<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - Passivehouse standard for community building?</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 18:01:33 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Passivehouse standard for community building?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6407&amp;Focus=91746#Comment_91746</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6407&amp;Focus=91746#Comment_91746</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:12:55 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Is it economic to try to renovate a community hall to some decent levels of insulation when it will  be used a several times a week for a couple of hours?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Passivehouse standard for community building?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6407&amp;Focus=91748#Comment_91748</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6407&amp;Focus=91748#Comment_91748</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:32:13 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>jamesingram</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I guess it depends on how long the hall is going to be there.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Passivehouse standard for community building?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6407&amp;Focus=91751#Comment_91751</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6407&amp;Focus=91751#Comment_91751</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:43:02 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The reason for the decent insulation standards isn't to save money. It's to save the planet. I guess a full lifecycle carbon analysis or whatever they call it will answer your question, though.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Passivehouse standard for community building?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6407&amp;Focus=91752#Comment_91752</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6407&amp;Focus=91752#Comment_91752</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:47:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>JTGreen</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Presumably there are possibilities for increasing the use of the community hall?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Passivehouse standard for community building?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6407&amp;Focus=91759#Comment_91759</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6407&amp;Focus=91759#Comment_91759</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:54:28 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[hopefully iot will get used more and more but never all the time.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Passivehouse standard for community building?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6407&amp;Focus=91802#Comment_91802</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6407&amp;Focus=91802#Comment_91802</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 01:13:05 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>sinnerboy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I recall about 13 years back a (non domestic) developer client berating me for "specifying too much insulation" for a call-center project . ( Just complying with regs mind you ) . His "other architect" specified none for the project on the adjacent site . Which was a steel stockholders warehouse . No heat to loose . <br /><br />Tony IF the building continues not to demand ( and therefore lose) heat then on economic grounds the argument to insulate is very weak indeed to say the least . <br /><br />I would argue that if the building is insulated well and therefore becomes more attractive to use because it is more comfortable then it's use will increase . In these economically and socially challenging times community activities will become even more vital and relevant . <br /><br />For example if left insulated the building going to tend to be less viable for use as a low-fee-to user day care center to encourage single parents to take up work .  Or for after school homework clubs . Or job finder clubs . Or pensioners cards nights ... or any other such function . Much easier for an LA to simply lock the doors then ! <br /><br />Invest in the facility . To paraphrase from the movie  Field of Dreams  - " If you improve it they will come "]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>