Home  5  Books  5  Magazines  5  News  5  GreenPro  5  HelpDesk  5  Your Cart  5  Register  5  Green Living Forum
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building
"The most popular book on green building in the UK today."
New fourth edition in two volumes!

Order both books now for the combined price of just £17.00
and free delivery!

(free delivery applies to UK addresses only).

Or get both books for just £15.00 if purchased at the same time as a subscription to Green Building magazine





Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




  1.  
    Hi all,
    I have been planning to harvest rainwater on a renovation that Ive spent the last few years doing(aarrggh).
    Essentially I have a well/holding tank as a legacy from the brewery that existed along way back. It holds about 2000litres. I intended to pump collected water from here into my loft.
    However I now have to make a cost based decision on wether to include this aspect of the build. It would mean rebuilding the whole loft area to support the weight etc.

    So that I am in charge of the facts could anyone tell me what I could expect to save?
    I will have 3 toilets and two bath/showers. With 5 people in the house.
    Currently I am not on a meter as there is some issue with shared water pipes to same address, so I am paying for water rates.
    Roughly by how much could I expect to reduce my water bill by ( assuming I will be going onto a meter sometime in the near future) by using the rainwater for my toilet use only?

    Many thanks Tim
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2012
     
    Look at your bill and see how much of it is for sewage, costs me more than the water I buy in. That bit shoudl not change as you will still be using the same amount, just from a different source.
  2.  
    Posted By: SteamyTeaLook at your bill and see how much of it is for sewage, costs me more than the water I buy in. That bit shoudl not change as you will still be using the same amount, just from a different source.

    How do they measure sewage? over here its water in = sewage out, i.e. the water meter is used to measure (guess) the sewage. If its the same over there then any reduction in water in will reduce the sewage bill.

    Why will you need to upgrade the loft? a small tank say 50 - 100lts. with an automatic level sensor controlling the pump should be enough. (other posts give various ways to get automatic mains fill in the event of no rain water). BTW if you are re-plumbing for the WC then what about the washing machine as well.
  3.  
    Peter in Hungary, you are right on the principle. Sewerage is measured at (as far as I remember) 90% of metered water 'in'. So using harvested RW will reduce sewerage charges.

    In answer to the OP, how much you save depends on the accuracy of your estimates, and your knowledge of cistern capacities, whether or not you have variable flush devices etc. Also on lifestyle. To put it indelicately, where are you when you want to pee, dump etc? If you are out a lot then your flush consumption starting-point is going to be lower.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2012
     
    I think I have to notify my water company if I am using rainwater, but was several years since I asked.
    SW Water is a bit strange, they charge more than anyone else.
    • CommentAuthorGaryB
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2012 edited
     
    Mightyworthit:

    Attached are sample calculations to BS8515:2009 which indicates that for 5 people and dual flush WCs a 2,700 litre RWH storage tank is recommended.

    The yield from the roof depends on rainfall and collectable roof area (mid terraces can only collect from one side of the roof for instance). Your tank would be suitable for a 55m2 roof collector area.

    The calculations indicate that a larger tank would be better but if you have a free tank, use it!

    The normal use for WC flushing is 5 x say 30 litres/day = 150 litres. A full tank would give you nearly a fortnight's use until the next rainfall. Should just about work :wink:

    The maximum amount of rainwater recovered per year is:

    Potential Recovery = (Annual Rainfall in m) x (Roof Coeff) x (Filter eff) x (Roof Area)

    for the example of 55m2 roof and 1,000mm annual rainfall:

    Potential Recovery = 1 x 0.8 x 0.9 x 55 = 39,600 litres, or 39.6 m3.

    Multiply the m3 by the amount you will pay for water and sewerage / m3 from your friendly local water supplier to get the potential maximum saving per annum. In practice you will get less than this as there will be some tank overflow in heavy rain and when away on holidays.

    If you have a larger roof your recovery will not increase pro-rata - there will be more rainfall wasted to overflow.

    I don't understand your comment about strengthening the roof - surely the tank will be at ground level or underground and water pumped via a sump pump with float switch up to a smaller header tank in the roofspace with dual ball valves - one for recovered water and one for mains water (ballcock on the mains adjusted to only operate at a low water level).

