Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




    • CommentAuthorRobinB
    • CommentTimeDec 14th 2010
     
    Is there a gauge you can buy/hire? I have a table showing the desired flow for each vent but not sure how to achieve it, and have guesstimated it so far. Also it sounds a bit rumbly maybe this will improve with a balanced system? Is this a case where I should use a professional? All advice/experience welcome.
    thanks
    RobinB
    • CommentAuthorjms452
    • CommentTimeDec 14th 2010
     
    An anemometer would be ideal but you could probably passably use a bin bag, bent coat hanger and stop watch.

    Plan to try this myself next year so will be intersted to hear your final solution.

    John
    • CommentAuthorRobinB
    • CommentTimeDec 14th 2010
     
    Thanks John, Are there special ones to measure very low rates of airflow? I couldn't even tell if the kitchen extract was working except by wafting a bit of thin plastic nearby and watching it get sucked over the vent.
    • CommentAuthorbrig001
    • CommentTimeDec 14th 2010
     
    Posted By: RobinBThanks John, Are there special ones to measure very low rates of airflow?


    I would expect any bin bag would do... :bigsmile: Sorry, couldn't resist.

    I am intending to use the bin bag method when I get round to MVHR next year as I expect that a sensitive enough anemometer would be quite expensive.
    • CommentAuthorGreenPaddy
    • CommentTimeDec 14th 2010
     
    RobinB,

    do you have calc's for expected/design flow rates for each leg/outlet for your system. Your kitchen extract ought to be one of the higher flow rates in your system.

    For my system (which I designed myself, and am just about to commission), I have the following;

    1. system schematic, with design flow rates at each intake/outlet (terminal)
    2. anemometer (from Maplin for about £50)
    3. a cone (made from cardboard) which (big end) fits over the terminal, and (small end with known cross sect. area) for the anmometer.

    A little bit of maths gets you flow rate though the terminal, converted into a velocity read by the anmometer. I would do the calc for each terminal, and write that on the schematic. Then you hold up the cone, check the air velocity, and adjust the terminal valve to get the required velocity.

    It is very important you do this, so our system is balanced, and the right amount of air is going the right way. It is not complicated but you need tobe robustin your approach.

    Hope that helps?

    GreenPaddy
    • CommentAuthorjms452
    • CommentTimeDec 15th 2010
     
    Hi GP,

    I assume you mean:
    http://www.maplin.co.uk/Module.aspx?ModuleNo=396688

    I wanted to clarify to avoid buying the wrong one as it would need better than 1m/s accuracy & resolution.

    RobonB
    The bin bag method is just a refined version of your 'wafting a bit of thin plastic nearby and watching it get sucked over the vent' test.
    • CommentAuthorevan
    • CommentTimeDec 15th 2010 edited
     

    The bin bag method is just a refined version of your 'wafting a bit of thin plastic nearby and watching it get sucked over the vent' test.


    I haven't tried it, but I think it may actually be quite good.
    If the flow from a single vent on an MHRV system is 10m^3 per hour, and a binbag is maybe 0.125m^3, it will take 1/80th of an hour to fill the bag, or 45 seconds. This would be quite easy to measure accurately, starting with a squashed flat binbag and waiting for it to be fully inflated.

    At least good enough to make a relative comparison between different vents. I'm going to try it :)
    • CommentAuthorRobinB
    • CommentTimeDec 15th 2010
     
    Right, this weekend once I've finished laying flooring, sorted the leaky sink, insulated the letter box and made some superinsulated curtains I might actually get around to trying the bin-bag method (a not-so-special one!) method. Will post here when I do. Measuring air flow into a bag sounds relatively simple - getting a bag full of air over a "sucky" vent sounds a bit trickier to do with any degree of accuracy.
    thanks
    Robin
    ps might even manage to update the blog too!
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeDec 15th 2010
     
    for a Heath-Robinson route how about a child's beech type windmill?

    hold it under the vent and count how many times it goes round in say 20 seconds. do this to all the vents at the same distance away and do some comparative maths with room volumes etc

    I dont like the bag ideas much

    Heath-Robbo could be improved by mounting the windmill on the cut out base of a waste paper bin then it would do flow and return and different size ducts too.
    • CommentAuthorRobinB
    • CommentTimeDec 15th 2010
     
