<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 11:09:07 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135113#Comment_135113</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135113#Comment_135113</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>lineweight</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I'm about to do some repointing and general repair to some brickwork. At this stage, all to the internal face of a 9" external wall, Victorian, fairly soft/crappy bricks with the original lime mortar. It doesn't really matter what it looks like as it won't be visible once the project is finished.<br /><br />So, have been trying to read up on lime mortar and get my head around the options. Unfortunately it seems the more I read the more conflicting advice I see.<br /><br />That cement mortar is a big no-no I get, and understand the reasons.<br /><br />As far as I can see, the options for lime mortar are:<br /><br />1) Lime putty. Non-hydraulic. Mix 1:3 with sand, slow setting.<br /><br />2) Natural Hydraulic Lime (NHL). Again mix approx. 1:3 with sand. Fast setting. NHL3.5 seems most appropriate to my needs.<br /><br />3) Cement:Lime:Sand mix using hydrated lime(ie non-hydraulic, bagged lime as available widely from builders merchants). Mix 1:2:9 (or 1:1:6 where more strength desirable). Fairly fast setting on account of inclusion of cement.<br /><br />I think I'm going to rule out (1) because I'd like something fairly fast setting, especially at the moment with cold weather, and because I've seen comment that it's a bit more difficult to work with and I'm not a bricklayer.<br /><br />Option (3) is attractive because the hydrated lime is cheap and easy to come by. The potential concern is the inclusion of the dreaded cement, but this kind of mix seems fairly widely recommended for repointing historic brickwork. I am however aware that thinking changes over time and this advice might be outdated.<br /><br />The reason I'mÂ a bit sceptical about option (2) is that most of the advice saying that I should use this comes from people who are trying to sell NHL. Flexibility and breathability are mentioned as the benefits but is there really a big advantage over say a 1:2:9 mix where the cement content is pretty low? <br /><br /><br />Any thoughts appreciated!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135131#Comment_135131</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135131#Comment_135131</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>jms452</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I'll start with the comment that I'm no expert but my $0.02 is:<br /><br />Can you not wait a couple of months (i.e. until its not freezing every night) and go for option (1) it is the mortar that will have been used in the house after all. I've worked with sharp sand (to match existing) and lime putty and wouldn't describe it as hard.<br /><br />It is also worth some effort to trial the mix first to make sure it does match - the first time I tried repointing it was with some distinctly red sand from BnQ, it looked C*** and I ended up repointing it again!<br /><br />This may attract some tutting but I've also found that lime putty home-made from non-hydraulic bagged lime is as good as expensively purchased lime putty. Just leave it covered and under water in a couple of builders tubs until the weather warms up.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135134#Comment_135134</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135134#Comment_135134</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I'm by no means an expert but sources I'd trust include SPAB and Building Conservation. Here are some links (there are probably others on the sites, as well as references):<br /><br /><a href="http://www.buildingconservation.com/articles/pointing/pointing.htm" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.buildingconservation.com/articles/pointing/pointing.htm</a><br /><a href="http://www.buildingconservation.com/articles/plaster/lime-plaster.htm" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.buildingconservation.com/articles/plaster/lime-plaster.htm</a><br /><a href="http://www.spab.org.uk/advice/technical-qas/technical-qa-11-repointing/" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.spab.org.uk/advice/technical-qas/technical-qa-11-repointing/</a><br /><a href="http://www.spab.org.uk/advice/technical-qas/technical-qa-21-inappropriate-cement-pointing/" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.spab.org.uk/advice/technical-qas/technical-qa-21-inappropriate-cement-pointing/</a><br /><a href="http://www.spab.org.uk/advice/technical-qas/technical-qa-14-lime/" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.spab.org.uk/advice/technical-qas/technical-qa-14-lime/</a><br /><br />There's also <a href="http://www.shetland.gov.uk/planningcontrol/advicenotes/documents/AdviceNote13-LimeMortarsandRenders.pdf" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.shetland.gov.uk/planningcontrol/advicenotes/documents/AdviceNote13-LimeMortarsandRenders.pdf</a><br /><br />As far as very low temperatures go, the rule of thumb seems to be - just don't, wait for warmer weather.<br /><br />The articles say the mortar should be softer than the bricks, so if you've got soft bricks, you need soft mortar, which tends to indicate (1). The articles recommend against cement and against the use of bagged hydrated lime (though I understand it can be OK if it is really fresh). Instead of considering adding cement to speed up setting, consider adding a pozzolan.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135136#Comment_135136</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135136#Comment_135136</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Beau</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[There is quite a lot of useful information on this site <a href="http://www.mikewye.co.uk/mikepointng.htm" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.mikewye.co.uk/mikepointng.htm</a><br />When re-pointing our barn we did as they recommended and have had no problems.  Make sure you avoid frost.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135162#Comment_135162</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135162#Comment_135162</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[how about slaking your own lime! <br /><br />hydraulic lime in tubs is better than bags.<br /><br />Avoiding cement = avoiding future problems, fast set is not a relevant consideration more so if you cant see it all when finished]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135175#Comment_135175</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135175#Comment_135175</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>lineweight</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: tony</cite> fast set is not a relevant consideration </blockquote><br /><br />What about the frost issue?