<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - Biomass - a burning issue</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 14:22:54 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=157764#Comment_157764</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=157764#Comment_157764</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:40:44 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>renewablejohn</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Why do I bother. The hoover example was just to highlight the point that if you had 1mm dust then a 0.5mm filter would eliminate the dust problem. I did not and would not suggest putting a paper hoover filter in a chimney that is just plain stupid. The analogy should have been an electro static filter or water scrubber is quite capable of removing PM particles in a similar way to dust particles are removed by a hoover bag.<br /><br />If your concerned about PM then you should try filtering woodgas to such an extent that it can be used in internal combustion engines without damaging the engine.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=157776#Comment_157776</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=157776#Comment_157776</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:24:04 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Brianwilson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[John â€“ Wood oil was put forward for use in combustion engines but I understand solids content plus low ph and high sg creates problems, wood gas  appears to offer hope if it can be produced economically with suitable characteristics. <br /> Your suggestions of filter applications although effective incur substantial   cost which unfortunately means they are avoided in the UK where the combustion industry  appear to exploit  loose regulation e.g. current  biomass plant proposal detailing use of multi- cyclone filter system despite knowledge that it is ineffective in removal of sub PM 10 particles.    The irony is there are reports that we are exporting WESP systems for effective PM abatement on biomass combustion plants in other Countries.<br />A few years ago I noted reports of Swiss success in use of ceramic filters and suggested  use in the UK to the Environment Agency but the response was  ceramic filters were considered unsuitable due to failure caused by thermal shock. Based on experience with ceramics in heating considered it rubbish and now note ceramic filters are being retrospectively fitted to Scottish biomass installations at schools and public premises. <br />Other Countries are taking positive action in order to reduce nasties such as PM, NOX and SO2  pollution and protect life , we appear to fixate on  carbon and ignore the deliberate  degradation of our air quality. This is despite our knowledge of external cost implications resulting from the damage.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161486#Comment_161486</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161486#Comment_161486</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>jamesingram</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[from a poster on the aecb facebook page <br /><a href="https://www.facebook.com/groups/theaecb/" target="_self" rel="nofollow">https://www.facebook.com/groups/theaecb/</a><br />"Interesting â€œMaterial Worldâ€ on Radio 4. A report this week issued by Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth and the RSPB suggests that crucial mistakes in our carbon accounting procedures make burning biomass in the form of wood appear a better idea than it really is. In fact, they go so far as to suggest we'd be better off sticking with coal."<br />Listen again on <br /><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01ntjpz" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01ntjpz</a>]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161487#Comment_161487</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161487#Comment_161487</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>jamesingram</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[6 more posts and it'll hit a 1000 , do i get a price <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/bigsmile.gif" alt=":bigsmile:" title=":bigsmile:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161488#Comment_161488</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161488#Comment_161488</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: jamesingram</cite>crucial mistakes in our carbon accounting procedures make burning biomass in the form of wood appear a better idea than it really is</blockquote>Really, hard to believe after 1034 comments on here.  Wish I had thought of it <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/wink.gif" alt=":wink:" title=":wink:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161520#Comment_161520</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161520#Comment_161520</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Brianwilson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-20303668" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-20303668</a><br />Includes-<br />â€œDrax will get 10% of its fuel from British sources like these and there's a high-walled maze at the power station of blocks of chopped miscanthus next to high mounds of shredded willow.<br />But since energy crops first stirred agricultural excitement there's been controversy over the impact of using land to grow crops to burn. Drax say miscanthus can still be useful for farmers wanting to stabilise sandy soils. <br />But it is possible that in future this may be uneconomic, and that growing coppiced wood for burning will be mainly concentrated on the high-value market for wood-burning stoves in the homes of the rich. <br />In the meantime, the imports of wood from round the world are likely to continueâ€<br />90% import requirement, price of indigenous biomass such as miscanthus  doubled, confirmed degradation of air quality compared with fossil fuel , low efficiency biomass powerplants in UK with high pollution burden per unit of useful power out. Where is the due diligence and joined up thinking? <br />â€œhigh- value market for wood-burning stoves in the homes of the richâ€ ! So what should be the real future for wood burning in the UK and the consequences?<br />Rgds Brian Wilson]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161523#Comment_161523</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161523#Comment_161523</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>jamesingram</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Brianwilson</cite> So what should be the real future for wood burning in the UK and the consequences? Rgds Brian Wilson</blockquote><br />How about.