Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


widget @ surfing-waves.com




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeDec 2nd 2010 edited
     
    Yeah IES are real hook-you-in merchants. At least there's only one, full, version of Tas. Unfortunately the Tas tie-up with Bentley has been purely a sales thing, no discernable input from Bentley, which is solely needed. Hot3000 shouldn't be too difficult once one has time to get into it, esp (I hope) after experience with Tas. There are others.
    • CommentAuthorwookey
    • CommentTimeDec 5th 2010
     
    As I noted in my post - there is already BRE approved free software available for those who want to download it


    Not if your computer runs Linux(or indeed anything apart from Windows or maybe a mac there isn't. Of the 20-odd approved tools on BREs list _none_ of them run on my computer, or any android machine or any iOS machine or Symbian machine or solaris machine. They might run under wine, or they might not. And most of the demo or free versions of proprietary software has some tiresome crippling done to it (no saving, no printing).

    Are there any which aren't too crippled? it would be worth checking wether they work under wine or not.

    So the only choice I currently have is is a simple openoffice spreadsheet of the SAP workbook or the energydesigntools site (which in fact doesn't work on my machine either due to the use of proprietary flash and actionscript 3.0 which is not yet supported by free tools. I checked and they have no interest in making it compatible with anything other than Adobe's flash player - at least I did get an anwser).

    Still, I guess I should stop wittering and just write something. It does seem like there will be some interest. I'll put it on the list :-)
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeDec 5th 2010 edited
     
    Wookey
    Have you thought of getting a copy of Windows, may be a lot easier:bigsmile:
    I agree with you though I think there should be a freely availably package and it would be useful.
    • CommentAuthorJoiner
    • CommentTimeDec 5th 2010 edited
     
    Wookey - as to the 'no saving, no printing' issue, wouldn't "Print Screen" (depending on the keyboard, sometimes "PrtScr") do it?

    Or whatever the equivalent is on the Mac.
    • CommentAuthorvectistim
    • CommentTimeJan 18th 2011
     
    Wookey - are you aware of anyone having actually put the SAP workbook (and the necessary calculations) together as a spreadsheet - that would be fine for my needs, and would save me having to try and complete the same exercise.
    • CommentAuthorwookey
    • CommentTimeJan 21st 2011 edited
     
    vectistim - yes. I have a spreadhseet for the SAP 2005 spec. I started updating it for 2009 but it's not done yet. I'll dig it out, put it online and post a URL
  1.  
    Speaking to Buildesk yesterday the chap told me SAP software will be likley to be bundled up in SBEM in a couple of years possible free issue approved software from the government and suggested I just download FSAP from Stroma...

    Now my thoughts move on to U-value and condensation checkers...

    Any ideas?
  2.  
    I am a neophyte in the u-value and condensation checker world but I did attend the recent 2 day course in Wufi-pro, the dynamic moisture simulation software.

    With wufi-pro which is 1D the input is simple and, of course, you have to take care to get the input parameters right. There is plenty of output graphing and it certainly gives a good guide to the potential problems eg the 1 mm layer of insulation inside plywood placed on the outside of a thick timber stud wall.

    There are some materials commonly used here in Ireland for which it is difficult to obtain the required five key parameters that define the material for hygrothermal simulation.

    My overall impression is that wufi-pro is immensely useful but needs more to it to be worth the money. A single user license is about £1650- and even an upgrade is £500-! You are paying for a lot of building science but it is a leap.

    One clear message from the course is that in terms of the science of moisture behaviour in walls (for vapour drive and capillary action), putting aside the installation issues, external insulation makes sense and internal insulation does not unless you are can justify it by some sort of modelling.

    Wufi modelling for a typical, terrible Dublin hollowblock wall with 'upgraded' internal, builder's-favourite, dry-lining insulation gives grim results for the now-even-colder inside of the masonry behind the insulation. Instead of decreasing after build close-in, RH climbs and climbs: mould everywhere and all those joists no doubt rotting nicely; all conveniently out of sight of the inhabitant.

    As a beginner it has helped me to go back to first principles. David MacKay in his excellent book http://www.withouthotair.com does the best job I have seen of explaining all the heat loss calcs for a building in simple terms. I made a building u-value spreadsheet from his explanation given the degree-days from http://www.degreedays.net/.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeJan 29th 2011
     
    How much did the 2-day course cost? It's next in my wish-list after Therm (which is free s/w)
  3.  
    Wufi course was €450- but reduced fee of €315 for registered companies. Excellent trainers for very full 2 days. Need windows to run wufi so for mac need to boot-up as a PC or use Parallels to run windows.

