<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - Passivhaus V&amp;#039;s SAP</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 08:24:20 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Passivhaus V&#039;s SAP</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=7657&amp;Focus=114184#Comment_114184</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=7657&amp;Focus=114184#Comment_114184</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 12:32:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>PeteLawley</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I have been doing some research into energy usage of domestic buildings to try and get a comparision of the energy costs for low energy v's building regs compliant buildings.<br /><br />Its tricky because every standard/ measuring device uses different criteria. However, I am fairly confident that the primary energy (all energy use + transmission losses) and space heating calculations from SAP and those used by Passivehaus are comparable.<br /><br />So, imagine my surprise. I modelled a house to passivehaus standards in SAP 2009 and got a spaceheating requirement of 36.59 kWh/m2/yr but a primary energy usage of only 25.5 (passivehaus minimum standards are 15 / 120 kWh/m2/yr respectively)<br /><br />Any ideas anyone? <br /><br />Also, can anyone know what the average space heating requirement of a dwelling to ADL 2010 is (in kWh.m2/yr)<br /><br />Thanks]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Passivhaus V&#039;s SAP</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=7657&amp;Focus=114193#Comment_114193</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=7657&amp;Focus=114193#Comment_114193</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 13:31:57 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: PeteLawley</cite>However, I am fairly confident that the primary energy (all energy use + transmission losses) and space heating calculations from SAP and those used by Passivehaus are comparable.</blockquote><br />I don't think your confidence is shared by many other people. The first link I found was http://www.greenbuildingstore.co.uk/page--passivhaus-and-csh.html but there are plenty more.<br /><br />What did your PHPP model of the house show, BTW? And if you haven't done one, how do you know it is 'to passivehaus[sic] standards'?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Passivhaus V&#039;s SAP</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=7657&amp;Focus=114202#Comment_114202</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=7657&amp;Focus=114202#Comment_114202</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:24:50 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>PeteLawley</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Good link.<br /><br />It doesn't give either primary energy usage of space heating by both SAP and PHPP though. I guess to know how similar the calculations are we need to find both. This paper goes into more detail <a href="http://www.ukgbc.org/site/document/download/?document_id=494," target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.ukgbc.org/site/document/download/?document_id=494,</a>  and you are correct - they are very different.<br /><br />The PH comparison is a bit of sideline really, I was trying to find a way to accurately compare annual energy costs of our timber panel system with a house built to current building regulations (without fiddling with SAP until I just about reached the minimum standards), but because ADL 2010 uses DER/TER rather than FEE I have been unable to find anything useful on the web.<br /><br />Then, whilst reading about Passivhaus standards I thought it would be interesting to see how our buildings would perform if I upped the spec to minimum PH standards, thats when I discovered the discrepancies that I mention.<br /><br />Always happy to be told there are beter ways to do things.....?<br /><br />P]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Passivhaus V&#039;s SAP</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=7657&amp;Focus=114203#Comment_114203</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=7657&amp;Focus=114203#Comment_114203</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:46:52 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>PeteLawley</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Sorry, reading more carefully I see that the link you gave does indeed compare space heating calculations under SAP and PHPP and  they are very different. <br /><br />It makes me wonder what our SAP space heating requirement of around 60 kWh/m2/year would look like through PHPP...?<br /><br />P]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Passivhaus V&#039;s SAP</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=7657&amp;Focus=114259#Comment_114259</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=7657&amp;Focus=114259#Comment_114259</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:46:19 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I suspect 60 kWh/m2 is getting a bit high for PHPP to give accurate results. It's four times above its normal limit!<br /><br />PHPP is only Â£120 or so and fairly easy to learn to drive in a basic fashion. I'd suggest taking a course if you want to understand it properly though (still on my to-do list).]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>