    Regards, Gary
    • CommentAuthorjamesingram
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2012 edited
     
    Waters so cheap and energy efficient when delivered via the utility company is there really any point installing rainwater harvesting for these 2 reasons ?
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2012 edited
     
    An interesting point, and if you are on mains water and sewage probably not financially worth it. If they every use our 'waste' to make energy on a large scale, they could/should possibly surcharge people who do not use the main sewage system.
    But having said that, go to the beach at Portreath after a heavy rainfall and work out why there is a brown stain running across the beach and where all the cotton buds come from. Domestic rainwater harvesting could help alleviate that problem.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2012
     
    There are some good reasons for making use of rainwater and I would make it mandatory for all new builds.

    Saves water and helps prevent drought, is economic and I love the idea of not paying for flushing the loo either for the water or for the sewage, nice to water the garden/wash the car with. Rainwater is great for cleaning windows with, mine leaves no spots or streaks.

    Pure greenness and sustainability -- every little helps.
    • CommentAuthorseascape
    • CommentTimeJul 5th 2012
     
    This may help - about 26% saving on flushing toilets and 12% on washing and 7% on outdoor/car washing.

    Oh yes, and never go swimming near an outfall after heavy rain - even on designated beaches - overwhelms the sewage treatment system.

    http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/PDF/GEHO1110BTEN-E-E.pdf
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeJul 5th 2012 edited
     
    Was down at Poldhu Cove earlier (where Marconi sent the first radio signal across the pond).
    The river was brown, the beach was brown, pools where full of brown, the sea had a large brown streak in it and some Northern family where surfing.
    The brown was was the colour you get when you wash a cattle yard :bigsmile:
    That will learn them.
  4.  
    When I lived in Swansea in the '70's (before the days of colourful wet-suits) the local joke was that the water-skiers went out in black wet-suits and came back in brown ones...
    • CommentAuthorJTGreen
    • CommentTimeJul 6th 2012
     
    Not having rainwater harvesting was the only major voluntary compromise in our renovation. (There were compromises with decisions about where to use IWI/EWI, but they pretty much unavoidable due to the nature of the house/plot). It was the added cost and complication of the plumbing on top of an already expensive (to us) build that was the final straw. Even though I know we couldn't have afforded it, I do regret not doing it for all the reasons tony and others have said. Since I've vowed no more work on the house ever after this, it's something that we're just not going to do.

    Our primary environmental aim was to reduce CO2 emissions, but there is a lot to be said for sustainable urban drainage ad just being more mindful of resources. I've no idea how much CO2 is involved in flushing toilets with potable water, but it's an obvious insanity. Using the surface water for some purpose before sending it into our sewer system would have been a good thing to do from a drainage point of view too.
  5.  
    Thanks for all of your replies
    I found this water meter comparison calculator.
    By fiddling around with the numbers you are able to come up with some guess-timated figures

    http://www.ccwater.org.uk/server.php?show=nav.388

    My decision is based now on how much I stand to save by going on a meter..if any!
    Then by installing RW harvetsing how much this will further save me.

    Then I have to ask myself does this total saving justify the £2000 odd pounds its going to cost me to install (plus my time to do the work)

    BTW does anyone have any idea what sort of pump I would be best using? I am intending to pump from a well/ underground holding tank (capacity 2000l) To a cold water tank in the loft 6m up.

    tim
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeJul 11th 2012
     
    I used a good quality submersible pump with a pressure switch and I have it on a timer set to run for a bit longer than it takes to cover my daily usage and it runs to refill the loft store once a day.
    • CommentAuthorGaryB
    • CommentTimeJul 11th 2012 edited
     
    If you are pumping to a tank 6m above the ground from an underground tank, say 1.5 m deep, then the pump will have to supply water at sufficient pressure to deliver the required flowrate through the ball valve in the loft tank.

    To achieve this, the pressure remaining at the ball valve inlet should ideally be 0.5 bar, or 5m head, giving a total pump head of 6 + 1.5 + 5 = 11.5m. The pump has to deliver this head at the required flowrate depending on your demand / pumping duration.

    The submersible pump + float switch combo suggested by Tony is definitely the way to go - these pumps are reliable and well proven technology. Good brands are Grundfos, Lowara, Dab or Wilo.
  6.  
    What are water rates??
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeJul 12th 2012 edited
     
    Posted By: renewablejohnWhat are water rates??