    What is the best way to go about beginning to use Therm? Are there any good guides out there on the net? Have not even looked but it is what I would like to look at next.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeJan 29th 2011
     
    AFAIK there's no published instruction in use of Therm - that's why I.m paying £295 incl VAT (incl £50 +VAT reduction as AECB member) for a 1-day course http://www.carbonlite.org.uk/courses/downloads/thermal%20Bridging%20-%20no%20dates%20.pdf with Warm Associates in Feb. It's not just about Therm, but all about Bridging incl Therm. Mark Sidall's assured me it's not just a Therm taster/intro, but a solid grounding, and there's some follow-up support in the package.
    • CommentAuthorwookey
    • CommentTimeJan 31st 2011
     
    OK. I found the SAP2005 spreadsheet. It was on my website :-)
    http://wookware.org/files/SAPWorksheet9.80.ods
    (that's not my work BTW - someone sent it to me)

    I'll post here when I finish the 2009 one.

    Do please report any bugs you find,
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeFeb 17th 2011
     
    All set for my AECB Carbonlite Thermal Bridging (incl Therm s/ware) Bristol course today but yesterday during birthday treat at the Pool/Spa, skidded in the shower, poss broken rib, so I've missed it, v disappointed, but booked on the London one in May http://www.carbonlite.org.uk/courses/calendar/
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeFeb 17th 2011
     
    Tom
    I could have taken your place, on the course, not the shower floor.
    Best way to check for broken ribs is a bit of pepper up the nose, if your chest really hurts when you sneeze, then you know you have broken them.

    Get well soon.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeFeb 17th 2011
     
    Having a lovely day lying in bed reading and dozing, no real pain if I move carefully. Body just needed a break from e.g. sitting from of computer - but here I am again!
    • CommentAuthorlineweight
    • CommentTimeMar 12th 2012 edited
     
    I'm bumping this thread in case anyone is aware of any new options that have cropped up in the past year or so.

    It seems difficult to find much that is free or inexpensive for those of us on Mac.

    Have recently come across this online u-value calculator which I think is quite good as allows you to include the effects of bridging insulation with framing elements and so on, and will update dynamically as you tinker with numbers which I find useful:

    http://www.thermalcalconline.com/u-value-calculator/u-value-calculator.html

    it would be nice if it included some capability for condensation risk analysis too - I use this (thanks to previous suggestion via this forum) sometimes but it doesn't give you much detail:

    http://vesma.com/tutorial/uvalue01/uvalue01.htm
    • CommentAuthorDarylP
    • CommentTimeMar 12th 2012
     
    Try JPA :

    http://www.techlit.co.uk/downloads/index.htm

    Download the 'JPA Designer U-value and SAP' offering. You should be able to run the U-value calcs with condensation risk analysis....

    Good luck...:smile:
    • CommentAuthorSeret
    • CommentTimeMar 13th 2012
     
    Posted By: rhamdu
    wookey, I was thinking mainly of the climatic data: monthly wind speeds and degree days.


    Data about the physical world isn't anyone's IP AFAIK, a company recently tried to take the open source repository for timezone data to court for using data from one of their compendiums, but had to drop the case on the (very sensible) basis that nobody owns the rights to the movement of astronomical bodies.
    •  
      CommentAuthorJSHarris
    • CommentTimeMar 13th 2012
     
    <blockquote><cite>Posted By: Seret</cite>
    Data about the physical world isn't anyone's IP AFAIK, a company recently tried to take the open source repository for timezone data to court for using data from one of their compendiums, but had to drop the case on the (very sensible) basis that nobody owns the rights to the movement of astronomical bodies.</blockquote>

    It's a bit of a grey area. The actual physical data, in the form of the positions of astronomical bodies etc, isn't owned by anyone. However, once you compile data into a user-friendly form and publish it, then it may, in that form, become subject to copyright. For many years we spent lots of money each year or so buying the latest Kaye and Laby to stick on the bookshelf in the lab. It was an expensive book, but all it contained was masses of physical constants, data, tables etc. The book was copyright, because the act of compiling the data into user-friendly form took intellectual effort, effort that someone had to pay for.

    Nowadays most governments have seen the light and realised that making data freely available that was obtained or collated using taxpayers money is generally a good thing. Even Kaye and Laby is now available freely online, at the NPL website (and a darned sight easier to use than the big old book used to be!).
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeMar 13th 2012
     
    Kaye and Laby is like the Carnot Cycle, you can't get better and I think, for what it is worth, that the GBF members should use it as the standard reference for material properties, saves a lot of guesswork.
    It explains a lot of the terminology as well.
    Here is a link to the Table of Content:
    http://www.kayelaby.npl.co.uk/toc/
    •  
      CommentAuthorJSHarris
    • CommentTimeMar 13th 2012
     
    <blockquote><cite>Posted By: SteamyTea</cite>Kaye and Laby is like the Carnot Cycle, you can't get better and I think, for what it is worth, that the GBF members should use it as the standard reference for material properties, saves a lot of guesswork.
    It explains a lot of the terminology as well.
    Here is a link to the Table of Content:
    <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.kayelaby.npl.co.uk/toc/">http://www.kayelaby.npl.co.uk/toc/</a></blockquote>

