Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.

The AECB accepts no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site. Views given in posts are not necessarily the views of the AECB.



    • CommentAuthorwindyboy
    • CommentTimeOct 8th 2011
     
    Hi Guys.......am I being a "bit thick" today ? Question.......presumably if you want fit income from your turbine it has to be on the MCS Product List .....right ? Now there appears to be just 9 turbines listed on that MCS list......how is it then that you can put up a 50 kw Endurance and still get fits ? I dont understand and I apologise in advance if the answer is obvious.....Cheers Windyboy:confused:
    •  
      CommentAuthorted
    • CommentTimeOct 8th 2011
     
    MCS only covers kit up to 50 kW. Anything above is open.

    Although the manufacturers advertise the Endurance as exactly 50 kW that is at 9.5 m/s wind speed whereas the MCS standard is 11 m/s. So at the higher speed it is rated at approx 55 kW - meaning that it doesn't need to be MCS registered.
    • CommentAuthorwindyboy
    • CommentTimeOct 8th 2011
     
    As always thanks Ted. So lets be clear.....there hasnt been any MCS testing on the Endurance 50 kw and you are still able to receive FIT Income ? May I ask Ted, have you a wind turbine and if so what model? If you havent one, from what you know/have heard which 10-15KW turbine would you buy and which 50kw turbine would you buy (sorry to put you on the spot !!) Thanks Ted........kind regards Windyboy.
    •  
      CommentAuthorted
    • CommentTimeOct 8th 2011
     
    I have a Proven 6kW.

    If you have a 3 phase supply then I think the Gaia 11kW is a top contender - although there is supposed to be a single phase version coming soon. Bergey also have a well founded reputation, though they are not on the MCS list.

    I haven't looked at 50kW machines in enough detail to say.
  1.  
    Windyboy,
    After doing a lot of research in 2010 I opted for a Gaia, 11kW, which was installed in June. Has had no problems, just a few error messages on the computer which are easy enough to reset. I've had 7200kWh since June, 1500 in June, 1100 July, 1200 Aug and 2600 in Sept. Then 800kWh so far in Oct. My annual, measured, average wind speed last year was 4.5m/s at hub height.
    I was going to go for an Evoco but they kept putting the price up so the Gaia worked out much better £/kW. The Bergey comes with a 10 year warrantee but no FITs and is better suited to high wind areas. The Gaia owners I visited and spoke to whilst doing my research were all very positive. I do know of a couple of Gaias that do/did have software issues which took time to solve. Think of it like buying a car. Do you go for a new model from a new manufacturer or do you go for an existing model with a track record. Either way you could buy one that's built on Friday afternoon but you can reduce the risk by doing your homework. And remember, Choosing the right installer is as important as the turbine.
  2.  
    Windy lamb/Windyboy,
    From my knowledge of larger machines I would never buy a new model. Most of the testing is done in the field and you can pay the price with long periods of lost production. Go for a machine with a proven track record every time. It should have all the teething faults sorted before you install then,
    Gusty.
    • CommentAuthorpauler
    • CommentTimeOct 10th 2011 edited
     
    <blockquote><cite>Posted By: ted</cite>MCS only covers kit up to 50 kW. Anything above is open.

    Although the manufacturers advertise the Endurance as exactly 50 kW that is at 9.5 m/s wind speed whereas the MCS standard is 11 m/s. So at the higher speed it is rated at approx 55 kW - meaning that it doesn't need to be MCS registered.</blockquote>

    Ted - the Endurance E3120 has a manufcture rating of 50kw,and is rated at 55kw @11m/s - but this is not the reason for not requiring MCS - It's because the swept area is to large, and is outside the remit of MCS, despite being called a 50kw by the manufacture. Interestingly it comes with a 73kw ABB Generator as standard.