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135179#Comment_135179</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135179#Comment_135179</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>mark_s</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[buy your bagged lime now, put it in a plastic tub and cover with water.<br /><br />When the weather improves use your new lime putty.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135185#Comment_135185</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135185#Comment_135185</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>muddy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I would guess that you want to render the masonry to make it air tight before insulating, therefore its not going to be seen. I would also second that you can soak bagged hydraulic lime in a tub for a month or two, or you can use nhl bagged lime directly. For an internal wall try adding hemp fibre if you have a very irregular thickness, it will stop it cracking.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135187#Comment_135187</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135187#Comment_135187</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>lineweight</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Thanks for the various comments/links so far.<br /><br />So the consensus seems to be that putty is better than NHL, and that any kind of mix involving cement is completely out.<br /><br />Fair enough, but I find it quite frustrating that so much of the advice is stated without anything terribly objective to back it up.<br /><br />Why exactly is putty preferable to NHL for example? How critical actually is the difference...? several of those articles just make a kind of vague statement that if that's what was originally used, then that's what should be used now, but that in itself doesn't seem to be a particularly logical reason to make the decision.<br /><br />And as for the inclusion of cement in mixes...so cement decreases flexibilty and breathability - that's fine - but in a mix with a small amount of cement how much impact does it really have? Does it make it 95 percent as permeable or 50 percent as permeable....has any actual objective research been done?<br /><br />This article is kind of interesting...seems to imply that guaging with cement may be ok in some instances and also makes the point about relative costs of different options.<br /><br />http://www.ihbc.org.uk/context_archive/63/limemortars/hydraulicity.html<br /><br />How much of this insistence on, say, the superiority of (expensive) lime putty is drawn from aesthetic preference rather than objective assessment, I wonder.<br /><br />I'm not in any way having a go at anyone who has posted on this thread by the way....just expressing my frustration as someone who just wants a straightforward, objective answer to a seemingly straightforward question.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135188#Comment_135188</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135188#Comment_135188</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>lineweight</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: muddy</cite>I would guess that you want to render the masonry to make it air tight before insulating, therefore its not going to be seen. I would also second that you can soak bagged hydraulic lime in a tub for a month or two, or you can use nhl bagged lime directly. For an internal wall try adding hemp fibre if you have a very irregular thickness, it will stop it cracking.</blockquote><br /><br />Not going to render the masonry - it will indeed be behind insulation but the airtightness will be dealt with in a separate layer. <br /><br />Just need to repoint/repair/replace bricks in a few locations where the brickwork has been damaged or where the mortar is failing.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135189#Comment_135189</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135189#Comment_135189</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 07:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Lime pointing is crucially involved in the processes involving moisture in the wall, it sucks up any moisture, water, wet or damp as it is highly hygroscopic and transports that moisture away to the outside.<br /><br />It keeps the bricks dry too by the same process.<br /><br />Lime is much better to work with when it is fully hydrated, it will work from bags, cheaper out of bags but sometimes it can be quite old too.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135196#Comment_135196</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135196#Comment_135196</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Triassic</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I've done loads of repointing using lime putty in tubs. I've also slaked my own lime. Tubs is better and quick. <br /><br />I'd suggest you experiment with colour, you'll need to try different types of local sand to get the colour right. I tend to wet the wall using a garden spray as you don't want a dry background to pull too much water out of your mix. <br /><br />Best keep your mix a little on the dry side, it should be damp and when squezed form and remain in a ball without being wet and slumping. I also us a Churn brush to beat back to mix into the crevises in the wall. I find the finished pointing less harsh (I don't like it too smooth with tool marks) and more textured which looks good against the sandstone rock we have round here.<br /><br />Do not use red sand and cement, or put cement into your lime mortar mix.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135208#Comment_135208</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135208#Comment_135208</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>lineweight</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: tony</cite>Lime pointing is crucially involved in the processes involving moisture in the wall, it sucks up any moisture, water, wet or damp as it is highly hygroscopic and transports that moisture away to the outside.<br /><br />It keeps the bricks dry too by the same process.<br /></blockquote><br /><br />Sure, I understand this, but how much more hygroscopic is it than say a 1:2:9 cement/lime/sand mix? I can't find anything that actually states in figures how much of a difference it makes.