    What we pay not to pollute the surrounding area.
    Seems valuing nature is all the rage at the moment.
  7.  
    Hi,

    Why lift to a holding tank and gravity feed down again?

    As you have a reservoir of water below ground why not use an on demand pressure set something like the DAB aqua jet

    http://www.pumpsukltd.com/pump-type/booster-pumps/domestic-water-booster.html

    Would be fed by a pipe from your reservoir with a foot valve at the bottom. The pressure set maintains against surging (when failed the pressure switch will cut in/out)
    Most of us on well / bore hole water use these – relatively cheap and reliable, easily obtained. BUT although generally reliable they do have a finite life.

    The only question I have on these is that as every drop of my water passes through this there is a fairly high electric consumption, have not worked it out. But is offset by not having to pay someone for water. Tastes nice too.

    Cheers Mike up North
    • CommentAuthoradwindrum
    • CommentTimeJul 12th 2012
     
    £2000 plus time/labour and then upkeep, changing pump/filters every so often, plus the fact that it only provides a proportion of your water needs doesnt seem to make economic sense to me. Even environmentally all that embodied energy in pumps and plastic must throw some doubts on their green credentials too? I do want to be sold on the technology though......makes so much sense. I use roof water in a 500litre gravity feed tank for the garden and it works a dream.
  8.  
    Hi,
    Typically the Dab pumpset would be £300 ish (online). As the water is already in a reservoir why lift it? simply pump to point of use. A small pump like this does whole houses so easily capable. Either way its being pumped.

    Cheers, Mike up North
    • CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeJul 13th 2012
     
    I quite fancy the idea of using a hand-operated bilge pump to lift the water from the reservoir to a holding tank. Low maintenance, no electricity and good exercise.
  9.  
    So tell me then. If you are harvesting but also on mains sewage, do the water comanies meter your clean water use or you own harvested use? If not then how do they estimate a charge for foul? Do they charge at all or just estimate for number of people etc?
    • CommentAuthorGaryB
    • CommentTimeJul 13th 2012
     
    They charge based on the meter readings for clean water supply.

    About a year back I was assisting a Client who had a site water leak and who was being charged not just for the leaked water but also for the mains sewerage on a pro-rata basis - I was able to get the water authority to drop the sewerage charges as it was quite clear that the leaked water did not enter the mains sewer system.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeJul 13th 2012
     
    Down here you are meant to notify them, rightly so.
    6 houses here, 5 on meters and one not. We should really run a pipe from the one that is not metered and each give him 100 quid.
    Actually should insist that that house is metered.
  10.  
    Mike up north

    Pumpimg to an intermediate tank allows me to have a mains feed to this tank as a back up, on a seperate float valve. I would not be able to install this sort of back up in the reservoir, impractability being the main factor.

    I cannot be certain that the reservoir is one of unlimited supply.

    In fact I know that it isnt.

    Tim
    • CommentAuthorseascape
    • CommentTimeJul 27th 2012
     
    It's very tempting to try and get off the water/sewage monopoly as much as you can. My water company has just increased my monthly direct debit by 25%, despite me using less water than last year, being £100 in credit and the unit/standard charge going up by just over 8%.

    After some ludicrous discussion for about 15 minutes I finally worked why: it's based on your (1) predicted yearly usage (2) the price increase(8%) and (3) water usage from date of last bill in Feb 12, which is unpaid according to them as they don't bill until Aug 12. Obviously in a year it will all catch up and my direct debit will go down but it means they've had the excess money for a year.
  11.  
    Seascape, what is to stop you paying them an amount based on 5/6 of your August bill, then asking them to re-calc your DD?
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeJul 27th 2012
     
    Funny that Seascape, don't we get a discount (50 quid or something) from central government because we have the most expensive water in the UK. They soon got that fake discount back.
    • CommentAuthorseascape
    • CommentTimeJul 29th 2012
     
    I did get it sorted eventually and pointed out that I had paid for my water usage from Feb 12 by monthly direct debit, it was just 'unbilled', which is not the same thing as unpaid.

    I have asked for a formal explanation as to why this usage is considered unpaid and used in the calculation for future payments. So far no explanation given, just an apology and agreement I should pay just 8% increase.
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press