<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - Window details - what do you think?</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 10:48:13 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150111#Comment_150111</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150111#Comment_150111</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 13:18:45 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Shevek</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Here's our preliminary set of window details. What do you builders you think?<br /><br />1. It's a shame with you can't start the sill flashing halfway up the Geneo window frames; this means you can't overlap the insulation at the sill.<br />3. Existing internal plaster - should we remove the whole lot and start again or just strip it at the junctions if we can and make good?<br />3. Perimeter insulation and plywood - do you think we need to take the plywood around the whole perimeter? How should we attach the XPS? Does polyurethane expanding foam react with XPS?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150119#Comment_150119</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150119#Comment_150119</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 14:15:34 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Numbers from your pdf  1. I would seal before plastering, 3. I cant see the purpose of the ply and it is acting as a thermal bridge and it is not fail safe, 11. I like this, 12. may be fixing foam rather than expanding ma be easier, cause less problems ?  14. there seem to be packers and something else under the window board, what is it and is it necessary or better than more insulation would be?<br /><br />your numbers 1. you could lift the bottom of the window frame further away from the structure to allow more insulation, remove a course of bricks or smaller window, 2. make good, 3. I cant see why you need ply atall unless you push the window out into the EWI<br /><br />Important --  you MUST have a drip at the render above the window, I make the render slope upwards towards the window, <br /><br />Looks like a good detail, shame everyone hasn't got it on their houses we would all be a lot better off them.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150128#Comment_150128</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150128#Comment_150128</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 16:04:17 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Shevek</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Thanks Tony, much appreciated.<br /><br />The idea behind the plywood is to spread the load of the window so it doesn't damage and compress the XPS. And for something firm to seal against. Do you think XPS will be man enough by itself? And sufficient to seal against?<br /><br />Good question on the packers. I didn't really think about it putting them in. Just in the habit of showing them on details, for levelling the window I guess. Clearly not needed for levelling as we can make sure the XPS is level. What about the seal to the bottom edge of the window frame, do I need to keep a gap for that or just sit the window down over the seal?<br /><br />What's the best way to fix the window into place, screws?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150132#Comment_150132</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150132#Comment_150132</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 16:37:43 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I would fix the frame to your brickwork using twin threaded frame fixings three each side, push the window out a bit further too 30mm?<br /><br />I cant see the window squashing the insulation, how wide are the windows? I did support my wide 2400 ones centrally with a bracket up the outside of the brick wall onto the outside few mm of the front of the frame.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150133#Comment_150133</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150133#Comment_150133</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 16:47:58 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Shevek</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Ah I see, so the side fixings take most of the load, right.<br /><br />Why would you push the window out? This would reduce the amount of insulation cover in front of the jambs and head.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150134#Comment_150134</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150134#Comment_150134</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 17:46:58 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Nice drawings!<br /><br />Prime principle is to move the frame outboard away from the (now internal) masonry. As it is, you have a v short heat-flow path from outside frame face, thro the frame chambers, reveal insulation, to masonry. V lossy. Move the frame right outboard, into the EWI zone, away from the masonry - that's one of the reasons for using EWI at least 150, pref 200 thick, to fully accomodate frame depth plus a bit of reveal depth.<br /><br />Depth of insul cover in front of the frame - depth only say 1.3 x the width of cover will be effective. So, if 25mm width of cover, no point in making reveals more than 40 deep (except for visual and weather-shedding reasons). You could increase your width of cover considerably - entirely 'lose' the fixed frames, esp as open-in - no open-out hinges etc to clear.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150138#Comment_150138</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150138#Comment_150138</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 18:54:28 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Shevek</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Thanks Tom. I see what you mean now.<br /><br />I thought Timber had modelled it in Therm on this thread but it looks like he didn't get round to it:<br /><a href="http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/forum114/comments.php?DiscussionID=8550" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/forum114/comments.php?DiscussionID=8550</a><br /><br />Will hopefully model this myself if I can get Windows running on my machine again.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150161#Comment_150161</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150161#Comment_150161</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 21:17:46 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Timber</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Yeah, sorry about that. I got busy and forgot to do the model.<br /><br />Have you got your head around how to actually do the modelling in therm? You need to model a 1m long section of blank wall first and get the U-Value. Then model the detail (excluding the window and frame (see BR496)) and then do a quick sum with the two sets of numbers.<br /><br />I can post up the calculation, although it is in BR496 anyway.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150162#Comment_150162</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150162#Comment_150162</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 21:22:11 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>TimSmall</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Agreed re ditching the ply and possibly another course of bricks (you can work out compressive loading on XPS given 60kg/mÂ² glazing weight, and cross-reference XPS rating), and higher density foam, plus hiding more of the frame in insulation (the Geneo looks a bit chunky otherwise IMO).