    Nice idea, I will try the windmill. the fun-factor is moving this job up the list. It will need very good bearings to turn at all, and that's my worry with a proper anenonometer too.
    • CommentAuthorevan
    • CommentTimeDec 15th 2010
     
    Bag or Windmill, which is best? There's only one way to find out!
  1.  
    Posted By: RobinBI dont like the bag ideas much
    The bag method is actually the recommended method for those who can't afford the proper magnehelic guages - I've read this in the instruction manuals of several HRV systems over here. The bag method is quite accurate for the low-ish flowrates that HRV systems have.

    Paul in Montreal.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeDec 15th 2010
     
    I said that I didn't like the bag method much, it is difficult to define when the bag if full and as it nears full there is back pressure so slower flows would register slightly differently

    I can see it working though and it would be cheap!
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeDec 16th 2010 edited
     
    Cross Sectional Area times Velocity or m^2 x ms^-1 will give you flow rate.

    Now the tricky bit is calculating flow rate. My method, and I have not tried it but I am sure it will work is to have a stop watch, two people (one a non smoker), packet of Marlboro and matches.

    Get the non smoker to stand by an outlet with the stop watch, the lucky person at the inlet lights up, deep draw and shouts Start and gently blows the nectar down the pipe. When hearing Start the non smoker (actually an ex smoker would be better) starts the stop watch, when they smell the beautiful smell they stop the watch. Measure the distance it has travelled and do the maths.

    God I wish I was a heating 'engineer':bigsmile:
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeDec 16th 2010
     
    Posted By: SteamyTeapacket of Marlboro and matches

    A joss stick will work quite well for those of a deep green going on purple persuasion. I can also imagine that using a piece of wet fish and substituting a cat for one of the people might be entertaining.
    • CommentAuthorevan
    • CommentTimeDec 16th 2010
     
    Have you done a risk assessment for that ST? You don't want to be breathing in particulates y'know.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeDec 16th 2010
     
    Posted By: evanYou don't want to be breathing in particulates y'know

    I do sometimes :bigsmile:
    • CommentAuthorwookey
    • CommentTimeDec 17th 2010
     
    Greenpaddy (or anyone else who knows) - can you expand on how the flow calcs are done? Is the idea that you work out room volumes, decide on air-changes per hour (or take standard ones from somewhere), thus getting a volume-per-hour then calculate flowrates fro mthe pipe sizes (or perhaps outlet sizes - how does that modify things)?

    Like jemhayward I'm looking to do this as a condensation-control method. And am currently dithering between the Fiwi standalone and whole-house systems.

    Much of our house is unheated most of the time - I wonder how this should be factored in when doing MHRV design? Can you just turn off/down the vents to unused rooms. Will that spoil careful balancing. Is dynamic balancing easy to implement?

    For anemometers I know Silva make nice ones, but as they are aimed at outdoor windspeeds suspect they may just read zero on MHRV - what is the airspeed out of the vent? anemometers.co.uk have a wide range. The silva summit claims to measure down to 0 in 0.1m/s steps at 10% accuracy. Or for 36 quid you can have a lacrosse device which measures down to 0.2m/s in 0.1m/s steps with 5% accuracy (according to the spec) http://www.anemometers.co.uk/anemometer_la_crosse_anemometers.html
    If anyone tries this do tell us how well it works. A phone cal to the anemometer people would probably glean some useful advice.
    • CommentAuthorbrig001
    • CommentTimeDec 17th 2010 edited
     
    wookey, we are facing the same decision too, coincidentally, between the same options...
    I had thought about using a mass air flow sensor from a car for inlet and exhaust. It could balance itself then. Any thoughts? Shouldn't be too much trouble with a pic.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeDec 17th 2010
     
    Wheatstone Bridge, hot wire and a comparator, should be easy for someone with the technical knowledge I would have thought, another of those 'InterestingProjects'(TM)
  2.  
    Here's the instructions from our unit:

    5.0 AIR FLOW BALANCING

    WHAT YOU NEED TO BALANCE THE UNIT
    • A magnehelic gauge capable of measuring 0 to
    0.5 inches in water (0 to 125 Pa) and 2 plastic tubes.
    • The balancing chart of the unit.