<br />Burning of managed locally sourced new wood, not required for other uses. <br />Burning of wood from individuals own managed production ( trimming of tree on land/property ). <br />Burning of any waste wood not tarnished by other polutants ( paint, glue etc.) <br /><br />I'd imagine the consequences, in terms of polution, of the above, relative to other negative influances on the environment, would be very small. <br /><br />cheers Jim]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161535#Comment_161535</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161535#Comment_161535</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 21:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The only reason that it would be small is because it  is a minority sport. <br /><br />In therms of per unit it is worse than average. and average is already way too bad.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161539#Comment_161539</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161539#Comment_161539</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 21:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>mike7</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: jamesingram</cite>Thought this would be of interest . From the AECB web site................ 6 more posts and it'll hit a 1000 , do i get a price<img title="<img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/bigsmile.gif" alt=":bigsmile:" title=":bigsmile:" />" alt="<img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/bigsmile.gif" alt=":bigsmile:" title=":bigsmile:" />" src="<a href="https:///forum114/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/bigsmile.gif" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https:///forum114/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/bigsmile.gif</a>" ></img></blockquote><br /><br />Well, if Brian is paying....<br /><br />I think the future will include domestic-size woodburners far more sophisticated than the crude boxes they mostly are at present. It'll cost, but then what won't?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161550#Comment_161550</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161550#Comment_161550</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Timber</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[1000!<br /><br />Do I win the prize?<br /><br />BTW, nothing helpful to add to the debate, other than I have been looking at smoking chimneys differently in the last few weeks now the weather has turned. Fine for the minority, not for the majority.  I was in London today, and I was thinking (while I was driving around) that if all the chimneys on the houses were producing emissions from open fires or wood stoves, we would be in serious trouble!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161554#Comment_161554</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161554#Comment_161554</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Timber<br />How is your stove design doing, has it smoked out my parents yet, not heard from them is a week or two <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/bigsmile.gif" alt=":bigsmile:" title=":bigsmile:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161598#Comment_161598</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161598#Comment_161598</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 22:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>renewablejohn</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite ><br /><br />I think the future will include domestic-size woodburners far more sophisticated than the crude boxes they mostly are at present. It'll cost, but then what won't?</blockquote><br /><br />Technology is already on its way. Efficiencies in excess of 5x chemical energy of wood are already achievable and does not rely on burning wood.</cite>]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161606#Comment_161606</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161606#Comment_161606</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 23:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Must be nuclear or fusion that you are talking about?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161607#Comment_161607</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161607#Comment_161607</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 00:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>renewablejohn</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[No just good old fashioned friction]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161610#Comment_161610</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161610#Comment_161610</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 02:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>mike7</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Tell us more. Hope it doesn't involve boy scouts.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161612#Comment_161612</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161612#Comment_161612</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 05:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: renewablejohn</cite>Technology is already on its way. Efficiencies in excess of 5x chemical energy of wood are already achievable and does not rely on burning wood.</blockquote>Depending on the way it is measured  it could be PV as that has a yield of about that per metre squared <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/wink.gif" alt=":wink:" title=":wink:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161624#Comment_161624</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161624#Comment_161624</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 09:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>renewablejohn</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[By using wood as brake blocks 5x heat can be generated compared to just burning the wood. The benefit from our point of view is that unseasoned wood works better than dry wood.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161625#Comment_161625</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161625#Comment_161625</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 09:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[What is the 'brake block' rubbing against?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161626#Comment_161626</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161626#Comment_161626</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 09:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>billt</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[And where's the energy come from to move whatever is being braked?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161627#Comment_161627</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161627#Comment_161627</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 09:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Stolen my thunder Bill <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/cry.gif" alt=":cry:" title=":cry:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161666#Comment_161666</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161666#Comment_161666</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>renewablejohn</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: SteamyTea</cite>What is the 'brake block' rubbing against?</blockquote><br /><br />Either steel drum or disc depending on design.