<br /><br />I was wondering how robust your airtight detailing would be, especially with the degree of movement which you might get in a softwood board?  Normally best to have a sealant bead attached on two opposite sides only (not pushed into a corner, or attached on three sides).  Butyl (DPM-jointing) tape, or something more proprietary instead/as-well?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150164#Comment_150164</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150164#Comment_150164</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 21:30:17 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Shevek</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Update attached based on your comments guys, thanks.<br /><br />With the window pushed out 30 mm, wouldn't the screw fixings now be too close to the edge of brick?<br /><br />Another one, would this comply with NHBC requirements? Don't they require two barriers against water ingress or something? Whereas I've only got one seal where the render meets the window frame to the jambs and head, and just the sill flashing to the sill.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150165#Comment_150165</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150165#Comment_150165</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 21:46:47 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Shevek</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[@Timber<br />I'm guessing once you know what you're doing Therm is pretty quick, but at the moment I'm still trying to get the detail into a tidy usable form. Haven't got round to any calcs yet. Didn't realise you model a length of the wall first, thanks for that tip.<br /><br />@TimSmall<br />Not sure what you mean by "Normally best to have a sealant bead attached on two opposite sides only (not pushed into a corner, or attached on three sides)." Is there any guidance/diagrams/photos anyone can point me to? We're trying to reach Passivhaus standards so airtightness detailing is going to be crucial.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150166#Comment_150166</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150166#Comment_150166</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 21:49:29 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[3.  20mm is a bit mean for the drip oversail  50mm would be betterer<br /><br />17. you can angle the fixings a bit towards the middle of the wall.<br /><br />it is looking like a great detail now though]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150169#Comment_150169</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150169#Comment_150169</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 22:19:45 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Shevek</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Righto, cheers. :)<br /><br />If all the load is being taken by the screws to the jambs I guess there's no reason not to make the perimeter insulation PIR as well?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150170#Comment_150170</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150170#Comment_150170</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 22:50:40 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Timber</cite>I can post up the calculation, although it is in BR496 anyway.</blockquote>I'd love to see that - I couldn't understand that bit on the course, not concentrating in fact, struggling with a useless borrowed laptop (got my own (useless) laptop now!).]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150177#Comment_150177</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150177#Comment_150177</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 07:45:12 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>TimSmall</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Posted By: Shevek<br /><br />"Not sure what you mean by "Normally best to have a sealant bead attached on two opposite sides only (not pushed into a corner, or attached on three sides)." Is there any guidance/diagrams/photos anyone can point me to?"<br /><br />Try this (45 year old!) article:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/eng/ibp/irc/cbd/building-digest-96.html" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/eng/ibp/irc/cbd/building-digest-96.html</a>]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150192#Comment_150192</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150192#Comment_150192</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 08:57:28 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>davidfreeborough</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Shevek</cite>With the window pushed out 30 mm, wouldn't the screw fixings now be too close to the edge of brick?</blockquote>Window fixing straps are available in lengths of up to around 200mm. They are screw fixed to the perimeter of the frame before inserting the window in the opening.<br /><br />I wouldn't rely on silicone sealant for airtightness. I would seal the perimeter of the frame to the interior face of the insulation with something like illbruck ME500 Duo Flexible Window Membrane:<br /><br />http://www.tremco-illbruck.co.uk/products/01920_index.html<br /><br />And then seal the insulation to the inner face of the masonry with something like illbruck ME404 Butyl Fleece Tape:<br /><br />http://www.tremco-illbruck.co.uk/products/03254_index.html<br /><br />This can be incorporated into the plaster to maintain the continuity of the air barrier.<br /><br />David]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150204#Comment_150204</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150204#Comment_150204</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 09:56:26 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Timber</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[As outlined in BS EN ISO 14683, the linear thermal transmittance, Î¨ values are calculated from:<br /><br />Î¨ = L2D - Î£U1D * Wi<br /><br />where<br />L2D is the linear thermal coupling coefficient obtained from a 2-dimensional calculation of the component separating the two environments being considered; U1D is the thermal transmittance of the 1-dimensional component, separating the two environments being considered; Wi is the width within the 2-dimensional geometrical model over which the value of U1D applies.<br /><br />In simple terms, calulcate the U-Value of the plane wall in therm and multiply it by the length of the wall (in the model (so normally 1m)) in meters (anwser X). Then model the junction and multiply the U-Value by the length in meters (Answer y) (relevant lengths to be taken in accordance with BR497). Then, subtract X from Y and you have an answer.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150282#Comment_150282</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150282#Comment_150282</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 21:47:11 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Shevek</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Thanks again guys.<br /><br />@David thanks for the tape pointer.