    Oooh, and the Endurance turbine is not a new turbine, was formerly called a PGE Turbine i think? - Endurance bought them over a few years back, think they have nearly 8 years under their belt between PGE/Endurance - seems to be a well sorted/developed turbine using some class leading components - ABB Genies & Seimens GearBoxes etc
    •  
      CommentAuthorted
    • CommentTimeOct 10th 2011
     
    This is what the MCS MIS 3003 standard says - updated just a few weeks ago (but previous versions used similar wording):

    "For the purposes of this standard, Micro and Small Wind Turbine systems are defined as those having an electrical output up to 50kW (measured at a wind speed of 11.0 metres per second as defined in BWEA etc)."

    The BWEA do have a safety and performance standard for small turbines that applies based on swept area - up to 200m2, but that is not what the MCS are using as their definition. Above that size different BWEA standards would apply. But the FiTs legislation requires that the MCS limit is based on 50kW Declared Net Capacity.
  3.  
    Siemens= Yeahhhh
    ABB= Boooooooo
    At least in the 850kW stuff.
    • CommentAuthorwindyboy
    • CommentTimeOct 28th 2011
     
    Re windylamb........After doing a lot of research in 2010 I opted for a Gaia, 11kW, which was installed in June. Has had no problems, just a few error messages on the computer which are easy enough to reset. I've had 7200kWh since June, 1500 in June, 1100 July, 1200 Aug and 2600 in Sept. Then 800kWh so far in Oct. My annual, measured, average wind speed last year was 4.5m/s at hub height.
    I was going to go for an Evoco but they kept putting the price up so the Gaia worked out much better £/kW. The Bergey comes with a 10 year warrantee but no FITs and is better suited to high wind areas. The Gaia owners I visited and spoke to whilst doing my research were all very positive. I do know of a couple of Gaias that do/did have software issues which took time to solve. Think of it like buying a car. Do you go for a new model from a new manufacturer or do you go for an existing model with a track record. Either way you could buy one that's built on Friday afternoon but you can reduce the risk by doing your homework. And remember, Choosing the right installer is as important as the turbine.

    Thanks for this WL.........RE OUTPUT FIGURES......Are these what you expected on the Gaia Windylamb? Projecting for the 12 months are you expecting say 20-25000 Kwh ? Based on your estimated average windspeed is this about right or are you currently disappointed ? Regards Windyboy.
    • CommentAuthorpauler
    • CommentTimeOct 28th 2011
     
    Apparently a manufacture warning was issued to shut the evocos down in the high winds a few weeks ago....and a some threw/broke blades...worth asking the manufacture about that one.
    • CommentAuthorwindyboy
    • CommentTimeOct 28th 2011
     
    Hi Pauler........thanks for the above info.....your intel on cracked flanges last time was spot on so I'm not doubting your info this time.......looks like another mail to Ben Harrison at Evoco on this one.....will report back with response......thanks again Pauler.
    •  
      CommentAuthorJSHarris
    • CommentTimeOct 28th 2011
     
    As someone who'd designed light aircraft (in my spare time, not as a job) I'm getting increasingly concerned about the apparent reliability issues with domestic-scale wind turbines that have, or appear to have, a fatigue-related element.

    The design of structures that are exposed to long duration fluctuating loads is complex and requires not only an understanding of basic material strength, but also an in-depth understanding of the effects of fatigue. The last failure reported here concerned a shaft that had welded parts, an exceedingly difficult manufacturing technique for this type of component and one that would not normally be used for an aircraft component of this type (and aircraft high load, high fatigue rating parts would not be required to have a design life anything like as long as a wind turbine).

    I can't help but feel that these small commercially made wind turbines may not have an appropriate degree of fatigue testing before they are marketed.
    • CommentAuthorwindy lamb
    • CommentTimeOct 29th 2011
     
    Windyboy
    Re my Gaia; Yes the output/production is about what I expected. I estimated an annual generation of 24,000kWh which was based on my 2009-2010 measured wind speed of 4.5m/s. I'm hoping it may be a bit more but we'll see. Most installers said it would be 30,000kWh. I'm averaging about 95kWh/day since the start of September but in total, since installation (June), it's averaged 63kWh/day - so it's around 22,000kWh/year.