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135218#Comment_135218</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135218#Comment_135218</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Peter_S</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[this article sets out most of the points you raised, but if you need more science, then your getting into the building physics and chemistry fields..<br /><br />http://www.buildingconservation.com/articles/cement/cement.htm]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135222#Comment_135222</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135222#Comment_135222</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>lineweight</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Peter_S</cite>this article sets out most of the points you raised, but if you need more science, then your getting into the building physics and chemistry fields..<br /><br />http://www.buildingconservation.com/articles/cement/cement.htm</blockquote><br /><br />Thanks, that clarifies a few things. Amongst others that a 1:1:6 mix is better than a 1:2:9 mix if you are using cement.<br /><br />Interesting that it implies that hydraulic lime is somewhat impermeable....although it doesn't state *how* impermeable compared to a cement or non-hydraulic mix.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135223#Comment_135223</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135223#Comment_135223</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Dominic Cooney</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I have read that article above before, it is worth reading. <br />You will find that cement is unnecessary for this job. Lime putty really is easy to use for pointing, I mixed sharp and soft sand with putty, choose the colour of the soft sand to get a good match for the existing (although perhaps doesn't matter if it will not be seen). Once you have tried it you will wonder what all the fuss is about, and will not want to use anything else again.<br />If you want a quick set, use NHL. I have used it for lime plastering. Goes off quick.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135226#Comment_135226</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135226#Comment_135226</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>lineweight</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I wonder what people think of this piece - expresses some similar doubts to those that I have -<br /><br />http://markbrinkley.blogspot.com/2005/12/why-build-with-lime-why-indeed.html<br /><br /><br /><blockquote >It sounds just dreadful, doesnâ€™t it. â€œMajor hazardâ€, â€œcloggingâ€, â€œgreatly reduced porosity,â€ â€œseriously weakenedâ€, â€œpoorly formed pore structureâ€, â€œsusceptible to frost damage and deterioration.â€ What a catalogue of woe! What we have here is an attempt to drive a wedge between the purists, who are delighted with the results from the Smeaton Project, and the mixers. But there is something just a little bit too alarming about these findings for my liking. Whilst they may have found segregation taking place on certain mixes, how can they be so sure that all these horrors will result? After all, the test of a good mortar is how it behaves after 50 years in place. The choice of language used by Graham in this piece is, to my mind, a dead giveaway that we are not seeing pure science at work here, with its understated conclusions and room for doubt, but an attempt to rubbish a practice that has been in widespread use since the 1830s.</blockquote>]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135227#Comment_135227</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135227#Comment_135227</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>lineweight</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Dominic Cooney</cite>I have read that article above before, it is worth reading.<br />You will find that cement is unnecessary for this job. Lime putty really is easy to use for pointing, I mixed sharp and soft sand with putty, choose the colour of the soft sand to get a good match for the existing (although perhaps doesn't matter if it will not be seen). Once you have tried it you will wonder what all the fuss is about, and will not want to use anything else again.<br />If you want a quick set, use NHL. I have used it for lime plastering. Goes off quick.</blockquote><br /><br />I might give it a go just to see what it's like to work with if nothing else.<br /><br />What about repair-type work (replacing bricks, rebuilding some areas) rather than just pointing - would you still advocate using putty for that?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135229#Comment_135229</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135229#Comment_135229</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Peter_S</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[This is interesting....<br /><br />http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/obj/irc/doc/pubs/nrcc20148/nrcc20148.pdf]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135230#Comment_135230</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135230#Comment_135230</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Nick Parsons</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[''Once you have tried it you will wonder what all the fuss is about, and will not want to use anything else again.''   So yes, why not?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135269#Comment_135269</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135269#Comment_135269</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>lineweight</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Nick Parsons</cite>''Once you have tried it you will wonder what all the fuss is about, and will not want to use anything else again.''   So yes, why not?</blockquote><br /><br />Well, the extra cost, mainly, would appear to be the main downside.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135275#Comment_135275</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135275#Comment_135275</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Nick Parsons</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[If you use slaked bag-lime (to make your own putty) it will, if I remember correctly, cost you about Â£2 a bag more than cement. Not a huge deal.<br />Edit: Google says it's Â£9 a bag, so read Â£5 a bag more. It's still not a lot.