<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 20:08:25 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1321#Comment_1321</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1321#Comment_1321</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 09:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Katymac</cite>been promised an ARCHITECT</blockquote>In a basket with pink ribbon?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1326#Comment_1326</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1326#Comment_1326</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Katymac</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Well I was hoping gift-wrapped - but I'll take him/her anyway I can get him/her<img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/wink.gif" alt=":wink:" title=":wink:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1327#Comment_1327</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1327#Comment_1327</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Chris Wardle</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I think studwork might work out a bit cheaper if you don't need internal walls to act for any load bearing purpose and they can be moved more easily I guess.  However, solid walls give a higher quality feel to a building and increase the thermal storage capacity evening out fluctuations in external temperatures.  They are also more durable and could be used to support joists for a future mezzanine level.  As for the roof, I'm afraid I'm not qualified to comment further having no personal experience of using Masonite or glu-lam beams.<br /><br />What about using compressed earth blocks for your internal partions?  Make them from the earth on your site with some volunteer labour and a manually operated block press.  You would end up with a large hole to bury that asbestos in as well...  How about that for low cost, low embodied energy building and taking care of your own waste?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1360#Comment_1360</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1360#Comment_1360</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Katymac</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Well it wasn't really his sort of project...apparently<br /><br />Do you think I have BO?<img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/shamed.gif" alt=":shamed:" title=":shamed:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1362#Comment_1362</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1362#Comment_1362</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Stranger and stranger - have you followed those lines of enquiry suggested?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1363#Comment_1363</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1363#Comment_1363</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Katymac</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Looked on the aceb one & rang 2 or 3 localish ones<br /><br />Didn't look at the archtectural technician - as i thought I needed a architect<br /><br />I looked in the green bible & rang about 4....honest I did]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1365#Comment_1365</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1365#Comment_1365</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Come on everyone, how can we get Katymac an enthusiastic Architect?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1368#Comment_1368</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1368#Comment_1368</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Katymac</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I'm nice, kind to children and animals<br />I bake & provide bacon sarnies for all my workmen<br />I'm going to hire a portaloo......<br />What other bribes should I consider....<br /><br />Hubby married me for the cooking]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1393#Comment_1393</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1393#Comment_1393</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Why not put out a new-topic request for names of suggested Architects, on as many relevant forums as you can find?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1399#Comment_1399</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1399#Comment_1399</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Julian</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I'm not surprised by your experiences Katy - we had the same. We approached a local green Architect (from GBB) and when we told him our budget was Â£150,000 he just laughed down the 'phone. Another local green Architect wanted 12.5% (RIBA say you can "negotiate" but only if he/she wants to) of the budget, plus travel expenses and further fees for site visits. I am not anti Architect at all but it can be very difficult and it's not about our supposed "unwillingness to pay" Fostertom. Katy we eventually found a good Architect via the Shelter scheme. You pay Shelter a sum of money (something like Â£50 I think) and they give you a list of local Architects who are signed up to their scheme. You pick an Architect who comes out and gives you an initial consultation without charge. Then if you like them off you go - and you have to pay them - naturally. I don't know if Shelter run the scheme all year or if it is seasonal but you could talk to them...<br /><br /><a href="http://england.shelter.org.uk/home/index.cfm" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://england.shelter.org.uk/home/index.cfm</a><br /><br />(sorry - don't know how to do it proper like)]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1401#Comment_1401</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1401#Comment_1401</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Chris Wardle</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I have an architect and a builder who are interested in your project.  They are based in Burwell, Cambridgeshire.  Not sure where you are - Norfolk somewhere isn't it so not too far away?<br /><br />They have collaberated before on projects and are currently setting up a business together.  I've seen some of the architect's work and it is very good and he has excellent "Green" credentials.  I have also been to the builder's self-built house which is of SIPs construction with GSHP etc.  They know what they are doing.  The builder also has a background in building stable complexes so tackling a concrete block barn is right up his street (for example, putting a new roof structure in place, laying a new concrete floor, internal blockwork partitioning - all bread and butter stuff to him).<br /><br />Interested?  If so, email me with your contact details at christopher_wardle@btinternet.com and I'll put you in touch.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1403#Comment_1403</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1403#Comment_1403</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Katymac</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Have been in touch - thanks]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1418#Comment_1418</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1418#Comment_1418</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 10:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Katymac</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[On another website I use the following statement has been made.....I'm not altogether sure I agree<br /><br />"you are building a practical utilitarian building with as its purpose its use and low impact on the environment<br /><br />its appearance doesn't matter as long as it is low impact" <br /><br />Opinions?