New - Spring 2015 edition.
View the current issue.
Browse back issues.
Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
91 to 117 of 117
Posted By: martintMany more people die mining coal in China, or at explosions on pipelines in Nigeria, than in the nuclear industry.
Posted By: pmagowanThe developing countries ask the question, 'why should we cut emmissions when you don't make the effort?'
Posted By: JoinerProve me wrong.
Shocking Implications One shocking implication from the paper was the projection that hydropower would be worse than coal for the next 60 years. The study’s authors cited methane emissions as organic matter buried under water as the reason for this apparent anomaly. But that’s not the really shocking thing about the study for me. The most shocking conclusion was the magnitude of the numbers we are talking about. Even if you could in theory shut down all of the coal-fired power plants in the world and replace them with wind, solar, and hydropower — in 50 years the projected temperature is only one-twentieth of a degree C cooler than the base case of continuing to use coal. In 100 years, if I had a magic wand and could today replace all global coal-fired power plants with firm, renewable power — the temperature is only projected to be about 0.2 degrees cooler than under the coal base case. And the way this is being spun is that the 0.09 degree reduction from switching to natural gas is equivalent to an effect of “zero”, but the 0.2 degree reduction in hypothetically replacing everything with wind and solar power 100 years from now is significant. About the natural gas case, Romm literally said the 0.09 degree lower temperature in switching to natural gas means that “natural gas is a bridge fuel to nowhere”, but the the 0.2 degree lower temperature in switching to renewables is “the world’s only plausible hope to avert catastrophic temperature rise.”Conclusion: Study is a Major Downer for Activists Battling Climate Change To be honest, if I was devoting my life to fighting against the threat of climate change, this would be one of the most depressing papers I have ever read. If we could convince everyone in the world to shut down their coal-fired power plants — which we can’t — and replace them with renewable power — which isn’t available in quantities sufficient to replace coal-fired power — then by the end of my life there would still be no statistically significant temperature change to even be able to tell if my life’s work was successful.
© Green Building Press