Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.

The AECB accepts no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site. Views given in posts are not necessarily the views of the AECB.



  1.  
    A number of 'system' house-types were developed by the British Iron and Steel Federation (BISF). There's lots of these around, and they present a potential conundrum in terms of insulation. A colleague has come across one with insulated render externally, but believes that the cavity is ventilated! If you were starting from scratch with this house-type, what would you do?
    •  
      CommentAuthorJSHarris
    • CommentTimeJun 16th 2012
     
    Didn't we discuss this type of construction recently?

    I remember reading that the ventilated cavity was deemed essential to prevent condensation on the steel frame, with the inevitable risk of corrosion.

    Years ago I saw something similar when some insulated partition rooms were built inside hangars, to create offices. The builder insulated between the metal outer skin of the hangar and the internal partition walls with glass fibre or rock wool and within ten years the steel structural frame inside the insulation had corroded to the point where it was unsafe.
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeJun 16th 2012
     
    Internal insulation with vapour permeable material is obviously stupid but why would ventilation be required if the insulation is external?

    I'd have thought the best approach with external insulation would be to remove as much as possible of the internal insulation to make sure the steel was at room temperature. If you want anything over the steel for aesthetic reasons then ventilate behind it to the room. If not, being able to use fridge magnets anywhere would be a small compensation, I suppose.
    • CommentAuthorDarylP
    • CommentTimeJun 17th 2012
     
    Structherm have a system that Wrexham BC have used on a couple, as a trial.
    100mm EPS/XPS rendered with a two coat finish, the top 'brick' coat scratched back to give the 'mortar' lines.

    Definitely go EWI, otherwise any condensation will contribute to serious structural failure...!

    Cheers...:smile:
  2.  
    Ed,

    I suppose if it is steel-clad, then even if it is internally lined, a strong magnet will hold. Visions of electro-magnets holding everything to the walls! BIG crash when there's a power cut!

    Ed, DarylP: My understanding is that, as it has been 'improved', the cavity (so I suppose the whole depth of the steel frame) is ventilated. So the consensus is (?) that that needs to be blocked. The steel should then be at room temp so corrosion should not be an issue. But should the cavity be ventilated from *inside*? Particularly if everything else were left 'as built', there'd be a thin layer (thickness unknown) of mineral wool between plasterboard and steel. I think this may serve to cool things sufficiently that the steel may be colder than room temp, and thus attract condensation.

    What do you think?
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeJun 17th 2012
     
    In answer to the original question -- Knock it down and start again!
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeJun 17th 2012 edited
     
    Steel is one of the more recyclable materials so the knock it down argument is (even) stronger in this case than most.

    Still it's interesting to compare with qeipl's suggestion on a recent thread of progressively filling out a grain silo construction:

    http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/forum114/comments.php?DiscussionID=9181&page=1#Comment_148230

    though when I previously read it I took him to mean external insulation. I'm far from convinced about his suggested internal insulation - comment made on that thread.
    • CommentAuthorDarylP
    • CommentTimeJun 18th 2012 edited
     
    Nick,

    These are on the Defective List iirc...
    You have no choice other than EWI I think. Unless you want to dismantle it and rebuild in block, bit by bit? It is a semi I imagine, so Party Wall Act rules may apply...

    The cavity is ventilated, more by corrosion than design....

    Good luck....:smile:
  3.  
    It's not mine! I am 'airing' (ventilating?) this for a colleague. I think the issue is going to be trying to stop the ventilation, as it already has some (unknown how much) EWI. Do you think the cavity should be ventilated to the house, or that there should be an attempt at a VCL at the plasterboard/room 'interface'?

    Thanks for your input.

    Oh, and yes, I am pretty sure it's a semi....

    Nick
    • CommentAuthorDarylP
    • CommentTimeJun 19th 2012
     
    When I saw the refurb of them here, I think the cavity was vented to the inside.

    The whole of the thermal resistance of the wall is on the outside of the steelwork, keeping the steelwork warm and reduced condensation risk.

    The ones hereabouts were 'temporary' just after WW2 ended, now still going strong, but ever so cold and draughty in their 'virgin' state :shamed:

    Cheers..:smile:
    • CommentAuthoratomicbisf
    • CommentTimeSep 30th 2012
     
    Hi all, I live in a British Iron and Steel Federation (BISF) house which I have been insulating myself.

    First of all, a Howard House is something different from a BISF house. They are both steel-framed houses, but to different designs. The BISF house is by far the more common of the two with over 30 000 built, while I believe about 1 500 Howard Houses were built. I don't know much about the Howard House apart from that, but the above diagram is of a BISF house. The BISF house had a design life of 65 years and in the 80s when studies were done on defective housing types, it was found that they should last as well as a traditionally built house of the time - they should not be confused with the temporary prefabricated bungalows that were built at around the same time.

    In the original construction, the cavity is open to the loft to provide ventilation. There are also ventilation grilles in the upstairs rooms just below ceiling height that open into the cavity. Though in theory the design is vulnerable to condensation and corrosion, I have found little sign of it when I've exposed the steelwork from the inside and from speaking to others who work on them serious problems are rare.

    I have found that while it isn't up to modern insulation standards, it is a lot better than many people would imagine, certainly better than a house with solid masonry walls.

    My solution to insulation has been to strip out the inner lining of the walls (plasterboard or hardboard(!) on timber studwork) together with the original glassfibre insulation and insert 70mm Kingspan/Celotex into the cavity, leaving an air gap for ventilation behind, before rebuilding the studwork and putting up new board.