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135293#Comment_135293</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135293#Comment_135293</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Triassic</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I've always found these document to be an interesting read, mainly because of the illustrations -<br /><br />The use of lime & cement in traditional buildings<br /><br /><a href="http://www.historic-scotland.gov.uk/informguide-limeandcement.pdf" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.historic-scotland.gov.uk/informguide-limeandcement.pdf</a><br /><br /><a href="http://cadw.wales.gov.uk/docs/cadw/publications/Tech_Con_2_Lime_Mortar_EN.pdf" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://cadw.wales.gov.uk/docs/cadw/publications/Tech_Con_2_Lime_Mortar_EN.pdf</a>]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135304#Comment_135304</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135304#Comment_135304</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>lineweight</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Nick Parsons</cite>If you use slaked bag-lime (to make your own putty) it will, if I remember correctly, cost you about Â£2 a bag more than cement. Not a huge deal.<br />Edit: Google says it's Â£9 a bag, so read Â£5 a bag more. It's still not a lot.</blockquote><br /><br />Fair enough; it's not a lot extra.<br /><br />Does require you to be thinking a bit ahead of yourself though.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135310#Comment_135310</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135310#Comment_135310</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Joiner</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[6:1:1 is the old "restoration" mix, used by me (and MANY others) for years without apparent problems.<br /><br />But note the "apparent". I become good friends with a local assistent-CO during his tenure on our patch. He'd done his master's dissertation on lime and took a lot of time to explain in detail why an unadulterated mix was better all round. He didn't lecture in the way that lime purists do when talking to those plebs who lack the capacity to understand natural processes, that capacity which makes them so superior to heavy-handed trades people. (HEAVY IRONY WARNING!)<br /><br />Of course you can't see what's going on unless you get it completely wrong and you go back the next week to find half the wall on the floor or the next year to find half the wall spalled all to hell. The processes are more subtle than that for all the reasons explained in previous posts - and other threads ad nauseum.<br /><br />Having said that, the Italians don't seem to be quite so particular. They'll happily bond masonry (brick or stone) in historic buildings with cement and then POINT with lime to achieve the "authentic look". Even in earthquake zones! And they discovered/invented lime mortar!<br /><br />But having tried it the "proper" way I'm inclined to stick with it now because it's much nicer to use. Significantly, the two "traditional British brickie" guys who've worked with me on a regular basis have, after moaning about "all that twaddle" and how they "couldn't guarantee it" have come around to seeing the sense of it and have actually both said how nice it is to work, to the point where they now recommend lime rendering to all their customers. I won't say anything about how they've also caught on to the fact that they can charge more for it by cashing-in on the premium that attaches to the green-cache. Love it. <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/wink.gif" alt=":wink:" title=":wink:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135413#Comment_135413</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135413#Comment_135413</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>mike7</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Twenty years ago I had some restoration work done on old external brickwork - soft red bricks and lime mortar. Knowing no better, I crushed a sample of the old mortar and found it had very little sand in it, so I tried to reproduce that using 2:1 builders lime:sand. The builders wanted to add cement and after some experimentation they settled for adding just 5% white portland. This is much less than the proportion of cement (33%) that gave the adverse results mentioned here.<br /><br />I've been very happy with the result - it kept the builders happy at the time as it stiffened fairly quickly, and the strength it eventually developed seems comparable with the original. Could it be that my 5% was sufficient to act as a pozzolan, yet not sufficient to introduce other unwanted characteristics?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135414#Comment_135414</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135414#Comment_135414</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Joiner</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Define 5% in shovel equivalents. <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/wink.gif" alt=":wink:" title=":wink:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135421#Comment_135421</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135421#Comment_135421</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>hairydude</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I've been on a few of the lime / conservation courses at the Scottish Lime Centre (http://www.scotlime.org/).<br /><br />Very helpful bunch and offer a lime matching service - if you take a sample of your existing mortar or render and send it up to them they'll advise on mix and spec to match the existing (can't recall how much it was but I didn't think it was too dear at the time).<br /><br />They also do a course and have advice notes on working with lime in low temperatures.<br /><br />Masons Mortar (http://www.masonsmortarshop.com/knowledge/) are a good supplier and have always been a good source of advice (free<img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/smile.gif" alt=":smile:" title=":smile:" />) on the use of lime.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135430#Comment_135430</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135430#Comment_135430</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Joiner</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Likewise Limegreen of Much Wenlock. Always helpful.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Repointing/repairing lime mortar: NHL vs hydrated (bag lime)??</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135464#Comment_135464</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=8623&amp;Focus=135464#Comment_135464</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>lineweight</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Is it unreasonable for me to be slightly sceptical of advice given about the pros and cons of lime vs alternatives, when that advice comes from people who want to sell me lime products?<br /><br />Anyway, I've got hold of a copy of the Smeaton report and I'm going to sit down and have a read of it and see what I make of it.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>