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161668#Comment_161668</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161668#Comment_161668</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Timber</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: SteamyTea</cite>Timber<br />How is your stove design doing, has it smoked out my parents yet, not heard from them is a week or two<img src="<a href="https:///newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/bigsmile.gif" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https:///newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/bigsmile.gif</a>" alt="<img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/bigsmile.gif" alt=":bigsmile:" title=":bigsmile:" />" title="<img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/bigsmile.gif" alt=":bigsmile:" title=":bigsmile:" />" ></img></blockquote><br /><br />Nah, it is going well. Ironically though given my comments about chimneys and smoke etc.<br /><br />In my defense, it is much better than an open fire that many people run, and once running it doesn't emit any visible smoke from the chimney, which I am happy about.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161670#Comment_161670</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161670#Comment_161670</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>renewablejohn</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: billt</cite>And where's the energy come from to move whatever is being braked?</blockquote><br /><br />Depends if you have any "free" energy to use wind turbine, water wheel, solar electric motor. If not then use some of the steam generated to drive the drum or disc.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161674#Comment_161674</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161674#Comment_161674</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Basic physical law is that you cant extract more energy from a system that went into it (except fission and fusion and snake oil)<br /><br />Free energy is an interesting concept though]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161675#Comment_161675</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161675#Comment_161675</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 19:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>mike7</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: renewablejohn</cite><blockquote ><cite >Posted By: billt</cite>And where's the energy come from to move whatever is being braked?</blockquote><br /><br />Depends if you have any "free" energy to use wind turbine, water wheel, solar electric motor. If not then use some of the steam generated to drive the drum or disc.</blockquote><br /><br />To quote another John:- "You cannot be serious!"]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161696#Comment_161696</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161696#Comment_161696</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 09:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>renewablejohn</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: tony</cite>Basic physical law is that you cant extract more energy from a system that went into it (except fission and fusion and snake oil)<br /><br />Free energy is an interesting concept though</blockquote><br /><br />Where not talking overunity. The wood is being consumed as a fuel only the heat output is greater than its chemical composition. No different analogy to a heat pump having a COP in excess of 1 or is that snake oil as well.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161698#Comment_161698</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161698#Comment_161698</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 09:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>renewablejohn</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: mike7</cite><blockquote ><cite >Posted By: renewablejohn</cite><blockquote ><cite >Posted By: billt</cite>And where's the energy come from to move whatever is being braked?</blockquote><br /><br />Depends if you have any "free" energy to use wind turbine, water wheel, solar electric motor. If not then use some of the steam generated to drive the drum or disc.</blockquote><br /><br />To quote another John:- "You cannot be serious!"</blockquote><br /><br />What is your problem wood has been used to raise steam to drive steam engines for centuries. All were talking about is a more efficient flash boiler using friction to raise the heat instead of fire.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161710#Comment_161710</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161710#Comment_161710</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: renewablejohn</cite>No different analogy to a heat pump having a COP in excess of 1 or is that snake oil as well.</blockquote>That is not how a heat pump works.<br /><br />So you have a wheel/disk/shaft and a friction surface (your wooden block), as you spin the wheel, the blocks get hot.  You then draw the heat away (probably though pipes and a fluid) and do something with that energy.<br />Now that wheel takes energy to turn it, takes even more with it has a brake on it.  So you get the energy for 'free', say a turbine of some sort (though you could push a truck down a hill, but would have to push it up again), the formula for calculating the energy in the wind/water is well know and can give you the input energy.  The change in energy caused by the rise in temperature of the brake blocks can be measures and the energy calculated.<br />Bet it is not more than than energy input.  In fact I know it will not be.<br />Now what you are actually talking about here is energy harvesting from low entropy sources.  Not the same as over unity though.<br />The thing to remember is that you have to calculate all the inputs but only one output (the useful bit) to calculate the efficiency.<br />So you have been measuring the wrong thing.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161716#Comment_161716</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161716#Comment_161716</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>jamesingram</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[link to report at bottom of page.<br />"Burning whole trees in power stations can be dirtier than coal, concludes a new report by the RSPB, Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace."<br /><a href="http://www.rspb.org.uk/news/328523-electricity-from-trees-dirtier-than-coal" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.rspb.org.uk/news/328523-electricity-from-trees-dirtier-than-coal</a>]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Biomass - a burning issue</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161724#Comment_161724</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6241&amp;Focus=161724#Comment_161724</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>renewablejohn</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Steamy<br /><br />I suggest you look up friction on Wicki then you might have a better understanding <br /><br />What you fail to grasp is the friction wood blocks are actually a fuel source just the same as petrol in a combustion engine.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>