<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - Retrospective Insulation of old stone building</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 20:00:10 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Retrospective Insulation of old stone building</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=849&amp;Focus=9150#Comment_9150</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=849&amp;Focus=9150#Comment_9150</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 14:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Mike (Up North)</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi,<br /><br />Can anyone make any suggestions to better insulate the following.<br /><br />Draught proofing and effective use of energy are already being addressed. I need to increase the insulation in an old stone built cottage.<br /><br />Walls are rough stone/rubble with possible lime mortar (100yr old property) ranging from 2 to 3 feet thick then battens then lath and plaster/pitch pine boards.<br /><br />Please do not suggest ripping all out as it is being lived in and well itâ€™s just not do-able like that. Itâ€™s basically sound and original, but needs to be greatly improved. Even if it does not get the reqâ€™d thickness to meet current standards it will be a great improvement. External insulation is a non starter as well.<br /><br />I have considered some sort of loose fill poured down the cavity between wall and plaster but the wall heads are not very accessible and the battening is haphazard (from past experience) so it might not go that far down. Also from looking at sub-floor level, Iâ€™m not sure whatâ€™s to stop it simply falling out the bottom. You canâ€™t get to the bottoms as from below the wall below floor level is much thicker (another couple of feet) so you canâ€™t actually see what at the end of the joists. <br /><br />I have thought about some sort of squirt in foam (yuk) not ideal but might be the only solution as could be done progressively from the inside. I am worried this might cause damp etc as I imagine the walls can breathe a bit as is. Also this would further stop draughts within the shell of the building, but that in itself may be giving the necessary ventilation.<br /><br />I have discovered from an internet search that there is a difference between the can foam from DIY stores (single component, open cell structure = porous) and that sold by others â€“ specialists (?) these being 2 part component, closed cell structure = non-porous. <br /><br />Another problem in that living in the far north many esoteric or natural materials are not available without huge round trips.<br /><br />Any ideas anyone? Suggestions?<br /><br />Cheers.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Retrospective Insulation of old stone building</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=849&amp;Focus=9152#Comment_9152</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=849&amp;Focus=9152#Comment_9152</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[What is the outside finish? Could you do external insulation?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Retrospective Insulation of old stone building</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=849&amp;Focus=9155#Comment_9155</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=849&amp;Focus=9155#Comment_9155</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Mike (Up North)</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi,<br />Cant do external. Planners wont allow. I think there would be problems with reveals etc plus interfring with other adjoining bits of building - it is a detached property though. Also dont want to cover up pointed stone work.<br /><br />Cheers anyway]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Retrospective Insulation of old stone building</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=849&amp;Focus=9159#Comment_9159</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=849&amp;Focus=9159#Comment_9159</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[you would do well to make good and sure that outside air or wind isnt gaining access to the small gap behind your paneling. Otherwise you are effectively living in a very thin wooden box.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Retrospective Insulation of old stone building</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=849&amp;Focus=9269#Comment_9269</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=849&amp;Focus=9269#Comment_9269</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Mike (Up North)</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi, Thats exactly the problem. Hence the thaught that maybe some sort of expanding foam would seal between the lath and the stonework. Any other ideas???<br />Cheers]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Retrospective Insulation of old stone building</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=849&amp;Focus=9271#Comment_9271</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=849&amp;Focus=9271#Comment_9271</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Filling behind the boarding seems a hopeless exercise. Sounds like there's no chance of making the filling function as a worthwhile air barrier, and as insulation it would be trivial, except for serving to cut your interior off from the benefit of the thermally massive wall. So, if you can't do either inside or outside, then put your faith simply in the walls' massiveness - that can be a fair substitute for U-value - in real-life dynamically varying conditions, massiveness can perform much better than you'd expect from its steady-state U-value. However, Tony is 100% right - absolute essential is to prevent air blowing through the internal voids of your thick stone walls. Do you think that's what's happening? If the wall's really well built with squared stones right through, there may be few if any voids, but if it's the usual 'built' rubbish stone loosely mortared between squared facings, then the voids probably become near-enough outside air, when the wind blows, so thermally your wall is just the thickness of the squared inner skin. Or even, maybe there's no inner skin and the 'built' voidy rubbish stone comes right through to the inside face. Put all your effort into air-sealing the outside face of the wall, with scrupulously cleaned and well-filled joints of lime mortar, so the lime bonds well to each stone and hopefully won't shrink and create hairline cracks. Because it's pinholes and hairlines that let the air in - a 95% job's not good enough! If you could limewash your exterior, that would do a good job of filling pinholes and hairlines every so often.<br /><br />PS in olden times, 'building' was the name for the low-grade task of filling the interior wall with rubbish stone, after or while the high-grade masons built the outer facings. That's what it means, to be a 'builder'!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>