<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - Ronseal PV</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 14:13:41 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Ronseal PV</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=147396#Comment_147396</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=147396#Comment_147396</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 14:19:11 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>jms452</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I remember some old threads about fitters forgetting to connect a string etc on PV installs and didn't fancy waiting year/few months to check performance.<br /><br />So using pvgis (thanks Damon) I calculated the clear sky irradiance of the two 45 degree inclination arrays 1.75kW SSE(-11) and 2.25kW WSW (-79) for May.<br /> <br />The pvgis fixed plane clear sky irradiance is multiplied by panel efficiency (15.4%) x panel area (1.6m2) x no of panels (16) x non-panel system efficiency (90%). The the two aspects summed for each time interval.<br /><br />This only holds for a perfect cloud free days so I was rather chuffed when day 1 was the start of our mini heat wave!<br /><br />The only fudge factor is the non-panel system efficiency (inverter + wires + panels getting hot + etc) which pvgis suggests as 86% but I got a better fit at 90%.<br /><br />So it seems at a first (and arguably second) order pvgis is a very good predictor of clear sky irradiance and that my array(s) 'does what it said on the tin'.<br /><br />Now it just 'weather' to investigate - I think I should hold off for a bit before making any impressive claims for annual yield based on the 5 days since install..]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ronseal PV</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=147398#Comment_147398</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=147398#Comment_147398</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 14:21:23 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>jms452</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[and the graph]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ronseal PV</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=147401#Comment_147401</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=147401#Comment_147401</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 14:34:51 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[No idea where you are, but I would expect 95% of the time your output will be between Red and the Green lines.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ronseal PV</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=147402#Comment_147402</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=147402#Comment_147402</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 14:40:32 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Interesting that there is a small dip at 9AM on the prediction and you have a dip in performance until then.  There is nothing to read into that at all, I suspect that the small dip is either a rounding error if they are using some random numbers to mimic cloud cover or a van parked by the light meter if they are not.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ronseal PV</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=147433#Comment_147433</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=147433#Comment_147433</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 18:36:16 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>DamonHD</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Could be allowance for horizon effects.<br /><br />I get some very early morning shading even now from a tree a considerable distance to the north east of us.<br /><br />Rgds<br /><br />Damon]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ronseal PV</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=147454#Comment_147454</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=147454#Comment_147454</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 20:06:45 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>jms452</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The dip at about 9:30 predicted is probably just excell when the gradient of the line changes from diffuse to direct sunlight.<br /><br />The dip on actual is partly due to a big tree about 50m East from us and partly due to a slight haze that morning - on subsequent mornings it moved up close to predicted at about 8:30.<br /><br />In general very pleased both with the direct sunlight performance and the amount of power we generate even when its cloudy. i.e. in todays thunder storm we had ~100W as we do at the moment (wrote at 8:30pm -dusk approaching) !]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ronseal PV</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=147455#Comment_147455</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=147455#Comment_147455</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 20:10:58 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Diffused light can be quite deceptive.  Sometimes it is possible to get more power by pointing a panel directly upwards (how solar data is collected) as then, regardless of the time of year, as soon as the sun is up, some light is being collected.<br />Keep wanting to test this more to find out how much difference it makes over a year.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ronseal PV</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=178077#Comment_178077</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=178077#Comment_178077</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 21:56:59 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>jms452</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The PV has been up for a year now (and when searching through old threads I always wonder what happened in the end) so I thought I'd post the production over the past year.<br /><br />Predicted (by the installers): 3152kwH<br />Actual: 3510kwH<br /><br /><img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/bigsmile.gif" alt=":bigsmile:" title=":bigsmile:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ronseal PV</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=178090#Comment_178090</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=178090#Comment_178090</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:07:54 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[358 kWh extra is not to be sniffed at.<br />Do you have the split on the two strings/arrays?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ronseal PV</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=178109#Comment_178109</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=178109#Comment_178109</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:02:39 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>billt</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[MCS installers have to use SAP for the predicted output in their quote, which is (rightly) very conservative.<br /><br />Quoted SAP production for my system was 3026 kWhr P.A., PVGIS prediction was 3450 or 3710 depending on which model was chosen. Actual production is 7043 kWhr over 2 years, 3520 P.A., 16% more than the SAP estimate.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ronseal PV</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=178153#Comment_178153</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=178153#Comment_178153</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:34:39 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>jms452</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: SteamyTea</cite>Do you have the split on the two strings/arrays?</blockquote><br /><br />Yes using a 2 string independently MPPTed inverter (SMA 3600TL) one string for the 1.75kW SSE and the other for the 2.25kW WSW.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ronseal PV</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=178169#Comment_178169</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=178169#Comment_178169</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:13:48 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[You have bluetooth on that, do you look at the daily files?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ronseal PV</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=178189#Comment_178189</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=178189#Comment_178189</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:40:41 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>jms452</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Yes but the installer threw in a Sunny beam too so that's what we tend to look at.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ronseal PV</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=178192#Comment_178192</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=178192#Comment_178192</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:27:54 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>jamesingram</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Is the SMA3600TL set on optitract global peak ? might counteract slight morning shading<br />"OptiTrac Global Peak is an extension of the proven OptiTrac yield optimization function.<br />OptiTrac Global Peak improves the yield of the PV plant for partially shadowed PV modules. Detailed<br />information on this topic is available in the technical information "Shade Management" in the<br />download area at www.SMA.de/en."]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ronseal PV</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=178333#Comment_178333</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=178333#Comment_178333</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:18:43 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>jms452</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: jamesingram</cite>Is the SMA3600TL set on optitract global peak</blockquote><br /><br />Its the 3600TL-20 and the data sheet claims 'Shade management with OptiTrac Global Peak'.<br /><br />Is this something that I can bluetooth into the inverter and check it is enabled?<br /><br />I'll have a look but the installers seemed pretty clued up...]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ronseal PV</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=178334#Comment_178334</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=178334#Comment_178334</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:25:44 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: jms452</cite><br />Is this something that I can bluetooth into the inverter and check it is enabled?<br /></blockquote>Yes it is.<br />I seem to remember chatting to some about OptiTrack and he though that it took longer to 'sort itself out' and that could cost you some power generation.<br />Never got to check it out, so only third hand information.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ronseal PV</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=178343#Comment_178343</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9144&amp;Focus=178343#Comment_178343</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:23:03 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>jamesingram</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Yes , can be switched on via Bluetooth using sunny explorer<br />Will be on settings list,  , I think you'll need to log on as installer, default password is shown on log on screen <br />Click on my name for email, send one over and I'll send SMA pdf on multi function relay and optitract ( not a great deal of info in it though)]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>