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1420#Comment_1420</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1420#Comment_1420</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 13:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Nick Parsons</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Katy, Why not start a separate thread with that Q?<br /><br />I am not sure I agree either, but it ties in with my feelings about energy use (carbon) reduction and aesthetics. For example, it would be cheaper per unit and arguably less disruptive to externally insulate a whole terrace that to insulate each one internally (fewer cold-bridges, too). It would, however, completely change the streetscape, even if the (Victorian red-brick) terrace wasn't of desperately high architectural value. Should this matter more to us than reduction in energy use?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1424#Comment_1424</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1424#Comment_1424</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 18:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Katymac</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I was thinking about it......then someone did<img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/shamed.gif" alt=":shamed:" title=":shamed:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1487#Comment_1487</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1487#Comment_1487</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:53:38 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[failed attempt, deleted]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1488#Comment_1488</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1488#Comment_1488</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:54:13 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Julian</cite>Another local green Architect wanted 12.5% (RIBA say you can "negotiate" but only if he/she wants to) of the budget, plus travel expenses and further fees for site visits</blockquote><br /><blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Julian</cite>it's not about our supposed "unwillingness to pay" Fostertom</blockquote>In your case Julian it clearly is about your unwillingness to pay, not in Katymac's I think. Your tone suggests outrage at 12.5% as exorbitant. Why?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1491#Comment_1491</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1491#Comment_1491</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:01:53 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>nigel</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I agree 12.5% is steep. <br /><br />Why?<br />Firstly katymac doesnt need the architect to do the full set of services.<br />Secondly the rate is very top end.<br /><br />I had two quotes for a similar but bigger project and they came in at 5% and 6% for all stages.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1499#Comment_1499</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1499#Comment_1499</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:50:44 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Nigel, I don't think Katymac has yet said whether she needs the full service or not; if not then of course she pays less - it's all laid out in the RIBA scale.<br />Your bigger project would make the quoted rate come down; so would if it was new-build rather than work to an existing building.<br />Beyond that, you get what you pay for, generally speaking (allowing that some excellent people in any trade will work for peanuts or charity and also that some rubbish people will charge full-fee). Did you have only limited expectations, that were easily satisfied by a cut-price Architect? There's always run-of-the-mill practitioners around, who find they need to compete on price because they don't know how to compete on quality. I rarely charge less than RIBA full-scale and believe me, with the work I can't help putting in, am not rich. I'm begining to charge more-than RIBA, and am not short of work!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1500#Comment_1500</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1500#Comment_1500</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:00:55 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>nigel</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[We shortlisted two practices both RIBA both with a good reputation and they put in open bids and attended a selection presentation.<br />We chose the more expensive one actually, price was'nt the issue. Both really wanted to do the job so that helped.<br /><br />I would also say that katymac building project may technically be a refurb but really the architectural work involved would be somewhere between the two as there is so little there to work with.<br /><br />I know what the RIBA scale is and 12.5% is at the top end of it. You might be able to get away with the RIBA scale with rich residential clients who dont know their arse from their elbow but commercial projects are a lot more competitive. Maybe your charm is in persuading them that its a win-win situation for them to pay you over the odds.<br /><br />The point is that katymac should not be paying 12.5% to an RIBA archictect for her project.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1501#Comment_1501</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1501#Comment_1501</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:35:51 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Lots of "good reputations" around in the provinces - so how good is the overall standard of design that results? Very rarely indeed "excellent", I'd say. Maybe that's because people who commission architects don't know their adequate from their excellent.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1504#Comment_1504</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1504#Comment_1504</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:03:55 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>nigel</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Sorry Tom but that sounds like a load of bull. You don't get a good design by paying high fees either there is little connection between fee scale and design quality.<br /><br />The quality of a design is more to do with the interaction of the whole design team and the client to deliver a solution that satisfies the brief.<br /><br />You might think that because you charge high fees you are a good designer but I don't think I would be so immodest. You might be a great salesman and a rubbish designer.<br />Similarly I wouldn't be so quick to judge the quality of a design based solely on the fee rate.