<br /><br />I read through the ME500 literature but couldn't decide whether the W or the E is more appropriate:<br /><a href="http://www.tremco-illbruck.co.uk/celumdb/documents/ME500-E_DS_GB_22553.pdf" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.tremco-illbruck.co.uk/celumdb/documents/ME500-E_DS_GB_22553.pdf</a><br /><a href="http://www.tremco-illbruck.co.uk/celumdb/documents/ME500-W_DS_GB_22554.pdf" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.tremco-illbruck.co.uk/celumdb/documents/ME500-W_DS_GB_22554.pdf</a><br /><br />I assume then that XPS will be the best insulation for the perimeter because it will be nice and firm to consolidate the tap against with a roller... I'm in two minds whether to use XPS or the same as the external wall insulation (which will probably be PIR or Phenolic).<br /><br />Updated detail attached using the W product.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150330#Comment_150330</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150330#Comment_150330</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:04:48 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[So you're still not pushing the windows properly outboard, using davidfreeborough's straps?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150338#Comment_150338</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150338#Comment_150338</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:44:38 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I think it is OK though as it has insulation all round it.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150344#Comment_150344</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150344#Comment_150344</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 11:28:40 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Try it in Therm and see. It's got to be worse than moving fully outboard.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150356#Comment_150356</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150356#Comment_150356</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 12:29:18 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Shevek</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Yeah I'm going to try it it Therm. Just need a moment when my head is fresh to get my head around Therm.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150449#Comment_150449</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150449#Comment_150449</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 09:36:06 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>davidfreeborough</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Shevek</cite>I read through the ME500 literature but couldn't decide whether the W or the E is more appropriate... I'm in two minds whether to use XPS or the same as the external wall insulation (which will probably be PIR or Phenolic).</blockquote>The E membrane is intended to be fixed to the internal face of the frame & has the two adhesive strips on the same side of the tape. The W membrane is intended to be fixed to the perimeter face of the frame & so has the adhesive strips on opposite sides of the tape. <br /><br />Which you choose depends upon the frame. If you're using a PVC frame with a series of ribs/channels to the perimeter then probably better to seal to the internal face with the E membrane. If you're using a timber frame with a smooth face to the perimeter then probably better to seal to the perimeter face with the W membrane.<br /><br />Foil face PIR/PUR insulation gives you a ready made air barrier to seal to & may allow you to use narrower/cheaper tape.<br /><br />David]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150491#Comment_150491</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150491#Comment_150491</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 16:52:05 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Timber</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Shevek<br /><br />I modelled the Jamb very quickly using some standard material specs, as I am not sure 100% what materials you are using and got a PSI value of 0.013 W/mK which is very good.<br /><br />Here is the Heat Flux output. Shows minimal patches of elevated heat flux around the window frame, but they are tiny.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150492#Comment_150492</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150492#Comment_150492</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 16:52:55 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Timber</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Here are the Isotherms<br /><br />Not really too much to improve on I don't think. 0.013 is great, but might be a little better if the window were pushed out just a smidge.  I will leave those for you to do!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150494#Comment_150494</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150494#Comment_150494</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 16:55:25 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[If eliminated by pushing window outboard, what wd the figure be, at a guess?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150498#Comment_150498</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150498#Comment_150498</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 17:13:42 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Timber</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Don't know. I have learned not to guess numbers like this, as I am almost always miles out <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/cry.gif" alt=":cry:" title=":cry:" /> <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/wink.gif" alt=":wink:" title=":wink:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150499#Comment_150499</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150499#Comment_150499</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 17:32:26 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Shevek</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Awesome, thanks Timber, much appreciated. Must learn Therm!!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150509#Comment_150509</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150509#Comment_150509</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 18:21:08 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Timber</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[^ and BR497!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Window details - what do you think?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150550#Comment_150550</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9270&amp;Focus=150550#Comment_150550</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 09:15:16 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Timber</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Well I had 5 minutes this morning, and curiosity got the better of me. I pushed the window out by 30mm and it has made quite a difference.<br /><br />We now have a calculated psi value of 0.004 W/mK for the jamb detail. That is excellent. So with EWI on masonry, it seems that pushing the window out improves the calculated PSI  values. <br /><br />Caviat again, I just used some normal material properties etc, so you might come up with a slightly different result when you do the sums for yourself using your own materials. I just used standard values for EPS, brick, plaster and render.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>