopsis of Green Building article please as I have  aversion to spending money on obtaining information that will increase blood pressure but  still seek data that will expand knowledge on  combustion impact.<br />Rgds<br />Brian]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99319#Comment_99319</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99319#Comment_99319</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 20:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>seascape</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Have you tried contacting www.fern.org? They maybe able to locate it for you.  Sorry if this is old/useless - can't face going through all posts!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99322#Comment_99322</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99322#Comment_99322</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Brian<br />Was it:<br />"Health effects of concentrated ambient air particulate matter (CAPs) and its components"]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99325#Comment_99325</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99325#Comment_99325</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 22:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Mike George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Yes Brian tell us more, I think there are many here interestd in your arguments here so not flogging a dead horse - no.  If you can give the Author and/or title someone here may be able to acquire a copy]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99337#Comment_99337</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99337#Comment_99337</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 08:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Joiner</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Brian - "Suspect I am flogging a dead horse trying to increase awareness of biomass combustion impact when Green Building apparently featuring biomass as the 21st century fuel in current mag."<br /><br />Possibly explained (but would hate to assume) by GB's focus on CO2, as exemplified by GBP-Keith's angry reaction to Jim Ingrams' OP that completely omitted mention of emissions which, in the light of your (Brian's) subsequent posts about the plethora of factual information, surprised me. Even a passing concern over particulate emissions I would have thought warranted a mention. I'll seek out a copy on Monday, but until then Brian, does the article mention emissions? Even as, perhaps, a qualifier against OTT enthusiasm for what is CURRENTLY a pretty deadly technology by anyone's standards?<br /><br />Would I be wrong in reading too much into Keiths subsequent absence from this debate since it acquired its current tone?<br /><br />I think you will have gathered, Brian, that your contributions on this matter have raised not just interest but concerns amongst a great many of us.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99364#Comment_99364</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99364#Comment_99364</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 20:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Brianwilson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Thanks for comments , I note  7 proposals for biomass systems in Scottish schools have been stopped and a Scottish report on comparitive particulate emissions details 1g/Gj for NG fired boilers, 5-12 g/Gj for oil, 30 for pellets, 60-80 for woodchip, 105g/Gj for logs and 120 g/Gj for coal. The conclusion being serious scrutiny required on use of biomass combustion in sensitive locations and type of system being replaced. The boiler tests indicated massive variation in pollution created by biomass systems tested. Hazardous pollution from biomass was previously considered to be similar to oil.<br />    I note alternative research details particulate emissions in excess of 800g/Gj for biomass boilers. There appears to be serious inconsistency in approach to use use of biomass combustion, research results and approach to impact.<br />  The Swedish biomass combustion impact research programme  detailed in <a href="http://www.mannagenergy.net/resources/12" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.mannagenergy.net/resources/12</a>  raises concern  due to lack of outcome details, why apparently not published to date? <br /> The UK Gov application for special dispensation to avoid compliance with EU air quality directive causes concern when viewed against deliberate degradation of air quality by investment in massive use of biomass combustion. Points to ponder!<br />Rgds<br />Brian]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99365#Comment_99365</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99365#Comment_99365</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 21:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Mike George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Link not working Brian]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99369#Comment_99369</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99369#Comment_99369</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 22:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<a href="http://www.managenergy.net/resources/12" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.managenergy.net/resources/12</a>]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99423#Comment_99423</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99423#Comment_99423</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Brianwilson</cite>Still trying to track down report from Swedish National Energy Administration , promised 3 year study into Emissions and air pollution from combustion of biomass detailed to cover many aspects of impact, carcinogenic,cardiovascular  etc . Understand it was carried out under European Commission and due to be published 2007-8. Anyone spotted this please.</blockquote><br /><br /><blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Brianwilson</cite>The Swedish biomass combustion impact research programme  detailed in http://www.mannagenergy.net/resources/12 raises concern  due to lack of outcome details, why apparently not published to date?</blockquote><br />[n.b. correct link given by ST above]<br /><br />I started to look to see if I can find the report you mentioned but now I'm confused. You provided a link to a summary of a study with the name you gave but which ran from 2000-2003. That summary gives a link to a PDF containing summaries of a host of publications from that project. Are you looking for one of those reports, or some other report not mentioned there?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99436#Comment_99436</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99436#Comment_99436</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Mike George</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Yes, I found that too. Need Author date and title really]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99505#Comment_99505</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99505#Comment_99505</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 13:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>janzon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Having read this thread with interest for a few months now, I am in need of some clarification of the actual harmful emissions from biomass boilers.