    PRELIMINARY STAGES TO BALANCING THE UNIT

    • Seal all the unit ductwork with tape. Close all windows
    and doors.
    • Turn off all exhaust devices such as range hoods, dryers and
    bathroom fans.
    • Make sure the balancing dampers are fully open.
    • Make sure all filters are clean (if it is not the first time you balance the unit).

    BALANCING PROCEDURE
    1. Set the unit to high speed:
    Make sure that the furnace blower is ON if the installation is in any way connected
    to the ductwork of the cold air return. If not leave furnace blower OFF. If the outside
    temperature is below 0°C / 32°F, make sure the unit is not running in defrost while
    balancing. (By waiting 10 minutes after plugging the unit in, you are assured that
    the unit is not in a defrost cycle.)

    2. Place the magnehelic gauge on a level surface and adjust it to zero.

    3. Connect tubing from gauge to EXHAUST air flow pressure
    taps (see diagram). Be sure to connect the tubes to their
    appropriate high low fitting. If the gauge drops below zero,
    reverse the tubing connections.
    NOTE: It is suggested to start with the exhaust air flow reading
    because the exhaust has typically more restriction
    than the fresh air, especially in cases of fully ducted and exhaust ducted installations.
    Place the magnahelic gauge upright and level. Record equivalent AIR FLOW of the
    reading according to the balancing chart.
    4. Move tubing to FRESH air flow pressure taps (see diagram). Adjust the fresh air balancing
    damper until the FRESH air flow is approximately the same as the EXHAUST air flow. If
    Fresh air flow is less than EXHAUST air flow, then go back and adjust the exhaust
    balancing damper to equal the FRESH air flow.

    5. Secure both dampers in place with tape or with a fastening screw.

    6. Write the required air flow information on a label and stick it
    near the unit for future reference (date, maximum speed
    air flows, your name, phone number and business address).

    NOTE
    • Use conversion chart provided with the unit to convert magnehelic gauge readings to
    equivalent cfm values.
    • The unit is considered balanced even if there is a difference of +/- 10 cfm or +/- 5 l/s
    or +/-17 m3/h (+/- 0.015 inch in water) between the 2 air flows.
    • CommentAuthorwookey
    • CommentTimeDec 18th 2010
     
    Hmm. So that's talking about using a pressure guage, not a flow meter (anemometer) (and then converting with a table). Is that a linear conversion I wonder?
    • CommentAuthorjms452
    • CommentTimeDec 19th 2010 edited
     
    It would only be linear well into the laminar regime - so probably not.

    sounds interesting though as I could probably borrow a pressure gauge for free
  3.  
    Posted By: wookeyMuch of our house is unheated most of the time - I wonder how this should be factored in when doing MHRV design?
    Centralised heat recovery ventilation is not well suited to houses where some rooms are unheated. Assuming equal flow, the temperature of the air extracted from the house will be the average of the temperatures of the rooms with extraction. And the air supplied to the house will be a degree or two below that temperature. So, if some rooms are unheated, the air supplied to living spaces can be at 12-14 degrees or lower in conditions like we're having at the moment. This is likely to lead to draughts & greatly reduces the comfort benefits of MVHR.

    If condensation is your main concern then look at single room MVHR units like the FiWi or, alternatively, positive input ventilation. PIV is a lot simpler than MVHR & doesn't require any ducts. It can be used with existing trickle vents, while tending to reduce the draught you get with trickle vents because the air flow is mainly outward.

    David
    • CommentAuthorRobL
    • CommentTimeDec 19th 2010
     
    You could make a differential pressure guage, with a loop of clear plastic tube & some water. One end of pipe goes inside, the other side outside, and the height difference of the water is proportional to the pressure difference between the two ends of the pipe. 1mm difference indicates 10Pa I think. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pressure_measurement
    •  
      CommentAuthorDamonHD
    • CommentTimeDec 19th 2010
     
    This was about the best a Google turned up for me on PIV and it didn't look that convincing to me, especially given that we have a pretty well insulated (ie from the heated living space) loft now!

    http://projects.bre.co.uk/positivevent/body.html

    But I do hear the likely reduced value of MHVR when the house is only partially heated, on a day like today.

