Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.
'Am starting to use limecrete in a ground bearing slab situations where it transfers domestic imposed floor loads only (ie not too testing), however I would be interestd in any advice for using it in more demanding locations and any reinforcemnet and mix advice, for eg:
Reinforced raft foundations Strip footings and reinforced wide strip footings Trench fill (I assume that the lime would take an eternity to cure in this situation?) Basement construction
Also any bright ideas for other concrete / cement alternatives would be appreciated...
I am not sure that there is much data available on the carbonation of limecrete: So design rules for reinforcement might be difficult. However, in theory, as it is highly alkaline, the durability should be comparable. Whether or not you can guarantee the same consistency would also also be a problem and you may need to increase sampling rates and to reduce w/c (w/l?) ratio to lowest possible. As far as ground contact, great care would be needed in acidic or chlorine/sulfate environments.
Does anyone know of a reference to information on this?
PFA: If by "considered" you mean that I've heard of it... then yes... ...as to how it works, and where it comes from, its environmental impact, how to make use of it and how it affects C02 re-absorption....then ... no....
Pulverised fuel ash (or fly but no idea why) can be substituted for cement up to about 65% (memory). Disadvantage: Takes longer to cure but then, compared to limecrete, can be relatively fast. Another disadvantage: must use OPC as remaining constituent of the cement as there is only sufficient research in this respect to get this type of concrete through Regulations: Impact very low, if not beneficial, as it is a waste material: 'Fuel' is coal so process from which it comes is not particularly environmentally friendly.. I doubt it affects CO2 reabsorbtion at all but I don't know if there is any research into its properties in this respect: No doubt there will be if we have to start opening up the coal stations again as we reach peak oil.
V. interesting read, at 65% I would it would seem to provide a 37% reduction in Greenhouse gas emission. Do you have any data on curing at that proportion?
Clearly as a by product of coal fire power stations it is not a total solution in the long term but these power stations are going to be around for a while and it is clearly an option for an individual project.
Strength gain is slower: From recollection if you have a mix that goes to 90% at 5 days then the same mix using PFA would take 10 days to get to 90% strength (but this is just anecdotal from memory): There is tech literature available but not the sort you can reference off the internet. The best people for info on this sort of thing are usually the BRE.
If you have technical uses that do not require early strength gains (heavily loaded structures, earth bearing slabs, walls, columns in slow builds) then early strength gain becomes totally irrelevant to your strike times. However I would think twice about using it where it does affect strike times (though these will be quite rare and most likely to occur in high rise residential construction)
It should get you a 65% reduction rather than 37% relative to cement contents but, obviously compared to total concrete usage (depending on where you source your aggregates and sand) will be a lower embodied % reduction: There are stockpiles of this stuff near coal power stations throughout the country: It's very cheap if you can source and use it yourself though you would need to source in bulk and have appropriate dry storage. The specialist nature of its use counterbalances against that economy if done through a supplier. Most large concrete suppliers should be able to source it. The PFA you get will be probably be pure stockpiled waste (and thus you're not helping to keep coal power stations going and are helping to reduce an environmental waste problem)
Local sourcing is clearly a big issue here as with any mass material, I seem to remember from memory that the Green Guide to Housing Specification has some figures for 'eco'-nomical transport distances, 'will have a look.
It shows some interesting ideas including work done in Australia with 'Eco cement', which actually claims to have a negative effect on global C02, (if my quick scan read is an accurate understanding). However the process depends on Magnesium, which is not abundant in the UK.(?)
http://www.tececo.com/simple.eco-cement.php
However for the average architect or eco-self builder on an individual small or domestic project today it all seems a little out of reach at this stage, where as PFA and Lime could be more easily achievable.
Of course OPC, PFA and Lime all need the high kiln temperatures, so earth (stabilised or otherwise) is probably worth a look at but I would think they're struggling for ground contact situations, ie foundations, basements and slabs...? ....Forum input needed here....
Getting back to Lime, it also has other useful building properties such as the "breathabilty" factor
Anecodtal evidence: grand designs programme series V episode 7 an environmentally friendly farmhouse in wales. They used limecrete and it took quite a bit longer to mix and lay - bit farcical as they were laying the limecrete in the middle of winter and so it took a long time to go off... This caused cost overuns and the client fell out with the green architect - who was very defensive when accused of being evangelical about green issues (gotta love that show). But in the end the limecrete worked and looked good - it was the finish in the main family rooms and used externally as deck.
'remember the program with pain to this day, why is it that when the few architects who are foolish enough to appear on the show do so, they always give the public such a fantastic impression of the profession .
If I remember correctly the house had thermafleece, limecrete and a timber frame, but had 3/4 bedrooms and the size of a substantial hotel... remember people; the first 'R' of the 3 is reduce...!
Incidentally I came across this while doing a bit of research close to our hearts:
The amount of CO2 absorbed can therefore be estimated from:Equation 2 ((amount of free lime) + (cement content x 0.65)) x 44/56
This is a first principles statement from the methodology behind the Green Guide (yet to be published). The 2007 version (2008?) looks as if it will concentrate specifically on Cat 3 requirements.
As,(when it is published), it will form part of Cat 3 of the CfSH, this will effectively be incorporated into the Building Regulations soon, if anyone has cause to disagree, they should get some sort of submission in soon as this equation will effectively rule how lime is seen for the next ten years within the construction industry.
<blockquote><cite>Posted By: chocolatepixie</cite>Like the idea of using hemp to build a house... Another option is recycled glass with lime - 'glascrete' . Has anyone tried this?</blockquote>
Ty Mawr now uses glass as the aggregate for its lime screeds. I've also used it for plastering - it works extremely well. Graded like sand, it has a nice coarse grain and is perfect for limework.
Hi, has anyone here got experience in having a limecrete floor approved by building regs??? By BCO is telling me that Ty mawr's info is not enough - that they need a certificate of some sort. Has anyone seena any certificate from another supplier? How do other such floors get approved in new builds?
Thanks James. Fired my BCO, hired an independent instead, provided all the info I had and quote "Cheers for info on Hemcrete and Limecrete. Details appear fine to me; covers how applied, thickness and compliance with Building Regs; can't understand why Local Building Control would have an issue." Drawings need to be finalised but hopefully we'll get approval in a few weeks.
We put fibreglass reinforcement in limecrete - not very eco, but we had to find something to stop clients insisting on steel reinforcement (just doesn't seem right to us in a breathable floor). The limecrete gains strength more quickly so can be worked on sooner. There doesn't seem to be a huge effect on final strength (after a year or more).
We have had success with limecrete foundations, just need to be sensible leaving a few months to cure and then constructing the house out of wood or some other lightweight material. One of these new builds also has a basement - underground to the North but ground level to the South. We put gravel filled land drains around and under and all is well (2nd winter has passed now).