    Gets my vote. Having relied on K&L (albeit as a big green book) for my whole working life, and having never once found an error or omission in the data it's provided, I'd not rely on anything else.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeMar 13th 2012
     
    Just a shame that you cannot copy and paste into Excel, they move little bit and pieces about to stop that happening, but a bit of editing after gets it all straight.
    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeOct 11th 2012
     
    The problem with u-value calculator software is that they're all designed by computer programmers!
    • CommentAuthorDarylP
    • CommentTimeOct 11th 2012
     
    Shevek,

    .... email me what you have got,I will do you a U-value calc and email it back to asap.

    Cheers...:bigsmile:
    • CommentAuthorwookey
    • CommentTimeOct 12th 2012
     
    shevek - how would you design one differently? Or to put it another way, what is the 'problem' you refer to? I can't see much of a way to improve the vesma one for example, but then I'm a computer programmer :-)
  4.  
    To add my tuppence-worth,
    Having played with THERM for a brief time and working in a practice where the current focus in terms of financial investment and training is Revit; what would be very welcome in the architectural world is a means to assess a 3D construction detail within the original software package rather than re-draw it using dxf files in THERM. The (hopefully) attached image is the closest I've found to describing what I mean - apparently generated by 'Autodesk Simulation Multiphysics' which, knowing Autodesk will never be cross compatible within their own product line...

    I understand that BuildDesk already does a rough approximation of 3D (it appears to just be extruded 2D), but since we are currently building libraries of 3D Revit components it would be mighty handy to give them material properties like thermal transmittance (apparently this feature is due in 2013) and then subsequently analyse an assembly to get a similar output to the one in the picture. Most current U-value software (well the freeware at least) appears to be based around a spreadsheet type input with a similarly impenetrable output of boolean responses to condensation risk queries. Once you start getting into correction coefficients for mechanical fastenings and the like, it quickly becomes more and more of a dark art and you need to know a necromancer who can tweak the coefficients to get the 'right' answer. The beauty of THERM is the more 'literal' output of isobars and thermal flow. For an industry still struggling with the basics of VCL's and thermal bridges I think the more 'visual' the output the better*
    * caveat: as long as the data is still mathematically precise and not just a load of pretty colours without a scale...
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeOct 15th 2012 edited
     
    How do you mean 'apparently' - is this just an image you've come across, or resulting from your own use of Adesk Sim Physics? What is that - their new 'upload to the cloud' scheme where they run your sim for a stonkin fee (or subscription) and post the answer back to you? That's what I call black-box!

    Can't believe that Revit hasn't got thermal attributes of materials yet - so how do the various environmental analysis plugins to Revit, like IES's, work?
  5.  
    Sorry, by 'apparently' I just meant that I'd never heard of it before and was reading between the lines - for my part I just did a google search for "THERM Revit" and it was in the results. Similar images I'd seen before were just applying a 2D THERM output as a texture on a 3D model, but the above result would appear (again I'm inferring from the Autodesk website) to model each element fully in 3D and represent 3D temp flows.

    Having once destroyed a laptop by trying to run AnSYS for curvature analysis, I'm wondering what the computation requirements would be for this type of calculation - presumably more than your standard U-value or THERM simulation and I imagine too large for Revit to handle 'in-house'. I think the Autodesk Sim Multiphysics software is a standalone tool for engineers who want to model machine components etc. The service you refer to is called 'Green Building Studio' or Autodesk 360 but having tried to upload a complex model we've been working with for about 9 months, you can't currently do much more than say that walls are of 'Heavy' or 'Light' construction and that glazing ratios are about 40% etc...In other words it's a service geared around early stage concept work not 1:5 detailing and as you say is very 'black box' in terms of its operation. Never tested the veracity of the output either.

    Regarding the thermal attributes, I agree - couldn't believe this hasn't been around before since it would be so simple to implement, but this website: http://www.aecbytes.com/tipsandtricks/2012/issue61-revit.html appears to confirm what I thought. It does look pretty comprehensive now though, and will perhaps allow more detailed computations to be performed 'in the cloud'.

    What I'm really looking forward to though is a seamless link between PHPP and Revit. Currently this appears to be a little way off (there are some issues regarding the way Revit calculates internal exposed wall areas as discussed here: http://www.gduncan.us/?p=756). But there must be some demand for this out there.
    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeNov 12th 2014 edited
     
    First time I've come across this in my search:
    http://www.dartwin.it/sw/mold3/

    Anyone used it?
    • CommentAuthorSaint
    • CommentTimeNov 12th 2014
     
    First used this suite of software over 15 years ago.
    Still seems to be relevant ...http://www.physibel.be/
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press