<br />The figures kindly produced by Brian in his many links to various publications don't mean much to my (in this subject) untrained mind. Number of particles per cubic metre means nothing to me unless I have something to compare it to.<br /><br />How do the emissions from a domestic gasification log boiler, burning well seasoned wood at optimum temperatures for one year, compare to for example:<br /><br />a suburban gardener burning wet leaves and hedge trimmings for a week each autumn, <br /><br />one equestrian property leaving their muckheap smouldering 24/7,<br /><br />an open fire,<br /><br />a farmer burning an acre of straw stubble.<br /><br />Are these PM10 & 2.5 only harmful to people in the immediate vicinity at the time of burning or do they spread far and wide and remain dangerous for a long time?<br /><br />As Sweden appear to be decades ahead of the UK when it comes to the impact of human activity on health and the environment, I have been searching for any long term Swedish studies that would confirm Brian's assertion that biomass burning should be avoided, but I have yet to find any mainstream consensus to support this. <br /><br />I am in no way casting any doubts on Brian's beliefs, I'm just trying to form a balanced view.<br /><br />Jan]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99530#Comment_99530</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99530#Comment_99530</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Brianwilson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[joiner-  Humble apologies I have been immersed in cow manure and matters associated with proposed  introduction of mega dairies/ factory units involving thousands of animals and the first to be located on top of a sensitive aquifer.Interesting times we live in!<br />  Back to biomass I note Industry and vested interests are lobbying hard against stop on biomass proposals for 7 schools in Scotland . Still seeking outcome of Swedish 3 yr study into impact  but to Jan would recommend <br /><a href="http://www.biomasseverband.at/index.php?id=453" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.biomasseverband.at/index.php?id=453</a> a Finnish study Author Raimo O Salonen  MD Phd, Docent <br />     Toxicological evaluation of fine particle emissions from biomass combustion. Report details fine particle pollution causes serious health problems in Europe, biomass combustion contribution far higher than vehicle  emissions.<br />    <br /> WHO(World Health Organisation) designate particulate pollution as most hazardous air pollutant<br />Have found www.swedishenergyagency.sc/web/gemnyckelR5.nsf/vfiles/219061.pdf   Emissions from small scale combustion of biomass fuels and extensive quantification and characterization by Roger Westerholm .<br /><br />Reference query on health impact there is no minimum safe level for exposure to particulates. They are known to travel 200km but serious problem locally due to inversion characteristics of biomass emissions and low exit height.<br />Rgds<br />Brian]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99539#Comment_99539</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99539#Comment_99539</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Brianwilson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[jan-  You may find this report from Denmark of interest. Air pollution from Domestic Wood Combustion<br /><a href="http://www2.dmu.dk/Pub/PO_jest_2007_NOSA.pdf" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www2.dmu.dk/Pub/PO_jest_2007_NOSA.pdf</a>       published by NERI University of Aarhus Roskildu Denmark.<br />     Still seeking Swedish study report if anyone can help please. I become concerned when  investigation into all aspects of biomass combustion is announced but no report apparently published after 3 yr study, unless you know better!  Only a relatively recent convert to GBF I am aware this forum is a fountain of knowledge and it is understood from another thread some recognise God is among us in the form of Damon. We need all the help we can get to prevent deliberate degradation of air quality by unscrupulous profiteers or am I still missing something?<br />Rgds<br />Brian]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99540#Comment_99540</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99540#Comment_99540</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>bella</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[This is a wonderful thread lads. Well done! And well done AECB. But I guess not many of you are biologists so please read the Welsh farmer quoted by Andy Simmonds. The nutritional value of the soil is a terribly important issue where biofuels are concerned. I fear CAT have probably not considered this one adequately and the closest you get here is "burying a donkey under a vine". <br /><br />Although, plants gather their energy from the sun and carbon from the air, and some plants also fix nitrogen from the air, the trace elements, the ones you don't think about much when you add your fertilizer, are much more problematic - zinc, copper, iron, molybdenum, sulphur, iodine, selenium, magnesium, calcium, phosphorus. These are all depleted by growing plants including trees and a constant cycle of renewal is required when plants are harvested. Renewal, other than by shit and compost and dead bodies gathered locally is always going to be energy intensive and most of the best stuff plus the hard won manufactured fertilzer, is being dumped in the sea or sent up into the atmosphere in a high temperature whoosh. The billions of bugs and fungi needed to keep the soil alive need the good stuff too and don't like all these sterilized, concentrated mixtures. It isn't the small holder and his own local timber supply we need to worry about it's the big boys as always. Drive across Americal (San Francisco to New York) where once the wheat prairies were and you will see corn and soya as far as the eye can see. Small oil producing plants are dotted at intervals along the highways. Add all this to the pollution issues and -----Ahhhhhhhhhh!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99543#Comment_99543</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=99543#Comment_99543</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: bella</cite>It isn't the small holder and his own local timber supply we need to worry about it's the big boys as always</blockquote><br /><br />Could be why the Forestry Commission is quietly selling off our woodlands. (Sunday Times last weekend. Yes Brian another few hours wasted down at the harbour again).<br /><br />Though having said that the largest producers in any field tend to be the most efficient.  There was something on the radio earlier about food production and the calories needed to supply a calorie of food energy (seemed to range between 10:1 and 5:1) with most of the energy in 'feeding the land' from what I understood. Also large producers are better governed that smaller ones, but when things go wrong, they go wrong at a much larger scale, tarnishing the whole industry no matter what that industry is.<br />Much of it is about perception and I think that biomass burning has been branded as 'carbon neutral' and by definition a good thing, while the other issues connected with it such as land usage, crop substitution, transport, geographic and financial inequity and, this is where I agree with Brian 100%, particulate emissions.  This does not mean that we can carry burning coal and oil, just that any replacement must be better in all respects not just one.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>