    There's an Evoco a few miles away from me which has been up about the same time and seems always turning - I should go and ask him how he's doing, shouldn't I ?:shocked:
    • CommentAuthorwindyboy
    • CommentTimeOct 29th 2011
     
    Thanks Windylamb..........ummmmmm I think you are in Wales aren't you....I'm on the Carmarthenshire/Pembrokeshire border....I would be interested to know whereabouts you/the Evoco is located,I would be interested in talking to the owners to see how they are getting on with the Evoco.If you would prefer not to say publicly my personal email is lifestooshort@fsmail.net. Thanks windyboy.
    • CommentAuthorpauler
    • CommentTimeDec 1st 2011
     
    Some talk about EVOCO Blade issues here:

    http://farmingforum.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=59950
    • CommentAuthorpauler
    • CommentTimeJan 6th 2012
     
    Back to the drawing board for Evoco....
    • CommentAuthorpauler
    • CommentTimeJan 6th 2012
     
    Looks like 3 Evoco turbines had problems with blades breaking etc:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2083149/Wind-turbines-cope-UK-weather-3-blown-pieces.html
    • CommentAuthorpauler
    • CommentTimeJan 7th 2012
     
    News alert from Evovco Wind Energy, regarding the 10kw turbine - SHUT THEM DOWN!!
    • CommentAuthorwookey
    • CommentTimeJan 8th 2012
     
    Their press relase says they have 150 of these things installed, and only the ones in Yorskshire broke (but 3 of them did there). So either they have a batch of duff blades or it's been windier in yokshire than anywhere else.
    • CommentAuthorwindyboy
    • CommentTimeJan 10th 2012
     
    Ummm..........I think thats the final nail in the coffin !!!!! Where's that planning application for change of model and tower height ? Glad I didnt put down a deposit or pour the concrete !!! Happy new year Guys. Hows your Gaia holding up in these winds Windylamb ? Cheers Windyboy.:cool:
    • CommentAuthorwindy lamb
    • CommentTimeJan 11th 2012
     
    Hi Windyboy,
    My Gaia is fine (except for that "rotor overspeed" error message coming up all the time but I'm getting a new controller to sought that - finally).

    It's done 17,470kWh since June so no issues with production. I've also had no down time or breakages and without the overspeed error message I wouldn't have had to touch it. That's the only niggle - a false error message which stops the turbine in very light winds meaning I have to go to the turbine controller and press the reset button before it'll restart. Luckily it's not a long walk.

    In those strong winds we had it just kept going at 56rpm but you could hear the brake coming on in very strong gusts. Not sure if I would be as confident with a high rotor speed design - thought my little Rutland wind charger was going to take off and that's only about 1m wingspan!:cool:
    • CommentAuthorpauler
    • CommentTimeFeb 2nd 2012
     
  4.  
    What a shame, these bad news stories do no good for anyone. Followed the link and checked out some of the comments posted, they pretty much all say how bad wind farms/turbines are even a link there for an on line petition to stop all wind turbine development. Anyway I bet you PV guys are loving this sunny weather however here in sunny north Cornwall not a breath of wind, freezing cold and only the job of carrying out water to the animals to keep me warm (and a candle or two!)
    • CommentAuthorJeff B
    • CommentTimeFeb 2nd 2012
     
    Two Evoco wind turbines on farms near us (west Pembs) have been shut down for several weeks - now I see why!
  5.  
    Another knee jerk reaction by a planning department and as for the local MP wanting a blanket ban on all wind turbine applications. It's a bit like having a blanket ban on applications for houses because there was a house fire in Bradford last week - moron.
    • CommentAuthorpauler
    • CommentTimeFeb 10th 2012
     
    totally agree with windy lamb...
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press