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1508#Comment_1508</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1508#Comment_1508</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:44:55 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Julian</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Tom, you're quick to judge people! We were quite prepared to pay 12.5% - if that were appropriate. It wasn't. We didn't want full service and we didn't ask for it. He told us that was what we wanted. Without any discussion of what might be involved we were asked to commit to spending 12.5% of our very limited budget. We weren't outraged - just disappointed. This was our first experience with an Architect - and very nearly our last. Our job is a refurb. and extension. It's not complicated. The Architect we found via Shelter did a very good job and we would have got nowhere without him. We paid him for the work he did - and he indicated how his design might run and how he would approach things. I don't expect anyone to work for peanuts. But it is an unusual position to go after a job, and to be able to ask for a percentage of the budget. Nigel is absolutely right to say that good design comes from interaction and our project has proved that. The previous Architect wanted to dictate rather than interact and that wasn't appropriate.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1531#Comment_1531</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=1531#Comment_1531</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:27:20 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Sorry, seem to have got a bit lecturesome lately - don't know what brought that on]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=3107#Comment_3107</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=3107#Comment_3107</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 20:14:11 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Katymac</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[We have an architect...........some further issues (expensive ones I think)<br /><br />1st issue - what is my nursery is it eco? is it green? is it sustainable? is it low carbon?<br />Which band wagon do I jump on - I consider all the issues important but what do I tag the nursery with?<br />I like to be green, eco, sustainable & as low carbon as I can get<br />Currently none of these seem to matter to my target audience (or only about 10-15% of them )<br />So it's really what I want that matters - which makes it hard - in 5 yrs XXXX will be the description people use and it's hard to guess what that will be (5 yrs ago I thought it would be green - but it isn't really)<br /><br />2nd issue - would it be sad to offer to plant trees for the parents to offset the petrol used to travel to the nursery?<br /><br />Architect has had some interesting ideas<br /><br />Foyer outside the barn (to maximise floor space) - Do you think a canopy will be enough - architect thinking an actual porch<br /><br />Window in Foyer on to Oval(?) kitchen so that the parents can see the food being prepared (not sure about this difficult one - I think if you do it right you wouldn't object to someone having a quick look - but I would hate to be watched (iyswim) & I might be cooking (at least initially))<br /><br />My office above the kitchen (on a mezzanine?) with windows all the way round so I can see all the nursery<br /><br />Highways have agreed an entrance but it will cost me a fortune in paving an 80m driveway - hardcore & hoggin? (about 600 sqm incl parking)<br /><br />Hope someone reads this]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=3116#Comment_3116</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=3116#Comment_3116</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 21:39:22 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Chris Wardle</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Re carbon offset, why don't you plant fruit and nut trees on your own ground if space available.  Failing that, I think the world Land Trust is a worthy recipient of any funds earmarked for carbon offset.  They are actually buying up rainforest to prevent habitat destruction and the clearance of rainforest for agriculture.<br /><br />Advantage of an enclosed porch is that it will act as a draft lobby so you won't lose as much heat when people are entering and leaving the building.  Make sure the doors have self closers on as well.<br /><br />As for the parking area, have you considered that plastic mesh with grass growing through it?  No idea what it costs but it looks more natural than a large expanse of gravel.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=3119#Comment_3119</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=3119#Comment_3119</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 21:56:11 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Katymac</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Yes to fruit no to nut (allergies<img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/wink.gif" alt=":wink:" title=":wink:" />)<br /><br />I'll look into the Land Trust<br /><br />Agree about the porch - but we are very short of money<br /><br />I like self closers<br /><br />It's a plowed field atm not sure how much the foundations plus laying grass(I guess seed rather than turf?) plus mesh will cost?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=3197#Comment_3197</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=3197#Comment_3197</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 16:53:03 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>ecoworrier</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Your approach to the build is a sustainable development " development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own need.".*<br />The nursery should be run along those lines as well, covers just about everything.<br />Oval windows? Think of all your heat pouring out of it.<br />As for the drive, do you have a car park?<br />If not, could you move the car park closer to the drive entrance, paths are cheaper than drives. <br /><img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/wink.gif" alt=":wink:" title=":wink:" /><br /><br />*Brundtland 1987]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=3200#Comment_3200</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=3200#Comment_3200</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 17:47:43 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Katymac</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[No the kitchen is oval not the window<br /><br />Doesn't there need to be vehicle access for emergenct services?  If not - that's a great idea]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barn/Nursery conversion update</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=3201#Comment_3201</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=87&amp;Focus=3201#Comment_3201</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 17:54:38 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>ecoworrier</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/shamed.gif" alt=":shamed:" title=":shamed:" />Oops my mistake.<br /><br />You will need some access but not necessarily vehicular, worth having a look at the regs.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>