    VH's FiWi units don't look horribly expensive for example.

    At the moment we're resorting to opening the bedroom windows for an hour or so in the morning (and bathroom immediately after bath or shower), which seems to help, but drops the internal temperature to under 10C.

    Rgds

    Damon
    • CommentAuthorGreenPaddy
    • CommentTimeDec 19th 2010
     
    jms452,

    yes, that's the Maplin anemometer I've ordered. My calc's tell me that with an air flow for a room of 10 litre/s, and making a cone (to place over the terminals) with a final straight section of 100mm diam pipe (to get some sort of stable flow), the velocity would be about 2.5m/s - I think that anemometer should be adequate to measure that. Calc the required flows rates for each room, apply the cross sectional area of the cone inlet pipe, and that gives the target velocity. That's the method I have be involved with using, having balanced much more complex commercial facilities.


    RobinB/wookey, I have attached a schematic which might help you.

    As I understand it... there are 2 flow rate standards that must be met - one is a minimum flow rate versus each room needing an extract (wet rooms). This then gives you a total for the house. The second is a minimum flow rate based on the fresh air into the house and should be the greater of: (a) number of bedrooms, or (b) footprint of the house in squ metres. Again gives you a total for the house.

    Taking these result for air from wet rooms, and fresh air to the house, you should then choose the higher of these as the target for your house total flow rate. This is the starting point. Total air in and out will be set at this higher value.

    For each room flow rate, start with the wet rooms (extract air). The sum of these rooms flow rates, must equal the total flow for the house (which was calc'd above). You know the min. rate for each type of room (used it in the calc above), so each room must be set at more than that value. Then just use the room volumes to set the actual for each room, in proportion to each of the other extract rooms.

    eg. 1 kitchen (100m3) and 1 bathroom (50m3); total flow rate for house is 30 litre/s.

    Kitchen will be 20 litres/s (regulation min. 13l/s), and bathroom 10 litres/s (regulation min. 8 l/s).


    For the supply rooms, spread the total flow rate (as above) across each room, again as a proportion of their volumes. You might want to play a little with this, and have a little more air to your lounge than say a child's bedroom.


    To commission (I'm scraping the barrel of my memory banks), but as I recall, you open all the terminal valves fully, and then start with the "index" leg (ie. the terminal at the end of the duct with the greatest pressure drop - usually the longest run from the fan). Put the hood (cone and pipe) over the terminal valve, and start taking readings with the anemometer, and adjusting the valve to get the target value. It will be itterative, since when you set the valve on the next leg, it will alter the ones already set - but the impact gets less each time you get closer to the set values.

    My system has 3 manually selectable set points for fan speeds, which I have decided will be;

    "normal" - set at minimum to meet the regulations (calc'd at the start above)
    "set-back" - for when the house is empty
    "boost" - for when every shower, bath, cooker etc is in use (hopefully never)

    Hope the above either convinced you it is reasonably simple and have a go, or that that you shouldn't even go there and just employ a technician to do it for you. Either way, make sure you have a schematic similar to the one I've (hopefully) attached, to either work against, or to have a record of what the technician has done.

    GreenPaddy.
    • CommentAuthorGreenPaddy
    • CommentTimeDec 19th 2010
     
    hmmm...no attachment
    • CommentAuthorRobinB
    • CommentTimeDec 20th 2010
     
    Green paddy thanks for helpful method. I'll post again when I finally get the job done. Part one - the flow requirements is done, part 2 actually setting these is to do.
    • CommentAuthorarnyj
    • CommentTimeJan 24th 2011
     
    Sorry to hi hijack.
    But u all seem knoledge-able and I want to fit a mvhr unit, in a 1890's terrace

    initially to vent my bathroom to save the heat etc'

    I insulated bathroom last year but realise there is lots of vapour laden air in room
    so it needs to be done ASAP also a pipe to our new kichen hobs

    but how / where do you start what cost would the actual heat recovery unit be.
    the trunking aspect is not going to be a problem aprox 5mtrs from shower to outside

    look forward to your help.

    arnyj
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press