    You can see some of what I've done at: http://bisfhouse.com/internal-insulation-project-of-bisf-bedroom-by-ed/
    • CommentAuthoratomicbisf
    • CommentTimeSep 30th 2012
     
    My thoughts were that steel is such a good conductor of heat that any heating of the structure from the inside is going to be minimal even in the original unimproved state if the steel is on the cold side. Therefore improving the internal insulation should not have much effect - that steel is going to be cold no matter how poor the insulation is.

    I did calculations using an online U-value calculator that includes a condensation risk alert and it gives a condensation risk for the original structure (hardboard-void-glassfibre-void-steel). Probably what has kept the steel almost new since 1949 is the ventilation. In fact the calculator gave a condensation alert WHATEVER combination of materials you put in if steel is the last!

    However, to be safe I did use a vapour barrier on the external wall once it was skimmed.
    • CommentAuthoratomicbisf
    • CommentTimeOct 1st 2012 edited
     
    Here are some photos. To give a little background, the BISF house is a 3-bedroom double-storey house almost always semi-detached (as here) but occasionally built as a short terrace.

    This is the back (2nd) bedroom before work. You can just about see the ventilation grille behind the far lamp.

    http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8173/8044266212_f43b9070a5_b.jpg

    Here it is with the inner lining of the walls stripped off. The party wall is of traditional construction with two layers of concrete blocks but not load-bearing, to provide a fire-stop and sound barrier. The brown paper encloses glass-fibre insulation nailed to the back of the exterior walls.

    http://bisfhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/IMGP54331.jpg

    http://bisfhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/IMGP54351.jpg

    With the original insulation stripped out so you can see the back of the profiled steel cladding and steel frame.

    http://bisfhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/IMGP5438.jpg

    http://bisfhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/IMGP5439.jpg

    New 70mm insulation put into the cavity and new studwork built in front.

    http://bisfhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/IMGP5444.jpg

    http://bisfhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/IMGP5443.jpg

    50mm insulation in between the studwork

    http://bisfhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/IMGP5445.jpg

    Reboarded, skimmed and painted. The picture rails and fillets originally covered the joins between the boards but are now purely decorative to retain some 1940s feel.

    http://bisfhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/IMGP5447.jpg
    • CommentAuthorRobinB
    • CommentTimeOct 1st 2012 edited
     
    AtomicBiSF - Welcome to the forum!
    Lovely to see the GBF working and a practical example of what is being considered. I can only see the last of your pics in the post above - maybe just me?

    Posted By: Ed Daviesbeing able to use fridge magnets anywhere would be a small compensation, I suppose.
    love it!
  4.  
    Posted By: RobinB
    Posted By: Ed Daviesbeing able to use fridge magnets anywhere would be a small compensation, I suppose.
    love it!


    Lol, I haven't tried it. I suspect if if did work, it would only work upstairs on the external walls as only they are clad in profiled steel. There's actually a lot less steel in the structure than I imagined due to the lighweight nature of the cladding and roof- the steel uprights are about 1.5m apart horizontally and C-sections of about 60x60mm. Downstairs they support 50mm of concrete render on expanded steel lattice laths as an external covering, a bit like a more modern version of lath and plaster.

    Here's a photo of a prototype BISF house under construction from www.bisfhouse.com, those that were finally built differed a little especially in the roof structure (fewer beams at ceiling level and roof trusses of tubular steel) but the wall structure is basically the same.
    • CommentAuthoratomicbisf
    • CommentTimeOct 1st 2012 edited
     
    <blockquote><cite>Posted By: RobinB</cite>AtomicBiSF - Welcome to the forum!
    Lovely to see the GBF working and a practical example of what is being considered. I can only see the last of your pics in the post above - maybe just me?

    Thanks Robin! Maybe it doesn't like my HTML?
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeOct 1st 2012 edited
     
    Copying and pasting the URLs for the images into new tabs allows all to be viewed. If your browser doesn't like some of them then try editing out two of the extra slashes at the beginning, i.e, turn “http:////bisfhouse...” into “http://bisfhouse...”.

    Atomicbisf, you can help by editing your post. Use the “edit” link at top right of the post (it'll only appear on your own posts). Get rid of the extra slashes. Also, when you save the changes change the “Format comments as” radio buttons immediately below the main comment box to “Text” rather than “Html”. The forum software should then linkify the URLs.
  5.  
    Thanks Ed Davies,

    I'll do it when I get back from work,
    Ed
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeOct 1st 2012
     
    Why not just spay PU onto the steal like they do with boat hulls?
    • CommentAuthoratomicbisf
    • CommentTimeOct 1st 2012 edited
     
    I seem to have fixed it, though I was hoping to embed the images using HTML, but that didn't work.

    As far as I know the BISF only ever mass-produced one type of house, with a few minor variations such as chimney position, after building three different prototypes (one pair of each) at Northolt. The other types of steel-framed house were built by other manufacturers, but none in the same numbers. The Howard house I believe was a more radical design that featured asbestos cladding and I would imagine is more problematic though there is very little about them on the internet.

    It's a pity that BISF houses are very often mistaken for temporary prefabs as it leads to them being underestimated when in fact they are a lot better built than one might imagine, featuring good quality timbers, solid wood panel doors, parquet floors in the dining room and living room etc (in Bath at least).

    After all, steel-framed construction is only unusual for housing - it's perfectly common for all sorts of commercial and industrial buildings everything from warehouses to skyscrapers.

    Ed
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press